Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yet you have never produced one quote where Trump admitted to several criminal acts.
Has anyone bothered to explain the fine line differenceMovies by stupid people, for stupid people.
Okey Dokey ... Jackass boy.He never will because he is LYING constantly about it.
All the fool has to do is post the freaking QUOTE then he can crow about it but he resists requests over and over because it isn't there for him to quote it.
That is why he will post 30 times avoid quoting it because he is a basket case.
Try it with these.....they may help....all kinds of things he sees come into focus:I read it all but can't find them, but you keep avoiding quoting for several people in the thread thus you are full of shit!
Okey Dokey ... Jackass boy.
Then cite for us One Trump Misdemeanor.
Surely that would be much easier.Most americans can
attest to having one Misdemeanor.
Should be a piece of cake ... Moron boy.
OMG.....He overstated the value of his penthouse apartment....for tax purposes no less.
BTW, it's not against the law to overstate your net worth when you're talking about paying taxes.....because it only means you'll end up paying more taxes.
Don't you people have any brains God Dammit?????
Bullshit. Overstating the value of your property for insurance purposes isn't a crime. I used to have a state license.FDIC Law, Regulations, Related Acts
§ 1341. Frauds and swindles.
Whoever, having devised or intending to devise any scheme or artifice to defraud, or for obtaining money or property by means of false or fraudulent pretenses, representations, or promises, or to sell, dispose of, loan, exchange, alter, give away, distribute, supply, or furnish or procure for unlawful use any counterfeit or spurious coin, obligation, security, or other article, or anything represented to be or intimated or held out to be such counterfeit or spurious article, for the purpose of executing such scheme or artifice or attempting so to do, places in any post office or authorized depository for mail matter, any matter or thing whatever to be sent or delivered by the Postal Service, or deposits or causes to be deposited any matter or thing whatever to be sent or delivered by any private or commercial interstate carrier, or takes or receives therefrom, any such matter or thing, or knowingly causes to be delivered by mail or such carrier according to the direction thereon, or at the place at which it is directed to be delivered by the person to whom it is addressed, any such matter or thing, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both. If the violation occurs in relation to, or involving any benefit authorized, transported, transmitted, transferred, disbursed, or paid in connection with, a presidentially declared major disaster or emergency (as those terms are defined in section 102 of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5122)), or affects a financial institution, such person shall be fined not more than $1,000,000 or imprisoned not more than 30 years, or both.
[Codified to 18 U.S.C. 1341]
FDIC Law, Regulations, Related Acts - Miscellaneous Statutes and Regulations
18 U.S. Code § 1344 - Bank fraud
Whoever knowingly executes, or attempts to execute, a scheme or artifice—
(1)
to defraud a financial institution; or
(2)
to obtain any of the moneys, funds, credits, assets, securities, or other property owned by, or under the custody or control of, a financial institution, by means of false or fraudulent pretenses, representations, or promises;
shall be fined not more than $1,000,000 or imprisoned not more than 30 years, or both.
(Added Pub. L. 98–473, title II, § 1108(a), Oct. 12, 1984, 98 Stat. 2147; amended Pub. L. 101–73, title IX, § 961(k), Aug. 9, 1989, 103 Stat. 500; Pub. L. 101–647, title XXV, § 2504(j), Nov. 29, 1990, 104 Stat. 4861.)
18 U.S. Code § 1344 - Bank fraud
Insurance fraud
Primary tabs
insurance fraud: an overview
Insurance fraud refers to any duplicitous act performed with the intent to obtain an improper payment from an insurer. The pervasiveness of insurance fraud drives up costs for all consumers and costs the insurance industry billions of dollars each year. One authority estimates that the annual value of insurance fraud approaches $80 billion. Detecting insurance fraud is difficult because of the surreptitious nature by which the criminal perpetrates the fraud.
Police and prosecutors typically refer to an insurance fraud scheme as either “hard fraud” or “soft fraud.” Hard fraud, the rarer of the two forms, occurs when a criminal deliberately brings about the destruction of property for the purpose of collecting on the insurance policy. Soft fraud, on the other hand, occurs when a policyholder exaggerates an otherwise legitimate claim or when an individual applies for an insurance policy and lies about certain conditions or circumstances to lower the policy’s premium.
One common form of insurance fraud occurs when the insurance policy amounts to a greater value than the value of the insured property. In this situation the policy-owner has the incentive to commit insurance fraud by destroying the property and making it look like an accident in order to collect. In 2006, authorities estimate that fraudsters swindled insurance companies out of $766 million in this manner.
Insurance fraud
Your claim is a lie. And you know it Farty. We all know it.Liar.
Trump had to personally admit to several crimes.
As anyone can see in the document for themselves.
Maybe you squealing little twats are starting to understand why people don't post links for you.
Bullshit. Overstating the value of your property for insurance purposes isn't a crime. I used to have a state license.
All values for insurance coverage are usually a rough estimate. If your property is worth $98,568.00 they will cover you for $100,000.00. They always ask you how much coverage do you want.
They never have a appraiser appraise the property unless it's during a sale or for tax purposes. If there is any disagreement of the value of the property it's up to the insurance company to decide how much the property is worth when a claim is made.
Normally insurance companies will ask you how much is the value of the property and they charge you accordingly.
The only time this will become a problem is if the property is worth significantly less and it is intentionally destroyed by the owner for the insurance. The insurance company will only cover the costs up to the value of the policy.....so if repair or replacement goes above what you insured it for you're SOL.
This is basically harassment by the communists in the NYC attorney's office.
www.cbsnews.com
Yeah....they always say that. It's a common leftist tactic.well, lenny - lookey here:
New York AG says her office has evidence Trump's company lied to tax officials and banks
UPDATED ON: JANUARY 19, 2022 / 6:54 PM / CBS/AP
New York AG says her office has evidence Trump's company lied to tax officials and banks
Letitia James' office says it has evidence the Trump Organization "used fraudulent or misleading asset valuations to obtain a host of economic benefits" — and wants him and Trump Jr. and Ivanka to testify about it.
oh dear, oh my:
Eric Trump invoked the Fifth Amendment 500 times, NY AG says
Updated: Jan. 19, 2022, 2:19 p.m. | Published: Jan. 19, 2022, 2:12 p.m.
Eric Trump, the son of former President Donald Trump, invoked the Fifth Amendment more than 500 times when interviewed by investigators, according to new documents from New York Attorney General Letitia James.
The NY AG’s office submitted a 160-page filing in court Tuesday saying investigators found “significant evidence” that The Trump Organization used “fraudulent or misleading” asset valuations to get favorable loans or reduce taxes. The company, founded by the former president, is accused of overstating the value of land donations made in New York and California to justify millions of dollars in tax deductions.
James’ office, which has already interviewed Eric Trump and the company’s longtime chief financial officer Allen Weisselberg, detailed its findings in a court motion in an effort to force Donald Trump, his daughter Ivanka Trump and his son Donald Trump Jr. to comply with subpoenas for their testimony.
The Washington Post reports the AG filings show Eric Trump invoked the Fifth Amendment right to self-incrimination more than 500 times when asked more than 500 questions during a six-hour interview on Oct. 5, 2020. Weisselberg, who was charged last year with tax fraud in a parallel criminal investigation, similarly invoked the Fifth more than 500 times during his interview on Sept. 24, 2020.
Eric Trump invoked the Fifth Amendment 500 times, NY AG says
Yeah....they always say that. It's a common leftist tactic.
They try the case in the headlines rather than in court.
I remember when Adam Schifface did the same shit about their Russian Collusion hoax.
What these lying fucks say really doesn't carry much weight in a court of law.uh-huh - is that why a judge said there's ' copious amounts of evidence '. leanord?
your failed deflection is duly noted.
What these lying fucks say really doesn't carry much weight in a court of law.
They keep hearing this from the judges that look at their cases, but they keep trying again and again.
The understanding I have is nobody has gotten to that point.lol ... you mean like the judges, some of them trump appointed - saying that there was no election fraud nor that it was stolen?
like that?
The understanding I have is nobody has gotten to that point.
The judges denied the case because nobody had official proof of election fraud.
The evidence is all over the place that it happened.
It's not the same as not having evidence.
The only reason those judges denied the petitions is because the Supreme Court refused to hear the case.
To my knowledge at present, no......that is the issue.it has gotten to that point 60 x.
60x because there was no, is no, & will never be produced.
fake news.
when donny's lawyers were asked point blank for evidence, they said no.
Trump Lawyer to Pennsylvania Judge: Nope, I’ve Got No Evidence of Voter Fraud
President Donald J. Trump has been aggressively pursuing voter fraud in the courts — but in Montgomery County, even his own lawyers admit there's no grand conspiracy afoot.
by VICTOR FIORILLO· 11/11/2020, 3:18 p.m.
Trump Lawyer to Pennsylvania Judge: Nope, I've Got No Evidence of Voter Fraud
yaaaaaaaaaaa........... that's the ticket!
To my knowledge at present, no......that is the issue.
He had to admit that until a proper audit of the vote is done....nobody could say in court they had evidence.
Up until now.....
Using GPS coordinates of all of the mules that stuffed ballots in boxes in several states they were able to prove who did what, when, and where.
But that only scratches the surface....because of the destruction of evidence that has been taking place in many states....they can't tell exactly how much evidence there was on the day after the election.
