Procrustes Stretched
Dante's Manifesto
again,The long held tradition of lib loon”you read it wrong”
You are arguing politics. The justices and the judges argue the law.
next
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
again,The long held tradition of lib loon”you read it wrong”
AgreedThere’s nothing unusual about the timing of this decision.
there is
they never issue a ruling, while not in session.
The Court has never been asked to rule on something like this during an election season.
next
Oh! I forgot. You just troll with spam.Because no political party had ever been as corrupt as the current Democrat party.
I truthfully described the justice for what she factually is, a negress!Racist much?
JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR , JUSTICE KAGAN , and JUSTICE JACKSONI predict a 9-0 ruling or a 8-1 ruling with Sotomeyer dissenting.
Huh?I also believe it will be a 7-2 ruling at least.
Probably 9-0.... Didn't take them long so it's no to the petition.
This by the way has nothing to do with Trump. This is the supreme Court telling the state courts to put their dicks back in their pants and stay within their jurisdiction.
It's not hard for me to imagine that all the judges would agree on that issue no matter how much they may hate Trump.
Oh! I forgot. You just troll with spam.
The state ruling was a legal issue in the courts. Not a political one.
never mind
When was the last time a state took the unprecedented step to remove an eligible candidate from the ballot? The Colorado court forced this action. That’s what dictated the time table.The Court has never been asked to rule on something like this during an election season.
next
Bull-shit.Oh! I forgot. You just troll with spam.
The state ruling was a legal issue in the courts. Not a political one.
never mind
He doesn’t even try to disguise his racismRacist much?
Dopey. The Colorado ruling -- it's a legal thing.Nothing political. Try redaing it.It may have been presented to you as a legal issue , but it was purely political.
When was the last time a sitting president took the unprecedented step to keep his opponent's win from being certified?When was the last time a state took the unprecedented step to remove an eligible candidate from the ballot? The Colorado court forced this action. That’s what dictated the time table.
Sheesh.