Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That not taking over the ways and means. It’s penalizing companies for ripping off citizens which there are already laws against. Those laws don’t make us socialists. You’re being waaay over dramaticExcept Kamala HAS suggested taking over the means of production on a specific industry if the business owners don’t do what the government says. She’s on tape, saying “yes, we can do it.”
She’s leading us toward socialism. So what we have is an idiot picked for her female blackness whose proposals will destroy the country IF she’s elected and IF we don’t have enough Republicans to stop her.
Nope. She SAID the government can control the means of production, as a threat, and when the audience laughed, the socialist bitch said…. “Yes, we really CAN.”That not taking over the ways and means. It’s penalizing companies for ripping off citizens which there are already laws against. Those laws don’t make us socialists. You’re being waaay over dramatic
Personally, I’d offer, maybe mandate, any one insisting on more Socialism spend 90 days in either place. Your pickThey'd love to have you in either place.
You should get going.
Those are fascist dictatorships, not socialists.Personally, I’d offer, maybe mandate, any one insisting on more Socialism spend 90 days in either place. Your pick
Same shit, different marketingThose are fascist dictatorships, not socialists.
I don’t want to vote for her. I likely won’t. But agin that’s off topic.Nope. She SAID the government can control the means of production, as a threat, and when the audience laughed, the socialist bitch said…. “Yes, we really CAN.”
Without saying “not Trump,” why in the world would you want to vote for her? She’s too dumb to speak on her own, got to where she is by using sex, her female blackness, or the talents of others, proposes damaging policies, and wants to entice even more illegals to swarm in.
Here. She said the government could “snatch” the patents of pharmaceutical companies and take over production. Now, doesn’t that sound like a socialist to you?I don’t want to vote for her. I likely won’t. But agin that’s off topic.
Can you show her quote where she said she wanted the government to control the means and production? I have a hunch that you’re making that one up.
Here. She said the government could “snatch” the patents of pharmaceutical companies and take over production. Now, doesn’t that sound like a socialist to you?
Wait a minute. I thought we were talking about her price gouging proposition for grocery stores… what’s this stuff about pharmaceutical companies from years ago?!
Now you’re really sounding desperate and dishonest
You really can’t follow a conversation, can you? I said she was a socialist, and you said no…..I don’t know what socialism means, and you explained that it is controlling the means of production. I said she advocated for that, just like a socialist, and you said prove it.Wait a minute. I thought we were talking about her price gouging proposition for grocery stores… what’s this stuff about pharmaceutical companies from years ago?!
Now you’re really sounding desperate and dishonest
You really can’t follow a conversation, can you? I said she was a socialist, and you said no…..I don’t know what socialism means, and you explained that it is controlling the means of production. I said she advocated for that, just like a socialist, and you said prove it.
So I gave a link to the video where she said she would “snatch” private companies’ patents and then have the government handle the production. That is socialism,
And now to weasel out of it, you say, “that was years ago.” The point is….she really slipped with that comment and showed she is for socialism.
I think Trump should try to work her comment in during the debate, when the topic of economy is raised. He can say that she leans strongly toward socialism, which is a failed system - and then quote her statement about “snatching” the patents of private inventors and have the government take over production.As proclaimed from her mouth........her values have not changed.
I think Trump should try to work her comment in during the debate, when the topic of economy is raised. He can say that she leans strongly toward socialism, which is a failed system - and then quote her statement about “snatching” the patents of private inventors and have the government take over production.
Of course she’ll lie and deny it, so Trump will have to pre-empt that by saying the video of her saying it will be posted on his website in the morning (or later the same evening).
Maybe Trump pulled his punches with Biden because he saw he was dealing with a confused, bewildered old man - and it wasn’t necessary to land any blows.Trump really blew it at the last debate.
He should have bludgeoned Biden with his deficits. He never did.
When Harris talks about how she's going to give people stuff, he needs to point out that her and Joe already have huge debt and this will only add more. He needs to keep saying it. Over and over again.
Let’s look at the facts.Since none of these things are "Harris policies". You're flat out lying. Not a word of your post is true.
Please stop parroting Trump's lies, and get back to us when you know what's going on.
www.foxbusiness.com
www.cnn.com
Let’s look at the facts.
Kamala Harris acknowledges inflation surge is 'big deal' for Americans: 'Heavy weight to carry'
Vice President Kamala Harris on Friday acknowledged that inflation is a "big deal" for Americans, stressing that the Biden administration takes the issue "very seriously."
How the border problem caught the Biden team off guard, and how they've scrambled to fix it
As the number of unaccompanied children in Border Patrol custody ballooned this month, President Joe Biden's team raced to find more places to house them, leaving thousands of children stuck in jail-like facilities for longer than the 72 hours allowed under the law.
MSN
www.msn.comTim Walz Signed Bill Making Minnesota a Sanctuary State for Child Sex-Changes
More facts for you to ignore:These articles do not say what you think they say. You need to read what you're linking to.
With the exception of FOX News, which cannot be believed at all, and the MSN article on "child sex change" both of which are completely fabricated, the other pieces outline on border problems don't say what you believe they say.
THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS "CHILD SEX CHANGES". SEX CHANGES CANNOT BE DONE UNTIL THE PATIENT HAS COMPLETED PUBERTY.
How do you know?Her values haven't changed.
You changed the topic from grocery stores to medical. There has been debate for decades for Medicare for all or government subsidized/controls on pricing for the medical system. There are many other countries with socialized medical systems that aren’t socialist countries. Our own VA is a “socialist” entity. It is a disingenuous argument to take that situation and say it makes somebody a socialist or a country socialist. That’s not what the word means.You really can’t follow a conversation, can you? I said she was a socialist, and you said no…..I don’t know what socialism means, and you explained that it is controlling the means of production. I said she advocated for that, just like a socialist, and you said prove it.
So I gave a link to the video where she said she would “snatch” private companies’ patents and then have the government handle the production. That is socialism, my friend…..and it’s on tape.
And now to weasel out of it, you say, “that was years ago.” The point is….she really slipped with that comment and showed she is for socialism.
Here. She said the government could “snatch” the patents of pharmaceutical companies and take over production. Now, doesn’t that sound like a socialist to you?
