John "Traitor" Kerry Declares Syria Has Weapons of Mass Destruction

It's common/old/long-declassified knowledge that Saddam Hussein moved his WMD to Syria. Anyone who does not know that by now should not even be discussing the topic. Do your homework. Idiots...

So you have supporting evidence for it then yeah?

why is it such a novel idea to be able to support your position when asked for a source?

How many links do you need ?

Iraq's WMDs: The Russian connection

Right, but there was no field evidence of that. Our own investigation into the matter via the Iraq Survey Group found that it was unlikely that such official transfers took place. I am familiar with the interviews of people suggesting it as a possibility, but we never found physical supporting evidence of such claims in the entire decade we've been there.

Furthermore, Syria and Iraq didn't like each other, hell Assad even channeled money into Islamist terrorist groups fighting Sadaam. An official transfer of WMD, while a formerly popular suggestion to cover up the fact that the US was simply wrong about it, wasn't very politically likely. Why give weapons of mass destruction to an enemy? It never made much political sense which is why it isn't surprising that the physical evidence of such theories never materialized.

Do you have proof involving physical evidence of such transfers?
 
So you have supporting evidence for it then yeah?

why is it such a novel idea to be able to support your position when asked for a source?

How many links do you need ?

Iraq's WMDs: The Russian connection

Right, but there was no field evidence of that. Our own investigation into the matter via the Iraq Survey Group found that it was unlikely that such official transfers took place. I am familiar with the interviews of people suggesting it as a possibility, but we never found physical supporting evidence of such claims in the entire decade we've been there.

Furthermore, Syria and Iraq didn't like each other, hell Assad even channeled money into Islamist terrorist groups fighting Sadaam. An official transfer of WMD, while a formerly popular suggestion to cover up the fact that the US was simply wrong about it, wasn't very politically likely. Why give weapons of mass destruction to an enemy? It never made much political sense which is why it isn't surprising that the physical evidence of such theories never materialized.

Do you have proof involving physical evidence of such transfers?

Assad using gas doesn't make sense either but look at the people that are accepting it as a fact.
 
Iraq/Saddam had them.
Moved them to Syria.
The End.
Nice supporting evidence.Iraq and Syria hated each other, just as an FYI.
It's common/old/long-declassified knowledge that Saddam Hussein moved his WMD to Syria. Anyone who does not know that by now should not even be discussing the topic. Do your homework. Idiots...
So you have supporting evidence for it then yeah?why is it such a novel idea to be able to support your position when asked for a source?

Do your own homework!
 
Not finding WMD is the Big Albatross for "W". He would be vindicated for leading America into unjust war. Yet for some really odd reason, there are folks that really think that WMDs were found and "W" just wants to look like an idoit for the fun of it, by not beating his chest and screaming from the mountain tops. "I told you there were WMDs"!
Yeeaah, that's the ticket!
 
Last edited:
You mean you think George was wrong? That tens of thousands of Americans were killed and maimed needlessly? That would shouldn't have spent trillions in Iraq. That the Republican leadership fucked over this country? Finally, we can agree on something.

I see your from Chicago, comrade. There are more kids killed there every month than our troops in Afghanistan. Get out of your mommas basement, clean up your own streets and then you can talk about solving the worlds problems.

Two thirds of all gun related deaths in the US are suicide. Most by white guys in Red States. Don't blame Chicago for whites killing them selves. They only have themselves to blame.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Not finding WMD is the Big Albatross for "W". He would be vindicated for leading America into unjust war. Yet for some really odd reason, there are folks that really think that WMDs were found and "W" just wants to look like an idoit for the fun of it, by not beating his chest and screaming from the mountain tops. "I told you there were WMDs"!
Yeeaah, that's the ticket!

So why was W ignored at the last two GOP conventions? For not finding WMD's or for finding them and pretending he didn't?
 
Iraq and George Bush are not important right now. What is important, is preventing WWIII. Partisan bickering won't help you when you're dead.
 

Forum List

Back
Top