Judge Chutkan swiftly smacks down six motions a day after setting March 2024 trial date

They use computers and word search. It's pretty routine.
That many documents? Bullshit, motherfucker!

Even if there is some kinda money-counter-ish document scanner, (which I doubt there is)

it'll take a team several years just to scan them all.

And the searching will lag behind that.
 
Easy peasy..

The Atlantic saying so is not fact, retard.

And people can't even read the whole and even relevant parts of the article without subscribing.

FAIL!

Okay, I can get around that, but it's still a retardedly slanted and bullshit article.

We learned about things like this when I was in 7th grade. In some places maybe a little later.

But kids used to be taught how to spot bullshit like this.

Would you like me to break down the fallacies and slanting in this article? Because I damn sure can. :rolleyes-41:

It can be taken apart piece by piece.

 
Last edited:
That many documents? Bullshit, motherfucker!

Even if there is some kinda money-counter-ish document scanner, (which I doubt there is)

Actually Duke, ya it is pretty routine.

I'm the HR Information Systems Administrator for a large employer. We use online personnel records that are scanned into the system, OCR'ed*, categorized by Meta Data**, and fully searchable. As of last count we had over 5,000,000 pages for our 20,000 employees. The company we use is linked above.

**Optical Character Recognition that converts a scanned image into text for searching.
*** Meta Data is the identifying information of a document such as a Document ID, Source, Date Created, Tags, etc. The Meta Data is the database fields about a document used to track and categorize. The document itself is then either stored as a link or stored in the record in a BLOB (Binary Large Object) field sometimes called a container field since it contains a individual file (Excel, Word Document, PDF, Image, etc.)

it'll take a team several years just to scan them all.

And the searching will lag behind that.

The prosecution isn't turning over boxes of paper that have to be scanned. The government has already scanned, indexed, OCR'd, and tagged the Meta Data for all the documents. They are already electronic and stored. Counsel for the defense will be given access to the documents already created. No new scanning involved.

WW
 
Last edited:

Actually Duke, ya it is pretty routine.

I'm the HR Information Systems Administrator for a large employer. We use online personnel records that are scanned into the system, OCR'ed*, categorized by Meta Data**, and fully searchable. As of last count we had over 5,000,000 pages for our 20,000 employees. The company we use is linked above.

**Optical Character Recognition that converts a scanned image into text for searching.
*** Meta Data is the identifying information of a document such as a Document ID, Source, Date Created, Tags, etc.



The prosecution isn't turning over boxes of paper that have to be scanned. The government has already scanned, indexed, OCR'd, and tagged the Meta Data for all the documents. They are already electronic and stored. Counsel for the defense will be given access to the documents already created. No new scanning involved.

WW
They will tell the biggest of lies.
 

Actually Duke, ya it is pretty routine.

I'm the HR Information Systems Administrator for a large employer. We use online personnel records that are scanned into the system, OCR'ed*, categorized by Meta Data**, and fully searchable. As of last count we had over 5,000,000 pages for our 20,000 employees. The company we use is linked above.

**Optical Character Recognition that converts a scanned image into text for searching.
*** Meta Data is the identifying information of a document such as a Document ID, Source, Date Created, Tags, etc. The Meta Data is the database fields about a document used to track and categorize. The document itself is then either stored as a link or stored in the record in a BLOB (Binary Large Object) field sometimes called a container field since it contains a individual file (Excel, Word Document, PDF, Image, etc.)



The prosecution isn't turning over boxes of paper that have to be scanned. The government has already scanned, indexed, OCR'd, and tagged the Meta Data for all the documents. They are already electronic and stored. Counsel for the defense will be given access to the documents already created. No new scanning involved.

WW

Duke,

I notice you disagreed with the above.

What is your disagreement with?

The fact that online document storage exists? (I linked to our supplier.)

The fact that the prosecution has already made the conversion of paper to electronic? (I can link to the court filings where this has already been stated for the court if that will help.)

Or,

You just disagree on principle in defense of your incorrect previous post?

WW
 
When there's 2 or more identifying him as the one, yes. Not because of the color of skin, but because he did it.

Something tells me there haven't been 12 million+ documents to go through for discovery ever before in America for any case ever.

Idjit.

And how many witnesses saw Trump do what?

As I said. Double standard abounds when we are dealing with the RW.

We have recordings of Trump trying to intimidate the Governor and Secretary of State into overturning the election in Georgia. We have the false electors, more than half of whom have taken immunity deals to offer testimony. We have lots of witnesses, and the question remaining is not if Trump did it. But if those actions are illegal.

But you guys don’t care if he did it. You don’t care if it was illegal. You want to get revenge on the Left for perceived slights.
 
And how many witnesses saw Trump do what?

As I said. Double standard abounds when we are dealing with the RW.

We have recordings of Trump trying to intimidate the Governor and Secretary of State into overturning the election in Georgia. We have the false electors, more than half of whom have taken immunity deals to offer testimony. We have lots of witnesses, and the question remaining is not if Trump did it. But if those actions are illegal.

But you guys don’t care if he did it. You don’t care if it was illegal. You want to get revenge on the Left for perceived slights.
Trump wasn't trying to do anything illegal, any more than what Gore did in 2000 in Florida and less so than the fat one in Georgia did. (Stacey Abrams)
 
The Atlantic saying so is not fact, retard.

And people can't even read the whole and even relevant parts of the article without subscribing.

FAIL!

Okay, I can get around that, but it's still a retardedly slanted and bullshit article.

We learned about things like this when I was in 7th grade. In some places maybe a little later.

But kids used to be taught how to spot bullshit like this.

Would you like me to break down the fallacies and slanting in this article? Because I damn sure can. :rolleyes-41:

It can be taken apart piece by piece.

The Atlantic has an excellent reputation for the last 100 years.
 

Actually Duke, ya it is pretty routine.

I'm the HR Information Systems Administrator for a large employer. We use online personnel records that are scanned into the system, OCR'ed*, categorized by Meta Data**, and fully searchable. As of last count we had over 5,000,000 pages for our 20,000 employees. The company we use is linked above.

**Optical Character Recognition that converts a scanned image into text for searching.
*** Meta Data is the identifying information of a document such as a Document ID, Source, Date Created, Tags, etc. The Meta Data is the database fields about a document used to track and categorize. The document itself is then either stored as a link or stored in the record in a BLOB (Binary Large Object) field sometimes called a container field since it contains a individual file (Excel, Word Document, PDF, Image, etc.)



The prosecution isn't turning over boxes of paper that have to be scanned. The government has already scanned, indexed, OCR'd, and tagged the Meta Data for all the documents. They are already electronic and stored. Counsel for the defense will be given access to the documents already created. No new scanning involved.

WW
My friend retired from the Secret Service now works for a big law firm. He said the same thing you've said. They scan the documents these days. No more hauling boxes.
 
Duke,

I notice you disagreed with the above.

What is your disagreement with?

The fact that online document storage exists? (I linked to our supplier.)

The fact that the prosecution has already made the conversion of paper to electronic? (I can link to the court filings where this has already been stated for the court if that will help.)

Or,

You just disagree on principle in defense of your incorrect previous post?

WW

The documents have already been scanned.
11.5 million documents already scanned by the prosecution. Yeah, right! :auiqs.jpg:

And they are all relevant to the prosecution too, huh?

I'm no lawyer, but I do have a good bullshit detector. :rolleyes-41:

That's a bunch of bullshit.
 
The Atlantic saying so is not fact, retard.

And people can't even read the whole and even relevant parts of the article without subscribing.

FAIL!

Okay, I can get around that, but it's still a retardedly slanted and bullshit article.

We learned about things like this when I was in 7th grade. In some places maybe a little later.

But kids used to be taught how to spot bullshit like this.

Would you like me to break down the fallacies and slanting in this article? Because I damn sure can. :rolleyes-41:

It can be taken apart piece by piece.


You're just behind the times about 30 years.
 
No bias there eh? impartial judge eh? Assumed innocent until proven guilty eh? You know this is a Kangaroo 3rd rate banana republic court here. Every defendant is allowed their due process and a chance to defend themselves .... this is one man against an entire government who goes after his attorneys.... gives his legal team a million documents they have to page through .... and then piles on indictment after indictment... its all about destroying a person. Hasn't changed since 2016.
This is the 2020s....there are no paper pages to sort through to learn new things.... Most are things trump already knows about, because he did them or his minions did them, with him knowing so.... :rolleyes:

It's depositions and evidence from the 1/6 committee which was made public 8 months ago, with a recommendation for prosecution. Trump team began going thru it back then...

And most importantly, we live in the DIGITAL AGE, with search engines and sorting abilities, and not a million pages of paper to go through. In minutes instead of days, to search and sort what they need.

And, Smith did the defense a big favor, he sorted out all of the evidence that he is going to use in the trial, and gave it to the Trump team....so they have a heads up to search and build their defense....

6 months to prepare seems normal, for a less complicated case like this one.
 
Trump wasn't trying to do anything illegal, any more than what Gore did in 2000 in Florida and less so than the fat one in Georgia did. (Stacey Abrams)

This is actually hilarious. He wasn’t “trying” to do anything illegal. That means you know he did do something illegal. That is proven by the next part where you point at others and say they are just as guilty.

That idiotic technique is used about every day in traffic court. I was speeding, but so was everyone else. It isn’t fair that I got a ticket.

The very first part of that is an admission of guilt.

There is a lot of difference. First Gore didn’t appoint alternate or “fake” electors. And after he lost the court cases gave up his dream of being President.

Stacey Abrams, who we in Georgia rejected Twice, ranted and raved. Filed lawsuits. But didn’t demand a special session of the legislature to declare her the winner. She didn’t demand the Secretary of State find votes did she?

Your posts prove you know he did it. You know it’s illegal. And still you defend him. Like those family members you mock. He didn’t do nuffin? Sound familiar?
 
This is the 2020s....there are no paper pages to sort through to learn new things.... Most are things trump already knows about, because he did them or his minions did them, with him knowing so.... :rolleyes:

It's depositions and evidence from the 1/6 committee which was made public 8 months ago, with a recommendation for prosecution. Trump team began going thru it back then...

And most importantly, we live in the DIGITAL AGE, with search engines and sorting abilities, and not a million pages of paper to go through. In minutes instead of days, to search and sort what they need.

And, Smith did the defense a big favor, he sorted out all of the evidence that he is going to use in the trial, and gave it to the Trump team....so they have a heads up to search and build their defense....

6 months to prepare seems normal, for a less complicated case like this one.
Yeah, for the biggest trial in the history of the US.

I don't think so. :nono:
 

Forum List

Back
Top