Jeffrey Epstein found injured in New York jail cell

[Polishprince]

Neither child molesters nor former cops have it easy in prison.

True enough.

But homosexuals really like being in the joint. All those naked men in the shower and all of the sodomy going on. Plenty of straight guys to try and recruit.

No. Such Trolling BS.
Since you know a lot about incarcerated homosexual men, pp. Enlighten me about straight dudes being recruited into Homosexuality.

A friend of mine was serving time in Maryland and he was in his cell. A couple of gay inmates tried to forcibly recruit him into the orientation. Of course he fought for his manhood and is still straight.

He was fortunate that he was pretty tough, otherwise, he might have been turned gay.

So...that's the story he told you?

Still wears men's clothing.

If he had changed orientation, he'd be proud about it

 

[playtime]

oh bullshit. i already said that the redacted info can easily be turned over to congress....like i said..... if barr PETITIONS the court. but he refuses to do so.

why is that huh? the grand jury will honor that request if barr asks. kenn starr had the entire 1800 page report re: slick willy released within days.

but barr is stonewalling & the most important info is being withheld.

nice try, jr. but no gold star for you.

Congress wants barr to violate the law. The courts will back barr mocking the dems. You lost, game over move on

straight up lying is not your strong suit is it?

Fact Muller is upping trumps poll numbers

lol... according to what polls?

All of them doofus even CNN is saying that Muller is a joke

no they aren't. you are hearing what you want to. that's ok, i understand.

 

[justinacolmena]

Still wears men's clothing.

If he had changed orientation, he'd be proud about it

Dude, it's about time to rip your fucking foreskin off with a pair of pliers.

 

[ButterNutter]

You are ahead of yourself.....the dems cannot impeach the president without the consent of the Senate.
Now if you had stated that they are bringing impeachment proceedings to a vote, you may have had something.
In other words, they are not impeaching the president.
They don't even have the votes in their own party to do so, IMO.

the senate has no input whether the house can impeach. first the house judiciary committee votes to open an impeachment inquiry, which means they get all the grand jury information, - which are the unredacted names & accompanying evidence. (they could have it all already, but barr is refusing to ask the grand jury to give it to them) so an inquiry must happen. articles of impeachment are then drawn up.

if it passes in the committee, , then it's open to the floor & then if it's a go- the public will be viewing it on TV every day.... all the people involved, what they did, where, when & how will be exposed. & once impeachment is over, then it goes to the senate for trial... or not.... the trial for removal is the senates job.

A small correction sir. The House Judiciary Comittee has had access to the ENTIRE unredacted Mueller report since May, since May and not one of the Democrats on the Committee , not even the fucking Chairman of the Judiciary Jerry Nadler has bothered to show up and look at the damn thing.

Why do you think that is? Oh that's right it's because they know that the 6% of the report that is redacted wouldn't provide them with a god damned thing, but they are too dishonest to go look at it and just tell the American people "we have seen the entire report, including the redacted material and there is nothing there that indicates the President violated the law" so instead they rely on idiotic voters such as yourself to buy it when they say "Barr won't give us the FULL report, and that redacted part, that's redacted to protect Trump"

This is 100% fact my man, not one Democrat on the Judiciary Committee, NOR the Intelligence Committee has got off their fat ass and went 2 blocks over to view the entire unredacted report in a secure environment

The reason that Barr hasn't just released the entire document to Congress without them having to go to a SCIF at the Justice Department is clear. The moment it gets their at least one of the scumbags will leak the entire thing , including grand jury material and other classified information. Do you think Jerry Nadler would even hesitate to burn someone in our intelligence communities cover in order to embarrass Trump? Hell no , he wouldn't.

Some of you Democrat voters HAVE to stop letting your outright hatred of Trump cloud your judgement. What I have just told you is factual. If Jerry Nadler or Adam Schiff truly cared what the full unredacted report said they have had access to it since mid May and could have seen it at any point since then but have not. There are zero explanations for this except that they already know they won't find anything in it.

ummmm.. not the entire unredacted report. as if barr thought that would be enough? there was still some evidence & names that were still to be unavailable.

You are ahead of yourself.....the dems cannot impeach the president without the consent of the Senate.
Now if you had stated that they are bringing impeachment proceedings to a vote, you may have had something.
In other words, they are not impeaching the president.
They don't even have the votes in their own party to do so, IMO.

the senate has no input whether the house can impeach. first the house judiciary committee votes to open an impeachment inquiry, which means they get all the grand jury information, - which are the unredacted names & accompanying evidence. (they could have it all already, but barr is refusing to ask the grand jury to give it to them) so an inquiry must happen. articles of impeachment are then drawn up.

if it passes in the committee, , then it's open to the floor & then if it's a go- the public will be viewing it on TV every day.... all the people involved, what they did, where, when & how will be exposed. & once impeachment is over, then it goes to the senate for trial... or not.... the trial for removal is the senates job.

A small correction sir. The House Judiciary Comittee has had access to the ENTIRE unredacted Mueller report since May, since May and not one of the Democrats on the Committee , not even the fucking Chairman of the Judiciary Jerry Nadler has bothered to show up and look at the damn thing.

Why do you think that is? Oh that's right it's because they know that the 6% of the report that is redacted wouldn't provide them with a god damned thing, but they are too dishonest to go look at it and just tell the American people "we have seen the entire report, including the redacted material and there is nothing there that indicates the President violated the law" so instead they rely on idiotic voters such as yourself to buy it when they say "Barr won't give us the FULL report, and that redacted part, that's redacted to protect Trump"

This is 100% fact my man, not one Democrat on the Judiciary Committee, NOR the Intelligence Committee has got off their fat ass and went 2 blocks over to view the entire unredacted report in a secure environment

The reason that Barr hasn't just released the entire document to Congress without them having to go to a SCIF at the Justice Department is clear. The moment it gets their at least one of the scumbags will leak the entire thing , including grand jury material and other classified information. Do you think Jerry Nadler would even hesitate to burn someone in our intelligence communities cover in order to embarrass Trump? Hell no , he wouldn't.

Some of you Democrat voters HAVE to stop letting your outright hatred of Trump cloud your judgement. What I have just told you is factual. If Jerry Nadler or Adam Schiff truly cared what the full unredacted report said they have had access to it since mid May and could have seen it at any point since then but have not. There are zero explanations for this except that they already know they won't find anything in it.

ummmm.... no. the entire unredacted report is still unavailable to the house chairs.

barr thought if he gave a little, it would be enough. bill was mistaken. & so are you.

House files lawsuit for grand-jury evidence behind Robert Mueller's report on the Russia investigation
Bart Jansen, USA TODAY Published 12:59 p.m. ET July 26, 2019 | Updated 2:00 p.m. ET July 26, 2019

The 53-page lawsuit states: “Because Department of Justice policies will not allow prosecution of a sitting president, the United States House of Representatives is the only institution of the federal government that can now hold President Trump accountable for these actions. To do so, the House must have access to all the relevant facts and consider whether to exercise its full Article 1 powers, including a constitutional power of the utmost gravity – approval of articles of impeachment.”

House files lawsuit for grand-jury evidence behind Robert Mueller's report on the Russia investigation

Judiciary Committee asks a judge to share Mueller's secret grand jury evidence
By KYLE CHENEY and JOSH GERSTEIN
07/26/2019 10:09 AM EDT

The House Judiciary Committee is preparing to petition a federal judge to release former special counsel Robert Mueller’s most closely guarded evidence: the material he gathered using a secretive grand jury.

The petition, which will be made to Beryl Howell, the chief judge of Washington, D.C.’s federal district court, asks that the material be provided to Congress, though it does not seek the public release of the grand jury evidence.


House Judiciary Chairman Jerry Nadler has sought Mueller’s grand jury evidence for months, arguing that it’s essential for Congress to view it in order to fully investigate potential abuses of power by President Donald Trump and his inner circle. Nadler has previously asked the Justice Department and Attorney General William Barr to join him in court to seek the release of the information, but Barr has declined, calling such a move unprecedented.

Judiciary Committee asks a judge to share Mueller's secret grand jury evidence

& another thing you are mistaken about.... i am not a dude.

You are 100% wrong on this, 100%. The only redacted information is information that the Justice Department can NOT legally show to anyone without a court order. Therefor , what they have been offered I unredacted as far as the law allows.

No Democrats have read the less-redacted Mueller report. But five Republicans have. - CNNPolitics


Not one Democrat has went to see the material.

Wake up man, you are actually arguing that the Justice Department should violate the law because Congress says so.

oh bullshit. i already said that the redacted info can easily be turned over to congress....like i said..... if barr PETITIONS the court. but he refuses to do so.

why is that huh? the grand jury will honor that request if barr asks. kenn starr had the entire 1800 page report re: slick willy released within days.

but barr is stonewalling & the most important info is being withheld.

nice try, jr. but no gold star for you.

Are you dishonest, or uneducated?

The law has changed since Kenneth Starr who was a SPECIAL PROSECUTOR not a special COUNSEL.

K Starr was required BY LAW to provide the ENTIRE report to Congress, becuase that is what the Special Prosecutor law called for. That law EXPIRED and Congress refused to renew it.

In actuality there was no legal basis to name a Special Council here, no law requiring one, and thus no law mandating that he MUST turn over anything to Congress. In actuality, Barr could have told Congress to go fuck themselves , he was under ZERO obligation to give Congress ANY version of the report. Do you understand that? Unlike Starr where there was a law that said "the special prosecutor WILL turn over a report to Congress" the special council is totally within the Justice Department and no law required him to do turn over anything to the Congress.

And further there was not a law protecting grand ury testimony from being released when K Starr was the Special Prosecutor , that has been changed and now there is a law protecting grand jury testimony. Your nonsense about Barr petitioning the Courts is just that, nonsense, Congress wants the information let them petition the courts, hell they could change the law again if they wanted.

Or here's an idea, they could stop being assholes and maybe the Justice Department would be more likely to cooperate. If I were Trump at this point I would absolutely refuse to cooperate with anything related to this sham of an investigation at all from this point forward.

 

[Frannie]

Congress wants barr to violate the law. The courts will back barr mocking the dems. You lost, game over move on

straight up lying is not your strong suit is it?

Fact Muller is upping trumps poll numbers

lol... according to what polls?

All of them doofus even CNN is saying that Muller is a joke

no they aren't. you are hearing what you want to. that's ok, i understand.

Were you one of the 85 people at a dem rally?

CNN said that Trump won yesterday.

He did

 

[Blackrook]

The incarceration community doesn’t take kindly to child molesters.

"Incarceration community?"

Wow, you're a dick.

 

[Darkwind]

Either an attempt at manipulation...or someone trying to administer jailhouse justice:

Jeffrey Epstein found injured in New York jail cell

"Jeffrey Epstein, the millionaire financier who is being held on federal sex trafficking charges, was found injured and in a fetal position in his cell at a New York City jail, sources close to the investigation told NBC News on Wednesday night.
Epstein, 66, was found semi-conscious with marks on his neck in his cell at the Metropolitan Correctional Center in Manhattan some time in the last two days, the sources said. Epstein is on suicide watch, two sources said.
Two sources told NBC News that Epstein may have tried to hang himself, while a third source cautioned that the injuries weren't serious, questioning whether Epstein might have staged an attack or a suicide attempt to get a transfer to another facility."

I think that those that are on suicide watch. That they put them in solitary confinement, while being monitored by CCTV. They don't put them with the general population. Because they may want someone to harm them. So he could of have injured himself just to be placed in the jail's infirmary to see if there are any young nurses working in that department. He knows that he can bribe one of them nurses to expose themselves to him while he whacks away.

View attachment 270938

Olivia Munn can come to choke My chicken anytime!


Wait, did I type that out loud?

 

[Darkwind]

The incarceration community doesn’t take kindly to child molesters.

"Incarceration community?"

Wow, you're a dick.

yeah, it's a "gated" community.

 

[Polishprince]

The incarceration community doesn’t take kindly to child molesters.

"Incarceration community?"

Wow, you're a dick.

yeah, it's a "gated" community.

I was watching this retrospective a few years back, where one of the old cons who was at Alcatraz was reminiscing about all of the great guys he met in the joint while he was serving his time on the rock.

There are good people everywhere.

The big difference nowadays is that if you go to prison now, you end up in a Pod. You could be in an institution with celebrity prisoners like Bill Cosby, or Jared Fogle or Bernie Madoff and never even see them if they are in a different pod.

 

[SomeDudeUDunno]

Bill Clinton is probably trying to shut him up.

More likely Trump. All Espstein has to do is confirm that woman's claim Trump raped here when she was 13.
Too any rich people want him dead.

But who has the authority to hush his documents????

Not more likely Trump, idiot. Clinton is implicated in this far more than Trump.

Theyll never learn to NOT go against Trump. Always ends up biting them in the ass.

 

[playtime]

the senate has no input whether the house can impeach. first the house judiciary committee votes to open an impeachment inquiry, which means they get all the grand jury information, - which are the unredacted names & accompanying evidence. (they could have it all already, but barr is refusing to ask the grand jury to give it to them) so an inquiry must happen. articles of impeachment are then drawn up.

if it passes in the committee, , then it's open to the floor & then if it's a go- the public will be viewing it on TV every day.... all the people involved, what they did, where, when & how will be exposed. & once impeachment is over, then it goes to the senate for trial... or not.... the trial for removal is the senates job.

A small correction sir. The House Judiciary Comittee has had access to the ENTIRE unredacted Mueller report since May, since May and not one of the Democrats on the Committee , not even the fucking Chairman of the Judiciary Jerry Nadler has bothered to show up and look at the damn thing.

Why do you think that is? Oh that's right it's because they know that the 6% of the report that is redacted wouldn't provide them with a god damned thing, but they are too dishonest to go look at it and just tell the American people "we have seen the entire report, including the redacted material and there is nothing there that indicates the President violated the law" so instead they rely on idiotic voters such as yourself to buy it when they say "Barr won't give us the FULL report, and that redacted part, that's redacted to protect Trump"

This is 100% fact my man, not one Democrat on the Judiciary Committee, NOR the Intelligence Committee has got off their fat ass and went 2 blocks over to view the entire unredacted report in a secure environment

The reason that Barr hasn't just released the entire document to Congress without them having to go to a SCIF at the Justice Department is clear. The moment it gets their at least one of the scumbags will leak the entire thing , including grand jury material and other classified information. Do you think Jerry Nadler would even hesitate to burn someone in our intelligence communities cover in order to embarrass Trump? Hell no , he wouldn't.

Some of you Democrat voters HAVE to stop letting your outright hatred of Trump cloud your judgement. What I have just told you is factual. If Jerry Nadler or Adam Schiff truly cared what the full unredacted report said they have had access to it since mid May and could have seen it at any point since then but have not. There are zero explanations for this except that they already know they won't find anything in it.

ummmm.. not the entire unredacted report. as if barr thought that would be enough? there was still some evidence & names that were still to be unavailable.

the senate has no input whether the house can impeach. first the house judiciary committee votes to open an impeachment inquiry, which means they get all the grand jury information, - which are the unredacted names & accompanying evidence. (they could have it all already, but barr is refusing to ask the grand jury to give it to them) so an inquiry must happen. articles of impeachment are then drawn up.

if it passes in the committee, , then it's open to the floor & then if it's a go- the public will be viewing it on TV every day.... all the people involved, what they did, where, when & how will be exposed. & once impeachment is over, then it goes to the senate for trial... or not.... the trial for removal is the senates job.

A small correction sir. The House Judiciary Comittee has had access to the ENTIRE unredacted Mueller report since May, since May and not one of the Democrats on the Committee , not even the fucking Chairman of the Judiciary Jerry Nadler has bothered to show up and look at the damn thing.

Why do you think that is? Oh that's right it's because they know that the 6% of the report that is redacted wouldn't provide them with a god damned thing, but they are too dishonest to go look at it and just tell the American people "we have seen the entire report, including the redacted material and there is nothing there that indicates the President violated the law" so instead they rely on idiotic voters such as yourself to buy it when they say "Barr won't give us the FULL report, and that redacted part, that's redacted to protect Trump"

This is 100% fact my man, not one Democrat on the Judiciary Committee, NOR the Intelligence Committee has got off their fat ass and went 2 blocks over to view the entire unredacted report in a secure environment

The reason that Barr hasn't just released the entire document to Congress without them having to go to a SCIF at the Justice Department is clear. The moment it gets their at least one of the scumbags will leak the entire thing , including grand jury material and other classified information. Do you think Jerry Nadler would even hesitate to burn someone in our intelligence communities cover in order to embarrass Trump? Hell no , he wouldn't.

Some of you Democrat voters HAVE to stop letting your outright hatred of Trump cloud your judgement. What I have just told you is factual. If Jerry Nadler or Adam Schiff truly cared what the full unredacted report said they have had access to it since mid May and could have seen it at any point since then but have not. There are zero explanations for this except that they already know they won't find anything in it.

ummmm.... no. the entire unredacted report is still unavailable to the house chairs.

barr thought if he gave a little, it would be enough. bill was mistaken. & so are you.

House files lawsuit for grand-jury evidence behind Robert Mueller's report on the Russia investigation
Bart Jansen, USA TODAY Published 12:59 p.m. ET July 26, 2019 | Updated 2:00 p.m. ET July 26, 2019

The 53-page lawsuit states: “Because Department of Justice policies will not allow prosecution of a sitting president, the United States House of Representatives is the only institution of the federal government that can now hold President Trump accountable for these actions. To do so, the House must have access to all the relevant facts and consider whether to exercise its full Article 1 powers, including a constitutional power of the utmost gravity – approval of articles of impeachment.”

House files lawsuit for grand-jury evidence behind Robert Mueller's report on the Russia investigation

Judiciary Committee asks a judge to share Mueller's secret grand jury evidence
By KYLE CHENEY and JOSH GERSTEIN
07/26/2019 10:09 AM EDT

The House Judiciary Committee is preparing to petition a federal judge to release former special counsel Robert Mueller’s most closely guarded evidence: the material he gathered using a secretive grand jury.

The petition, which will be made to Beryl Howell, the chief judge of Washington, D.C.’s federal district court, asks that the material be provided to Congress, though it does not seek the public release of the grand jury evidence.


House Judiciary Chairman Jerry Nadler has sought Mueller’s grand jury evidence for months, arguing that it’s essential for Congress to view it in order to fully investigate potential abuses of power by President Donald Trump and his inner circle. Nadler has previously asked the Justice Department and Attorney General William Barr to join him in court to seek the release of the information, but Barr has declined, calling such a move unprecedented.

Judiciary Committee asks a judge to share Mueller's secret grand jury evidence

& another thing you are mistaken about.... i am not a dude.

You are 100% wrong on this, 100%. The only redacted information is information that the Justice Department can NOT legally show to anyone without a court order. Therefor , what they have been offered I unredacted as far as the law allows.

No Democrats have read the less-redacted Mueller report. But five Republicans have. - CNNPolitics


Not one Democrat has went to see the material.

Wake up man, you are actually arguing that the Justice Department should violate the law because Congress says so.

oh bullshit. i already said that the redacted info can easily be turned over to congress....like i said..... if barr PETITIONS the court. but he refuses to do so.

why is that huh? the grand jury will honor that request if barr asks. kenn starr had the entire 1800 page report re: slick willy released within days.

but barr is stonewalling & the most important info is being withheld.

nice try, jr. but no gold star for you.

Are you dishonest, or uneducated?

The law has changed since Kenneth Starr who was a SPECIAL PROSECUTOR not a special COUNSEL.

K Starr was required BY LAW to provide the ENTIRE report to Congress, becuase that is what the Special Prosecutor law called for. That law EXPIRED and Congress refused to renew it.

In actuality there was no legal basis to name a Special Council here, no law requiring one, and thus no law mandating that he MUST turn over anything to Congress. In actuality, Barr could have told Congress to go fuck themselves , he was under ZERO obligation to give Congress ANY version of the report. Do you understand that? Unlike Starr where there was a law that said "the special prosecutor WILL turn over a report to Congress" the special council is totally within the Justice Department and no law required him to do turn over anything to the Congress.

And further there was not a law protecting grand ury testimony from being released when K Starr was the Special Prosecutor , that has been changed and now there is a law protecting grand jury testimony. Your nonsense about Barr petitioning the Courts is just that, nonsense, Congress wants the information let them petition the courts, hell they could change the law again if they wanted.

Or here's an idea, they could stop being assholes and maybe the Justice Department would be more likely to cooperate. If I were Trump at this point I would absolutely refuse to cooperate with anything related to this sham of an investigation at all from this point forward.

banned already?


wow- that was quick..................

 

[EvilEyeFleegle]

You are ahead of yourself.....the dems cannot impeach the president without the consent of the Senate.
Now if you had stated that they are bringing impeachment proceedings to a vote, you may have had something.
In other words, they are not impeaching the president.
They don't even have the votes in their own party to do so, IMO.

This is not true. The House can certainly impeach a President , has nothing to do with the Senate. They merely convict or not if the House impeaches.

Do they have the votes in the House, Hmmmmm? Not from what I'm hearing

No , of course they don't. And even the morons like Al Green don't REALLY want to impeach Trump. They simply want to keep this going to further smear him.

Nancy Pelosi could EASILY stop this if she wanted to , but she doesn't want to. I don't care what she says , she is behind all this BS

I was merely pointing out that factually the House impeaches, the Senate votes on conviction, you most certainly don't need the Senate to impeach.

Green really wants Trump impeached as green has no good ideas of his own

No he doesn't . The Dems have fooled you as well as everyone else. Green is a dumb son of a bitch , but even he know the truth. Trump hasn't committed an impeachable offense. And further he knew going in that his impeachment resolution would not pass. He is what is known as a useful idiot.

If Nancy Pelosi TRULY believed that Trump had committed impeachable offenses , she could and would FORCE enough Democrats in the House to impeach . She's not as powerless as the squad would make us believe she is. And likewise if she really thought impeachment talks were bad for the country , she could and would silence Al Green and his idiotic band.

ALL Democrats care about is getting and keeping power, NEVER forget that.

Kinda just like the Republicans, right?

 

[EvilEyeFleegle]

Well..new details..support either a suicide attempt or at least a fake attempt...his cellmate claims to have saved Epsteins life:

Jeffrey Epstein's ex-cop cellmate says he saved sex offender from hanging, source says

"Jeffrey Epstein’s cellmate — a former cop charged with quadruple murder — told authorities he came to the perverted multimillionaire’s rescue after he attempted to hang himself, alerting correction officers and possibly saving his life, a source told the New York Daily News on Friday.
A law enforcement source confirmed that the cellmate, Nicholas Tartaglione, claimed to have helped Epstein after finding him unconscious. Investigators were still trying to determine if an assault had occurred or if the sex offender facing up to 45 years in prison had in fact tried to take his own life, the law enforcement source said.
“You’ve got a guy who is a millionaire who is now living among rats and mold and wants to go home,” the source said.
“This is a disgusting place and the people there, they treat you disgusting. Who wouldn’t be suicidal in that kind of place? You have a silver spoon in your mouth and then you’re put in a cesspool.”
Bruce Barket, a lawyer for Tartaglione, refused to go into detail about the incident but did not dispute the account.
Epstein, 66, appeared to have genuinely believed he was going to get bail and return to his $77 million Upper East Side mansion, a source previously told the Daily News.
He was found on the floor of his jail cell with bruises on his neck early this week while awaiting trial on sex-trafficking charges, sources said Thursday.
Epstein has pleaded not guilty. One of his attorneys did not respond to a request for comment.
Barket said that contrary to reports that Tartaglione inflicted harm on Epstein in the Special Housing Unit of the Metropolitan Detention Center, the two cellmates get along just fine.
“They became more than cordial,” Barket said. “In the short time they were together, they became friends.”
The source also insisted that Tartaglione, 51, had nothing to do with Epstein’s injuries.
“The guy is on suicide watch. You don’t go on suicide watch if you’ve been assaulted, do you?” the source said.
The Bureau of Prisons did not respond to an inquiry."