James Comey defends Strzok, disputes 'treason' accusation in fiery op-ed: 'Dumb lies

[busybee01]

What triggered the initial investigation was a referral from the Australian government not the Steele dossier. Later McCain wanted the FBI to verify whether the dossier was true. That was after the election. It may have been intended as a campaign document but it was never used as Mother Jones published it a little less than a week before the election. There is no evidence Steele is a Trump hater. Steele is a solid investigator whose investigation found corruption in FIFA. Several sources have said that Steele became concerned about what his sources in Russia were telling him. The fact is that Comey confirmed some of it was verified. Since no one has seen the FISA application, you cannot say the application was the sole document used was the dossier. Mueller did not work on the dossier as he was not working for the FBI at that time. You are just giving us your spin.

Comey has not been proven to have committed any crimes and there was no coup. He did not admit to leaking classified information and there is no evidence that he did. Mueller and Comey were colleagues. Again there is no evidence they were especially close.

Lisa Page was in no position to make that claim. She was not the agent in charge and it was a ongoing investigation.
1) That was not a indefensible action. The espionage act should be used for people who commit espionage. They take classified information and willingly give it to a foreign power. That is espionage. The IG report got several things wrong but found no political bias in Comey's decision not to file charges.

2)Again she could only talk about the state of the investigation at the time. They did not conclude their investigation. THEY DID NOT STATE THEY FOUND NO EVIDENCE OF COLLUSION OR ANY OTHER CRIME. IT WAS A ONGOING INVESTIGATION.

It was not a illegal investigation. It was based on a referral from the Australian government. Again you take things out of context. Everything you stated was natural. Obama obviously would have wanted to be kept abreast of the investigation. Yates would have wanted a record so Trump could not bury it.

The so-called IG report that supposedly fingers Strzok is only known because a pro-Trump Republican says it is so. There is no independent confirmation. Just because the IG says it does not make it true. A IG accused McCabe of committing a crime but the DOJ has apparently found no evidence to support that.

The fact is that there is nothing to see. They have not provided any damaging information. The one who is providing the damaging information is YOU!! You put your own spin on things to try and make something that is not there. YOU ARE THE ONE SUFFERING FROM TDS!! YOU HAVE TO SPIN AND LIE TO PROTECT TRUMP. YOU SOUND STUPID AND PARANOID DOING IT. YOU ARE THE SNOWFLAKE!! YOU GIVE TRUMP A PASS ON THINGS YOU WOUKD DEMAND OBAMA BE PROSECUTED!!

View attachment 263796

So you say. When was he charged?

And OJ was set free, baby killing is legal, Bill and Lynch colluded on the plane, so what is your point again ?


.

So you say. Again you have no proof of any collusion between Lynch and Clinton.

The only proof you would take is another embarrassing Starr report to shove your nose in it again.



.

You have your nose and the rest of your face so stuck up Trump's ass that you wouldn't recognize facts if it hit you in the face. You are a partisan hack.

 

[busybee01]

We're also not buying BB's referral from the Australian government. Downer was at the Kensington Wine Rooms when he got the news. That's big-time MI6 territory.

You don't buy any facts that conflict with your beliefs. You are a partisan hack.

 

[Oldstyle]

THIS is where I call you on your constant fact-less, unsupported, unsubstantiated triggered, TDS-suffering, delusional lies / rants , which is all you ever post.

Produce the undisputable EVIDENCE that the DOJ found no evidence of the IS's finding against McCabe(especially since the DOJ is STILL investigating Strzok).

Produce the undisputable EVIDENCE that the US IG 'got material facts wrong'.

(** Your own opinionated rants do NOT count as 'evidence'.)

By being UNABLE to do these 2 things, which I have ZEROI doubt that you will NOT be able to do so, everyone will know you are a LIAR with NO credibility( not that they don't know this already... ).

Have any charges been filed against McCabe? It has been several years now. Surely if the IG recommended prosecution they would have found that evidence. Now that we have a dishonest AG, we should talk about whether any fake charges will be filed.

Both Rosenstein and the IG got it wrong. Comey was accused of insubordination because he stated that Clinton would not be prosecuted. They both said that was the DOJ's decision. However they failed to note that Lynch recused herself and said she would follow Comey's recommendation. Both the IG and Rosenstein failed to note that. They were both wrong on that.

You are the one who uses opinionated rants. That is all this talk about coups and treason are.You are the LIAR with NO CREDIBILITY.

Let's talk about Loretta Lynch recusing herself, Busy B! Why would the Attorney General of the United States recuse themselves from a decision of that magnitude? Why would she leave whether Clinton should be prosecuted or not up to James Comey? That isn't the way things are done! The FBI investigates and the DOJ decides whether or not to prosecute. Why is it that just days after meeting with Bill Clinton on the tarmac in Arizona that Lynch recused herself?

There was no evidence it was anything but a chance meeting. However Lynch decided to accept the FBI decision.

"Attorney General Loretta E. Lynch plans to announce on Friday that she will accept whatever recommendation career prosecutors and the F.B.I. director make about whether to bring charges related to Hillary Clinton’s personal email server, a Justice Department official said."

AG Loretta Lynch recuses herself from Hillary FBI case. - Discussionist

You don't really believe it was a chance meeting and they were discussing the grandkids, but you think you can convince others it was??? How insulting.

I don't see any evidence that it wasn't. It really doesn't matter.

Kindly explain how you have a "chance meeting" when you're flying on one plane and someone else is flying on another? A meeting where your staff departs the plane and it's just you, your husband and Bill Clinton having a private discussion? A meeting where one of Lynch's aides was prevented from going back onto the plane by security? Now why do you think a discussion about "grand kids" needed that kind of privacy, Busy B?

 

[busybee01]

He was hired to investigate Trump and became concerned over what he was finding out.

and what was the "concern?"

A: that Hillary would LOSE

That Trump would be influenced by the Russians. There is no evidence he had any feelings towards Clinton.

 

[Oldstyle]

And if you DO think that, Busy B...would you care to take a crack at explaining why we would want the naïve, bumbler that James Comey describes Hillary Clinton to be...sitting behind the desk in the Oval Office?

We already have a stupid bumbler in the White House.

Don't have an answer to that...do you, Busy B?

 

[Tumblin Tumbleweed]

No matter which sock you post it from.

Yup, I'm all of your tormentors, Special Ed!

You are saying Comey won’t catch charges because democrats are in charge, not because he doesn’t do anything wrong.

No, I'm saying- and get this- that you have to convince a grand jury that this is anything more than whining by Trump that people we mean to him. The Argument that Comey was out to get Trump falls apart when you consider he kept Trump's actions secret before the election but slimed Hillary.

You also forget, it’s not about convictions in Washington, it’s about vanity and legacy.

Um, no, it's really about convictions... Comey will probably be a hero to the majority who voted against Trump.

Comey will forever be known as a member of your class, sniveling vaginas. No one will buy his books, or read his tweets. He is done. No one considers him credible. He is just like you now, except successful.

James Comey's Book Sold 600,000 Copies In A Week, But Isn't The Next 'Fire And Fury' (Yet)

Meh, pro writer my ass. Just a grown up who lives at his moms. Really can’t even tell the truth about that. It switches from a posh house in Michigan to Chicago. No telling with you as you tend to lie allot.

We're all political robots on here, stupid human.

 

[BS Filter]

We're also not buying BB's referral from the Australian government. Downer was at the Kensington Wine Rooms when he got the news. That's big-time MI6 territory.

You don't buy any facts that conflict with your beliefs. You are a partisan hack.

Ironically hilarious.

 

[busybee01]

Have any charges been filed against McCabe? It has been several years now. Surely if the IG recommended prosecution they would have found that evidence. Now that we have a dishonest AG, we should talk about whether any fake charges will be filed.

Both Rosenstein and the IG got it wrong. Comey was accused of insubordination because he stated that Clinton would not be prosecuted. They both said that was the DOJ's decision. However they failed to note that Lynch recused herself and said she would follow Comey's recommendation. Both the IG and Rosenstein failed to note that. They were both wrong on that.

You are the one who uses opinionated rants. That is all this talk about coups and treason are.You are the LIAR with NO CREDIBILITY.

Let's talk about Loretta Lynch recusing herself, Busy B! Why would the Attorney General of the United States recuse themselves from a decision of that magnitude? Why would she leave whether Clinton should be prosecuted or not up to James Comey? That isn't the way things are done! The FBI investigates and the DOJ decides whether or not to prosecute. Why is it that just days after meeting with Bill Clinton on the tarmac in Arizona that Lynch recused herself?

There was no evidence it was anything but a chance meeting. However Lynch decided to accept the FBI decision.

"Attorney General Loretta E. Lynch plans to announce on Friday that she will accept whatever recommendation career prosecutors and the F.B.I. director make about whether to bring charges related to Hillary Clinton’s personal email server, a Justice Department official said."

AG Loretta Lynch recuses herself from Hillary FBI case. - Discussionist

You don't really believe it was a chance meeting and they were discussing the grandkids, but you think you can convince others it was??? How insulting.

I don't see any evidence that it wasn't. It really doesn't matter.

Kindly explain how you have a "chance meeting" when you're flying on one plane and someone else is flying on another? A meeting where your staff departs the plane and it's just you, your husband and Bill Clinton having a private discussion? A meeting where one of Lynch's aides was prevented from going back onto the plane by security? Now why do you think a discussion about "grand kids" needed that kind of privacy, Busy B?

That is innuendo and not fact. I can see how 2 people who know each other might want to talk away from any staff.

 

[BS Filter]

Let's talk about Loretta Lynch recusing herself, Busy B! Why would the Attorney General of the United States recuse themselves from a decision of that magnitude? Why would she leave whether Clinton should be prosecuted or not up to James Comey? That isn't the way things are done! The FBI investigates and the DOJ decides whether or not to prosecute. Why is it that just days after meeting with Bill Clinton on the tarmac in Arizona that Lynch recused herself?

There was no evidence it was anything but a chance meeting. However Lynch decided to accept the FBI decision.

"Attorney General Loretta E. Lynch plans to announce on Friday that she will accept whatever recommendation career prosecutors and the F.B.I. director make about whether to bring charges related to Hillary Clinton’s personal email server, a Justice Department official said."

AG Loretta Lynch recuses herself from Hillary FBI case. - Discussionist

You don't really believe it was a chance meeting and they were discussing the grandkids, but you think you can convince others it was??? How insulting.

I don't see any evidence that it wasn't. It really doesn't matter.

Kindly explain how you have a "chance meeting" when you're flying on one plane and someone else is flying on another? A meeting where your staff departs the plane and it's just you, your husband and Bill Clinton having a private discussion? A meeting where one of Lynch's aides was prevented from going back onto the plane by security? Now why do you think a discussion about "grand kids" needed that kind of privacy, Busy B?

That is innuendo and not fact. I can see how 2 people who know each other might want to talk away from any staff.

Oh, for sure. They did all this just to talk about the grandkids, huh. You're pissing on our shoes and trying to convince us it's raining.

 

[busybee01]

Have any charges been filed against McCabe? It has been several years now. Surely if the IG recommended prosecution they would have found that evidence. Now that we have a dishonest AG, we should talk about whether any fake charges will be filed.

Both Rosenstein and the IG got it wrong. Comey was accused of insubordination because he stated that Clinton would not be prosecuted. They both said that was the DOJ's decision. However they failed to note that Lynch recused herself and said she would follow Comey's recommendation. Both the IG and Rosenstein failed to note that. They were both wrong on that.

You are the one who uses opinionated rants. That is all this talk about coups and treason are.You are the LIAR with NO CREDIBILITY.

Let's talk about Loretta Lynch recusing herself, Busy B! Why would the Attorney General of the United States recuse themselves from a decision of that magnitude? Why would she leave whether Clinton should be prosecuted or not up to James Comey? That isn't the way things are done! The FBI investigates and the DOJ decides whether or not to prosecute. Why is it that just days after meeting with Bill Clinton on the tarmac in Arizona that Lynch recused herself?

There was no evidence it was anything but a chance meeting. However Lynch decided to accept the FBI decision.

"Attorney General Loretta E. Lynch plans to announce on Friday that she will accept whatever recommendation career prosecutors and the F.B.I. director make about whether to bring charges related to Hillary Clinton’s personal email server, a Justice Department official said."

AG Loretta Lynch recuses herself from Hillary FBI case. - Discussionist

You don't really believe it was a chance meeting and they were discussing the grandkids, but you think you can convince others it was??? How insulting.

I don't see any evidence that it wasn't. It really doesn't matter.

Yes, it matters. They're corrupt. Corruption in our government matters. Common sense.

Trump is proving that. He is as corrupt as they come.

 

[easyt65]

The memo is already discredited.

"The Democrats don’t need classified information to impeach the Nunes memo. The Nunes memo is the best evidence that the DOJ didn’t mislead the FISA court, but rather, that the Republicans on the House Intelligence Committee have tried to mislead the American people.

The Nunes memo is significant not for what it said but for what it left out, namely, the identification of any inaccurate facts in the wiretap application about Page’s activities, including his meetings with Russian officials."

Democrats don’t need to discredit Nunes memo — The memo does that itself

Unlike YOU, I do not have to attempt to discredit a source because I can not debunk what that source is reporting.

I have already debunked Politico's false claim by posting links to:

Department of Justice (DOJ) official Bruce Ohr's testimony under oath during which he testified Obama's '4-Horsemen' were informed Steele was discredited / untrustworthy and that the Dossier was proven unverified and unreliable, but they illegally used the information to commit FISA Court Abuses anyway.

Deputy Assistant Secretary of State Kathleen Kavalec's testimony making it clear how she filed a report making it clear to Obama's '4 Horsemen' that Steel lied to her during an interview.

"Her observations were recorded exactly 10 days before the FBI used Steele and his infamous dossier to justify securing a Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) warrant to spy on Trump campaign adviser Carter Page and the campaign’s contacts with Russia in search of a now debunked collusion theory."
-- FBI's Steele story falls apart: False intel and media contacts were flagged before FISA

Former FBI Deputy Director McCabe's testimony under oath clearly stating if not for the Dossier they would not have gotten a warrant to spy on Carter page.

...and these are just 3 of the many links / witness testimonies that have been recorded under oath and reported continually debunking the criminals', their defenders', and the faux news' claims...but keep trying, snowflake.

Or better yet, we can wait on the US IG's soon-to-be-released report on his investigation into the FISA Court abuses......

Now, again, back to the thread topic of desperate Comey pleading his already-debunked case and that of his flunky Strzok to anyone / snowflake who will listen....

 

[BS Filter]

Let's talk about Loretta Lynch recusing herself, Busy B! Why would the Attorney General of the United States recuse themselves from a decision of that magnitude? Why would she leave whether Clinton should be prosecuted or not up to James Comey? That isn't the way things are done! The FBI investigates and the DOJ decides whether or not to prosecute. Why is it that just days after meeting with Bill Clinton on the tarmac in Arizona that Lynch recused herself?

There was no evidence it was anything but a chance meeting. However Lynch decided to accept the FBI decision.

"Attorney General Loretta E. Lynch plans to announce on Friday that she will accept whatever recommendation career prosecutors and the F.B.I. director make about whether to bring charges related to Hillary Clinton’s personal email server, a Justice Department official said."

AG Loretta Lynch recuses herself from Hillary FBI case. - Discussionist

You don't really believe it was a chance meeting and they were discussing the grandkids, but you think you can convince others it was??? How insulting.

I don't see any evidence that it wasn't. It really doesn't matter.

Yes, it matters. They're corrupt. Corruption in our government matters. Common sense.

Trump is proving that. He is as corrupt as they come.

Oh, for sure. Your mind is what is corrupt.

 

[Wyatt earp]

Russian hackers were "in a position" to alter Florida voter rolls, Rubio confirms - Hot Air

'...were in a position to...' means 'COULD' have...but DID NOT....




Evidence shows Obama,his administration Cabinet members and Intel and Law Enforcement Agency Directors, Hillary, and a Trump-hating foreign spy who was working WITH the Russians and FOR the FBI had more of an impact on and made more of an effort to affect the outcome of the 2016 elections than the Russians did.

...and, of course, if Obama and the democrats truly cared about Russian interference Barry would have done more to stop in when he 1st learned about it in 2014.

Evidence does not show. The Russians were working to elect Trump. They were not helping Clinton. That is what may have been the deciding factor. The fact is that what gave Trump the election was he was not Clinton. Voters hated both Clinton and Trump.

"Monaco says that’s because the Obama administration was at the time focused on seeking cooperation for a last-ditch effort by the Department of Homeland Security to avoid Russian tampering in the actual voting process. But the administration, she said, faced a backlash from state and local governments who viewed the DHS cybersecurity election push as “a big federal takeover” and were reluctant to cooperate. That was the case that she, FBI Director James Comey and DHS Secretary Jeh Johnson made in a secret briefing of top members of Congress in the fall, during a session at which Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) reportedly balked at their characterization of the evidence of Russian involvement in the hack."

Essentially Republicans were more concerned about politics than Russians interfering in our elections. Would that have been the case if Russians were helping Clinton rather than Trump.

Did Obama Blow It on the Russian Hacking?

No the evidence shows, Putin hated Hillary and payed her back in kind.


.

 

[Wyatt earp]

View attachment 263796

So you say. When was he charged?

And OJ was set free, baby killing is legal, Bill and Lynch colluded on the plane, so what is your point again ?


.

So you say. Again you have no proof of any collusion between Lynch and Clinton.

The only proof you would take is another embarrassing Starr report to shove your nose in it again.



.

You have your nose and the rest of your face so stuck up Trump's ass that you wouldn't recognize facts if it hit you in the face. You are a partisan hack.

LMFAO, I am supporting a Democrat Tulsi for president, you are so blinded by Bill and Hillary's corruption over the years you don't want to hear the truth.



.

 

[Oldstyle]

Let's talk about Loretta Lynch recusing herself, Busy B! Why would the Attorney General of the United States recuse themselves from a decision of that magnitude? Why would she leave whether Clinton should be prosecuted or not up to James Comey? That isn't the way things are done! The FBI investigates and the DOJ decides whether or not to prosecute. Why is it that just days after meeting with Bill Clinton on the tarmac in Arizona that Lynch recused herself?

There was no evidence it was anything but a chance meeting. However Lynch decided to accept the FBI decision.

"Attorney General Loretta E. Lynch plans to announce on Friday that she will accept whatever recommendation career prosecutors and the F.B.I. director make about whether to bring charges related to Hillary Clinton’s personal email server, a Justice Department official said."

AG Loretta Lynch recuses herself from Hillary FBI case. - Discussionist

You don't really believe it was a chance meeting and they were discussing the grandkids, but you think you can convince others it was??? How insulting.

I don't see any evidence that it wasn't. It really doesn't matter.

Kindly explain how you have a "chance meeting" when you're flying on one plane and someone else is flying on another? A meeting where your staff departs the plane and it's just you, your husband and Bill Clinton having a private discussion? A meeting where one of Lynch's aides was prevented from going back onto the plane by security? Now why do you think a discussion about "grand kids" needed that kind of privacy, Busy B?

That is innuendo and not fact. I can see how 2 people who know each other might want to talk away from any staff.

According to Lynch's testimony, Busy B...she and Clinton didn't know each other socially. So why would two people who don't know each other socially suddenly feel the need to discuss their "grandchildren" with their staff removed from the area? Why would a member of Lynch's staff be prevented from interrupting a discussion about "grandchildren"? Does that even come CLOSE to passing the smell test with you?

 

[LaDairis]

That Trump would be influenced by the Russians

Good God the HYPOCRISY....

No reason for concern here that the CHINESE would "influence" Clinton/Gore....

 

[busybee01]

Have any charges been filed against McCabe? It has been several years now. Surely if the IG recommended prosecution they would have found that evidence. Now that we have a dishonest AG, we should talk about whether any fake charges will be filed.

Both Rosenstein and the IG got it wrong. Comey was accused of insubordination because he stated that Clinton would not be prosecuted. They both said that was the DOJ's decision. However they failed to note that Lynch recused herself and said she would follow Comey's recommendation. Both the IG and Rosenstein failed to note that. They were both wrong on that.

You are the one who uses opinionated rants. That is all this talk about coups and treason are.You are the LIAR with NO CREDIBILITY.

Let's talk about Loretta Lynch recusing herself, Busy B! Why would the Attorney General of the United States recuse themselves from a decision of that magnitude? Why would she leave whether Clinton should be prosecuted or not up to James Comey? That isn't the way things are done! The FBI investigates and the DOJ decides whether or not to prosecute. Why is it that just days after meeting with Bill Clinton on the tarmac in Arizona that Lynch recused herself?

There was no evidence it was anything but a chance meeting. However Lynch decided to accept the FBI decision.

"Attorney General Loretta E. Lynch plans to announce on Friday that she will accept whatever recommendation career prosecutors and the F.B.I. director make about whether to bring charges related to Hillary Clinton’s personal email server, a Justice Department official said."

AG Loretta Lynch recuses herself from Hillary FBI case. - Discussionist

You don't really believe it was a chance meeting and they were discussing the grandkids, but you think you can convince others it was??? How insulting.

I don't see any evidence that it wasn't. It really doesn't matter.

Kindly explain how you have a "chance meeting" when you're flying on one plane and someone else is flying on another? A meeting where your staff departs the plane and it's just you, your husband and Bill Clinton having a private discussion? A meeting where one of Lynch's aides was prevented from going back onto the plane by security? Now why do you think a discussion about "grand kids" needed that kind of privacy, Busy B?

They were using the same airport because they were both in the city that day. Coincidences do happen.

 

[busybee01]

We're also not buying BB's referral from the Australian government. Downer was at the Kensington Wine Rooms when he got the news. That's big-time MI6 territory.

You don't buy any facts that conflict with your beliefs. You are a partisan hack.

Ironically hilarious.

You are hilarious. The Australian government's referral was the reason for the original investigation. That is fact.

 

[busybee01]

There was no evidence it was anything but a chance meeting. However Lynch decided to accept the FBI decision.

"Attorney General Loretta E. Lynch plans to announce on Friday that she will accept whatever recommendation career prosecutors and the F.B.I. director make about whether to bring charges related to Hillary Clinton’s personal email server, a Justice Department official said."

AG Loretta Lynch recuses herself from Hillary FBI case. - Discussionist

You don't really believe it was a chance meeting and they were discussing the grandkids, but you think you can convince others it was??? How insulting.

I don't see any evidence that it wasn't. It really doesn't matter.

Kindly explain how you have a "chance meeting" when you're flying on one plane and someone else is flying on another? A meeting where your staff departs the plane and it's just you, your husband and Bill Clinton having a private discussion? A meeting where one of Lynch's aides was prevented from going back onto the plane by security? Now why do you think a discussion about "grand kids" needed that kind of privacy, Busy B?

That is innuendo and not fact. I can see how 2 people who know each other might want to talk away from any staff.

According to Lynch's testimony, Busy B...she and Clinton didn't know each other socially. So why would two people who don't know each other socially suddenly feel the need to discuss their "grandchildren" with their staff removed from the area? Why would a member of Lynch's staff be prevented from interrupting a discussion about "grandchildren"? Does that even come CLOSE to passing the smell test with you?

Cite evidence not allegations. That is what she said and there is no proof otherwise.

 

[busybee01]

And if you DO think that, Busy B...would you care to take a crack at explaining why we would want the naïve, bumbler that James Comey describes Hillary Clinton to be...sitting behind the desk in the Oval Office?

We already have a stupid bumbler in the White House.

Don't have an answer to that...do you, Busy B?

Clinton would be a huge improvement over Trump. I didn't vote for either of them.