Justice Roberts says what?

What will happen when the 2nd Impeachment Trial convenes?

  • It will proceed as a democrat Kangaroo Court with Kamala presiding

    Votes: 11 45.8%
  • It will be challenged for constitutionality and sent to the USSC for a decision

    Votes: 8 33.3%
  • Other?

    Votes: 5 20.8%

  • Total voters
    24
JUST IN: Chief Justice Roberts Will Not Preside Over Trump Senate Impeachment Trial

JUST IN: Chief Justice Roberts Will Not Preside Over Trump Senate Impeachment Trial (thegatewaypundit.com)
25 Jan 2021 ~~ By Cristina Laila


Chief Justice John Roberts will not preside over Trump’s Senate impeachment trial.
If was previously reported that Roberts was eager to avoid presiding over the sham impeachment of Trump because he doesn’t want to become a political lightning rod.
Senate President Pro Tempore, Pat Leahy (VT) will preside over the sham trial instead.
The Hill reported:
A Senate source said Leahy, a former chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, is expected to preside at the trial.​
A spokesman for Leahy said the decision on presiding over the trial is up to Senate Majority Leader Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.) and Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.).​

There is also talk that Republican senators may choose a secret ballot so their voting base will not know how each member voted.
If they do that the party is over. It’s already floundering after House leaders Kevin McCarthy and Liz Cheney blamed President Trump for the violence in the US Capitol on January 6th.
The Democrats are also floating barring Donald Trump from ever running for office.


Comment:
Damn the law and the Constitution, Progressive Marxist/DSA Democrats will use any means to destroy Trump and American Conservatism.
Chief Justice Roberts realizes that the sham trial of former President Trump is Un-Constitional.
Attorneys Alan Dershowitz and Jonathan Turley both agree that the impeachment trial is not only wrong but violates the tenets of the U.S. Constitution....
Progressive Marxist/DSA Democrat Commies and their quisling media have hit the ground running to reverse Trump' s policies. They'll soon begin to CLEANSE Trump supporters too. It's the Marxist communist wet dream come true.
The Progressive Marxist/DSA Democrat Leftists by their actions have proved that President Trump is actually the president now because they're trying like "Hell" to impeach him.
The majority of Americans do not believes that China Joey Xi was legitimately elected. Especially after he said, while signing 29 FAKE executive orders, that he obviously didn't even know what he was signing, but his Marxist handlers told him to sign it anyway. So as a good puppet he followed orders and signed the Executive Orders.
Americans that resist and pledge to restore America must Stay The Course.
Guess Roberts is tired of being blackmailed by the dems....

Are you still clinging to that ridiculous conspiracy theory? I feel very sorry for you.
 
JUST IN: Chief Justice Roberts Will Not Preside Over Trump Senate Impeachment Trial

JUST IN: Chief Justice Roberts Will Not Preside Over Trump Senate Impeachment Trial (thegatewaypundit.com)
25 Jan 2021 ~~ By Cristina Laila


Chief Justice John Roberts will not preside over Trump’s Senate impeachment trial.
If was previously reported that Roberts was eager to avoid presiding over the sham impeachment of Trump because he doesn’t want to become a political lightning rod.
Senate President Pro Tempore, Pat Leahy (VT) will preside over the sham trial instead.
The Hill reported:
A Senate source said Leahy, a former chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, is expected to preside at the trial.​
A spokesman for Leahy said the decision on presiding over the trial is up to Senate Majority Leader Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.) and Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.).​

There is also talk that Republican senators may choose a secret ballot so their voting base will not know how each member voted.
If they do that the party is over. It’s already floundering after House leaders Kevin McCarthy and Liz Cheney blamed President Trump for the violence in the US Capitol on January 6th.
The Democrats are also floating barring Donald Trump from ever running for office.


Comment:
Damn the law and the Constitution, Progressive Marxist/DSA Democrats will use any means to destroy Trump and American Conservatism.
Chief Justice Roberts realizes that the sham trial of former President Trump is Un-Constitional.
Attorneys Alan Dershowitz and Jonathan Turley both agree that the impeachment trial is not only wrong but violates the tenets of the U.S. Constitution....
Progressive Marxist/DSA Democrat Commies and their quisling media have hit the ground running to reverse Trump' s policies. They'll soon begin to CLEANSE Trump supporters too. It's the Marxist communist wet dream come true.
The Progressive Marxist/DSA Democrat Leftists by their actions have proved that President Trump is actually the president now because they're trying like "Hell" to impeach him.
The majority of Americans do not believes that China Joey Xi was legitimately elected. Especially after he said, while signing 29 FAKE executive orders, that he obviously didn't even know what he was signing, but his Marxist handlers told him to sign it anyway. So as a good puppet he followed orders and signed the Executive Orders.
Americans that resist and pledge to restore America must Stay The Course.
up for discussion on Fox in a minute.

CNN and MSNBC?

not yet.
 
The reason the chief justice presides over presidential impeachment, is because the normal person presiding over impeachment is the President of the Senate, which is the vice president.

The vice president of a sitting president being impeached, presiding over this kind of impeachment of his partner and boss, is a known conflict of interest.

Since the President is no longer a sitting president, and his own vice pres is no longer the President of the Senate, the chief justice is no longer needed.
 
JUST IN: Chief Justice Roberts Will Not Preside Over Trump Senate Impeachment Trial



This is actually kind of old news already. The reason why Roberts will not sit in is rather simple. Roberts, if nothing else, is a legal expert, and the Constitution ascribes his duty to preside over an impeachment of the president and Trump is not the president but a mere civilian now.

This kind of puts this impeachment hearing in a new light.
 
8 other Justices.

Why put an obviously partisan senator from the opposing party in charge?
 
John "Lefty" Roberts is such a fucking coward.
Someone on the left has pictures. I not sure who, but someone has pictures.

You are a conspiracy whacko too? I 'm sorry! I thought you were smarter than that.
Sometimes conspiracies are real. That being said, I was being a bit facetious. I don't know for a fact someone has incriminating pictures of Robert, but Robert does at times turn himself in contortions to give the left what they want.
 
JUST IN: Chief Justice Roberts Will Not Preside Over Trump Senate Impeachment Trial



This is actually kind of old news already. The reason why Roberts will not sit in is rather simple. Roberts, if nothing else, is a legal expert, and the Constitution ascribes his duty to preside over an impeachment of the president and Trump is not the president but a mere civilian now.

This kind of puts this impeachment hearing in a new light.
It is his job to preside over senate impeachment trials of the president or vice-president. Trump is no longer president. The impeachment trial of the senate serves little purpose. Sure, it can bar Trump from running for president again, but doesn't congress trust the vote of the people not to elect Trump again if what he did was so bad!
 
8 other Justices.

Why put an obviously partisan senator from the opposing party in charge?
That would defeat his purpose of not wanting the supreme court justices viewed as part of the partisan ranks....

The Senate president is who presides over all impeachment regardless of party affiliation of the impeached person, except for a sitting president...because the VP has a direct conflict of interest with the President.

The VP, recused herself, for conflict of interest. The rules replaces a vp with the longest serving member, of the Senate.
 
Still going to take 67 to convict.

Dont' see it happening
 
8 other Justices.

Why put an obviously partisan senator from the opposing party in charge?
That would defeat his purpose of not wanting the supreme court justices viewed as part of the partisan ranks....

The Senate president is who presides over all impeachment regardless of party affiliation of the impeached person, except for a sitting president...because the VP has a direct conflict of interest with the President.

The VP, recused herself, for conflict of interest. The rules replaces a votes, with the longest serving member, of the Senate.

The rules replaces a votes, with the longest serving member, of the Senate.

Who should also recuse himself, for the same reason
 
8 other Justices.

Why put an obviously partisan senator from the opposing party in charge?
That would defeat his purpose of not wanting the supreme court justices viewed as part of the partisan ranks....

The Senate president is who presides over all impeachment regardless of party affiliation of the impeached person, except for a sitting president...because the VP has a direct conflict of interest with the President.

The VP, recused herself, for conflict of interest. The rules replaces a votes, with the longest serving member, of the Senate.

The rules replaces a votes, with the longest serving member, of the Senate.

Who should also recuse himself, for the same reason
impeachment is a specific delegated partisan and political process, by our founders.... but a direct conflict of Interest, should still be good cause, to recuse!

Well hell's bells, you could say the whole Senate has a conflict of interest, they were all witnesses.
 
Last edited:
8 other Justices.

Why put an obviously partisan senator from the opposing party in charge?
I do not like trump or approve of his inciting insurrection, but not thrilled about Leahy. He is a politician and while I prefer to think he would honor the oath he will take, it will look partisan. Can understand why Roberts does not want a second dose, but the Supreme court supposedly has the concession on impartiality. I kind of think if Roberts wanted out of it, he should have re-ordered the court appointment and stuck one of the associate justices with the job.
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top