Kamala Wants Price Controls on Groceries, Venezuelan-Style

Except Kamala HAS suggested taking over the means of production on a specific industry if the business owners donā€™t do what the government says. Sheā€™s on tape, saying ā€œyes, we can do it.ā€

Sheā€™s leading us toward socialism. So what we have is an idiot picked for her female blackness whose proposals will destroy the country IF sheā€™s elected and IF we donā€™t have enough Republicans to stop her.
That not taking over the ways and means. Itā€™s penalizing companies for ripping off citizens which there are already laws against. Those laws donā€™t make us socialists. Youā€™re being waaay over dramatic
 
That not taking over the ways and means. Itā€™s penalizing companies for ripping off citizens which there are already laws against. Those laws donā€™t make us socialists. Youā€™re being waaay over dramatic
Nope. She SAID the government can control the means of production, as a threat, and when the audience laughed, the socialist bitch saidā€¦. ā€œYes, we really CAN.ā€

Without saying ā€œnot Trump,ā€ why in the world would you want to vote for her? Sheā€™s too dumb to speak on her own, got to where she is by using sex, her female blackness, or the talents of others, proposes damaging policies, and wants to entice even more illegals to swarm in.
 
They'd love to have you in either place.

You should get going.
Personally, Iā€™d offer, maybe mandate, any one insisting on more Socialism spend 90 days in either place. Your pick
 
Nope. She SAID the government can control the means of production, as a threat, and when the audience laughed, the socialist bitch saidā€¦. ā€œYes, we really CAN.ā€

Without saying ā€œnot Trump,ā€ why in the world would you want to vote for her? Sheā€™s too dumb to speak on her own, got to where she is by using sex, her female blackness, or the talents of others, proposes damaging policies, and wants to entice even more illegals to swarm in.
I donā€™t want to vote for her. I likely wonā€™t. But agin thatā€™s off topic.

Can you show her quote where she said she wanted the government to control the means and production? I have a hunch that youā€™re making that one up.
 
I donā€™t want to vote for her. I likely wonā€™t. But agin thatā€™s off topic.

Can you show her quote where she said she wanted the government to control the means and production? I have a hunch that youā€™re making that one up.
Here. She said the government could ā€œsnatchā€ the patents of pharmaceutical companies and take over production. Now, doesnā€™t that sound like a socialist to you?

 
Here. She said the government could ā€œsnatchā€ the patents of pharmaceutical companies and take over production. Now, doesnā€™t that sound like a socialist to you?


Wait a minute. I thought we were talking about her price gouging proposition for grocery storesā€¦ whatā€™s this stuff about pharmaceutical companies from years ago?!

Now youā€™re really sounding desperate and dishonest
 
Wait a minute. I thought we were talking about her price gouging proposition for grocery storesā€¦ whatā€™s this stuff about pharmaceutical companies from years ago?!

Now youā€™re really sounding desperate and dishonest

Her values haven't changed.
 
Wait a minute. I thought we were talking about her price gouging proposition for grocery storesā€¦ whatā€™s this stuff about pharmaceutical companies from years ago?!

Now youā€™re really sounding desperate and dishonest
You really canā€™t follow a conversation, can you? I said she was a socialist, and you said noā€¦..I donā€™t know what socialism means, and you explained that it is controlling the means of production. I said she advocated for that, just like a socialist, and you said prove it.

So I gave a link to the video where she said she would ā€œsnatchā€ private companiesā€™ patents and then have the government handle the production. That is socialism, my friendā€¦..and itā€™s on tape.

And now to weasel out of it, you say, ā€œthat was years ago.ā€ The point isā€¦.she really slipped with that comment and showed she is for socialism.
 
You really canā€™t follow a conversation, can you? I said she was a socialist, and you said noā€¦..I donā€™t know what socialism means, and you explained that it is controlling the means of production. I said she advocated for that, just like a socialist, and you said prove it.

So I gave a link to the video where she said she would ā€œsnatchā€ private companiesā€™ patents and then have the government handle the production. That is socialism,

And now to weasel out of it, you say, ā€œthat was years ago.ā€ The point isā€¦.she really slipped with that comment and showed she is for socialism.

As proclaimed from her mouth........her values have not changed.
 
As proclaimed from her mouth........her values have not changed.
I think Trump should try to work her comment in during the debate, when the topic of economy is raised. He can say that she leans strongly toward socialism, which is a failed system - and then quote her statement about ā€œsnatchingā€ the patents of private inventors and have the government take over production.

Of course sheā€™ll lie and deny it, so Trump will have to pre-empt that by saying the video of her saying it will be posted on his website in the morning (or later the same evening).
 
I think Trump should try to work her comment in during the debate, when the topic of economy is raised. He can say that she leans strongly toward socialism, which is a failed system - and then quote her statement about ā€œsnatchingā€ the patents of private inventors and have the government take over production.

Of course sheā€™ll lie and deny it, so Trump will have to pre-empt that by saying the video of her saying it will be posted on his website in the morning (or later the same evening).

Trump really blew it at the last debate.

He should have bludgeoned Biden with his deficits. He never did.

When Harris talks about how she's going to give people stuff, he needs to point out that her and Joe already have huge debt and this will only add more. He needs to keep saying it. Over and over again.
 
Trump really blew it at the last debate.

He should have bludgeoned Biden with his deficits. He never did.

When Harris talks about how she's going to give people stuff, he needs to point out that her and Joe already have huge debt and this will only add more. He needs to keep saying it. Over and over again.
Maybe Trump pulled his punches with Biden because he saw he was dealing with a confused, bewildered old man - and it wasnā€™t necessary to land any blows.

I just canā€™t imagine how Kamala is going to fill 2 minutes of airtime without sounding like a kid giving a book report on a book he hasnā€™t read.
 
Since none of these things are "Harris policies". You're flat out lying. Not a word of your post is true.

Please stop parroting Trump's lies, and get back to us when you know what's going on.
Letā€™s look at the facts.





Tim Walz Signed Bill Making Minnesota a Sanctuary State for Child Sex-Changes​

 
Last edited:
Letā€™s look at the facts.





Tim Walz Signed Bill Making Minnesota a Sanctuary State for Child Sex-Changes​


These articles do not say what you think they say. You need to read what you're linking to.

With the exception of FOX News, which cannot be believed at all, and the MSN article on "child sex change" both of which are completely fabricated, the other pieces outline on border problems don't say what you believe they say.

THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS "CHILD SEX CHANGES". SEX CHANGES CANNOT BE DONE UNTIL THE PATIENT HAS COMPLETED PUBERTY.
 
These articles do not say what you think they say. You need to read what you're linking to.

With the exception of FOX News, which cannot be believed at all, and the MSN article on "child sex change" both of which are completely fabricated, the other pieces outline on border problems don't say what you believe they say.

THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS "CHILD SEX CHANGES". SEX CHANGES CANNOT BE DONE UNTIL THE PATIENT HAS COMPLETED PUBERTY.
More facts for you to ignore:

Kamala Harris-backed bail fund that freed violent criminals back in spotlight​


A Biden-Harris foreign policy disaster:
 
Last edited:
You really canā€™t follow a conversation, can you? I said she was a socialist, and you said noā€¦..I donā€™t know what socialism means, and you explained that it is controlling the means of production. I said she advocated for that, just like a socialist, and you said prove it.

So I gave a link to the video where she said she would ā€œsnatchā€ private companiesā€™ patents and then have the government handle the production. That is socialism, my friendā€¦..and itā€™s on tape.

And now to weasel out of it, you say, ā€œthat was years ago.ā€ The point isā€¦.she really slipped with that comment and showed she is for socialism.
You changed the topic from grocery stores to medical. There has been debate for decades for Medicare for all or government subsidized/controls on pricing for the medical system. There are many other countries with socialized medical systems that arenā€™t socialist countries. Our own VA is a ā€œsocialistā€ entity. It is a disingenuous argument to take that situation and say it makes somebody a socialist or a country socialist. Thatā€™s not what the word means.
 
Here. She said the government could ā€œsnatchā€ the patents of pharmaceutical companies and take over production. Now, doesnā€™t that sound like a socialist to you?


Shall we look at your quote in context? Damn yā€™all are so dishonest with how you present your arguments. Itā€™s pretty sick

 
Back
Top Bottom