debbiedowner
Gold Member
- Feb 12, 2017
- 12,275
- 3,277
- 275
She has the morals of a goat! And no she cannot heal the country her party has so wounded and shat upon.
Just how do you know how low a goats morals are?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
She has the morals of a goat! And no she cannot heal the country her party has so wounded and shat upon.
Clips from the Kavanaugh hearings will sink her ship!
Black wife perhaps, your urges? No. And you would have had nothing to say about it them just as you do now, nada.you would have a slave and a black concubineNah, that's just how you're wiredeveryone would have a slave [ any color ] if they couldIf only your founders had been up to the task of performing their own labor.her skin color gives her over 90% of the black vote
because they did not have the $$$$$$$Lots of people did not. Revisit Bacon's Rebellion and the aristocracy's response to it.you're a liarNah, that's just how you're wiredeveryone would have a slave [ any color ] if they couldIf only your founders had been up to the task of performing their own labor.her skin color gives her over 90% of the black vote
if you lived in 1776 and were rich, you would have a slave
don't try to deny it
She has the morals of a goat! And no she cannot heal the country her party has so wounded and shat upon.
Just how do you know how low a goats morals are?
no--if you were white back then, you would have a white wife--you could not have a black wifeBlack wife perhaps, your urges? No. And you would have had nothing to say about it them just as you do now, nada.you would have a slave and a black concubineNah, that's just how you're wiredeveryone would have a slave [ any color ] if they couldIf only your founders had been up to the task of performing their own labor.her skin color gives her over 90% of the black vote
Clips from the Kavanaugh hearings will sink her ship!
I believe Democrats are responsive to emotional appeals and the emotional appeal of someone who is not only an attorney and also a no nonsense prosecutor but a Woman and a Black Woman and she is on THEIR side of the fence is a very strong attraction.
The MOST powerful attraction is that they want to see her kick DJT to the curb.
This ties to their close second most powerful attraction to Kamala Harris is that the Liberals who secretly know they are losers will believe they are winners if she wins with their support.
I have you as an example!She has the morals of a goat! And no she cannot heal the country her party has so wounded and shat upon.
Just how do you know how low a goats morals are?
I don't think you've read up on it at all son. If you are a natural born slave owner, that's on you. THAT you can legitimately claim.because they did not have the $$$$$$$Lots of people did not. Revisit Bacon's Rebellion and the aristocracy's response to it.you're a liarNah, that's just how you're wiredeveryone would have a slave [ any color ] if they couldIf only your founders had been up to the task of performing their own labor.
if you lived in 1776 and were rich, you would have a slave
don't try to deny it
People did, you're obviously ignorant of it.no--if you were white back then, you would have a white wife--you could not have a black wifeBlack wife perhaps, your urges? No. And you would have had nothing to say about it them just as you do now, nada.you would have a slave and a black concubineNah, that's just how you're wiredeveryone would have a slave [ any color ] if they couldIf only your founders had been up to the task of performing their own labor.
Yaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaawn, I wonder what they have in common, Jeebus.Kamala hates America like Barack does
1. not lawfulI don't think you've read up on it at all son. If you are a natural born slave owner, that's on you. THAT you can legitimately claim.because they did not have the $$$$$$$Lots of people did not. Revisit Bacon's Rebellion and the aristocracy's response to it.you're a liarNah, that's just how you're wiredeveryone would have a slave [ any color ] if they could
if you lived in 1776 and were rich, you would have a slave
don't try to deny it
Which is why the "two" parties actually work in tandem to manage we the people for concentrated wealth and power.$$$$$$ backers. Same as it ever was.is giving a speech right now announcing her bid to run for POTUS. Forget about the sex scandal, just watching her give a speech for the first time, I can tell you she doesn’t have the charisma to be a threat to Trump. I could be wrong, but I doubt it
I may be wrong, too...but I think she will be the Dem. nominee.
Could be. The loons seem to gravitate towards her
Virtually every politician, be it indirectly or directly, is bought and sold by Wall Street
Maybe not, but she's a shoo in for the nomination because she's half Jamaican and half Indian, and the Democrats who put racial diversity ahead of merit in importance will "We don't have one of those yet, so we have to vote for her."is giving a speech right now announcing her bid to run for POTUS. Forget about the sex scandal, just watching her give a speech for the first time, I can tell you she doesn’t have the charisma to be a threat to Trump. I could be wrong, but I doubt it
1. not lawfulI don't think you've read up on it at all son. If you are a natural born slave owner, that's on you. THAT you can legitimately claim.because they did not have the $$$$$$$Lots of people did not. Revisit Bacon's Rebellion and the aristocracy's response to it.you're a liarNah, that's just how you're wired
if you lived in 1776 and were rich, you would have a slave
don't try to deny it
2. you wouldn't get as far in business
son--hahahhahahahhahaha
Interracial marriage in the United States has been fully legal in all U.S. statessince the 1967 Supreme Court decision tPeople did, you're obviously ignorant of it.no--if you were white back then, you would have a white wife--you could not have a black wifeBlack wife perhaps, your urges? No. And you would have had nothing to say about it them just as you do now, nada.you would have a slave and a black concubineNah, that's just how you're wiredeveryone would have a slave [ any color ] if they could
How Interracial Marriage Laws Have Changed Since the 1600sThe U.S. Supreme Court unanimously overturns Pace v. Alabama (1883), ruling in Loving v. Virginia that state bans on interracial marriage violate the Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.
She has the morals of a goat!