Kasich does not belong in the race

[Rustic]

The voters have SOUNDLY rejected him.

Yes they don't want the most qualified. Just crazy.

He's most qualified piece of shit

 

[Rustic]

Pro immigration and anti gun was his death knell

He is neither of those.

Dumbass

 

[Rustic]

Pro immigration and anti gun was his death knell

He is neither of those.

BS...get informed

I am. He is realistic on the issues. You prefer fairytale land.

He does not know his ass from a hole in the ground. dumbass

 

[Rustic]

Maybe Kasich could get some traction with conservatives if he started talking about the size of his dick.

Joe just perked up....

 

[rightwinger]

I am. He is realistic on the issues. You prefer fairytale land.

Evidently you're not...but nice try

You think trump is really pro gun?

I'm not a Trump supporter...stay on point

But shouldn't trump being anti gun have killed him?

Donald Trump Thinks You Should Be Able To Bring Guns Anywhere, Except His Own Hotels

And trump even imported his wife so I don't believe he is anti immigration either.

Why did you think Trump was anti-immigration to begin with? Unlike Obama, Trump is anti-illegal immigration.

Then why does he hire them?

 

[Rustic]

Kasich is the only adult left in the GOP primaries

You mean career politician on the take

 

[Rustic]

Maybe Kasich could get some traction with conservatives if he started talking about the size of his dick.

Kaisch doesn't have a prayer.....and never did

Kasich was part of the GOP establishments plan to win the White House without the base, talk about your plan for failure. Lets be honest there's no freaking way the base was going to vote for Illegal amnesty and infringing on the 2nd amendment. I love his experience, I respect actual experience and accomplishments but the guy belongs in the Democratic party on key issues.

What you fail to understand is that if you ever want to see anything get done on the immigration front then you are going to need common sense proposals that will pass a vote. The extreme positions that the two blowholes take on many issues is just pandering to the base but they will gain no traction in congress without major compromise. Kasich is the only one being honest about this... Trump actually touched on it when he said his policies are negotiating positions... You'll see him get cozy right in the middle during the general election

Amnesty could never work

 

[Rustic]

The voters have SOUNDLY rejected him.

He's the only sane voice among the GOP clowns.

He can't be sane, career politician....

 

[BluesLegend]

Maybe Kasich could get some traction with conservatives if he started talking about the size of his dick.

Kaisch doesn't have a prayer.....and never did

Kasich was part of the GOP establishments plan to win the White House without the base, talk about your plan for failure. Lets be honest there's no freaking way the base was going to vote for Illegal amnesty and infringing on the 2nd amendment. I love his experience, I respect actual experience and accomplishments but the guy belongs in the Democratic party on key issues.

What you fail to understand is that if you ever want to see anything get done on the immigration front then you are going to need common sense proposals that will pass a vote. The extreme positions that the two blowholes take on many issues is just pandering to the base but they will gain no traction in congress without major compromise. Kasich is the only one being honest about this... Trump actually touched on it when he said his policies are negotiating positions... You'll see him get cozy right in the middle during the general election

Amnesty could never work

It didn't work last time, they studied it and it was a net loss to our economy and damaged wages and employment for American citizens.

 

[Rustic]

Too bad Republucans did not select Kasich
He would actually have a chance to beat Hillary

But.....I guess you know best
Trump....Trump.....Trump

John Kasich is about as conservative as Ralph Nader and twice is crazy if that's even possible…

 

[Rustic]

At this point, I think Kasich is running for the 2020 Republican nomination. After the Trump fiasco plays out, the kook wing of the Republicans will lose a lot of influence, and Kasich will be around to promote himself as the sensible choice. And in 2020, he won't have the "nobody has heard of me" handicap to start out with.

John kasich will run on the Socialist party ticket in 2020...

 

[Rustic]

At this point, I think Kasich is running for the 2020 Republican nomination. After the Trump fiasco plays out, the kook wing of the Republicans will lose a lot of influence, and Kasich will be around to promote himself as the sensible choice. And in 2020, he won't have the "nobody has heard of me" handicap to start out with.

Be nice to see a Republican who does not have to pander to the batshit crazy part of the party

He's a RINO

 

[Pogo]

Ummm.... no you didn't. Where do you see the word "force" in the quote? Where?

The word I quoted was "remove." I didn't quote the word "force," you did. So you're a former editor who doesn't know what quote marks look like or what they mean?

Here again-- the entire post:
Fatter o' mact, it's not in the OP, or anywhere in the thread until you bring it in.
Read much?

Which is again why I didn't quote "force." You did. LOL. I quoted "remove." If you remove someone from the ballot, you are forcing them out

---- which is --- once again --- why I asked you where you got the word "force" ---- SINCE NO ONE USED IT.

This is all sailing blissfully over your pointy little head innit?

Shame, shame, you didn't look up what quote marks mean like I told you to ...

Actually I USED quote marks to denote the term I questioned you on ---- which was, once again, "force".
It's still up there in my first post. And it's a question you continue to try to weasel out of.

Howzat working out for ya?

I didn't use quote marks because it was paraphrasing, if you "remove" someone you are forcing them out. You really aren't a bright guy

I'm not the asshat bending over backward to wiggle out of a term I deny having made up, now am I?

 

[theDoctorisIn]

I disagree. People in every state should have a voice to who they prefer to represent them. Names (nor consideration) should not be removed from ballot simply based on the feelings of people who are citizens of other states.

No one gets "removed from the ballot". Anyone who qualified to be on the ballot in the first place will be on it come election day, even if the candidate has already dropped out by that point.

They'll be on the ballot even if they die before election day.

 

[theDoctorisIn]

At this point, I think Kasich is running for the 2020 Republican nomination. After the Trump fiasco plays out, the kook wing of the Republicans will lose a lot of influence, and Kasich will be around to promote himself as the sensible choice. And in 2020, he won't have the "nobody has heard of me" handicap to start out with.

Be nice to see a Republican who does not have to pander to the batshit crazy part of the party

He's a RINO

I've always thought the term "RINO" was hilarious.

Who the fuck are you to claim the whole party, anyway?

 

[Rustic]

At this point, I think Kasich is running for the 2020 Republican nomination. After the Trump fiasco plays out, the kook wing of the Republicans will lose a lot of influence, and Kasich will be around to promote himself as the sensible choice. And in 2020, he won't have the "nobody has heard of me" handicap to start out with.

Be nice to see a Republican who does not have to pander to the batshit crazy part of the party

He's a RINO

I've always thought the term "RINO" was hilarious.

Who the fuck are you to claim the whole party, anyway?

A RINO is a progressive career politician - no matter side of isle....

 

[theDoctorisIn]

At this point, I think Kasich is running for the 2020 Republican nomination. After the Trump fiasco plays out, the kook wing of the Republicans will lose a lot of influence, and Kasich will be around to promote himself as the sensible choice. And in 2020, he won't have the "nobody has heard of me" handicap to start out with.

Be nice to see a Republican who does not have to pander to the batshit crazy part of the party

He's a RINO

I've always thought the term "RINO" was hilarious.

Who the fuck are you to claim the whole party, anyway?

A RINO is a progressive career politician - no matter side of isle....

I don't care what you think the term means.

I just think it's funny that you believe you're in a position to define what the "real" Republican Party stands for.

 

[rightwinger]

I think Trump will offer Kasich the VP to give himself some credibility

Will Kasich demean himself to accept?

 

[Rustic]

At this point, I think Kasich is running for the 2020 Republican nomination. After the Trump fiasco plays out, the kook wing of the Republicans will lose a lot of influence, and Kasich will be around to promote himself as the sensible choice. And in 2020, he won't have the "nobody has heard of me" handicap to start out with.

Be nice to see a Republican who does not have to pander to the batshit crazy part of the party

He's a RINO

I've always thought the term "RINO" was hilarious.

Who the fuck are you to claim the whole party, anyway?

A RINO is a progressive career politician - no matter side of isle....

I don't care what you think the term means.

I just think it's funny that you believe you're in a position to define what the "real" Republican Party stands for.

Lol

 

[kaz]

The word I quoted was "remove." I didn't quote the word "force," you did. So you're a former editor who doesn't know what quote marks look like or what they mean?

Which is again why I didn't quote "force." You did. LOL. I quoted "remove." If you remove someone from the ballot, you are forcing them out

---- which is --- once again --- why I asked you where you got the word "force" ---- SINCE NO ONE USED IT.

This is all sailing blissfully over your pointy little head innit?

Shame, shame, you didn't look up what quote marks mean like I told you to ...

Actually I USED quote marks to denote the term I questioned you on ---- which was, once again, "force".
It's still up there in my first post. And it's a question you continue to try to weasel out of.

Howzat working out for ya?

I didn't use quote marks because it was paraphrasing, if you "remove" someone you are forcing them out. You really aren't a bright guy

I'm not the asshat bending over backward to wiggle out of a term I deny having made up, now am I?

I didn't use quote marks because it was paraphrasing, if you "remove" someone you are forcing them out. You really aren't a bright guy. you don't understand why I quoted "remove" and why I didn't quote "force."

You edited the work of reporters, and you don't know what quote marks mean, you actually really don't. OMG, that is so funny