WinterBorn
Diamond Member
- Moderator
- #621
I posted the relevant portion I responded to. Do you understand? Your purpose for bring race into it was what if not to tether the gay cause to racism?Oh don't be coy- quote my entire post
If there is any case at all- the first one will be the first one.
Loving v. Virginia was the first case regarding mixed race marriage the Supreme Court heard.
Zablocki v. Rehail was the first marriage case regarding the right to marry if someone owes child support.
The first case regarding same gender marriage to reach the Supreme Court, they let the ruling stand that it was unconstitutional.
Feel free to show how I claimed that homosexuality is a race- and why you didn't also decide that i meant that 'owing child support' is a race.
Since I raised two Supreme Court decisions regarding marriage- Loving and Zablocki- why do you decide that my post was about race, and ignore the second case- Zablocki?
I was responding to a stupid post that whined about the gay marriage case finally having the Constitutionality addressed-
So I pointed out two other Federal marriage decisions that the Supreme Court made that over-ruled State marriage laws because they were unconstitutional.
Yet you saw only race.
Because that was what the case was about? Do you understand far left drone?
Oh don't be coy- quote my entire post
If there is any case at all- the first one will be the first one.
Loving v. Virginia was the first case regarding mixed race marriage the Supreme Court heard.
Zablocki v. Rehail was the first marriage case regarding the right to marry if someone owes child support.
The first case regarding same gender marriage to reach the Supreme Court, they let the ruling stand that it was unconstitutional.
Feel free to show how I claimed that homosexuality is a race- and why you didn't also decide that i meant that 'owing child support' is a race.
So yes the far left drones believe being "gay" is a race..
Repeating the same lie does not make it any less a lie.