So, Why Is It That Only Democrats Can Question Election Results?

[jc456]

Republicans are free to question election results. They just have to do it legally like Democrats.

they couldn't impeach biden since they didn't have congress.

 

[SeaMajor7]

No duality allowed SeaSwab.
REPORT me.

Yeah, even a dumbshit like you figured it out.

So............THAT'S were you get your comments from?
OR..........Is it "Truth" social?

 

[jc456]

Please note. The defense of January 6th not being an insurrection shouldn't be based on the fact it didn't work.

John Hinckley failing to assassinate Ronald Reagan, wasn't a defense.

since there wasn't one, not sure your point.

 

[postman]

they couldn't impeach biden since they didn't have congress.

They didn't impeach Biden because even their MAJORITY had enough sane republicans to know there were no grounds for doing so.

 

[jc456]

They didn't impeach Biden because even their MAJORITY had enough sane republicans to know there were no grounds for doing so.

they are looking into it now. again, impeaching at the start they didn't have any of congress. It was my answer to you.

 

[Independent thinker]

Really! Again! Are you pretending to be stupid or are you really confused about the difference between challenging results in the courts and plotting to steal the election after those challenges failed?

Who did that?

 

[Independent thinker]

Please note. The defense of January 6th not being an insurrection shouldn't be based on the fact it didn't work.

John Hinckley failing to assassinate Ronald Reagan, wasn't a defense.

How can it be an insurrection when no one was charged with insurrection?

 

[Independent thinker]

They didn't impeach Biden because even their MAJORITY had enough sane republicans to know there were no grounds for doing so.

Sounds to me like you are talking about the two Trump impeachments where there was enough sane Republicans to find Trump innocent of Democrats' Trumped up charges.

 

[Captain Caveman]

Every time they don't get the result they want, they question the election results. But, Republicans aren't allowed to question election results or they are accused of being insurrectionists.

Blinken says US has 'serious concerns' about announced result of Venezuelan election

U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken said the United States has ‘serious concerns’ about the announced result of Venezuela’s hotly contested presidential election that authorities say was won by incumbent Nicolas Maduro. Speaking in Tokyo on Monday shortly after the announcement was made...

www.yahoo.com

They also question every SCOTUS decision that doesn't go their way.

 

[postman]

they are looking into it now. again, impeaching at the start they didn't have any of congress. It was my answer to you.

The Biden impeachment was always just a political stunt. It was like Benghazi investigations. Only meant to sling mud.

 

[postman]

How can it be an insurrection when no one was charged with insurrection?

It's been answered many times through legal semantics.
Trump tried to say his "rape" verdict wasn't rape, since it was sexual abuse, and what he did, didn't constitute "rape" in NY at the time.
Trumps appeal that Trumps sexual abuse was de-facto rape, and would have been rape as defined in other states.

Seditious conspiracy = Insurrection

18 U.S. Code § 2384 - Seditious conspiracy

If two or more persons in any State or Territory, or in any place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, conspire to overthrow, put down, or to destroy by force the Government of the United States, or to levy war against them, or to oppose by force the authority thereof, or by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the United States, or by force to seize, take, or possess any property of the United States contrary to the authority thereof, they shall each be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both.

 

[jc456]

The Biden impeachment was always just a political stunt. It was like Benghazi investigations. Only meant to sling mud.

and the trump impeachments weren't? hahahahaahahhaahaha. It's called interference in a presidency, right?

 

[jc456]

It's been answered many times through legal semantics.

no it hasn't, no one was ever charged with it.

Trump tried to say his "rape" verdict wasn't rape, since it was sexual abuse, and what he did, didn't constitute "rape" in NY at the time.

it wasn't, it's why it wasn't reported as it.

Trumps appeal that Trumps sexual abuse was de-facto rape, and would have been rape as defined in other states.

well it never happened and she couldn't prove it did. Her own testimony said she made it up.
The judges TDS didn't matter.

Seditious conspiracy = Insurrection

show me where anything says that?

18 U.S. Code § 2384 - Seditious conspiracy

If two or more persons in any State or Territory, or in any place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, conspire to overthrow, put down, or to destroy by force the Government of the United States, or to levy war against them, or to oppose by force the authority thereof, or by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the United States, or by force to seize, take, or possess any property of the United States contrary to the authority thereof, they shall each be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both.

nope don't see insurrection in there.

 

[postman]

18 U.S. Code § 2383 - Rebellion or insurrection

Whoever incites, sets on foot, assists, or engages in any rebellion or insurrection against the authority of the United States or the laws thereof, or gives aid or comfort thereto, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both;

 

[postman]

They also question every SCOTUS decision that doesn't go their way.

Especially those they swore under oath to the senate, were precedent.

 

[postman]

and the trump impeachments weren't? hahahahaahahhaahaha. It's called interference in a presidency, right?

The Trump impeachments had bi-partisan support.

 

[jc456]

The Trump impeachments had bi-partisan support.

name them

 

[postman]

well it never happened and she couldn't prove it did. Her own testimony said she made it up.

I guess that's the $85 million question.

 

[jc456]

18 U.S. Code § 2383 - Rebellion or insurrection

Whoever incites, sets on foot, assists, or engages in any rebellion or insurrection against the authority of the United States or the laws thereof, or gives aid or comfort thereto, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both;

so why was no one charged? you all keeping completing loops to the same old nothing.

 

[jc456]

I guess that's the $85 million question.

which she will never see.