karl marx grave needs to be removed.

[bodecea]

Karl Marx's London grave vandalised in suspected hammer attack

Someone had the guts to begin tearing down an abomination to humanity. I can't believe it isn't a public toilet but if I get the chance I will piss there someday.

Why did you do it?

 

[bodecea]

Karl Marx's London grave vandalised in suspected hammer attack

Someone had the guts to begin tearing down an abomination to humanity. I can't believe it isn't a public toilet but if I get the chance I will piss there someday.

You either understand what Marx was teaching or you
believe the lies that are told about what he taught.
View attachment 244366

You are literally too stupid to insult.

What a disturbing post.

 

[HenryBHough]

Karl Marx's London grave vandalised in suspected hammer attack

Someone had the guts to begin tearing down an abomination to humanity. I can't believe it isn't a public toilet but if I get the chance I will piss there someday.

You either understand what Marx was teaching or you
believe the lies that are told about what he taught.
View attachment 244366

You are literally too stupid to insult.

What a disturbing post.

Wow, triggered THAT easily?

Scary........

 

[the other mike]

Wow, triggered THAT easily?

Scary........

To say that American society has been 'dumbed down' is a vast understatement.

1 In 4 Americans Thinks The Sun Goes Around The Earth, Survey Says

 

[Rustic]

Wrong.

The scientific dialectic view of history is abysmally dumb and leads to a prediction of the future which is absolutely proven false

Your examples are irrelevant as they have nothing to do with capitalism


Nothing he ever predicted came true every prediction he made was precisely 180 degrees the opposite.

He knew NOTHING about economics and was sensationally ignorant'

Nothing he ever predicted came true every prediction he made was precisely 180 degrees the opposite.

He knew NOTHING about economics and was sensationally ignorant'

"Happy birthday to Karl Marx, who was born 200 years ago on May 5. He was the most astute and influential critic of capitalism in history — and also the most misunderstood...."

"And as economist Branko Milanovic argues, Marx is incontestably one of the greatest and most influential intellectuals of all time, right up there with Aristotle and Augustine.

"If nothing else, he is worth examining for that reason alone.

"But not only for that.

"Today, as against the neoclassicals who view the capitalist economy as a perfect self-regulating machine, Marx reminds us that capitalism has an inherent tendency towards crisis — and the purer the capitalist institutions, the worse these crises are.

"His historical grounding is refreshing in an economics profession that is far too often obsessed with arid mathematical theories bearing little or no relationship to reality."

It's time to normalize Karl Marx

You may disagree with what he had to say, but there's little doubt he's among the top ten public intellectuals of all time.

Marx never held a job, really?

Writings on the American Civil War

"Works of Karl Marx and Frederick Engels 1861

"Writings on the U.S. Civil War"

Yes it is true he NEVER held a job or collected a pay check or paid a bill or balanced a check book

He lived as a dead beat bum his entire life begging for handouts from others.

This is why he was MASSIVELY ignorant about economics and every treatise or idea he wrote about economics if absolutely wrong.

His ideas on economics are in fact the equivalent of a 600 lb morbidly obese person writing about diet and healthy living

This is why he was MASSIVELY ignorant about economics and every treatise or idea he wrote about economics if absolutely wrong.

His ideas on economics are in fact the equivalent of a 600 lb morbidly obese person writing about diet and healthy living

Introduction to the Revolutionary Philosophy of Marxism

"Most people would not dream of expressing an informed opinion about brain surgery or quantum mechanics without specialized knowledge of these fields, but matters seem to be quite different when it comes to Marxism. It seems that anyone can express an opinion about Marxism without having read a single line of what Marx and Engels actually wrote."

Sound like anyone you know?

Socialism is for fucking losers that can’t make it in the real world

 

[Polishprince]

Karl Marx's London grave vandalised in suspected hammer attack

Someone had the guts to begin tearing down an abomination to humanity. I can't believe it isn't a public toilet but if I get the chance I will piss there someday.

Communism killed more people in the 20th Century than did Naziism. Hitler's corpus is in an unmarked grave, the same should be done for the father of this other Atrocity.

 

[georgephillip]

"Happy birthday to Karl Marx, who was born 200 years ago on May 5. He was the most astute and influential critic of capitalism in history — and also the most misunderstood...."

"And as economist Branko Milanovic argues, Marx is incontestably one of the greatest and most influential intellectuals of all time, right up there with Aristotle and Augustine.

"If nothing else, he is worth examining for that reason alone.

"But not only for that.

"Today, as against the neoclassicals who view the capitalist economy as a perfect self-regulating machine, Marx reminds us that capitalism has an inherent tendency towards crisis — and the purer the capitalist institutions, the worse these crises are.

"His historical grounding is refreshing in an economics profession that is far too often obsessed with arid mathematical theories bearing little or no relationship to reality."

It's time to normalize Karl Marx

You may disagree with what he had to say, but there's little doubt he's among the top ten public intellectuals of all time.

Marx never held a job, really?

Writings on the American Civil War

"Works of Karl Marx and Frederick Engels 1861

"Writings on the U.S. Civil War"

Yes it is true he NEVER held a job or collected a pay check or paid a bill or balanced a check book

He lived as a dead beat bum his entire life begging for handouts from others.

This is why he was MASSIVELY ignorant about economics and every treatise or idea he wrote about economics if absolutely wrong.

His ideas on economics are in fact the equivalent of a 600 lb morbidly obese person writing about diet and healthy living

This is why he was MASSIVELY ignorant about economics and every treatise or idea he wrote about economics if absolutely wrong.

His ideas on economics are in fact the equivalent of a 600 lb morbidly obese person writing about diet and healthy living

Introduction to the Revolutionary Philosophy of Marxism

"Most people would not dream of expressing an informed opinion about brain surgery or quantum mechanics without specialized knowledge of these fields, but matters seem to be quite different when it comes to Marxism. It seems that anyone can express an opinion about Marxism without having read a single line of what Marx and Engels actually wrote."

Sound like anyone you know?

Socialism is for fucking losers that can’t make it in the real world

Socialism is for fucking losers that can’t make it in the real world

Is this your idea of a winner?

Loon.

 

[Pete7469]

Karl Marx's London grave vandalised in suspected hammer attack

Someone had the guts to begin tearing down an abomination to humanity. I can't believe it isn't a public toilet but if I get the chance I will piss there someday.

Communism killed more people in the 20th Century than did Naziism. Hitler's corpus is in an unmarked grave, the same should be done for the father of this other Atrocity.

An unmarked grave or a public toilet

I'd make it the later.

Same with stalin, mao, lenin, hitler, et al....


.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Marx never held a job, really?

Writings on the American Civil War

"Works of Karl Marx and Frederick Engels 1861

"Writings on the U.S. Civil War"

Yes it is true he NEVER held a job or collected a pay check or paid a bill or balanced a check book

He lived as a dead beat bum his entire life begging for handouts from others.

This is why he was MASSIVELY ignorant about economics and every treatise or idea he wrote about economics if absolutely wrong.

His ideas on economics are in fact the equivalent of a 600 lb morbidly obese person writing about diet and healthy living

This is why he was MASSIVELY ignorant about economics and every treatise or idea he wrote about economics if absolutely wrong.

His ideas on economics are in fact the equivalent of a 600 lb morbidly obese person writing about diet and healthy living

Introduction to the Revolutionary Philosophy of Marxism

"Most people would not dream of expressing an informed opinion about brain surgery or quantum mechanics without specialized knowledge of these fields, but matters seem to be quite different when it comes to Marxism. It seems that anyone can express an opinion about Marxism without having read a single line of what Marx and Engels actually wrote."

Sound like anyone you know?

Socialism is for fucking losers that can’t make it in the real world

Socialism is for fucking losers that can’t make it in the real world

Is this your idea of a winner?

Loon.

Why would anyone wish to " normalize " an I ideology which consistently results in massive increases in poverty, destitution and starvation ?

Capitalism has accomplished exactly the opposite where ever it is allowed to flourish but that is beside the point.

Every attempt to implement Marxs theories have ended on death genocide and disaster

That is absolute fact so explain why the fools who wish to normalize Marx have any valid ideas?

 

[Rustic]

Marx never held a job, really?

Writings on the American Civil War

"Works of Karl Marx and Frederick Engels 1861

"Writings on the U.S. Civil War"

Yes it is true he NEVER held a job or collected a pay check or paid a bill or balanced a check book

He lived as a dead beat bum his entire life begging for handouts from others.

This is why he was MASSIVELY ignorant about economics and every treatise or idea he wrote about economics if absolutely wrong.

His ideas on economics are in fact the equivalent of a 600 lb morbidly obese person writing about diet and healthy living

This is why he was MASSIVELY ignorant about economics and every treatise or idea he wrote about economics if absolutely wrong.

His ideas on economics are in fact the equivalent of a 600 lb morbidly obese person writing about diet and healthy living

Introduction to the Revolutionary Philosophy of Marxism

"Most people would not dream of expressing an informed opinion about brain surgery or quantum mechanics without specialized knowledge of these fields, but matters seem to be quite different when it comes to Marxism. It seems that anyone can express an opinion about Marxism without having read a single line of what Marx and Engels actually wrote."

Sound like anyone you know?

Socialism is for fucking losers that can’t make it in the real world

Socialism is for fucking losers that can’t make it in the real world

Is this your idea of a winner?

Loon.

Lol
Congress does the spending, because if I remember correctly they control the purse strings.

Anyway, only a fucking moron would hold Karl Marx and his supporters in the high regard....

 

[georgephillip]

Why would anyone wish to " normalize " an I ideology which consistently results in massive increases in poverty, destitution and starvation ?

Because an economic system that concentrates wealth in fewer and fewer hands with each passing generation will continue to inflict poverty, war, and starvation on millions of innocent human beings in order for a small percentage to the world's population to live the "American Dream."

Monthly Review | Why Socialism?

"Private capital tends to become concentrated in few hands, partly because of competition among the capitalists, and partly because technological development and the increasing division of labor encourage the formation of larger units of production at the expense of smaller ones.

"The result of these developments is an oligarchy of private capital the enormous power of which cannot be effectively checked even by a democratically organized political society.

"This is true since the members of legislative bodies are selected by political parties, largely financed or otherwise influenced by private capitalists who, for all practical purposes, separate the electorate from the legislature.

"The consequence is that the representatives of the people do not in fact sufficiently protect the interests of the underprivileged sections of the population.

"Moreover, under existing conditions, private capitalists inevitably control, directly or indirectly, the main sources of information (press, radio, education).

"It is thus extremely difficult, and indeed in most cases quite impossible, for the individual citizen to come to objective conclusions and to make intelligent use of his political rights."

 

[georgephillip]

Marx never held a job, really?

Writings on the American Civil War

"Works of Karl Marx and Frederick Engels 1861

"Writings on the U.S. Civil War"

Yes it is true he NEVER held a job or collected a pay check or paid a bill or balanced a check book

He lived as a dead beat bum his entire life begging for handouts from others.

This is why he was MASSIVELY ignorant about economics and every treatise or idea he wrote about economics if absolutely wrong.

His ideas on economics are in fact the equivalent of a 600 lb morbidly obese person writing about diet and healthy living

This is why he was MASSIVELY ignorant about economics and every treatise or idea he wrote about economics if absolutely wrong.

His ideas on economics are in fact the equivalent of a 600 lb morbidly obese person writing about diet and healthy living

Introduction to the Revolutionary Philosophy of Marxism

"Most people would not dream of expressing an informed opinion about brain surgery or quantum mechanics without specialized knowledge of these fields, but matters seem to be quite different when it comes to Marxism. It seems that anyone can express an opinion about Marxism without having read a single line of what Marx and Engels actually wrote."

Sound like anyone you know?

Socialism is for fucking losers that can’t make it in the real world

Socialism is for fucking losers that can’t make it in the real world

Is this your idea of a winner?

Loon.

Lol
Congress does the spending, because if I remember correctly they control the purse strings.

Anyway, only a fucking moron would hold Karl Marx and his supporters in the high regard....

Lol
Congress does the spending, because if I remember correctly they control the purse strings.

Anyway, only a fucking moron would hold Karl Marx and his supporters in the high regard....

Did you vote for this fucking moron?

Sure you did.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Why would anyone wish to " normalize " an I ideology which consistently results in massive increases in poverty, destitution and starvation ?

Because an economic system that concentrates wealth in fewer and fewer hands with each passing generation will continue to inflict poverty, war, and starvation on millions of innocent human beings in order for a small percentage to the world's population to live the "American Dream."

Monthly Review | Why Socialism?

"Private capital tends to become concentrated in few hands, partly because of competition among the capitalists, and partly because technological development and the increasing division of labor encourage the formation of larger units of production at the expense of smaller ones.

"The result of these developments is an oligarchy of private capital the enormous power of which cannot be effectively checked even by a democratically organized political society.

"This is true since the members of legislative bodies are selected by political parties, largely financed or otherwise influenced by private capitalists who, for all practical purposes, separate the electorate from the legislature.

"The consequence is that the representatives of the people do not in fact sufficiently protect the interests of the underprivileged sections of the population.

"Moreover, under existing conditions, private capitalists inevitably control, directly or indirectly, the main sources of information (press, radio, education).

"It is thus extremely difficult, and indeed in most cases quite impossible, for the individual citizen to come to objective conclusions and to make intelligent use of his political rights."

All false.

Wealth is created for all and even though the wealthy get more of it a rising tide lifts ALL ships.

Capitalism has decreased poverty and benefited man more than any other system

Communism has not. Communism has consistently made things worse.

So once again even assuming your claims of wealth are true ( they are not ) why would you instead advocate an idea which is proven to be a failure and evil?

 

[Pete7469]

All false.

Wealth is created for all and even though the wealthy get more of it a rising tide lifts ALL ships.

Capitalism has decreased poverty and benefited man more than any other system

Communism has not. Communism has consistently made things worse.

So once again even assuming your claims of wealth are true ( they are not ) why would you instead advocate an idea which is proven to be a failure and evil?

Bed wetters are programmed to regurgitate that inane bullshit instinctively. You're not arguing with a cognizant human being. You're either arguing with a posting bot, or a piece of shit zealot that is literally as dumb as a parrot.

.

 

[MaryL]

Karl Marx's London grave vandalised in suspected hammer attack

Someone had the guts to begin tearing down an abomination to humanity. I can't believe it isn't a public toilet but if I get the chance I will piss there someday.

Confederate statues, flags or all that aside. What is offensive? What offends me are arrogant if not completely ignorant liberal scolds dictating what is acceptable when they no sense of history whatsoever. Like that.

 

[Tehon]

Why would anyone wish to " normalize " an I ideology which consistently results in massive increases in poverty, destitution and starvation ?

Because an economic system that concentrates wealth in fewer and fewer hands with each passing generation will continue to inflict poverty, war, and starvation on millions of innocent human beings in order for a small percentage to the world's population to live the "American Dream."

Monthly Review | Why Socialism?

"Private capital tends to become concentrated in few hands, partly because of competition among the capitalists, and partly because technological development and the increasing division of labor encourage the formation of larger units of production at the expense of smaller ones.

"The result of these developments is an oligarchy of private capital the enormous power of which cannot be effectively checked even by a democratically organized political society.

"This is true since the members of legislative bodies are selected by political parties, largely financed or otherwise influenced by private capitalists who, for all practical purposes, separate the electorate from the legislature.

"The consequence is that the representatives of the people do not in fact sufficiently protect the interests of the underprivileged sections of the population.

"Moreover, under existing conditions, private capitalists inevitably control, directly or indirectly, the main sources of information (press, radio, education).

"It is thus extremely difficult, and indeed in most cases quite impossible, for the individual citizen to come to objective conclusions and to make intelligent use of his political rights."

All false.

Wealth is created for all and even though the wealthy get more of it a rising tide lifts ALL ships.

Capitalism has decreased poverty and benefited man more than any other system

Communism has not. Communism has consistently made things worse.

So once again even assuming your claims of wealth are true ( they are not ) why would you instead advocate an idea which is proven to be a failure and evil?

Communism has yet to exist.

Marx was well aware of the benefits to our social evolution provided by the capitalist means of production. He was also well aware of how it would develop and how its full development would come to contradict societies needs.

We are witnessing that play out. Trump's election is a manifestation of that contradiction.

Socialism only develops out of fully developed capitalism. Be patient, it's coming.

 

[Polishprince]

Why would anyone wish to " normalize " an I ideology which consistently results in massive increases in poverty, destitution and starvation ?

Because an economic system that concentrates wealth in fewer and fewer hands with each passing generation will continue to inflict poverty, war, and starvation on millions of innocent human beings in order for a small percentage to the world's population to live the "American Dream."

Monthly Review | Why Socialism?

"Private capital tends to become concentrated in few hands, partly because of competition among the capitalists, and partly because technological development and the increasing division of labor encourage the formation of larger units of production at the expense of smaller ones.

"The result of these developments is an oligarchy of private capital the enormous power of which cannot be effectively checked even by a democratically organized political society.

"This is true since the members of legislative bodies are selected by political parties, largely financed or otherwise influenced by private capitalists who, for all practical purposes, separate the electorate from the legislature.

"The consequence is that the representatives of the people do not in fact sufficiently protect the interests of the underprivileged sections of the population.

"Moreover, under existing conditions, private capitalists inevitably control, directly or indirectly, the main sources of information (press, radio, education).

"It is thus extremely difficult, and indeed in most cases quite impossible, for the individual citizen to come to objective conclusions and to make intelligent use of his political rights."

All false.

Wealth is created for all and even though the wealthy get more of it a rising tide lifts ALL ships.

Capitalism has decreased poverty and benefited man more than any other system

Communism has not. Communism has consistently made things worse.

So once again even assuming your claims of wealth are true ( they are not ) why would you instead advocate an idea which is proven to be a failure and evil?

Communism has yet to exist.

Marx was well aware of the benefits to our social evolution provided by the capitalist means of production. He was also well aware of how it would develop and how its full development would come to contradict societies needs.

We are witnessing that play out. Trump's election is a manifestation of that contradiction.

Socialism only develops out of fully developed capitalism. Be patient, it's coming.

Actually, communism has existed and thrived in many places throughout history. In Cuba, North Korea, Venezuela. The results of a single party exercising totalitarian control don't have to be "imagined" as Lennon said, you just have to open your eyes.

By the way, North Korea is looking to abandon communism, I would not be surprised to see NK be fully free before you know it.


Our President tweeted about NK just yesterday.


Donald J. Trump‏Verified account @realDonaldTrump Feb 8
North Korea, under the leadership of Kim Jong Un, will become a great Economic Powerhouse. He may surprise some but he won’t surprise me, because I have gotten to know him & fully understand how capable he is. North Korea will become a different kind of Rocket - an Economic one!

41,496 replies28,100 retweets126,705 likes

 

[Soupnazi630]

Why would anyone wish to " normalize " an I ideology which consistently results in massive increases in poverty, destitution and starvation ?

Because an economic system that concentrates wealth in fewer and fewer hands with each passing generation will continue to inflict poverty, war, and starvation on millions of innocent human beings in order for a small percentage to the world's population to live the "American Dream."

Monthly Review | Why Socialism?

"Private capital tends to become concentrated in few hands, partly because of competition among the capitalists, and partly because technological development and the increasing division of labor encourage the formation of larger units of production at the expense of smaller ones.

"The result of these developments is an oligarchy of private capital the enormous power of which cannot be effectively checked even by a democratically organized political society.

"This is true since the members of legislative bodies are selected by political parties, largely financed or otherwise influenced by private capitalists who, for all practical purposes, separate the electorate from the legislature.

"The consequence is that the representatives of the people do not in fact sufficiently protect the interests of the underprivileged sections of the population.

"Moreover, under existing conditions, private capitalists inevitably control, directly or indirectly, the main sources of information (press, radio, education).

"It is thus extremely difficult, and indeed in most cases quite impossible, for the individual citizen to come to objective conclusions and to make intelligent use of his political rights."

All false.

Wealth is created for all and even though the wealthy get more of it a rising tide lifts ALL ships.

Capitalism has decreased poverty and benefited man more than any other system

Communism has not. Communism has consistently made things worse.

So once again even assuming your claims of wealth are true ( they are not ) why would you instead advocate an idea which is proven to be a failure and evil?

Communism has yet to exist.

Marx was well aware of the benefits to our social evolution provided by the capitalist means of production. He was also well aware of how it would develop and how its full development would come to contradict societies needs.

We are witnessing that play out. Trump's election is a manifestation of that contradiction.

Socialism only develops out of fully developed capitalism. Be patient, it's coming.

Actually you are quite wrong on every count.

Communism is not a state of being it is not the perfect stateless classless society. It is in fact the ideology and process of getting there and it is abominably evil evil by design.

Marx had no clue how capitalism or capitalist means of production would develop. He predicted many things about this development and EVERY thing HE EVER predicted has been absolutely proven wrong.

Society has no needs people do which is there is no such contradiction which is a fact and yet more proof of the absolute stupidity of marx and his followers.

Socialsm is not coming we have seen it fail too many times and is a worthless world view and ideology,

 

[Tehon]

Why would anyone wish to " normalize " an I ideology which consistently results in massive increases in poverty, destitution and starvation ?

Because an economic system that concentrates wealth in fewer and fewer hands with each passing generation will continue to inflict poverty, war, and starvation on millions of innocent human beings in order for a small percentage to the world's population to live the "American Dream."

Monthly Review | Why Socialism?

"Private capital tends to become concentrated in few hands, partly because of competition among the capitalists, and partly because technological development and the increasing division of labor encourage the formation of larger units of production at the expense of smaller ones.

"The result of these developments is an oligarchy of private capital the enormous power of which cannot be effectively checked even by a democratically organized political society.

"This is true since the members of legislative bodies are selected by political parties, largely financed or otherwise influenced by private capitalists who, for all practical purposes, separate the electorate from the legislature.

"The consequence is that the representatives of the people do not in fact sufficiently protect the interests of the underprivileged sections of the population.

"Moreover, under existing conditions, private capitalists inevitably control, directly or indirectly, the main sources of information (press, radio, education).

"It is thus extremely difficult, and indeed in most cases quite impossible, for the individual citizen to come to objective conclusions and to make intelligent use of his political rights."

All false.

Wealth is created for all and even though the wealthy get more of it a rising tide lifts ALL ships.

Capitalism has decreased poverty and benefited man more than any other system

Communism has not. Communism has consistently made things worse.

So once again even assuming your claims of wealth are true ( they are not ) why would you instead advocate an idea which is proven to be a failure and evil?

Communism has yet to exist.

Marx was well aware of the benefits to our social evolution provided by the capitalist means of production. He was also well aware of how it would develop and how its full development would come to contradict societies needs.

We are witnessing that play out. Trump's election is a manifestation of that contradiction.

Socialism only develops out of fully developed capitalism. Be patient, it's coming.

Actually you are quite wrong on every count.

Communism is not a state of being it is not the perfect stateless classless society. It is in fact the ideology and process of getting there and it is abominably evil evil by design.

Marx had no clue how capitalism or capitalist means of production would develop. He predicted many things about this development and EVERY thing HE EVER predicted has been absolutely proven wrong.

Society has no needs people do which is there is no such contradiction which is a fact and yet more proof of the absolute stupidity of marx and his followers.

Socialsm is not coming we have seen it fail too many times and is a worthless world view and ideology,

Trump won the White House because the evil capitalists decided they could produce commodities for greater profit in foreign lands. Americans lost jobs and they voted for the person who promised to bring them back. That is a social contradiction caused by capitalism. It will get worse. You will be clamoring for Marxist philosophy before all is said and done. Be patient.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Why would anyone wish to " normalize " an I ideology which consistently results in massive increases in poverty, destitution and starvation ?

Because an economic system that concentrates wealth in fewer and fewer hands with each passing generation will continue to inflict poverty, war, and starvation on millions of innocent human beings in order for a small percentage to the world's population to live the "American Dream."

Monthly Review | Why Socialism?

"Private capital tends to become concentrated in few hands, partly because of competition among the capitalists, and partly because technological development and the increasing division of labor encourage the formation of larger units of production at the expense of smaller ones.

"The result of these developments is an oligarchy of private capital the enormous power of which cannot be effectively checked even by a democratically organized political society.

"This is true since the members of legislative bodies are selected by political parties, largely financed or otherwise influenced by private capitalists who, for all practical purposes, separate the electorate from the legislature.

"The consequence is that the representatives of the people do not in fact sufficiently protect the interests of the underprivileged sections of the population.

"Moreover, under existing conditions, private capitalists inevitably control, directly or indirectly, the main sources of information (press, radio, education).

"It is thus extremely difficult, and indeed in most cases quite impossible, for the individual citizen to come to objective conclusions and to make intelligent use of his political rights."

All false.

Wealth is created for all and even though the wealthy get more of it a rising tide lifts ALL ships.

Capitalism has decreased poverty and benefited man more than any other system

Communism has not. Communism has consistently made things worse.

So once again even assuming your claims of wealth are true ( they are not ) why would you instead advocate an idea which is proven to be a failure and evil?

Communism has yet to exist.

Marx was well aware of the benefits to our social evolution provided by the capitalist means of production. He was also well aware of how it would develop and how its full development would come to contradict societies needs.

We are witnessing that play out. Trump's election is a manifestation of that contradiction.

Socialism only develops out of fully developed capitalism. Be patient, it's coming.

Actually you are quite wrong on every count.

Communism is not a state of being it is not the perfect stateless classless society. It is in fact the ideology and process of getting there and it is abominably evil evil by design.

Marx had no clue how capitalism or capitalist means of production would develop. He predicted many things about this development and EVERY thing HE EVER predicted has been absolutely proven wrong.

Society has no needs people do which is there is no such contradiction which is a fact and yet more proof of the absolute stupidity of marx and his followers.

Socialsm is not coming we have seen it fail too many times and is a worthless world view and ideology,

Trump won the White House because the evil capitalists decided they could produce commodities for greater profit in foreign lands. Americans lost jobs and they voted for the person who promised to bring them back. That is a social contradiction caused by capitalism. It will get worse. You will be clamoring for Marxist philosophy before all is said and done. Be patient.

Marxist philosophy is evil at the core and by design. It is no coincidence that every nation which has tried it has ended up with genocide, starvation, tyranny, poverty and destitution.

Capitalists can be evil but no one is evil because they are a capitalist and your analysis is massively stupid. Promising jobs was only one small part of why he was elected. Marx you have tunnel vision and ignore all the other factors and motives which led to his election. Jobs was not even the biggest one although he has delivered on it.

There is no social contradiction caused by capitalism.

Explain why anyone would want a philosophy which demands dictatorship?

DO not dodge as you have in the past. Marx preached dictatorship of the proletariat by which he MEANT DICTATORSHIP and despotism and tyranny.

We do not have one now so why would I want one?