candycorn
Diamond Member
Same old same old response from a fool who can only ignore facts.five farts in a row from the paid shills^ sent be their handlers at langley to fart here.![]()
That is all conspiracy theorists have
They demand facts, facts and answers to all their bizarre theories
But ask for any facts in return and this is what you get
I don’t think I’ve demanded much….I have my theory and you have yours. In my mind, both make sense. Conspriracies do not have to be grand and well thought out….
I do have some questions about your theory of events. You said earlier that:
". Oswald had no chance at escape. The police were going to check who worked at the Schoolbook Depository. Oswald would have been red flagged.”
and…
"Oswald read in the paper that the JFK motorcade would go by his workplace. So he brought his gun to work, fired three shots and blew JFKs brains out.”
Both of which I totally agree with.
But you also said this (which I agree with as well)
"Oswald wandered the city and shot a cop.”
So, to summarize your theory of events, Oswald acting totally on his own decided to shoot Kennedy with his Manlicher Carcano rifle which he brought to work one day. Right?
My question is this; if he was acting alone and had no escape plan from the TSBD…why not bring his revolver as well?
It would seem to me that if I knew I was going down for this and help was not on the way, I would keep the rifle in my hands…not hide it on the way out of the building and on the way away from my sniper’s nest…but I would also have my entire arsenal at my disposal; not 30 minutes away:
I think he had escape plans; they just fell through when his support didn’t materialize.
Anyway, please consider the question as to why he didn’t bring along his entire arsenal….