Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I need you to answer a simple question in order to do so. Should a father/daughter be able to marry if they are both consenting adults?I have always supported gay marriage.
I first learned that homosexuals couldn't legally get married in the early 80s when I was in my early 20s.
Nothing has changed in my opinion on gay marriage. I will always support consenting adults getting married whether it's a same sex couple or not.
The poster you're replying to has very little, if any, grasp of reality. I tried reading some of it's posts but the person is so crazy it's a waste of time. There isn't even a shred of reality in it's posts.
Facts don't matter to that poster and to posters like that person. So it's not worth wasting your time trying to give it facts. It won't listen or pay attention.
So you support the father/daughter marriage currently in the news?
Non sequitur.
When the argument used by you fag supporters is equality of consenting adults, unless you apply the concept to all forms of consenting adults, you're the ultimate hypocrite.
The argument I'm using is that if you're going to deny the right to marry to gays and lesbians, you'll need a very good reason and a compelling state interest. And opponents of gay marriage bans have neither.
Would you care to address the argument I'm making.....or keep knocking the stuffing out of those strawmen.
Why is this in a thread on legal gay marriage?I need you to answer a simple question in order to do so. Should a father/daughter be able to marry if they are both consenting adults?I have always supported gay marriage.
I first learned that homosexuals couldn't legally get married in the early 80s when I was in my early 20s.
Nothing has changed in my opinion on gay marriage. I will always support consenting adults getting married whether it's a same sex couple or not.
The poster you're replying to has very little, if any, grasp of reality. I tried reading some of it's posts but the person is so crazy it's a waste of time. There isn't even a shred of reality in it's posts.
Facts don't matter to that poster and to posters like that person. So it's not worth wasting your time trying to give it facts. It won't listen or pay attention.
So you support the father/daughter marriage currently in the news?
Non sequitur.
When the argument used by you fag supporters is equality of consenting adults, unless you apply the concept to all forms of consenting adults, you're the ultimate hypocrite.
The argument I'm using is that if you're going to deny the right to marry to gays and lesbians, you'll need a very good reason and a compelling state interest. And opponents of gay marriage bans have neither.
Would you care to address the argument I'm making.....or keep knocking the stuffing out of those strawmen.
Why is this in a thread on legal gay marriage?I need you to answer a simple question in order to do so. Should a father/daughter be able to marry if they are both consenting adults?So you support the father/daughter marriage currently in the news?
Non sequitur.
When the argument used by you fag supporters is equality of consenting adults, unless you apply the concept to all forms of consenting adults, you're the ultimate hypocrite.
The argument I'm using is that if you're going to deny the right to marry to gays and lesbians, you'll need a very good reason and a compelling state interest. And opponents of gay marriage bans have neither.
Would you care to address the argument I'm making.....or keep knocking the stuffing out of those strawmen.
Because Dana said...Why is this in a thread on legal gay marriage?I need you to answer a simple question in order to do so. Should a father/daughter be able to marry if they are both consenting adults?So you support the father/daughter marriage currently in the news?
Non sequitur.
When the argument used by you fag supporters is equality of consenting adults, unless you apply the concept to all forms of consenting adults, you're the ultimate hypocrite.
The argument I'm using is that if you're going to deny the right to marry to gays and lesbians, you'll need a very good reason and a compelling state interest. And opponents of gay marriage bans have neither.
Would you care to address the argument I'm making.....or keep knocking the stuffing out of those strawmen.
I am a conservative. I not only touched on it....but I support it.Why is this in a thread on legal gay marriage?I need you to answer a simple question in order to do so. Should a father/daughter be able to marry if they are both consenting adults?Non sequitur.
When the argument used by you fag supporters is equality of consenting adults, unless you apply the concept to all forms of consenting adults, you're the ultimate hypocrite.
The argument I'm using is that if you're going to deny the right to marry to gays and lesbians, you'll need a very good reason and a compelling state interest. And opponents of gay marriage bans have neither.
Would you care to address the argument I'm making.....or keep knocking the stuffing out of those strawmen.
Because Conservative won't touch the issue of gay marriage with 10 foot pole.
Which is fine. The USSC will take care of him in April.
Why is this in a thread on legal gay marriage?I need you to answer a simple question in order to do so. Should a father/daughter be able to marry if they are both consenting adults?So you support the father/daughter marriage currently in the news?
Non sequitur.
When the argument used by you fag supporters is equality of consenting adults, unless you apply the concept to all forms of consenting adults, you're the ultimate hypocrite.
The argument I'm using is that if you're going to deny the right to marry to gays and lesbians, you'll need a very good reason and a compelling state interest. And opponents of gay marriage bans have neither.
Would you care to address the argument I'm making.....or keep knocking the stuffing out of those strawmen.
Apparently is OK for the Right to voice their anti-semitism now, as well as their racism. They always were anti-semitic until they decided to embrace Israel.The two Jewesses must do the right thing and recuse theirselves from the upcoming ruling. It's the ethical thing to do.
Supreme Court justices officiated at same-sex 8216 marriages 8217
Stop babbling, please.That's how the same sex crowd works. They claim to support equality and state that denying two consenting adults to marry is wrong. However, when two adults want to marry and meet those conditions, if it's a type of marriage the fag supporters oppose, things change.
Immaterial.I need you to answer a simple question in order to do so. Should a father/daughter be able to marry if they are both consenting adults?I have always supported gay marriage.
I first learned that homosexuals couldn't legally get married in the early 80s when I was in my early 20s.
Nothing has changed in my opinion on gay marriage. I will always support consenting adults getting married whether it's a same sex couple or not.
The poster you're replying to has very little, if any, grasp of reality. I tried reading some of it's posts but the person is so crazy it's a waste of time. There isn't even a shred of reality in it's posts.
Facts don't matter to that poster and to posters like that person. So it's not worth wasting your time trying to give it facts. It won't listen or pay attention.
So you support the father/daughter marriage currently in the news?
Non sequitur.
When the argument used by you fag supporters is equality of consenting adults, unless you apply the concept to all forms of consenting adults, you're the ultimate hypocrite.
The argument I'm using is that if you're going to deny the right to marry to gays and lesbians, you'll need a very good reason and a compelling state interest. And opponents of gay marriage bans have neither.
Would you care to address the argument I'm making.....or keep knocking the stuffing out of those strawmen.
Stop babbling, please.That's how the same sex crowd works. They claim to support equality and state that denying two consenting adults to marry is wrong. However, when two adults want to marry and meet those conditions, if it's a type of marriage the fag supporters oppose, things change.
Yes, you are a bigot indeed, a hater of the Constitution and American values.I'm not a bigot. I'm an American pro-Constitution patriot who happens to be proud of his race and its accomplishments.The liberal indoctrination of our youths is working well. They are morally ruining our country and the ethical foundation it was created.Edgetho, just shut the fuck up. You have no idea what you are talking about now anymore than before.
Your social con far right is dying out, and the millennials (the largest numbers in a generation) all can vote in 2016. They won't be voting for your tripe and ilk.
In case you missed it, douche.
Millennials are breaking for Conservativism -- Big time.
Not on gay marriage:
In reality, millennials are overwhelmingly embracing gay marriage....by a ratio of nearly 4 to 1.
Where opposition to gay marriage is rooted overwhelmingly in seniors. And even they have moved by 28 points in the last 20 years.
By 'liberal indoctrination' you mean that youth are rejecting your agenda of hating blacks, jews and homosexuals- yes- our liberal indoctrination is working.
Bigots like you should be rejected by all Americans.
Not when you fag supporters argued equality.Immaterial.I need you to answer a simple question in order to do so. Should a father/daughter be able to marry if they are both consenting adults?So you support the father/daughter marriage currently in the news?
Non sequitur.
When the argument used by you fag supporters is equality of consenting adults, unless you apply the concept to all forms of consenting adults, you're the ultimate hypocrite.
The argument I'm using is that if you're going to deny the right to marry to gays and lesbians, you'll need a very good reason and a compelling state interest. And opponents of gay marriage bans have neither.
Would you care to address the argument I'm making.....or keep knocking the stuffing out of those strawmen.
Of course I do. I call him "Lord" and he calls me by my first name. You can, too.Justices Ginsburg And Kagan Officiated Over Same Sex Ceremonies; Will Have To Recuse Themselves
No conflict, any more than in in Loving. God is displeased with far right social religionists, obviously.
Wow, you know God?
Dimwits like you think as you will.Of course I do. I call him "Lord" and he calls me by my first name. You can, too.Justices Ginsburg And Kagan Officiated Over Same Sex Ceremonies; Will Have To Recuse Themselves
No conflict, any more than in in Loving. God is displeased with far right social religionists, obviously.
Wow, you know God?
I think you know a god, I doubt you know The God, but my guess is you think you know.
Dimwits like you think as you will.Of course I do. I call him "Lord" and he calls me by my first name. You can, too.Justices Ginsburg And Kagan Officiated Over Same Sex Ceremonies; Will Have To Recuse Themselves
No conflict, any more than in in Loving. God is displeased with far right social religionists, obviously.
Wow, you know God?
I think you know a god, I doubt you know The God, but my guess is you think you know.
Papa, why are you unhappy? The truth is you are a dimwit, and telling the truth is good.
OK, you are a happy dimwit, but one just the same.Papa, why are you unhappy? The truth is you are a dimwit, and telling the truth is good.
Ahhh Jake, I am a very happy person, but you go on drawing false conclusions and report them to your god, I'm sure he likes it when you gossip to him.
OK, you are a happy dimwit, but one just the same.Papa, why are you unhappy? The truth is you are a dimwit, and telling the truth is good.
Ahhh Jake, I am a very happy person, but you go on drawing false conclusions and report them to your god, I'm sure he likes it when you gossip to him.
A dimwit would be.
