Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
The incident was that a black called a Jew a K. And they sent the JEW to “sensitivity” training, and required nothing of the black. Odd how you take the side of the black and not the Jew who was victimized.You’re not even recounting your article correctly. First of all the incident could have been a she said she said situation so for you to say the black lady should have been fired is short sighted and ignorant: Fact is there are many ways this could have gone and you only have the story from the disgruntled employee. She didn’t get fired for complaining about being called a name. There was obviously an incident that led to her needing to take sensitivity classes and after taking those classes they still had issues with her. There is a story there that isn’t being told but you don’t seem curious about it. Why?
Now we’re getting somewhere. This is probably closer to the truth.(1) Deepest sympathies to the lady.
(2) Hopefully, she will get another job soon.
(3) Her bosses were probably afraid that they would lose their jobs if they took any action against her abusers.
Another leftist who is siding against the Jew.Maybe they were just looking for an excuse to fire her.
I’m not taking any side. I’m looking for a balanced story. It’s not believable that the lady was minding her business doing nothing and then got called a name and sent to sensitivity training. Common sense tells me that she probably did or said something to or about the black ladies that made the employer send her to sensitivity training. Don’t know what that is. Also don’t trust this lady’s account that nothing was done to the black ladies who called her a name. Also don’t know what persisted that lead to her firing after she took the classes. It was obviously something, but your article doesn’t even try to go there and you don’t seem the least bit curious. Why is that?The incident was that a black called a Jew a K. And they sent the JEW to “sensitivity” training, and required nothing of the black. Odd how you take the side of the black and not the zjew who was victimized.
Whatever the Jewish lady did, if anything, the black woman lashed out and called her a k***. And NO action was taken against the antisemitic black. Aren’t you curious as to why a black employee can get away with the nastiest name you can call a Jew (equivalent to the n-word), and her employers didn’t take some sort of action? That ALL the blame was placed on the Jew?I’m not taking any side. I’m looking for a balanced story. It’s not believable that the lady was minding her business doing nothing and then got called a name and sent to sensitivity training. Common sense tells me that she probably did or said something to or about the black ladies that made the employer send her to sensitivity training. Don’t know what that is. Also don’t trust this lady’s account that nothing was done to the black ladies who called her a name. Also don’t know what persisted that lead to her firing after she took the classes. It was obviously something, but your article doesn’t even try to go there and you don’t seem the least bit curious. Why is that?
If it happened, then it is unacceptable and she's entitled to damages.1) I have no “record” of racism.
2) And the blacks called the Jewish woman a K. There is no justification for that, and the blacks should have been fired. But the Jew had the misfortune of working for a woke company, and so they - like you - blame the Jewish woman instead of the antisemitic blacks.
If you complain about anything in the workplace, you are likely to be marked as someone they want to get rid of.If you complain about racism in workplace, you're likely to be fired for doing so. It does not matter if you are black or Jewish. The victim mentality is the problem.
Or that she was just someone who got fired for the main reason most people get fired: their inability to work within an institution.Reads like the plaintiff is a victim of the subsequent shenanigans of the ''long march through the institutions.''
The tolerance for antisemitism among leftists, so much so that if a Jew complains about being called a K at work, the liberals fire HER and take no action against her abusers.
So the person yelling the K word at a Jew gets off Scott-free, and the Jew is fired. It DOES matter whether you are black or Jewish.If you complain about racism in workplace, you're likely to be fired for doing so. It does not matter if you are black or Jewish. The victim mentality is the problem.
Just as bad, when they are caught in the act, they can count on other leftists to defend them - and claim the victim of their racism “deserved it.”I am continually impressed by the Radical Left who, among being champions for child rights, females control over her own body, human rights for prisoners, concern for the planet, animals, racism, et al, are so often found to be the biggest most indifferent abusers of children, women, racist attitudes and human rights violations yet just laugh it off when they are caught in the act, all the while excoriating others for what they do even if these other groups are not even actually guilty of the same things!
Or maybe a privileged white woman's inability to get along with her coworkers is just not very high up on our list of things to be concerned about.I am continually impressed by the Radical Left who, among being champions for child rights, females control over her own body, human rights for prisoners, concern for the planet, animals, racism, et al, are so often found to be the biggest most indifferent abusers of children, women, racist attitudes and human rights violations yet just laugh it off when they are caught in the act, all the while excoriating others for what they do even if these other groups are not even actually guilty of the same things!
I don't know if she got fired.So the person yelling the K word at a Jew gets off Scott-free, and the Jew is fired. It DOES matter whether you are black or Jewish.
How do you know no action was taken? Cause you read it in a one sided article that only told the ladies side of the story?And NO action was taken against the antisemitic black.
IF this white woman??? Where’s your thread? That gives me permission to call any Negro I hate the “ N” word1. Do you have evidence she did that? I didn't see it in the article.
2. If you don't, why are you postulating she might have done it? Are you just looking for an excuse, any excuse, to excuse the bigotry she faced?