Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Mormon Bob, there were just as many abortions going on before Roe as after Roe. Women would go to their OB?GYN, he'd perform the abortion and write something else on the chart.
Take a look at birth figures for 1973 and onward. The birth rate actually INCREASED, it didn't drop.
You seem to keep ignoring the fact that no one is driving around in trucks, snatching women off the street and making them get abortions.
Instead, women are making appointments, going to the clinic, getting their little problem taken care of, and getting on with their lives.
If you were serious about less of them doing that, then support paid family leave, universal health care, comprehensive sex education and availability of contraception.
You seem to keep ignoring the fact that no one is driving around in trucks, snatching women off the street and making them get abortions.
Correct...the democrat party is simply setting up abortion mills in black neighborhoods.......continuing their history of racism and killing blacks...but now under cover of law....
Correct...the democrat party is simply setting up abortion mills in black neighborhoods.......continuing their history of racism and killing blacks...but now under cover of law....
It's funny how @Incel Joe is so fond of falsely accursing others of “racism”, and of wanting to kill black people for no good reason; yet he supports murderous racist hate groups like Planned parenthood that have murdered more black people than all groups combined that can in any way be associated with those that he likes to call “racist”.
No one said there was.There is NO Constitutional right to kill a child.
As a settled, accepted fact of Constitutional law, prior to birth, an embryo/fetus is not entitled to Constitutional protections – the rights and protected liberties of the woman being paramount.You're talking about a human being. And by speaking of that human being's health and choices being under the jurisdiction of his mother, you're arguing for the right of the mother to kill than human being in cold blood.
There is no spin that you can pout on it, to hide the murderous evil which you are defending, nor to hide what it very clearly tells us about your own murderous character.
And yet, you believe the TX abortion ban is constitutional.No one said there was.
There is a right to privacy, however – prohibiting the state from compelling women to give birth against their will through force of law.
And yet, you believe the TX abortion ban is constitutional.As a settled, accepted fact of Constitutional law, prior to birth, an embryo/fetus is not entitled to Constitutional protections – the rights and protected liberties of the woman being paramount.
The right of a child to live supersedes the right of a mother to kill it.No one said there was.
There is a right to privacy, however – prohibiting the state from compelling women to give birth against their will through force of law.
That some might perceive an embryo/fetus as a ‘child’ is subjective, devoid of legal and Constitutional merit, in no manner mitigating the right to privacy.
The right of a child to live supersedes the right of a mother to kill it.
Basic human values.
You are a lying piece of shit. None of that would happen and you KNOW it, you just say it to try and scare the rubes.Except it doesn't stop there, does it?
Under such a law, you'd have to investigate every miscarriage as a potential homicide. Did the woman do something that caused her to miscarry a fetus that now has more rights than she has.
Women who smoke or drink or even have shitty diets while pregnant would be guilty of assault. You know all those pharma commercials that tell you in the disclaimer "don't take if pregnant", what happens when women unknowingly continue to take them before they realize they are pregnant?
We've already seen the use of fetal homicide laws to go after women who have had miscarriages. Usually poor women of color because they'd never pull that shit on a white woman... at least not yet.
You are a lying piece of shit. None of that would happen and you KNOW it, you just say it to try and scare the rubes.
Except it doesn't stop there, does it?
Under such a law, you'd have to investigate every miscarriage as a potential homicide. Did the woman do something that caused her to miscarry a fetus that now has more rights than she has.
Women who smoke or drink or even have shitty diets while pregnant would be guilty of assault. You know all those pharma commercials that tell you in the disclaimer "don't take if pregnant", what happens when women unknowingly continue to take them before they realize they are pregnant?
We've already seen the use of fetal homicide laws to go after women who have had miscarriages. Usually poor women of color because they'd never pull that shit on a white woman... at least not yet.
You are morally confused.
It is wrong for a woman to kill a child for the sake of her convenience.
You being a stupid uneducated Moon Bat have a hard time understanding basic human values like it being wrong to kill a child, don't you?
I know you are afraid that the Feminazis will beat you up if you don't support the killing of the children but it is moral to be against abortion on demand for the sake of convenience.
When I have to argue to someone why it is wrong to kill children for the sake of convenience then I am wasting my time. If a person doesn't understand that then they are crazy, confused and immoral and can never be reasoned with.A lot of things are wrong for the sake of convenience. People should smoke, drink, use drugs, sit on their asses and not exercise, eat fatty foods, drive recklessly, etc. But unless you are willing to live in the equivalent of North Korea, you should learn to mind your own fucking business.
Actually, I was brought up Catholic and got 12 years of Fetus Porn propaganda. Here's what I learned. The girls who got that same propaganda for 12 years or worse (they separated the boys and girls after middle school) still ended up getting abortions when their half-ass attempts at contraception failed.
Again, I'd take your side more seriously on this subject if you weren't constantly trying to cut programs for poor children and single mothers.
When I have to argue to someone why it is wrong to kill children for the sake of convenience then I am wasting my time. If a person doesn't understand that then they are crazy, confused and immoral and can never be reasoned with.
Basic human morality is lost on you. Kinda of like it was on Hitler to use a historical analogy.
Get real. Women have been having abortions since the dawn of time... and they will keep having them no matter how much you scream "JESUS!" at them.
Get real Moon Bat. It is wrong for anybody to kill a child for the sake of convenience.
You are one sick puppy if you don't understand that.
Of course all you Moon Bats are sick in the head to one extent or another.
Fetuses aren't children.
Half of zygotes that are fertilized never attach to the uterine wall.
of the ones that do, 20% are miscarried, 20% are aborted and 60% might become a baby...
Now, ideal world, women would never have abortions because contraception would always work and women would only get involved with men who are good father material.
Realistically- abortion happens because we live in a less than ideal world.
You stupid uneducated Moon Bat. By the time a woman knows she is knocked up the zygote stage has long passed. It is a developing human being.
You sound like a Nazi saying that Jew is not human as a justification for killing them.
You stupid uneducated Moon Bats don't know any more about Biology than you know about Economics, History, Climate Science, Ethics or the Constitution, do you?
