Just read Wilson's testimony to the grand jury....WOW!

[Pop23]

Grand Jury Volume 5

Beginning on page 195. He was in a battle with Brown!

I read it earlier...I swear to God the guy makes George Zimmerman look sane!

Consider the source?

 

[Pop23]

Hardly, the Wilson even appeared without council[/QUOTE]

His council was the prosecution. It's kind of easy to see that.[/QUOTE]

Let's see the payment receipt.

You understand that it must exist for your statement to have merit. right?

 

[LoneLaugher]

Wait until the shooting of the 12 year old with a air soft pistol.

Oh.....that's a good kill. Every 12 year old with a toy gun deserves to be shot dead. Absolutely.

Really dumb ass sometimes you really need to shut the fuck up
WATCH Tamir Rice shooting video

I refuse to watch your preferred jerk-off material. You have probably watched

Is there some reason why USMB nutters do not want anyone with some chops to cross examine Wilson?

Is there ANYTHING that Wilson has said that doesn't seem right to you idiots? Anything at all? Or...are you prepared to believe every word that came out of his mouth.

Please note.....Wilson and his supervisor do not agree on something. Both testified for the GJ. Different answers to the same important question. Did you even know that?

Dumbass, that's not how a Grand Jury works.

The requirements to indict are so incredibly LOW, that there must have been almost no evidence to back an indictment.

Also understand that the jurors live in that town. They were taking their own lives in their hands by a no indictment judgement.

Holy crap, what part do you NOT understand

Pops....

You want to maintain our cordial relationship? I do.

The requirements are low.....normally. Normally...the DA is hell bent on bringing the case to trial. Normally....the defendant will plead the 5th. Normally, the prosecution only reveals as much as they feel will move the GJ to indict.

This case was hardly normal.

Easy as to why. The prosecutor knew that he would be persecuted for recommending an indictment so he stayed out of it and left it to the GJ to make a decision which ever was correct. If the prosecutor would have done it the way you are crying about you would then cry that he is biased because his father was killed by a black thug. He did the right thing.

^^^^BINGO^^^^

Great post

Nope. He never did anything like that before. Sorry. This was just not normal.

 

[LoneLaugher]

Hardly, the Wilson even appeared without council

His council was the prosecution. It's kind of easy to see that.[/QUOTE]

Let's see the payment receipt.

You understand that it must exist for your statement to have merit. right?[/QUOTE]

No. You are trying hard though.

 

[Pop23]

Wilson even appeared without council

No one is allowed counsel in a GJ.

Nor is he compelled to testify and answer jurors questions. All of which could be used against him if indicted.

 

[Pop23]

Hardly, the Wilson even appeared without council

His council was the prosecution. It's kind of easy to see that.

Let's see the payment receipt.

You understand that it must exist for your statement to have merit. right?[/QUOTE]

No. You are trying hard though.[/QUOTE]

You made the assertion. I simply ask you to provide the proof

 

[Derideo_Te]

Nor is he compelled to testify and answer jurors questions. All of which could be used against him if indicted.

Unless the prosecutor colluded with Wilson and needed his "testimony" to sway the GJ not to indict.

The legal profession is crying foul on what this prosecutor did.

 

[ScienceRocks]

Nor is he compelled to testify and answer jurors questions. All of which could be used against him if indicted.

Unless the prosecutor colluded with Wilson and needed his "testimony" to sway the GJ not to indict.

The legal profession is crying foul on what this prosecutor did.

Constitutionally, Wilson is cleared as another trial would be double japitety. Of course, I don't expect you criminal supporters to accept such.

 

[Pop23]

Nor is he compelled to testify and answer jurors questions. All of which could be used against him if indicted.

Unless the prosecutor colluded with Wilson and needed his "testimony" to sway the GJ not to indict.

The legal profession is crying foul on what this prosecutor did.

And thus this thread belongs in the conspiracy section.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

He would never have gotten away with that testimony in a regular trial.

The forensic evidence contradicts his testimony. According to Wilson he said that Brown was trying to hit him after the shot him in the hand. There should also have been a blood trail from the vehicle to the body. Wilson even said that Brown was holding his hand against his stomach (probably trying to stem the bleeding). Wilson made out that he thought that Brown was going for a gun.

The fact that there was no cross examination is criminal in my opinion.

The facts don't back up your opinion, they back up Wilsons account. Another libtard We don't believe the truth thread. Where is the mod that shuts them down?

The facts were never cross examined. There was no one offering an alternative to the prosecutors case. That isn't justice, that is a whitewash. GJ indictments are easy to obtain but the Ferguson Prosecutor was failed 5 out of 5 times to obtain a GJ indictment when a cop was involved.

Corrupting the justice system is a problem that needs to be addressed because next time it might be you who doesn't get your day in court.

So you say. They did the right thing, get over it.

Nope, justice was denied, not served.

Wrong, a Grand Jury was convened and it checked all the known testimony evidence and statements. 12 Jurors decided that the information available was not even so remotely connected to a need for trial they ruled no BILL.

 

[Derideo_Te]

Nor is he compelled to testify and answer jurors questions. All of which could be used against him if indicted.

Unless the prosecutor colluded with Wilson and needed his "testimony" to sway the GJ not to indict.

The legal profession is crying foul on what this prosecutor did.

Constitutionally, Wilson is cleared as another trial would be double japitety. Of course, I don't expect you criminal supporters to accept such.

Nonsense! A GJ is not a trial.

 

[Pop23]

Nor is he compelled to testify and answer jurors questions. All of which could be used against him if indicted.

Unless the prosecutor colluded with Wilson and needed his "testimony" to sway the GJ not to indict.

The legal profession is crying foul on what this prosecutor did.

I'll await the disbarment proceedings.

Lol , ain't gonna happen

 

[Derideo_Te]

Nor is he compelled to testify and answer jurors questions. All of which could be used against him if indicted.

Unless the prosecutor colluded with Wilson and needed his "testimony" to sway the GJ not to indict.

The legal profession is crying foul on what this prosecutor did.

And thus this thread belongs in the conspiracy section.

Who to believe?

Legal professionals or a USMB poster with a dubious reputation when it comes to the truth.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

Nor is he compelled to testify and answer jurors questions. All of which could be used against him if indicted.

Unless the prosecutor colluded with Wilson and needed his "testimony" to sway the GJ not to indict.

The legal profession is crying foul on what this prosecutor did.

Constitutionally, Wilson is cleared as another trial would be double japitety. Of course, I don't expect you criminal supporters to accept such.

A Grand Jury is not a trial and no jeopardy attaches, One can convene as many Grand Juries against one man as they want on the same evidence.

 

[Derideo_Te]

He would never have gotten away with that testimony in a regular trial.

The forensic evidence contradicts his testimony. According to Wilson he said that Brown was trying to hit him after the shot him in the hand. There should also have been a blood trail from the vehicle to the body. Wilson even said that Brown was holding his hand against his stomach (probably trying to stem the bleeding). Wilson made out that he thought that Brown was going for a gun.

The fact that there was no cross examination is criminal in my opinion.

The facts don't back up your opinion, they back up Wilsons account. Another libtard We don't believe the truth thread. Where is the mod that shuts them down?

The facts were never cross examined. There was no one offering an alternative to the prosecutors case. That isn't justice, that is a whitewash. GJ indictments are easy to obtain but the Ferguson Prosecutor was failed 5 out of 5 times to obtain a GJ indictment when a cop was involved.

Corrupting the justice system is a problem that needs to be addressed because next time it might be you who doesn't get your day in court.

So you say. They did the right thing, get over it.

Nope, justice was denied, not served.

Wrong, a Grand Jury was convened and it checked all the known testimony evidence and statements. 12 Jurors decided that the information available was not even so remotely connected to a need for trial they ruled no BILL.

Remind us again where you obtained your law degree?

 

[RetiredGySgt]

The facts don't back up your opinion, they back up Wilsons account. Another libtard We don't believe the truth thread. Where is the mod that shuts them down?

The facts were never cross examined. There was no one offering an alternative to the prosecutors case. That isn't justice, that is a whitewash. GJ indictments are easy to obtain but the Ferguson Prosecutor was failed 5 out of 5 times to obtain a GJ indictment when a cop was involved.

Corrupting the justice system is a problem that needs to be addressed because next time it might be you who doesn't get your day in court.

So you say. They did the right thing, get over it.

Nope, justice was denied, not served.

Wrong, a Grand Jury was convened and it checked all the known testimony evidence and statements. 12 Jurors decided that the information available was not even so remotely connected to a need for trial they ruled no BILL.

Remind us again where you obtained your law degree?

The system works as intended. You are the one claiming to know differently, you need to provide your proof you are a lawyer, a Judge or some other person that would have intimate knowledge of the system.

 

[LoneLaugher]

Nor is he compelled to testify and answer jurors questions. All of which could be used against him if indicted.

Unless the prosecutor colluded with Wilson and needed his "testimony" to sway the GJ not to indict.

The legal profession is crying foul on what this prosecutor did.

Constitutionally, Wilson is cleared as another trial would be double japitety. Of course, I don't expect you criminal supporters to accept such.

Jeopardy. Double jeopardy.

Not even close to being true.

 

[Roadrunner]

Nor is he compelled to testify and answer jurors questions. All of which could be used against him if indicted.

Unless the prosecutor colluded with Wilson and needed his "testimony" to sway the GJ not to indict.

The legal profession is crying foul on what this prosecutor did.

Constitutionally, Wilson is cleared as another trial would be double japitety. Of course, I don't expect you criminal supporters to accept such.

A Grand Jury is not a trial and no jeopardy attaches, One can convene as many Grand Juries against one man as they want on the same evidence.

Exactly, or on new evidence.

If this is truly a cover-up, it will come out.

 

[JoeMoma]

MB's convience store robbing partner in crime made up a story about MB being executed by Wilson after MB had surrendered with his hands up.

The MSM reported the story.

Since that time, the initial reports have been discredited with hard evidence and testimony backed up by the hard evidence.

That being said, many people will not think that justice has been done with anything short of a murder conviction of Wilson. If there were an actual trial ending with Wilson found not guilty, that trial would be called unfair by many of the same people that are unhappy with the outcome of the GJ. To these people, Wilson is guilty regardless of any facts.

 

[Roadrunner]

Nor is he compelled to testify and answer jurors questions. All of which could be used against him if indicted.

Unless the prosecutor colluded with Wilson and needed his "testimony" to sway the GJ not to indict.

The legal profession is crying foul on what this prosecutor did.

Constitutionally, Wilson is cleared as another trial would be double japitety. Of course, I don't expect you criminal supporters to accept such.

Jeopardy. Double jeopardy.

Not even close to being true.

Nor is he compelled to testify and answer jurors questions. All of which could be used against him if indicted.

Unless the prosecutor colluded with Wilson and needed his "testimony" to sway the GJ not to indict.

The legal profession is crying foul on what this prosecutor did.

Constitutionally, Wilson is cleared as another trial would be double japitety. Of course, I don't expect you criminal supporters to accept such.

He wasn't on trial.

You could say the evidence was on trial, but he was not on trial.

Do you know the difference between a grand jury no-billing a person, and a jury finding a person not guilty of a crime?