Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You mean on this page? ]I have yet see you make any actual post defending children's rights.
You repeatedly want to deny children married parents- if their parents happen to be gay.
Only Thomas and Scalia objecting? I think this gives us an idea of how the vote is going to go when the case is heard by SCOTUS. With 37 states now granting licenses for gay marriage, the hand writings is on the wall. Gay marriage in the US is not going to be stopped and turned around in Alabama.
Page 10 (The bold largest heading above the material that followed it)In addition to indexing the happiness and wellbeing of young people, the report explores some significant demographic differences between young people. They include a comparison between those not in education employment or training with their peers...those without a positive role model of their gender in their lives (women without a positive female role model and men without a positive male role model) and their peers...those with fewer than five GCSEs graded A* to C (or equivalent) with their peers... Respondents are asked how happy and confident they are in different areas of their life. The responses are converted to a numerical scale, resulting in a number out of 100-- with 100 representing entirely happy or confident and zero being not at all happy or confident.
The Daily Mail article from the Prince's Trust study... Teens without parent role model are 67 per cent less likely to get a job Daily Mail OnlineYoung people without a role model of the same gender in their lives
Young men with no male role models in their lives and women without a mother figure struggle to keep their lives on track, a hard-hitting report warns today. The Prince’s Trust youth index, the largest survey of its kind, found that....67 per cent more likely to be unemployed than their counterparts. They are also significantly more likely to stay unemployed for longer than their peers, the report suggests....It found that young men with no male role model are 50 per cent more likely to abuse drugs and young females in the corresponding position are significantly more likely to drink to excess..
Young men with no male role model to look up to were twice as likely to turn or consider turning to crime as a result of being unemployed...The report, which was based on interviews with 2,170 16 to 25-year-olds...These young men are also three times more likely to feel down or depressed all of the time and significantly more likely to admit that they cannot remember the last time they felt proud...They are also significantly less likely to feel happy and confident than those with male role models, according to the figures....The Prince’s Trust report, which was carried out by YouGov, suggests young people without male role models are more than twice as likely to lack a sense of belonging.
Only Thomas and Scalia objecting? I think this gives us an idea of how the vote is going to go when the case is heard by SCOTUS. With 37 states now granting licenses for gay marriage, the hand writings is on the wall. Gay marriage in the US is not going to be stopped and turned around in Alabama.
Only Thomas and Scalia having the balls to openly object. We can only guess what Roberts, Alito and Kennedy are thinking at this point in time, after the Prince's Trust study and Alabama setting its heels on states rights.. (unless, as it appears to the general public,...that you already seem to know how the Verdict will be...which is the point of this thread after all).
...oh and how they're also thinking after their colleagues openly spanked them of record the other day for their public display of bias towards one set of litigants in this case...
Page 8 (the left side on the green background) http://www.princes-trust.org.uk/pdf/Youth_Index_jan2011.pdf
Page 10 (The bold largest heading above the material that followed it)In addition to indexing the happiness and wellbeing of young people, the report explores some significant demographic differences between young people. They include a comparison between those not in education employment or training with their peers...those without a positive role model of their gender in their lives (women without a positive female role model and men without a positive male role model) and their peers...those with fewer than five GCSEs graded A* to C (or equivalent) with their peers... Respondents are asked how happy and confident they are in different areas of their life. The responses are converted to a numerical scale, resulting in a number out of 100-- with 100 representing entirely happy or confident and zero being not at all happy or confident.
Only Thomas and Scalia objecting? I think this gives us an idea of how the vote is going to go when the case is heard by SCOTUS. With 37 states now granting licenses for gay marriage, the hand writings is on the wall. Gay marriage in the US is not going to be stopped and turned around in Alabama.
Only Thomas and Scalia having the balls to openly object. We can only guess what Roberts, Alito and Kennedy are thinking at this point in time, after the Prince's Trust study and Alabama setting its heels on states rights..]
Swim, they're just practicing their excuses for why they lost in June. What you're seeing is denial and self delusion...in slow motion. You can actually watch the echo chamber form its bullshit talking points. Its like watching Logical Fallacies give birth to Conspiracy Batshit's baby.
Yes, the majority in a democracy always gets their undies in a bunch when the power to self-govern is taken away and their last bastion of "impartial" justice (the US Surpreme Court) loads the scales heavy on one side of the litigants, against the clear-majority's Will, by a secret forced-attrition to their marriage laws concerning which lifestyles may marry and which may not (you know, for the good of the children in their state of which they are morally obligated to defend legally with their vote)...
...all so that Court can throw its hands up later in a pre-choreographed show if "impotence" in the face of "all those gay people married now and their kids who will suffer immediate legal harm if we don't force this radical new change to marriage on all the states" (and the other types of marriage repugnant to the majority who in the name of "marriage equality" will force the states' children to be lab rats in their new social experiment also).
In my opinion, however, the view that this Court will take of state prohibition of same-sex marriage is indicated beyond mistaking by today’s opinion. As I have said, the real rationale of today’s opinion, whatever disappearing trail of its legalistic argle-bargle one chooses to follow, is that DOMA is motivated by “ ‘bare . . . desire to harm’ ” couples in same-sex marriages. Supra, at 18. How easy it is, indeed how inevitable, to reach the same conclusion with regard to state laws denying same-sex couples marital status.
Justice Scalia in dissent of Windsor v. US
He's simply paraphrasing Justice Scalia:
Note the words 'inevitable' and 'beyond mistaking'.
We'll see around June.
Say it with me;
....."inevitable".
Only one thing that is inevitable, death. If it lives death will overtake it.
Laughing....so you know better than Justice Scalia, huh? Good luck with that.
Two justices should recuse themselves because they have officiated same sex marriages, if they do the proper thing, I'm not sure you will like the resulting 4-3 decision.
Say it with me;
....."inevitable".
Only one thing that is inevitable, death. If it lives death will overtake it.
Laughing....so you know better than Justice Scalia, huh? Good luck with that.
Two justices should recuse themselves because they have officiated same sex marriages, if they do the proper thing, I'm not sure you will like the resulting 4-3 decision.
What would the conflict of interest be?
Doc your not that dense, by officiating same sex marriages they have demonstrated a bias toward the subject. Even an appearance of bias is enough to justify them recusing themselves but we all know the bias is real.
Only one thing that is inevitable, death. If it lives death will overtake it.
Laughing....so you know better than Justice Scalia, huh? Good luck with that.
Two justices should recuse themselves because they have officiated same sex marriages, if they do the proper thing, I'm not sure you will like the resulting 4-3 decision.
What would the conflict of interest be?
Doc your not that dense, by officiating same sex marriages they have demonstrated a bias toward the subject. Even an appearance of bias is enough to justify them recusing themselves but we all know the bias is real.
Then by some officiating straight weddings they've shown their bias and should recuse themselves.
Laughing....so you know better than Justice Scalia, huh? Good luck with that.
Two justices should recuse themselves because they have officiated same sex marriages, if they do the proper thing, I'm not sure you will like the resulting 4-3 decision.
What would the conflict of interest be?
Doc your not that dense, by officiating same sex marriages they have demonstrated a bias toward the subject. Even an appearance of bias is enough to justify them recusing themselves but we all know the bias is real.
Then by some officiating straight weddings they've shown their bias and should recuse themselves.
Scalia did that in 2007. Does that mean he has to recuse himself? After all, per the logic of OK, he demonstrated a bias toward traditional marriage.
Every divorced parent left with kids to raise on their own faces the problem of finding a role model for their kids. Usually the parent looks to other family members, grandparents, older siblings, aunts uncles, uncles, and close family friends to fulfill the role. This is exactly what happens with gay couples. Most gay couples with children are children from a previous marriage. This article is lot of nonsense.Only Thomas and Scalia objecting? I think this gives us an idea of how the vote is going to go when the case is heard by SCOTUS. With 37 states now granting licenses for gay marriage, the hand writings is on the wall. Gay marriage in the US is not going to be stopped and turned around in Alabama.
Only Thomas and Scalia having the balls to openly object. We can only guess what Roberts, Alito and Kennedy are thinking at this point in time, after the Prince's Trust study and Alabama setting its heels on states rights.. (unless, as it appears to the general public,...that you already seem to know how the Verdict will be...which is the point of this thread after all).
...oh and how they're also thinking after their colleagues openly spanked them of record the other day for their public display of bias towards one set of litigants in this case...
Page 8 (the left side on the green background) http://www.princes-trust.org.uk/pdf/Youth_Index_jan2011.pdf
Page 10 (The bold largest heading above the material that followed it)In addition to indexing the happiness and wellbeing of young people, the report explores some significant demographic differences between young people. They include a comparison between those not in education employment or training with their peers...those without a positive role model of their gender in their lives (women without a positive female role model and men without a positive male role model) and their peers...those with fewer than five GCSEs graded A* to C (or equivalent) with their peers... Respondents are asked how happy and confident they are in different areas of their life. The responses are converted to a numerical scale, resulting in a number out of 100-- with 100 representing entirely happy or confident and zero being not at all happy or confident.
The Daily Mail article from the Prince's Trust study... Teens without parent role model are 67 per cent less likely to get a job Daily Mail OnlineYoung people without a role model of the same gender in their lives
Young men with no male role models in their lives and women without a mother figure struggle to keep their lives on track, a hard-hitting report warns today. The Prince’s Trust youth index, the largest survey of its kind, found that....67 per cent more likely to be unemployed than their counterparts. They are also significantly more likely to stay unemployed for longer than their peers, the report suggests....It found that young men with no male role model are 50 per cent more likely to abuse drugs and young females in the corresponding position are significantly more likely to drink to excess..Young men with no male role model to look up to were twice as likely to turn or consider turning to crime as a result of being unemployed...The report, which was based on interviews with 2,170 16 to 25-year-olds...These young men are also three times more likely to feel down or depressed all of the time and significantly more likely to admit that they cannot remember the last time they felt proud...They are also significantly less likely to feel happy and confident than those with male role models, according to the figures....The Prince’s Trust report, which was carried out by YouGov, suggests young people without male role models are more than twice as likely to lack a sense of belonging.
Just post that you hate gay Americans and leave it at that.
You'll at least be honest and will stop looking ridiculous.
Ah, if you could only make this debate about "people hating those poor (ubermilitant litigant-army of) gays"....instead of people standing up to defend children's natural rights to have states incentivize only a mother and father as adult role models: for their best formative shot at life.
"...And it humiliates tens of thousands of children now being raised by same-sex couples. The law in question makes it even more difficult for the children to understand the integrity and closeness of their own family and its concord with other families in their community and in their daily lives.
DOMA also brings financial harm to children of same-sex couples. It raises the cost of health care for families by taxing health benefits provided by employers to their workers’ same-sex spouses. And it denies or reduces benefits allowed to families upon the loss of a spouse and parent, benefits that are an integral part of family security..."
Windsor v. US
Every divorced parent left with kids to raise on their own faces the problem of finding a role model for their kids. Usually the parent looks to other family members, grandparents, older siblings, aunts uncles, uncles, and close family friends to fulfill the role. This is exactly what happens with gay couples. Most gay couples with children are children from a previous marriage. This article is lot of nonsense.Only Thomas and Scalia objecting? I think this gives us an idea of how the vote is going to go when the case is heard by SCOTUS. With 37 states now granting licenses for gay marriage, the hand writings is on the wall. Gay marriage in the US is not going to be stopped and turned around in Alabama.
Only Thomas and Scalia having the balls to openly object. We can only guess what Roberts, Alito and Kennedy are thinking at this point in time, after the Prince's Trust study and Alabama setting its heels on states rights.. (unless, as it appears to the general public,...that you already seem to know how the Verdict will be...which is the point of this thread after all).
...oh and how they're also thinking after their colleagues openly spanked them of record the other day for their public display of bias towards one set of litigants in this case...
Page 8 (the left side on the green background) http://www.princes-trust.org.uk/pdf/Youth_Index_jan2011.pdf
Page 10 (The bold largest heading above the material that followed it)In addition to indexing the happiness and wellbeing of young people, the report explores some significant demographic differences between young people. They include a comparison between those not in education employment or training with their peers...those without a positive role model of their gender in their lives (women without a positive female role model and men without a positive male role model) and their peers...those with fewer than five GCSEs graded A* to C (or equivalent) with their peers... Respondents are asked how happy and confident they are in different areas of their life. The responses are converted to a numerical scale, resulting in a number out of 100-- with 100 representing entirely happy or confident and zero being not at all happy or confident.
The Daily Mail article from the Prince's Trust study... Teens without parent role model are 67 per cent less likely to get a job Daily Mail OnlineYoung people without a role model of the same gender in their lives
Young men with no male role models in their lives and women without a mother figure struggle to keep their lives on track, a hard-hitting report warns today. The Prince’s Trust youth index, the largest survey of its kind, found that....67 per cent more likely to be unemployed than their counterparts. They are also significantly more likely to stay unemployed for longer than their peers, the report suggests....It found that young men with no male role model are 50 per cent more likely to abuse drugs and young females in the corresponding position are significantly more likely to drink to excess..Young men with no male role model to look up to were twice as likely to turn or consider turning to crime as a result of being unemployed...The report, which was based on interviews with 2,170 16 to 25-year-olds...These young men are also three times more likely to feel down or depressed all of the time and significantly more likely to admit that they cannot remember the last time they felt proud...They are also significantly less likely to feel happy and confident than those with male role models, according to the figures....The Prince’s Trust report, which was carried out by YouGov, suggests young people without male role models are more than twice as likely to lack a sense of belonging.
Raise your hand if you are not queer. Yup, that's what I thought.
Raise your hand if you are not queer. Yup, that's what I thought.
Yeah, because the only reason one would ever fight for basic civil rights is because you're gay.
Sigh......you really didn't think that through, did you?
Like justice Thomas recused himself during health care cases because his wife stood to make financial gains from its demise and was actively involved in tea party groups who opposed the law?
Only one thing that is inevitable, death. If it lives death will overtake it.
Laughing....so you know better than Justice Scalia, huh? Good luck with that.
Two justices should recuse themselves because they have officiated same sex marriages, if they do the proper thing, I'm not sure you will like the resulting 4-3 decision.
Oh wait, he didn't recuse himself. Never mind
Only Thomas and Scalia objecting? I think this gives us an idea of how the vote is going to go when the case is heard by SCOTUS.
Just like thomas recused himself in the 2000 election dispute because his wife was working for an organization that was gathering resumes for appointment positions for the bush boy's administration.
Oh wait, he didn't recuse himself on that one either. Never mind.
The stays have been pled on preserving the status quo and rights of states to self-govern on the question of gay marriage: citing Windsor.Only Thomas and Scalia objecting? I think this gives us an idea of how the vote is going to go when the case is heard by SCOTUS.
No it doesn't. The SCOTUS denied the request to extend the stay. That is all. It says nothing about the merits of the case. It is strictly a decision on the merits on the the request to extend a stay. Alabama has an appeal on the merits of the case pending with the 11th Circuit. Whether the state is entitled to a stay of the district court's injunction is a legal matter entirely separate than the merits of the appeal.
The stays have been pled on preserving the status quo and rights of states to self-govern on the question of gay marriage: citing Windsor.Only Thomas and Scalia objecting? I think this gives us an idea of how the vote is going to go when the case is heard by SCOTUS.
No it doesn't. The SCOTUS denied the request to extend the stay. That is all. It says nothing about the merits of the case. It is strictly a decision on the merits on the the request to extend a stay. Alabama has an appeal on the merits of the case pending with the 11th Circuit. Whether the state is entitled to a stay of the district court's injunction is a legal matter entirely separate than the merits of the appeal.
And all other manner of serious and compelling concerns to the states affected by forced-attrition of their laws. The public has been watching this parade with a keen eye, seeing one good argument of theirs after another shot down by SCOTUS' majority.
In other words as Thomas said, the Court is telling the public "no matter what you plead on this case, we're going to find in favor of the LGBT cult".
Raise your hand if you are not queer. Yup, that's what I thought.
Yeah, because the only reason one would ever fight for basic civil rights is because you're gay.
Sigh......you really didn't think that through, did you?
It's ok you can admit it now.
