Judge Challenges Prosecution Bullshit at Manafort Trial

[DrLove]

Mueller investigation is a crock of shit. Will result in same if charges are brought. Bunch of Keystone Cops amateur hour that can’t get over fact that Hillary lost in 2016. Donald J. Trump is doing a great job as President and you socialist turds will be taught another lesson in 2018 mid-terms. Public is sick of liberal media and campus professoriate trying to tell them how to think and what opinions they should have.
Manafort prosecutors, Judge Ellis engage in 10-minute courtroom spat

I love these kinds of post. You're arguing that a case should be thrown out, not because of the accused not being guilty. Not because of a lack of evidence. Not even because the judge is fundamentally disagreeing with the evidence. No you are claiming that when a judge challenges the way the prosecution is presenting its case in any form, charges should be dropped.

No it needs to be thrown out because the charges lack merit..and the prosecution isn't trying to prove the charges, but instead are just flinging shit.

“I don’t know if they are bad or good. And I don’t care,” Ellis argued, reiterating his previous claim that the prosecution seemed to be focusing not on the actual charges but on what he considered “political contributions.”

"Ellis again compared the Ukrainians in question to American billionaires and “Mr. Koch and Mr. Soros” as political contributors.

“I don’t know why you keep bringing (up) these people,” Andres said, referring to the Ukrainians. “These people are not like any Americans. These people are oligarchs and that means they control a segment of the economy based on the governments allowing them to do that.”’

“These are not really political contributions,” he continued. “They are self-serving payments with respect to what oligarchs do.”

“That makes it even clearer to me that it doesn’t have anything to do with the allegations in this case,” Ellis responded. “It throws dirt on these people. They may deserve it. I don’t know - and I don’t care.”

Manafort prosecutors, Judge Ellis engage in 10-minute courtroom spat

Clearly, you've not looked at the MOUNTAIN of evidence. You simply don't care because Crooked Paul is one of your ilk.

 

[DrLove]

Prosecution needs to move beyond political grandstanding.

Not an answer to the question I asked now is it? You claim the prosecution is incompetent. You claim the case is weak. You claim the judge isn't accepting the prosecutions case. You claim the case is politically motivated. Will you accept a guilty verdict from a jury of his peers, if all these things are true?

Does it really matter, we already know you idiots haven't accepted the outcome of the Presidential election. Pretty sure you won't accept the outcome of this trial.

As a matter of fact I will. I'm probably the only person on this board who can prove he was on Comey's side when he made his first speech that claimed no prosecutor would go after Clinton. Who can prove he was on Comey's side when he reopened the Clinton case. And who can prove he still was on Comey's side when he acquitted her again. I would accept the verdict of this trial, I will accept the verdicts of all the trials that will follow, and yes I would accept it if Trump is cleared of any wrongdoing if that would be the conclusion of the Mueller probe. I would even accept if congress would ignore another conclusion for political gain. Accepting that, that is how the founding fathers set up their checks and balances. I would hope they would get punished at the ballot box for it, but I would accept it. My view and the importance of due process and law and order doesn't change depending on the situation.

You can not prove that you were or are on Comeys side, because he is a scared lush who has no side

What does that even mean?

It's Rosy - Don't expect much more than indecipherable gibberish

 

[iceberg]

Mueller investigation is a crock of shit. Will result in same if charges are brought. Bunch of Keystone Cops amateur hour that can’t get over fact that Hillary lost in 2016. Donald J. Trump is doing a great job as President and you socialist turds will be taught another lesson in 2018 mid-terms. Public is sick of liberal media and campus professoriate trying to tell them how to think and what opinions they should have.
Manafort prosecutors, Judge Ellis engage in 10-minute courtroom spat

I love these kinds of post. You're arguing that a case should be thrown out, not because of the accused not being guilty. Not because of a lack of evidence. Not even because the judge is fundamentally disagreeing with the evidence. No you are claiming that when a judge challenges the way the prosecution is presenting its case in any form, charges should be dropped.

No it needs to be thrown out because the charges lack merit..and the prosecution isn't trying to prove the charges, but instead are just flinging shit.

“I don’t know if they are bad or good. And I don’t care,” Ellis argued, reiterating his previous claim that the prosecution seemed to be focusing not on the actual charges but on what he considered “political contributions.”

"Ellis again compared the Ukrainians in question to American billionaires and “Mr. Koch and Mr. Soros” as political contributors.

“I don’t know why you keep bringing (up) these people,” Andres said, referring to the Ukrainians. “These people are not like any Americans. These people are oligarchs and that means they control a segment of the economy based on the governments allowing them to do that.”’

“These are not really political contributions,” he continued. “They are self-serving payments with respect to what oligarchs do.”

“That makes it even clearer to me that it doesn’t have anything to do with the allegations in this case,” Ellis responded. “It throws dirt on these people. They may deserve it. I don’t know - and I don’t care.”

Manafort prosecutors, Judge Ellis engage in 10-minute courtroom spat

Clearly, you've not looked at the MOUNTAIN of evidence. You simply don't care because Crooked Paul is one of your ilk.

if there's a mountain of evidence and this so clear to even us commoners, how come meuller is having a hard time in court with it?

if paul is guilty - take him in the same way you would anyone you don't know who faces this daily. but google "obama appointments tax evasion" and see how many tax cheats he put into public offices on his staff.

didn't see you and your "ilk" get upset about that.

 

[DrLove]

Please back up the assertion that the prosecution's case in the Manafort trial is "bullshit." What do you know about him and Gates and their foreign bank accounts? Are you an insider?

The point about all of this is Manafort is being prosecuted simply because he worked for Trump for a few days.

A few days? He was Trump's fucking CAMPAIGN CHAIRMAN for FIVE MONTHS.
Jesus - some of you are beginning to lie as bad as your Orange Overlord

 

[DrLove]

Mueller investigation is a crock of shit. Will result in same if charges are brought. Bunch of Keystone Cops amateur hour that can’t get over fact that Hillary lost in 2016. Donald J. Trump is doing a great job as President and you socialist turds will be taught another lesson in 2018 mid-terms. Public is sick of liberal media and campus professoriate trying to tell them how to think and what opinions they should have.
Manafort prosecutors, Judge Ellis engage in 10-minute courtroom spat

I love these kinds of post. You're arguing that a case should be thrown out, not because of the accused not being guilty. Not because of a lack of evidence. Not even because the judge is fundamentally disagreeing with the evidence. No you are claiming that when a judge challenges the way the prosecution is presenting its case in any form, charges should be dropped.

No it needs to be thrown out because the charges lack merit..and the prosecution isn't trying to prove the charges, but instead are just flinging shit.

“I don’t know if they are bad or good. And I don’t care,” Ellis argued, reiterating his previous claim that the prosecution seemed to be focusing not on the actual charges but on what he considered “political contributions.”

"Ellis again compared the Ukrainians in question to American billionaires and “Mr. Koch and Mr. Soros” as political contributors.

“I don’t know why you keep bringing (up) these people,” Andres said, referring to the Ukrainians. “These people are not like any Americans. These people are oligarchs and that means they control a segment of the economy based on the governments allowing them to do that.”’

“These are not really political contributions,” he continued. “They are self-serving payments with respect to what oligarchs do.”

“That makes it even clearer to me that it doesn’t have anything to do with the allegations in this case,” Ellis responded. “It throws dirt on these people. They may deserve it. I don’t know - and I don’t care.”

Manafort prosecutors, Judge Ellis engage in 10-minute courtroom spat

Clearly, you've not looked at the MOUNTAIN of evidence. You simply don't care because Crooked Paul is one of your ilk.

if there's a mountain of evidence and this so clear to even us commoners, how come meuller is having a hard time in court with it?

if paul is guilty - take him in the same way you would anyone you don't know who faces this daily. but google "obama appointments tax evasion" and see how many tax cheats he put into public offices on his staff.

didn't see you and your "ilk" get upset about that.

Mueller is not having a bit of trouble in court. This judge just happens to be a grumpy, senile old asshole who favors the defense and should have retired ten years ago.

 

[dannyboys]

Does it really matter, we already know you idiots haven't accepted the outcome of the Presidential election. Pretty sure you won't accept the outcome of this trial.

As a matter of fact I will. I'm probably the only person on this board who can prove he was on Comey's side when he made his first speech that claimed no prosecutor would go after Clinton. Who can prove he was on Comey's side when he reopened the Clinton case. And who can prove he still was on Comey's side when he acquitted her again. I would accept the verdict of this trial, I will accept the verdicts of all the trials that will follow, and yes I would accept it if Trump is cleared of any wrongdoing if that would be the conclusion of the Mueller probe. I would even accept if congress would ignore another conclusion for political gain. Accepting that, that is how the founding fathers set up their checks and balances. I would hope they would get punished at the ballot box for it, but I would accept it. My view and the importance of due process and law and order doesn't change depending on the situation.

But accept the outcome of the 2016 election....evidently not.

Hmms, because I don't agree with crappy arguments in defense of someone who broke the law I don't accept the outcome of the elections? I said that I would even accept Trump being president if Mueller would present evidence of criminal behavior on the part of Trump, if congress chooses to turn a blind eye. How much more acceptance do you want?

You are confused. See Trump is the president and you fully accept this, sure your flea brain is fighting this acceptance and as such you have Trump Derangement Syndrome...…………….

Now go feed the illegal immigrants under the bridge, and pick up their poop while you are there

Flea brain? Trump Derangement Syndrom? I just conceded Trumps legitimacy even if it would be proven he's a criminal. A man I despise both for his policies and for his person. Because I believe it's the responsibility off congress to oust a president. It's an act of integrity and respect towards the constitution and Democracy so far removed from your capability to understand that you don't even see it. Let alone acknowledge it. You know what? Call me some more names and see it it does anything beyond highlighting your own surrender of reason on the altar of blind partisanship.

You may get more respect on this forum if you would bother to correct your spelling mistakes.
Maybe you don't know any better.

 

[iceberg]

Mueller investigation is a crock of shit. Will result in same if charges are brought. Bunch of Keystone Cops amateur hour that can’t get over fact that Hillary lost in 2016. Donald J. Trump is doing a great job as President and you socialist turds will be taught another lesson in 2018 mid-terms. Public is sick of liberal media and campus professoriate trying to tell them how to think and what opinions they should have.
Manafort prosecutors, Judge Ellis engage in 10-minute courtroom spat

I love these kinds of post. You're arguing that a case should be thrown out, not because of the accused not being guilty. Not because of a lack of evidence. Not even because the judge is fundamentally disagreeing with the evidence. No you are claiming that when a judge challenges the way the prosecution is presenting its case in any form, charges should be dropped.

No it needs to be thrown out because the charges lack merit..and the prosecution isn't trying to prove the charges, but instead are just flinging shit.

“I don’t know if they are bad or good. And I don’t care,” Ellis argued, reiterating his previous claim that the prosecution seemed to be focusing not on the actual charges but on what he considered “political contributions.”

"Ellis again compared the Ukrainians in question to American billionaires and “Mr. Koch and Mr. Soros” as political contributors.

“I don’t know why you keep bringing (up) these people,” Andres said, referring to the Ukrainians. “These people are not like any Americans. These people are oligarchs and that means they control a segment of the economy based on the governments allowing them to do that.”’

“These are not really political contributions,” he continued. “They are self-serving payments with respect to what oligarchs do.”

“That makes it even clearer to me that it doesn’t have anything to do with the allegations in this case,” Ellis responded. “It throws dirt on these people. They may deserve it. I don’t know - and I don’t care.”

Manafort prosecutors, Judge Ellis engage in 10-minute courtroom spat

Clearly, you've not looked at the MOUNTAIN of evidence. You simply don't care because Crooked Paul is one of your ilk.

if there's a mountain of evidence and this so clear to even us commoners, how come meuller is having a hard time in court with it?

if paul is guilty - take him in the same way you would anyone you don't know who faces this daily. but google "obama appointments tax evasion" and see how many tax cheats he put into public offices on his staff.

didn't see you and your "ilk" get upset about that.

Mueller is not having a bit of trouble in court. This judge just happens to be a grumpy, senile old asshole who favors the defense and should have retired ten years ago.

typical liberal response - blame the judge. the left is never accountable for their actions it's always someone else holding them down.

grow the fuck up dude.

 

[forkup]

As a matter of fact I will. I'm probably the only person on this board who can prove he was on Comey's side when he made his first speech that claimed no prosecutor would go after Clinton. Who can prove he was on Comey's side when he reopened the Clinton case. And who can prove he still was on Comey's side when he acquitted her again. I would accept the verdict of this trial, I will accept the verdicts of all the trials that will follow, and yes I would accept it if Trump is cleared of any wrongdoing if that would be the conclusion of the Mueller probe. I would even accept if congress would ignore another conclusion for political gain. Accepting that, that is how the founding fathers set up their checks and balances. I would hope they would get punished at the ballot box for it, but I would accept it. My view and the importance of due process and law and order doesn't change depending on the situation.

But accept the outcome of the 2016 election....evidently not.

Hmms, because I don't agree with crappy arguments in defense of someone who broke the law I don't accept the outcome of the elections? I said that I would even accept Trump being president if Mueller would present evidence of criminal behavior on the part of Trump, if congress chooses to turn a blind eye. How much more acceptance do you want?

You are confused. See Trump is the president and you fully accept this, sure your flea brain is fighting this acceptance and as such you have Trump Derangement Syndrome...…………….

Now go feed the illegal immigrants under the bridge, and pick up their poop while you are there

Flea brain? Trump Derangement Syndrom? I just conceded Trumps legitimacy even if it would be proven he's a criminal. A man I despise both for his policies and for his person. Because I believe it's the responsibility off congress to oust a president. It's an act of integrity and respect towards the constitution and Democracy so far removed from your capability to understand that you don't even see it. Let alone acknowledge it. You know what? Call me some more names and see it it does anything beyond highlighting your own surrender of reason on the altar of blind partisanship.

You may get more respect on this forum if you would bother to correct your spelling mistakes.
Maybe you don't know any better.

Whatever would I do without the respect of people like you and Rosy? If integrity and honesty can't convince a person, then I'm afraid flawless spelling won't either. As to what I know. I know that a person who feels he has to comment on spelling, without even attempting to engage the premise of what a person says, usually doesn't have anything interesting to say. Thanks for pointing out my flaws for me though , I have many more.

 

[Thinker101]

Prosecution needs to move beyond political grandstanding.

Not an answer to the question I asked now is it? You claim the prosecution is incompetent. You claim the case is weak. You claim the judge isn't accepting the prosecutions case. You claim the case is politically motivated. Will you accept a guilty verdict from a jury of his peers, if all these things are true?

Does it really matter, we already know you idiots haven't accepted the outcome of the Presidential election. Pretty sure you won't accept the outcome of this trial.

As a matter of fact I will. I'm probably the only person on this board who can prove he was on Comey's side when he made his first speech that claimed no prosecutor would go after Clinton. Who can prove he was on Comey's side when he reopened the Clinton case. And who can prove he still was on Comey's side when he acquitted her again. I would accept the verdict of this trial, I will accept the verdicts of all the trials that will follow, and yes I would accept it if Trump is cleared of any wrongdoing if that would be the conclusion of the Mueller probe. I would even accept if congress would ignore another conclusion for political gain. Accepting that, that is how the founding fathers set up their checks and balances. I would hope they would get punished at the ballot box for it, but I would accept it. My view and the importance of due process and law and order doesn't change depending on the situation.

But accept the outcome of the 2016 election....evidently not.

Hmms, because I don't agree with crappy arguments in defense of someone who broke the law I don't accept the outcome of the elections? I said that I would even accept Trump being president if Mueller would present evidence of criminal behavior on the part of Trump, if congress chooses to turn a blind eye. How much more acceptance do you want?

Kinda missed the point there champ. You originally asked whether we would accept a guilty verdict if one was rendered. Which is the same BS strategy candidates were asked during the presidential election. Then you guys were so up in arms because Trump wouldn't agree, while Clinton did agree. Here it's been about two fricken years and neither the left or Clinton has accepted their loss. WTF.

 

[DrLove]

typical liberal response - blame the judge. the left is never accountable for their actions it's always someone else holding them down.

grow the fuck up dude.

You grow the fuck up. I have now seen minimally 5 expert former federal prosecutors and a retired judge who have suggested his behavior is entirely inappropriate.

Manafort Judge Sass Watch: He May Have Made a Prosecutor Cry
Judge Ellis behavior in Manafort trial risks helping the defense

 

[Thinker101]

But accept the outcome of the 2016 election....evidently not.

Hmms, because I don't agree with crappy arguments in defense of someone who broke the law I don't accept the outcome of the elections? I said that I would even accept Trump being president if Mueller would present evidence of criminal behavior on the part of Trump, if congress chooses to turn a blind eye. How much more acceptance do you want?

You are confused. See Trump is the president and you fully accept this, sure your flea brain is fighting this acceptance and as such you have Trump Derangement Syndrome...…………….

Now go feed the illegal immigrants under the bridge, and pick up their poop while you are there

Flea brain? Trump Derangement Syndrom? I just conceded Trumps legitimacy even if it would be proven he's a criminal. A man I despise both for his policies and for his person. Because I believe it's the responsibility off congress to oust a president. It's an act of integrity and respect towards the constitution and Democracy so far removed from your capability to understand that you don't even see it. Let alone acknowledge it. You know what? Call me some more names and see it it does anything beyond highlighting your own surrender of reason on the altar of blind partisanship.

You may get more respect on this forum if you would bother to correct your spelling mistakes.
Maybe you don't know any better.

Whatever would I do without the respect of people like you and Rosy? If integrity and honesty can't convince a person, then I'm afraid flawless spelling won't either. As to what I know. I know that a person who feels he has to comment on spelling, without even attempting to engage the premise of what a person says, usually doesn't have anything interesting to say. Thanks for pointing out my flaws for me though , I have many more.

Yup, and I'm surprised you even know how to spell integrity and honesty...now if those on the left could display some we'd all be in a better place.

 

[koshergrl]

 

[CowboyTed]

Please back up the assertion that the prosecution's case in the Manafort trial is "bullshit." What do you know about him and Gates and their foreign bank accounts? Are you an insider?

The point about all of this is Manafort is being prosecuted simply because he worked for Trump for a few days.
That is the only reason they broke into his home.
How many of us would stand up under such scrutiny.
The press and the liars in the Democrat party will repeatedly say that Manafort worked for Trump.
Nothing else matters.
The Clintons had to amend their last tax return because of undeclared income and were allowed to. Manafort wasn't offered that option.

More mental masterbation for the trumpets....

Manafort wilfully evaded tax.... the proof is there....

Your problem is that you know Trump is guilty and that Manafort might have proof. Why didn't vote for a guy who isn't a criminal...

Because you can't resist a guy who jerks off your bigoted views...

Now when answering this don't forget "BUT BUT HILLARY/OBAMA.........

 

[Rosy]

But accept the outcome of the 2016 election....evidently not.

Hmms, because I don't agree with crappy arguments in defense of someone who broke the law I don't accept the outcome of the elections? I said that I would even accept Trump being president if Mueller would present evidence of criminal behavior on the part of Trump, if congress chooses to turn a blind eye. How much more acceptance do you want?

You are confused. See Trump is the president and you fully accept this, sure your flea brain is fighting this acceptance and as such you have Trump Derangement Syndrome...…………….

Now go feed the illegal immigrants under the bridge, and pick up their poop while you are there

Flea brain? Trump Derangement Syndrom? I just conceded Trumps legitimacy even if it would be proven he's a criminal. A man I despise both for his policies and for his person. Because I believe it's the responsibility off congress to oust a president. It's an act of integrity and respect towards the constitution and Democracy so far removed from your capability to understand that you don't even see it. Let alone acknowledge it. You know what? Call me some more names and see it it does anything beyond highlighting your own surrender of reason on the altar of blind partisanship.

You may get more respect on this forum if you would bother to correct your spelling mistakes.
Maybe you don't know any better.

Whatever would I do without the respect of people like you and Rosy? If integrity and honesty can't convince a person, then I'm afraid flawless spelling won't either. As to what I know. I know that a person who feels he has to comment on spelling, without even attempting to engage the premise of what a person says, usually doesn't have anything interesting to say. Thanks for pointing out my flaws for me though , I have many more.

If you want respect get off your knees and salute the flag, and stop defending the fools who kneel, also remember to call the president sir

 

[forkup]

Hmms, because I don't agree with crappy arguments in defense of someone who broke the law I don't accept the outcome of the elections? I said that I would even accept Trump being president if Mueller would present evidence of criminal behavior on the part of Trump, if congress chooses to turn a blind eye. How much more acceptance do you want?

You are confused. See Trump is the president and you fully accept this, sure your flea brain is fighting this acceptance and as such you have Trump Derangement Syndrome...…………….

Now go feed the illegal immigrants under the bridge, and pick up their poop while you are there

Flea brain? Trump Derangement Syndrom? I just conceded Trumps legitimacy even if it would be proven he's a criminal. A man I despise both for his policies and for his person. Because I believe it's the responsibility off congress to oust a president. It's an act of integrity and respect towards the constitution and Democracy so far removed from your capability to understand that you don't even see it. Let alone acknowledge it. You know what? Call me some more names and see it it does anything beyond highlighting your own surrender of reason on the altar of blind partisanship.

You may get more respect on this forum if you would bother to correct your spelling mistakes.
Maybe you don't know any better.

Whatever would I do without the respect of people like you and Rosy? If integrity and honesty can't convince a person, then I'm afraid flawless spelling won't either. As to what I know. I know that a person who feels he has to comment on spelling, without even attempting to engage the premise of what a person says, usually doesn't have anything interesting to say. Thanks for pointing out my flaws for me though , I have many more.

If you want respect get off your knees and salute the flag, and stop defending the fools who kneel, also remember to call the president sir

Rosy, I can say in absolute honesty that I don't give a flying fuck whether or not you respect me. If I would gain the respect of a person who is as dishonest, blatantly partisan, not to mention apparently dumb enough to not have a consistent argument for 5 hours as you, I would probably not be worthy of respect. Rebutting straw man arguments, deflections and outright dishonesty is not a productive use of my time. So we are done.

 

[Rosy]

You are confused. See Trump is the president and you fully accept this, sure your flea brain is fighting this acceptance and as such you have Trump Derangement Syndrome...…………….

Now go feed the illegal immigrants under the bridge, and pick up their poop while you are there

Flea brain? Trump Derangement Syndrom? I just conceded Trumps legitimacy even if it would be proven he's a criminal. A man I despise both for his policies and for his person. Because I believe it's the responsibility off congress to oust a president. It's an act of integrity and respect towards the constitution and Democracy so far removed from your capability to understand that you don't even see it. Let alone acknowledge it. You know what? Call me some more names and see it it does anything beyond highlighting your own surrender of reason on the altar of blind partisanship.

You may get more respect on this forum if you would bother to correct your spelling mistakes.
Maybe you don't know any better.

Whatever would I do without the respect of people like you and Rosy? If integrity and honesty can't convince a person, then I'm afraid flawless spelling won't either. As to what I know. I know that a person who feels he has to comment on spelling, without even attempting to engage the premise of what a person says, usually doesn't have anything interesting to say. Thanks for pointing out my flaws for me though , I have many more.

If you want respect get off your knees and salute the flag, and stop defending the fools who kneel, also remember to call the president sir

Rosy, I can say in absolute honesty that I don't give a flying fuck whether or not you respect me. If I would gain the respect of a person who is as dishonest, blatantly partisan, not to mention apparently dumb enough to not have a consistent argument for 5 hours as you, I would probably not be worthy of respect. Rebutting straw man arguments, deflections and outright dishonesty is not a productive use of my time. So we are done.

Yet keep on arguing u go. Sad that you do not respect yourself.....

But thanks for your time, I enjoyed laughing

 

[Reasonable]

Mueller investigation is a crock of shit. Will result in same if charges are brought. Bunch of Keystone Cops amateur hour that can’t get over fact that Hillary lost in 2016. Donald J. Trump is doing a great job as President and you socialist turds will be taught another lesson in 2018 mid-terms. Public is sick of liberal media and campus professoriate trying to tell them how to think and what opinions they should have.
Manafort prosecutors, Judge Ellis engage in 10-minute courtroom spat

Thanks for admitting you have no respect for the law just like your POS president.

 

[Reasonable]

Manaforte made money from being a foreign lobbyist and didn’t report the income and didn’t pay taxes on it.

Mueller’s team was hoping to paint the picture that Manaforte is a bad person who hung out with bad Russian people, Manaforte was a Trump advisor. Therefore Trump is a bad person who hung out with bad Russian people.

It should be a pretty fucking easy case to prosecute. Show the trail of money that leads to Manaforte, prove he knowingly obscured the source of the money and knowingly avoided paying taxes.

This all happened in like 2005.

Nothing at all to do with Trump. Why the media is jerking off all over themselves about this case is beyond me...I guess they know Mueller is trying to really make it about Trump.

Too bad for the Mueller team, the judge knows it’s a dog and pony show.

So Trump’s campaign manager didn’t have anything to do with Trump?
Deplorable reasoning.
Did fat boi do a terrible job of vetting him or did he hire him because of his ties to Russia?
What a coincidence Manafort laundered his money in the same bank Putin and probably Trump has.
Is it also a coincidence that fat boi made Wilbur Ross , who worked at that Bank of Cyprus, his Commerce Secretary?
All roads lead to Russia with this administration.
No wonder you assholes want to pull the plug on this investigation.

 

[Reasonable]

Trump( feeling the heat) “ Manafort only worked for me for 45 days. “

Fact: Manafort worked as his campaign manager for 3 months.

You know when the Liar in chief is lying, he’s trying to cover something up.

 

[koshergrl]

You are confused. See Trump is the president and you fully accept this, sure your flea brain is fighting this acceptance and as such you have Trump Derangement Syndrome...…………….

Now go feed the illegal immigrants under the bridge, and pick up their poop while you are there

Flea brain? Trump Derangement Syndrom? I just conceded Trumps legitimacy even if it would be proven he's a criminal. A man I despise both for his policies and for his person. Because I believe it's the responsibility off congress to oust a president. It's an act of integrity and respect towards the constitution and Democracy so far removed from your capability to understand that you don't even see it. Let alone acknowledge it. You know what? Call me some more names and see it it does anything beyond highlighting your own surrender of reason on the altar of blind partisanship.

You may get more respect on this forum if you would bother to correct your spelling mistakes.
Maybe you don't know any better.

Whatever would I do without the respect of people like you and Rosy? If integrity and honesty can't convince a person, then I'm afraid flawless spelling won't either. As to what I know. I know that a person who feels he has to comment on spelling, without even attempting to engage the premise of what a person says, usually doesn't have anything interesting to say. Thanks for pointing out my flaws for me though , I have many more.

If you want respect get off your knees and salute the flag, and stop defending the fools who kneel, also remember to call the president sir

Rosy, I can say in absolute honesty that I don't give a flying fuck whether or not you respect me. If I would gain the respect of a person who is as dishonest, blatantly partisan, not to mention apparently dumb enough to not have a consistent argument for 5 hours as you, I would probably not be worthy of respect. Rebutting straw man arguments, deflections and outright dishonesty is not a productive use of my time. So we are done.

You're right, you aren't worthy of respect.