Jobs report is not good: it may be as low as 140,000 although

[Dad2three]

Obama Blows Republicans Out Of The Water With Fastest Job Growth Pace Since Clinton

President Obama, the alleged “socialist” president, has presided over the longest uninterrupted stretch of private sector job growth on record. Private sector.

The Rich are more wealthy than ever, and profits are soaring... And you are braging about job growth under Obama.

But you also post pictures saying the rich are getting richer and the poor poorer... And how the rich don't create jobs.

So what is it?

That's the problem with dumb ass pics and even dumber captions, dumb people make them up and even dumber people post them.

YOUR inability to grasp that jobs under Obama AND the rich getting richer (thanks mainly to trickle down) CAN BOTH BE TRUE!


Of course NOTHING about low taxes on the ":job creator" is responsible for the jobs being created, it's a function of DEMAND DUMBFUKK

IN RIGHT WING WORLD, YOU CUT TAXES FOR THE RICH AND THEY JUST USE EXTRA MONEY TO HIRE PEOPLE, LMAOROG


Dishonest POS righties NEVER fail look more and more ignorant everyday

 

[saveliberty]

If you can't pay the employee, demand really isn't a factor.

 

[Avorysuds]

Job creation misses big in September

The unemployment rate has been declining steadily, but that has come in significant part due to the lowest labor force participation rate since the late 1970s. The participation rate plunged to 62.4 percent in September.

Retirement Among Baby Boomers Contributing To Shrinking Labor Force. According to The Washington Post, many economists agree the shrinking labor force participation rate is largely explained by a demographic shift, wherein "baby boomers are starting to retire en masse":

Demographics have always played a big role in the rise and fall of the labor force. Between 1960 and 2000, the labor force in the United States surged from 59 percent to a peak of 67.3 percent. That was largely due to the fact that more women were entering the labor force while improvements in health and information technology allowed Americans to work more years.

But since 2000, the labor force rate has been steadily declining as the baby-boom generation has been retiring. Because of this, the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago expects the labor force participation rate to be lower in 2020 than it is today, regardless of how well the economy does.

In a March report titled "Dispelling an Urban Legend," Dean Maki, an economist at Barclays Capital, found that demographics accounted for a majority of the drop in the participation rate since 2002.


The incredible shrinking labor force

That's nice...now take a risk and come down from your ivory tower and talk to those mere serfs you are so afraid of and find out the real story. I promise they won't hurt you....as long as you don't say something stupid and piss them off.

What's your point? Those "job creators" having the lowest sustained tax "burden" since before Harding/Coolidge's great depression, aren't giving US a good return on investment???

I'm lost....

You keep attacking the rich and republicans on grounds that if Republicans hold office there are no jobs being crated and if there are rich people less jobs are created.

Where I get lost is you post fake images of massive job losses under Bush and incredible job growth under Obama... Despite the rich being far richer and there being a Republican Senate/House. Yes under Bush it was a Democrat Senate and House and under Clinton it was a Republican Senate and house...

You then called the 1930's depression Harding/Coolidge's despite Hoover and FDR being in power. Also Wilson left Harding with a depression before Harding was elected and it took 18 months to get out of a depression and into a booming economy.

My point is you flip back and forth very quickly on what branches of Government are responsible for a recession, depression or low jobs... You always seem to find a way to blame Republicans and not Democrats, every single time.

I'm not a Republican nor do I defend them, simply pointing out that yer a race baiting, clueless, economically ignorant partisan hack.

Even RW (one of the internet dumbest fucking people) blamed having a Republican house/Senate as the problem... Yet I doubt he blames the House/Senate being Democrat for the 2008 crash.

YES, MORE DISHONESTY FROM THE "MODERATE". SHOCKING



PLEASE GIVE ME ONE POLICY THE DEM CONGRESS DID JAN 2007-JAN 2009 THAT CAUSED DUBYA'S GREAT RECESSION?

NOW GIVE ME A BILL THE GOP GAVE US THAT HELPED OBAMA WITH CREATING JOBS? oops


IF you were HONEST, you'd see that the GOP "job creator" BULLSHIT that taxes HAVE to be GUTTED to create the environment for jobs to be created is a total fukkn lie!

I'M CONSISTENT HOWEVER, PREZ POLICY IS NUMBER 1 ON THE ECONOMY, REGARDLESS OF PARTY IN THE CONGRESS!


Oh right, Harding/Coolidge didn't cheer on the credit bubbles and 3 asset bubbles that Hoover/FDR inherited right? JUST LIKE DUBYA DIDN'T CHEER ON THE SUBPRIME BANKSTER BUBBLE, RIGHT?

LMAOROG

Once again you have done the same thing you have been doing this whole time.

Under Bush the Dems ran on undoing everything Bush had done, and as you provided did absolutely nothing different. Dems didn't even try and stall Bush on a single thing, they lock step supported him. Dems under Bush helped create a bigger bubble, not one bill was aimed at preparing for the crash. Obama was apart of this, only voting to not increase the debt ceiling... What a stand!

Now, under Obama you complain that the GOP is not doing anything, just like the Dems.

Also, just fyi Obama has been running near 2 trillion in deficit spending ever year in office... That's his stimulus/jobs bill right there.

No President in world history has got the Federal reserve spending 80 billion a month to "stimulate" the economy (that also artificially increases tax revenues). All the while Obama was spending 1.4ish trillion for years, and even when the budget was around 500 billion for a moment it was done with fake revenues crated by printed money being injected into the economy while NOT counting that money being created and spent as debt, and it is...

 

[Avorysuds]

Obama Blows Republicans Out Of The Water With Fastest Job Growth Pace Since Clinton

President Obama, the alleged “socialist” president, has presided over the longest uninterrupted stretch of private sector job growth on record. Private sector.

The Rich are more wealthy than ever, and profits are soaring... And you are braging about job growth under Obama.

But you also post pictures saying the rich are getting richer and the poor poorer... And how the rich don't create jobs.

So what is it?

That's the problem with dumb ass pics and even dumber captions, dumb people make them up and even dumber people post them.

YOUR inability to grasp that jobs under Obama AND the rich getting richer (thanks mainly to trickle down) CAN BOTH BE TRUE!


Of course NOTHING about low taxes on the ":job creator" is responsible for the jobs being created, it's a function of DEMAND DUMBFUKK

IN RIGHT WING WORLD, YOU CUT TAXES FOR THE RICH AND THEY JUST USE EXTRA MONEY TO HIRE PEOPLE, LMAOROG


Dishonest POS righties NEVER fail look more and more ignorant everyday

You have proven yourself a racist so it really does not matter what pictures you post.

 

[pinqy]

The labor force participation rate is the percentage of working-age persons who are employed or unemployed but looking for a job in the Civilian Labor Force.

No, that is not the correct definition.

 

[Stephanie]

Here's something that many Americans -- including some of the smartest and most educated among us -- don't know: The official unemployment rate, as reported by the U.S. Department of Labor, is extremely misleading.
Right now, we're hearing much celebrating from the media, the White House and Wall Street about how unemployment is "down" to 5.6%. The cheerleading for this number is deafening. The media loves a comeback story, the White House wants to score political points and Wall Street would like you to stay in the market.
None of them will tell you this: If you, a family member or anyone is unemployed and has subsequently given up on finding a job -- if you are so hopelessly out of work that you've stopped looking over the past four weeks -- the Department of Labor doesn't count you as unemployed. That's right. While you are as unemployed as one can possibly be, and tragically may never find work again, you are not counted in the figure we see relentlessly in the news -- currently 5.6%. Right now, as many as 30 million Americans are either out of work or severely underemployed. Trust me, the vast majority of them aren't throwing parties to toast "falling" unemployment.

There's another reason why the official rate is misleading. Say you're an out-of-work engineer or healthcare worker or construction worker or retail manager: If you perform a minimum of one hour of work in a week and are paid at least $20 -- maybe someone pays you to mow their lawn -- you're not officially counted as unemployed in the much-reported 5.6%. Few Americans know this.
Yet another figure of importance that doesn't get much press: those working part time but wanting full-time work. If you have a degree in chemistry or math and are working 10 hours part time because it is all you can find -- in other words, you are severely underemployed -- the government doesn't count you in the 5.6%. Few Americans know this.

YOU can't believe ONE WORD out of this lying administration. not from the ONE who looked right our faces and lie while winning LIE OF THE YEAR
Anyone with a half a brain knows our Unemployment is NOT at 5.1%. there is NO GAWDDAM WAY

 

[Dad2three]

Obama Blows Republicans Out Of The Water With Fastest Job Growth Pace Since Clinton

President Obama, the alleged “socialist” president, has presided over the longest uninterrupted stretch of private sector job growth on record. Private sector.

The Rich are more wealthy than ever, and profits are soaring... And you are braging about job growth under Obama.

But you also post pictures saying the rich are getting richer and the poor poorer... And how the rich don't create jobs.

So what is it?

That's the problem with dumb ass pics and even dumber captions, dumb people make them up and even dumber people post them.

You are correct....most of this economic growth is going to the rich

Time to undo those supply side economic theories, don't you think?

Sure I agree, no more bail outs (done by Obama), no more massive stimulus for the rich (Done by Obama), and stop the .02% interest rates for the bankers to lend to the peeon masses at 4%-20%, also done by Obama.

You have to stop the massive corruption being done under Obama's watch, with his approval and his support.

FUKKN LIAR. Dubya and his treasury sec tried the 5 page bailout remember dumbfukk? dubya got the bailout through Congress BECAUSE he didn't want ANOTHER GOP great depression. Obama's stimulus stopped US from landing there!

Dubya had 3 STIMULUS BILLS, 2 TAX CUTS THEN THE $300+ BILLION 2008 STIMULUS, checks sent to US remember? Fukkn lying POS

 

[rdean]

CNN is reporting a different number: "At 8:30 a.m. Eastern, the Labor Department will report its latest figures on hiring and unemployment for September.

After employers added a disappointing 173,000 new jobs last month, analysts are hoping that gains will at least top the 200,000 mark as the economy heads into the final quarter of 2015. The jobless rate is expected to hold at 5.1 percent"

The Dems and the Pubs in the House have to work out a jobs bill the Senate and the Pres can support.

The stone walling by both parties has to end.

A jobs bill is your solution? Talk about doing the same thing over and over again and expecting a different result.

Hey, let's ask the wolves to draft legislation to protect chickens!

where did that CLOSE to a TRILLON dollars go that he stole from us and called it a "stimulus" that suppose to give them Shovel ready jobs. so their idea. throw more money at it. screw it if we go bankrupt as a country

Iraq cost 3 trillion. Was it worth it?

 

[bedowin62]

The idiotic Left is bragging about the job creation of obama out of one corner of their mouths that the are saying hasnt happened because the job creators havent created jobs; out of the other side of their mouths

mental-cases

 

[bedowin62]

CNN is reporting a different number: "At 8:30 a.m. Eastern, the Labor Department will report its latest figures on hiring and unemployment for September.

After employers added a disappointing 173,000 new jobs last month, analysts are hoping that gains will at least top the 200,000 mark as the economy heads into the final quarter of 2015. The jobless rate is expected to hold at 5.1 percent"

The Dems and the Pubs in the House have to work out a jobs bill the Senate and the Pres can support.

The stone walling by both parties has to end.

A jobs bill is your solution? Talk about doing the same thing over and over again and expecting a different result.

Hey, let's ask the wolves to draft legislation to protect chickens!

where did that CLOSE to a TRILLON dollars go that he stole from us and called it a "stimulus" that suppose to give them Shovel ready jobs. so their idea. throw more money at it. screw it if we go bankrupt as a country

Iraq cost 3 trillion. Was it worth it?

Biden said it was

it was until obama turned victory into defeat and disaster leftard

 

[rdean]

Obama Blows Republicans Out Of The Water With Fastest Job Growth Pace Since Clinton

President Obama, the alleged “socialist” president, has presided over the longest uninterrupted stretch of private sector job growth on record. Private sector.

The Rich are more wealthy than ever, and profits are soaring... And you are braging about job growth under Obama.

But you also post pictures saying the rich are getting richer and the poor poorer... And how the rich don't create jobs.

So what is it?

That's the problem with dumb ass pics and even dumber captions, dumb people make them up and even dumber people post them.

You are correct....most of this economic growth is going to the rich

Time to undo those supply side economic theories, don't you think?

Sure I agree, no more bail outs (done by Obama), no more massive stimulus for the rich (Done by Obama), and stop the .02% interest rates for the bankers to lend to the peeon masses at 4%-20%, also done by Obama.

You have to stop the massive corruption being done under Obama's watch, with his approval and his support.

FUKKN LIAR. Dubya and his treasury sec tried the 5 page bailout remember dumbfukk? dubya got the bailout through Congress BECAUSE he didn't want ANOTHER GOP great depression. Obama's stimulus stopped US from landing there!

Dubya had 3 STIMULUS BILLS, 2 TAX CUTS THEN THE $300+ BILLION 2008 STIMULUS, checks sent to US remember? Fukkn lying POS

The Fireman and the Arsonist - what a fabulous cartoon. Thanks.

 

[rdean]

CNN is reporting a different number: "At 8:30 a.m. Eastern, the Labor Department will report its latest figures on hiring and unemployment for September.

After employers added a disappointing 173,000 new jobs last month, analysts are hoping that gains will at least top the 200,000 mark as the economy heads into the final quarter of 2015. The jobless rate is expected to hold at 5.1 percent"

The Dems and the Pubs in the House have to work out a jobs bill the Senate and the Pres can support.

The stone walling by both parties has to end.

A jobs bill is your solution? Talk about doing the same thing over and over again and expecting a different result.

Hey, let's ask the wolves to draft legislation to protect chickens!

where did that CLOSE to a TRILLON dollars go that he stole from us and called it a "stimulus" that suppose to give them Shovel ready jobs. so their idea. throw more money at it. screw it if we go bankrupt as a country

Iraq cost 3 trillion. Was it worth it?

Biden said it was

it was until obama turned victory into defeat and disaster leftard

Oh, it was Obama that turned victory into defeat. Not even Bush believes that turd.

 

[bedowin62]

Obama Blows Republicans Out Of The Water With Fastest Job Growth Pace Since Clinton

President Obama, the alleged “socialist” president, has presided over the longest uninterrupted stretch of private sector job growth on record. Private sector.

The Rich are more wealthy than ever, and profits are soaring... And you are braging about job growth under Obama.

But you also post pictures saying the rich are getting richer and the poor poorer... And how the rich don't create jobs.

So what is it?

That's the problem with dumb ass pics and even dumber captions, dumb people make them up and even dumber people post them.

You are correct....most of this economic growth is going to the rich

Time to undo those supply side economic theories, don't you think?

Sure I agree, no more bail outs (done by Obama), no more massive stimulus for the rich (Done by Obama), and stop the .02% interest rates for the bankers to lend to the peeon masses at 4%-20%, also done by Obama.

You have to stop the massive corruption being done under Obama's watch, with his approval and his support.

FUKKN LIAR. Dubya and his treasury sec tried the 5 page bailout remember dumbfukk? dubya got the bailout through Congress BECAUSE he didn't want ANOTHER GOP great depression. Obama's stimulus stopped US from landing there!

Dubya had 3 STIMULUS BILLS, 2 TAX CUTS THEN THE $300+ BILLION 2008 STIMULUS, checks sent to US remember? Fukkn lying POS

YAWN

actually obama voted for the Bush stimulus and TARP; and that made the recession END IN THE SUMMER OF OBAMA'S FIRST YEAR.

none of the obama Stimulus jobs still exist

libs are losers who lie to themselves

 

[saveliberty]

Iraq cost 3 trillion. Was it worth it?

No major terrorist attacks in 14 years. You tell me.

 

[saveliberty]

The idiotic Left is bragging about the job creation of obama out of one corner of their mouths that the are saying hasnt happened because the job creators havent created jobs; out of the other side of their mouths

mental-cases

My point earlier in the thread.

 

[bedowin62]

CNN is reporting a different number: "At 8:30 a.m. Eastern, the Labor Department will report its latest figures on hiring and unemployment for September.

After employers added a disappointing 173,000 new jobs last month, analysts are hoping that gains will at least top the 200,000 mark as the economy heads into the final quarter of 2015. The jobless rate is expected to hold at 5.1 percent"

The Dems and the Pubs in the House have to work out a jobs bill the Senate and the Pres can support.

The stone walling by both parties has to end.

A jobs bill is your solution? Talk about doing the same thing over and over again and expecting a different result.

Hey, let's ask the wolves to draft legislation to protect chickens!

where did that CLOSE to a TRILLON dollars go that he stole from us and called it a "stimulus" that suppose to give them Shovel ready jobs. so their idea. throw more money at it. screw it if we go bankrupt as a country

Iraq cost 3 trillion. Was it worth it?

Biden said it was

it was until obama turned victory into defeat and disaster leftard

Oh, it was Obama that turned victory into defeat. Not even Bush believes that turd.

sorry nutjob; i was only using Biden's and obama's OWN STATEMENTS WHEN THEY HANDED OVER IRAQ


my bad

 

[Dad2three]

Retirement Among Baby Boomers Contributing To Shrinking Labor Force. According to The Washington Post, many economists agree the shrinking labor force participation rate is largely explained by a demographic shift, wherein "baby boomers are starting to retire en masse":

Demographics have always played a big role in the rise and fall of the labor force. Between 1960 and 2000, the labor force in the United States surged from 59 percent to a peak of 67.3 percent. That was largely due to the fact that more women were entering the labor force while improvements in health and information technology allowed Americans to work more years.

But since 2000, the labor force rate has been steadily declining as the baby-boom generation has been retiring. Because of this, the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago expects the labor force participation rate to be lower in 2020 than it is today, regardless of how well the economy does.

In a March report titled "Dispelling an Urban Legend," Dean Maki, an economist at Barclays Capital, found that demographics accounted for a majority of the drop in the participation rate since 2002.


The incredible shrinking labor force

That's nice...now take a risk and come down from your ivory tower and talk to those mere serfs you are so afraid of and find out the real story. I promise they won't hurt you....as long as you don't say something stupid and piss them off.

What's your point? Those "job creators" having the lowest sustained tax "burden" since before Harding/Coolidge's great depression, aren't giving US a good return on investment???

I'm lost....

You keep attacking the rich and republicans on grounds that if Republicans hold office there are no jobs being crated and if there are rich people less jobs are created.

Where I get lost is you post fake images of massive job losses under Bush and incredible job growth under Obama... Despite the rich being far richer and there being a Republican Senate/House. Yes under Bush it was a Democrat Senate and House and under Clinton it was a Republican Senate and house...

You then called the 1930's depression Harding/Coolidge's despite Hoover and FDR being in power. Also Wilson left Harding with a depression before Harding was elected and it took 18 months to get out of a depression and into a booming economy.

My point is you flip back and forth very quickly on what branches of Government are responsible for a recession, depression or low jobs... You always seem to find a way to blame Republicans and not Democrats, every single time.

I'm not a Republican nor do I defend them, simply pointing out that yer a race baiting, clueless, economically ignorant partisan hack.

Even RW (one of the internet dumbest fucking people) blamed having a Republican house/Senate as the problem... Yet I doubt he blames the House/Senate being Democrat for the 2008 crash.

YES, MORE DISHONESTY FROM THE "MODERATE". SHOCKING



PLEASE GIVE ME ONE POLICY THE DEM CONGRESS DID JAN 2007-JAN 2009 THAT CAUSED DUBYA'S GREAT RECESSION?

NOW GIVE ME A BILL THE GOP GAVE US THAT HELPED OBAMA WITH CREATING JOBS? oops


IF you were HONEST, you'd see that the GOP "job creator" BULLSHIT that taxes HAVE to be GUTTED to create the environment for jobs to be created is a total fukkn lie!

I'M CONSISTENT HOWEVER, PREZ POLICY IS NUMBER 1 ON THE ECONOMY, REGARDLESS OF PARTY IN THE CONGRESS!


Oh right, Harding/Coolidge didn't cheer on the credit bubbles and 3 asset bubbles that Hoover/FDR inherited right? JUST LIKE DUBYA DIDN'T CHEER ON THE SUBPRIME BANKSTER BUBBLE, RIGHT?

LMAOROG

Once again you have done the same thing you have been doing this whole time.

Under Bush the Dems ran on undoing everything Bush had done, and as you provided did absolutely nothing different. Dems didn't even try and stall Bush on a single thing, they lock step supported him. Dems under Bush helped create a bigger bubble, not one bill was aimed at preparing for the crash. Obama was apart of this, only voting to not increase the debt ceiling... What a stand!

Now, under Obama you complain that the GOP is not doing anything, just like the Dems.

Also, just fyi Obama has been running near 2 trillion in deficit spending ever year in office... That's his stimulus/jobs bill right there.

No President in world history has got the Federal reserve spending 80 billion a month to "stimulate" the economy (that also artificially increases tax revenues). All the while Obama was spending 1.4ish trillion for years, and even when the budget was around 500 billion for a moment it was done with fake revenues crated by printed money being injected into the economy while NOT counting that money being created and spent as debt, and it is...

I guess since Dubya started vetoing bills once the Dems took Congress, YOU ARE FULL OF SHIT, AS USUAL

Preparing for the crash? LMAOROG. Grow a fukkn brain dumbass

Obama CUT Dubya's deficits by 2/3rds liar!


SHOW ME ONE TIME AUSTERITY WORKED ANYWHERE DURING A DOWNTURN DUMBFUKK? LOL


I KNOW, LET'S GO BACK TO DUBYA/GOP "JOB CREATOR" POLICIES SINCE THEY WORKED SO WELL RIGHT?

 

[bedowin62]

Biden 2010: Iraq Could be One of Obama's “great ...
www.whitehousedossier.com/.../biden-2010-iraq-obamas-great-achievem...

• Cached
• Similar

Jun 12, 2014 - Given for best White House coverage. ... Biden 2010: Iraq Could be One of Obama's “great achievements” .... We all recognize that the Obama administration has no credible foreign policy, simply because they don't understand ... Juan would probably agree with Joe Biden. Because….Obama. Sadie says:.

 

[saveliberty]

I guess since Dubya started vetoing bills once the Dems took Congress, YOU ARE FULL OF SHIT, AS USUAL

Preparing for the crash? LMAOROG. Grow a fukkn brain dumbass

Obama CUT Dubya's deficits by 2/3rds liar!


SHOW ME ONE TIME AUSTERITY WORKED ANYWHERE DURING A DOWNTURN DUMBFUKK? LOL


I KNOW, LET'S GO BACK TO DUBYA/GOP "JOB CREATOR" POLICIES SINCE THEY WORKED SO WELL RIGHT?

Worked great at my house.

 

[bedowin62]

That's nice...now take a risk and come down from your ivory tower and talk to those mere serfs you are so afraid of and find out the real story. I promise they won't hurt you....as long as you don't say something stupid and piss them off.

What's your point? Those "job creators" having the lowest sustained tax "burden" since before Harding/Coolidge's great depression, aren't giving US a good return on investment???

I'm lost....

You keep attacking the rich and republicans on grounds that if Republicans hold office there are no jobs being crated and if there are rich people less jobs are created.

Where I get lost is you post fake images of massive job losses under Bush and incredible job growth under Obama... Despite the rich being far richer and there being a Republican Senate/House. Yes under Bush it was a Democrat Senate and House and under Clinton it was a Republican Senate and house...

You then called the 1930's depression Harding/Coolidge's despite Hoover and FDR being in power. Also Wilson left Harding with a depression before Harding was elected and it took 18 months to get out of a depression and into a booming economy.

My point is you flip back and forth very quickly on what branches of Government are responsible for a recession, depression or low jobs... You always seem to find a way to blame Republicans and not Democrats, every single time.

I'm not a Republican nor do I defend them, simply pointing out that yer a race baiting, clueless, economically ignorant partisan hack.

Even RW (one of the internet dumbest fucking people) blamed having a Republican house/Senate as the problem... Yet I doubt he blames the House/Senate being Democrat for the 2008 crash.

YES, MORE DISHONESTY FROM THE "MODERATE". SHOCKING



PLEASE GIVE ME ONE POLICY THE DEM CONGRESS DID JAN 2007-JAN 2009 THAT CAUSED DUBYA'S GREAT RECESSION?

NOW GIVE ME A BILL THE GOP GAVE US THAT HELPED OBAMA WITH CREATING JOBS? oops


IF you were HONEST, you'd see that the GOP "job creator" BULLSHIT that taxes HAVE to be GUTTED to create the environment for jobs to be created is a total fukkn lie!

I'M CONSISTENT HOWEVER, PREZ POLICY IS NUMBER 1 ON THE ECONOMY, REGARDLESS OF PARTY IN THE CONGRESS!


Oh right, Harding/Coolidge didn't cheer on the credit bubbles and 3 asset bubbles that Hoover/FDR inherited right? JUST LIKE DUBYA DIDN'T CHEER ON THE SUBPRIME BANKSTER BUBBLE, RIGHT?

LMAOROG

Once again you have done the same thing you have been doing this whole time.

Under Bush the Dems ran on undoing everything Bush had done, and as you provided did absolutely nothing different. Dems didn't even try and stall Bush on a single thing, they lock step supported him. Dems under Bush helped create a bigger bubble, not one bill was aimed at preparing for the crash. Obama was apart of this, only voting to not increase the debt ceiling... What a stand!

Now, under Obama you complain that the GOP is not doing anything, just like the Dems.

Also, just fyi Obama has been running near 2 trillion in deficit spending ever year in office... That's his stimulus/jobs bill right there.

No President in world history has got the Federal reserve spending 80 billion a month to "stimulate" the economy (that also artificially increases tax revenues). All the while Obama was spending 1.4ish trillion for years, and even when the budget was around 500 billion for a moment it was done with fake revenues crated by printed money being injected into the economy while NOT counting that money being created and spent as debt, and it is...

I guess since Dubya started vetoing bills once the Dems took Congress, YOU ARE FULL OF SHIT, AS USUAL

Preparing for the crash? LMAOROG. Grow a fukkn brain dumbass

Obama CUT Dubya's deficits by 2/3rds liar!


SHOW ME ONE TIME AUSTERITY WORKED ANYWHERE DURING A DOWNTURN DUMBFUKK? LOL


I KNOW, LET'S GO BACK TO DUBYA/GOP "JOB CREATOR" POLICIES SINCE THEY WORKED SO WELL RIGHT?

all you do is make a fool of yourself all day long.

what is the point of even mentioning vetoes when the ACTUAL RECORD shows Democrats WILLINGLY VOTED FOR ALL THE "BUSH" POLICIES