🌟 Exclusive 2024 Prime Day Deals! 🌟

Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁

Kerry: Door for 'Two-State Solution' May be Closing

P F Tinmore; et al,

I have read all the cables:

  • 05/22/1948 S/RES/49 (1948)
  • S/773 Military operations in Palestine/Cease-fire order/Truce Commission/Jerusalem - SecCo resolution
  • 05/22/1948 S/776 Military situation in Jerusalem - Cablegram from Chairman SecCo Truce Commission
  • 05/22/1948 S/771 Shooting of US Consul-General Jerusalem - Telegram from United States Representative
  • 05/22/1948 S/766 Palestine question/SecCo questions - UN letter, reply from Provisional Government of Israel in Tel Aviv
  • 05/22/1948 S/792 SecCo resolution 46 - Truce in Palestine - Response by Iraq, Arab States
  • 05/21/1948 S/764 Shelling of Hadassah hospital - Cablegram from Chairman SecCo Truce Commission
  • 05/21/1948 S/765 Jerusalem military attacks - Cablegram from Deputy Municipal Comm-Gen for Jerusalem
  • 05/21/1948 PAL/173 ICRC appeals for security zones in Jerusalem - Press release
  • 05/21/1948 S/763 Military situation in Jerusalem - Cablegram from Chairman SecCo Truce Commission
  • 05/20/1948 S/761 Ceasefire efforts - Cablegram from Chairman SecCo Truce Commission
  • 05/19/1948 S/732 Palestine question - Issues of which SecCo is seized - SecGen summary statement
  • 05/19/1948 S/758 Battle in Jerusalem - Cablegram from Chairman SecCo Truce Commission
  • 05/19/1948 S/759 Military situation in Jerusalem - Cablegram from Chairman SecCo Truce Commission
  • 05/19/1948 S/755 Palestine question/Truce/ Juridical status of Palestine - SecCo draft resolution - United Kingdom amendment
  • 05/19/1948 S/757 Mideast situation/Truce violations - Cablegram from Chairman SecCo Truce Commission/Israel
  • 05/18/1948 S/750 Jerusalem/Arab attack on Armenian Patriarchate - Letter/Cablegram from Israel
  • 05/18/1948 S/772 Situation in Palestine - Presence of Saudi Arabian troops - Communication between SecCo President and Foreign Minister of Saudi Arabia
  • 05/18/1948 S/774 Situation in Palestine - Presence of Yemeni troops - Communication between SecCo President and Yemen Foreign Minister
  • 05/18/1948 S/751 Jerusalem/Jewish attack on Al-Aqsa Mosque Compound - Cablegram from Transjordan
  • 05/18/1948 S/769 Mideast situation/Truce violations - Cablegram from SecCo president, Iraqi response
  • 05/18/1948 S/770 Situation in Palestine - Presence of Lebanese troops - Communication between SecCo President and Lebanese Foreign Minister
  • 05/18/1948 S/768 Mideast situation/Truce violations - Cablegram from SecCo president, Syrian response
  • 05/18/1948 S/767 Mideast situation/Truce violations - SecCo questions, Egyptian response
  • 05/18/1948 S/760 Situation in Palestine - Presence of Transjordan troops - Communication between SecCo President and Foreign Minister of Transjordan
  • 05/18/1948 S/753 Palestine question/1948 war - SecCo questions to the parties
  • 05/18/1948 S/753
  • S/PV.295 Palestine question - A questionnaire to the parties - SecCo decision
  • 05/18/1948 S/754 Shipment of military equipment - Letter/Cablegram from Israel
  • 05/17/1948 A/AC.21/Agenda/76 UN Palestine Commission - Agenda
  • 05/17/1948 S/747/Corr.1 Palestine question - Cablegram from Israel to the SecGen/Corr.
  • 05/17/1948 PAL/169 Palestine question - Palestine Commission adjourns sine die - Press release
  • 05/17/1948 S/749 Situation in Palestine - SecCo draft resolution
  • 05/17/1948 A/AC.21/12/Rev.1 UN Palestine Commission - Documents distributed to the Commission - Note by Secretariat (Rev.1)
  • 05/17/1948 PAL/171 Attack on Jewish quarter Jerusalem - Letter/Cable from Israel, Press release
  • 05/17/1948 A/AC.21/SR.76 UN Palestine Commission adjourns indefinitely - Summary record
  • 05/16/1948 A/AC.21/UK/147 UN Palestine Commission - Palestine Currency Board - Letter from United Kingdom
  • 05/16/1948 A/AC.21/UK/14 UN Palestine Commission - Palestine Currency Board - Letter from United Kingdom
  • 05/16/1948 PAL/167 Transjordan army entry into Palestine - Cable from King Abdullah, Press release
  • 05/15/1948 S/747 Proclamation of state of Israel - Cablegram to SecGen

Where does it say attack Israel?
(COMMENT)

You are correct. The Arabs, just happen to have their troops massed already. The Palestinians initiate a conflict and that gives the Arabs and excuse to enter the sovereign territory of Israel. All politically correct on paper.

Except the world knows the Jewish Leadership was not so stupid as to initiate any hostile action. They were too vulnerable and the risks too high.
independence2.jpg

Most Respectfully,
R

Except the world knows the Jewish Leadership was not so stupid as to initiate any hostile action.

Then how did Israel occupy all that blue in the map?
 
P F Tinmore; et al,

I have read all the cables:

  • 05/22/1948 S/RES/49 (1948)
  • S/773 Military operations in Palestine/Cease-fire order/Truce Commission/Jerusalem - SecCo resolution
  • 05/22/1948 S/776 Military situation in Jerusalem - Cablegram from Chairman SecCo Truce Commission
  • 05/22/1948 S/771 Shooting of US Consul-General Jerusalem - Telegram from United States Representative
  • 05/22/1948 S/766 Palestine question/SecCo questions - UN letter, reply from Provisional Government of Israel in Tel Aviv
  • 05/22/1948 S/792 SecCo resolution 46 - Truce in Palestine - Response by Iraq, Arab States
  • 05/21/1948 S/764 Shelling of Hadassah hospital - Cablegram from Chairman SecCo Truce Commission
  • 05/21/1948 S/765 Jerusalem military attacks - Cablegram from Deputy Municipal Comm-Gen for Jerusalem
  • 05/21/1948 PAL/173 ICRC appeals for security zones in Jerusalem - Press release
  • 05/21/1948 S/763 Military situation in Jerusalem - Cablegram from Chairman SecCo Truce Commission
  • 05/20/1948 S/761 Ceasefire efforts - Cablegram from Chairman SecCo Truce Commission
  • 05/19/1948 S/732 Palestine question - Issues of which SecCo is seized - SecGen summary statement
  • 05/19/1948 S/758 Battle in Jerusalem - Cablegram from Chairman SecCo Truce Commission
  • 05/19/1948 S/759 Military situation in Jerusalem - Cablegram from Chairman SecCo Truce Commission
  • 05/19/1948 S/755 Palestine question/Truce/ Juridical status of Palestine - SecCo draft resolution - United Kingdom amendment
  • 05/19/1948 S/757 Mideast situation/Truce violations - Cablegram from Chairman SecCo Truce Commission/Israel
  • 05/18/1948 S/750 Jerusalem/Arab attack on Armenian Patriarchate - Letter/Cablegram from Israel
  • 05/18/1948 S/772 Situation in Palestine - Presence of Saudi Arabian troops - Communication between SecCo President and Foreign Minister of Saudi Arabia
  • 05/18/1948 S/774 Situation in Palestine - Presence of Yemeni troops - Communication between SecCo President and Yemen Foreign Minister
  • 05/18/1948 S/751 Jerusalem/Jewish attack on Al-Aqsa Mosque Compound - Cablegram from Transjordan
  • 05/18/1948 S/769 Mideast situation/Truce violations - Cablegram from SecCo president, Iraqi response
  • 05/18/1948 S/770 Situation in Palestine - Presence of Lebanese troops - Communication between SecCo President and Lebanese Foreign Minister
  • 05/18/1948 S/768 Mideast situation/Truce violations - Cablegram from SecCo president, Syrian response
  • 05/18/1948 S/767 Mideast situation/Truce violations - SecCo questions, Egyptian response
  • 05/18/1948 S/760 Situation in Palestine - Presence of Transjordan troops - Communication between SecCo President and Foreign Minister of Transjordan
  • 05/18/1948 S/753 Palestine question/1948 war - SecCo questions to the parties
  • 05/18/1948 S/753
  • S/PV.295 Palestine question - A questionnaire to the parties - SecCo decision
  • 05/18/1948 S/754 Shipment of military equipment - Letter/Cablegram from Israel
  • 05/17/1948 A/AC.21/Agenda/76 UN Palestine Commission - Agenda
  • 05/17/1948 S/747/Corr.1 Palestine question - Cablegram from Israel to the SecGen/Corr.
  • 05/17/1948 PAL/169 Palestine question - Palestine Commission adjourns sine die - Press release
  • 05/17/1948 S/749 Situation in Palestine - SecCo draft resolution
  • 05/17/1948 A/AC.21/12/Rev.1 UN Palestine Commission - Documents distributed to the Commission - Note by Secretariat (Rev.1)
  • 05/17/1948 PAL/171 Attack on Jewish quarter Jerusalem - Letter/Cable from Israel, Press release
  • 05/17/1948 A/AC.21/SR.76 UN Palestine Commission adjourns indefinitely - Summary record
  • 05/16/1948 A/AC.21/UK/147 UN Palestine Commission - Palestine Currency Board - Letter from United Kingdom
  • 05/16/1948 A/AC.21/UK/14 UN Palestine Commission - Palestine Currency Board - Letter from United Kingdom
  • 05/16/1948 PAL/167 Transjordan army entry into Palestine - Cable from King Abdullah, Press release
  • 05/15/1948 S/747 Proclamation of state of Israel - Cablegram to SecGen

Where does it say attack Israel?
(COMMENT)

You are correct. The Arabs, just happen to have their troops massed already. The Palestinians initiate a conflict and that gives the Arabs and excuse to enter the sovereign territory of Israel. All politically correct on paper.

Except the world knows the Jewish Leadership was not so stupid as to initiate any hostile action. They were too vulnerable and the risks too high.
independence2.jpg

Most Respectfully,
R
Tinmore assumes everybody is as stupid and ignorant as itself.

I don't believe Tinhorn is stupid or ignorant ... just a lame propagandist. :D
 
Last edited:
The Governments of the Arab League States issued a statement on 15 May 1948, as their forces were advancing into Palestine:

1. Palestine was part of the former Ottoman Empire subject to its law and represented in its parliament. The overwhelming majority of the population of Palestine were Arabs. There was in it a small minority of Jews that enjoyed the same rights and bore the same responsibilities as the [other] inhabitants, and did not suffer any ill-treatment on account of its religious beliefs. The holy places were inviolable and the freedom of access to them was guaranteed.

2. The Arabs have always asked for their freedom and independence. On the outbreak of the First World War, and when the Allies declared that they were fighting for the liberation of peoples, the Arabs joined them and fought on their side with a view to realising their national aspirations and obtaining their independence. England pledged herself to recognise the independence of the Arab countries in Asia, including Palestine. The Arabs played a remarkable part in the achievement of final victory and the Allies have admitted this.

3. In 1917 England issued a declaration in which she expressed her sympathy with the establishment of a National Home for the Jews in Palestine. When the Arabs knew of this they protested against it, but England reassured them by affirming to them that this would not prejudice the right of their countries to freedom and independence or affect the political status of the Arabs in Palestine. Notwithstanding the legally void character of this declaration, it was interpreted by England to aim at no more than the establishment of a spiritual centre for the Jews in Palestine, and to conceal no ulterior political aims, such as the establishment of a Jewish State. The same thing was declared by the Jewish leaders.

4. When the war came to an end England did not keep her promise. Indeed, the Allies placed Palestine under the Mandate system and entrusted England with [the task of carrying it out], in accordance with a document providing for the administration of the country, in the interests of its inhabitants and its preparation for the independence which the Covenant of the League of Nations recognised that Palestine was qualified to have.

5. England administered Palestine in a manner which enabled the Jews to flood it with immigrants and helped them to settle in the country. [This was so] notwithstanding the fact that it was proved that the density of the population in Palestine had exceeded the economic capacity of the country to absorb additional immigrants. England did not pay regard to the interests or rights of the Arab inhabitants, the lawful owners of the country. Although they used to express, by various means, their concern and indignation on account of this state of affairs which was harmful to their being and their future, they [invariably] were met by indifference, imprisonment and oppression.

5 Arab League declaration on the invasion of Pales
 
P F Tinmore; et al,

I have read all the cables:

  • 05/22/1948 S/RES/49 (1948)
  • S/773 Military operations in Palestine/Cease-fire order/Truce Commission/Jerusalem - SecCo resolution
  • 05/22/1948 S/776 Military situation in Jerusalem - Cablegram from Chairman SecCo Truce Commission
  • 05/22/1948 S/771 Shooting of US Consul-General Jerusalem - Telegram from United States Representative
  • 05/22/1948 S/766 Palestine question/SecCo questions - UN letter, reply from Provisional Government of Israel in Tel Aviv
  • 05/22/1948 S/792 SecCo resolution 46 - Truce in Palestine - Response by Iraq, Arab States
  • 05/21/1948 S/764 Shelling of Hadassah hospital - Cablegram from Chairman SecCo Truce Commission
  • 05/21/1948 S/765 Jerusalem military attacks - Cablegram from Deputy Municipal Comm-Gen for Jerusalem
  • 05/21/1948 PAL/173 ICRC appeals for security zones in Jerusalem - Press release
  • 05/21/1948 S/763 Military situation in Jerusalem - Cablegram from Chairman SecCo Truce Commission
  • 05/20/1948 S/761 Ceasefire efforts - Cablegram from Chairman SecCo Truce Commission
  • 05/19/1948 S/732 Palestine question - Issues of which SecCo is seized - SecGen summary statement
  • 05/19/1948 S/758 Battle in Jerusalem - Cablegram from Chairman SecCo Truce Commission
  • 05/19/1948 S/759 Military situation in Jerusalem - Cablegram from Chairman SecCo Truce Commission
  • 05/19/1948 S/755 Palestine question/Truce/ Juridical status of Palestine - SecCo draft resolution - United Kingdom amendment
  • 05/19/1948 S/757 Mideast situation/Truce violations - Cablegram from Chairman SecCo Truce Commission/Israel
  • 05/18/1948 S/750 Jerusalem/Arab attack on Armenian Patriarchate - Letter/Cablegram from Israel
  • 05/18/1948 S/772 Situation in Palestine - Presence of Saudi Arabian troops - Communication between SecCo President and Foreign Minister of Saudi Arabia
  • 05/18/1948 S/774 Situation in Palestine - Presence of Yemeni troops - Communication between SecCo President and Yemen Foreign Minister
  • 05/18/1948 S/751 Jerusalem/Jewish attack on Al-Aqsa Mosque Compound - Cablegram from Transjordan
  • 05/18/1948 S/769 Mideast situation/Truce violations - Cablegram from SecCo president, Iraqi response
  • 05/18/1948 S/770 Situation in Palestine - Presence of Lebanese troops - Communication between SecCo President and Lebanese Foreign Minister
  • 05/18/1948 S/768 Mideast situation/Truce violations - Cablegram from SecCo president, Syrian response
  • 05/18/1948 S/767 Mideast situation/Truce violations - SecCo questions, Egyptian response
  • 05/18/1948 S/760 Situation in Palestine - Presence of Transjordan troops - Communication between SecCo President and Foreign Minister of Transjordan
  • 05/18/1948 S/753 Palestine question/1948 war - SecCo questions to the parties
  • 05/18/1948 S/753
  • S/PV.295 Palestine question - A questionnaire to the parties - SecCo decision
  • 05/18/1948 S/754 Shipment of military equipment - Letter/Cablegram from Israel
  • 05/17/1948 A/AC.21/Agenda/76 UN Palestine Commission - Agenda
  • 05/17/1948 S/747/Corr.1 Palestine question - Cablegram from Israel to the SecGen/Corr.
  • 05/17/1948 PAL/169 Palestine question - Palestine Commission adjourns sine die - Press release
  • 05/17/1948 S/749 Situation in Palestine - SecCo draft resolution
  • 05/17/1948 A/AC.21/12/Rev.1 UN Palestine Commission - Documents distributed to the Commission - Note by Secretariat (Rev.1)
  • 05/17/1948 PAL/171 Attack on Jewish quarter Jerusalem - Letter/Cable from Israel, Press release
  • 05/17/1948 A/AC.21/SR.76 UN Palestine Commission adjourns indefinitely - Summary record
  • 05/16/1948 A/AC.21/UK/147 UN Palestine Commission - Palestine Currency Board - Letter from United Kingdom
  • 05/16/1948 A/AC.21/UK/14 UN Palestine Commission - Palestine Currency Board - Letter from United Kingdom
  • 05/16/1948 PAL/167 Transjordan army entry into Palestine - Cable from King Abdullah, Press release
  • 05/15/1948 S/747 Proclamation of state of Israel - Cablegram to SecGen


(COMMENT)

You are correct. The Arabs, just happen to have their troops massed already. The Palestinians initiate a conflict and that gives the Arabs and excuse to enter the sovereign territory of Israel. All politically correct on paper.

Except the world knows the Jewish Leadership was not so stupid as to initiate any hostile action. They were too vulnerable and the risks too high.
independence2.jpg

Most Respectfully,
R
Tinmore assumes everybody is as stupid and ignorant as itself.

I don't believe Tinhorn is stupid or ignorant ... just a lame propagandist. :D
I agree. His stupidity is that he throws his shit on the wall and assumes everybody is ignorant of the truth.
 
The Governments of the Arab League States issued a statement on 15 May 1948, as their forces were advancing into Palestine:

1. Palestine was part of the former Ottoman Empire subject to its law and represented in its parliament. The overwhelming majority of the population of Palestine were Arabs. There was in it a small minority of Jews that enjoyed the same rights and bore the same responsibilities as the [other] inhabitants, and did not suffer any ill-treatment on account of its religious beliefs. The holy places were inviolable and the freedom of access to them was guaranteed.

2. The Arabs have always asked for their freedom and independence. On the outbreak of the First World War, and when the Allies declared that they were fighting for the liberation of peoples, the Arabs joined them and fought on their side with a view to realising their national aspirations and obtaining their independence. England pledged herself to recognise the independence of the Arab countries in Asia, including Palestine. The Arabs played a remarkable part in the achievement of final victory and the Allies have admitted this.

3. In 1917 England issued a declaration in which she expressed her sympathy with the establishment of a National Home for the Jews in Palestine. When the Arabs knew of this they protested against it, but England reassured them by affirming to them that this would not prejudice the right of their countries to freedom and independence or affect the political status of the Arabs in Palestine. Notwithstanding the legally void character of this declaration, it was interpreted by England to aim at no more than the establishment of a spiritual centre for the Jews in Palestine, and to conceal no ulterior political aims, such as the establishment of a Jewish State. The same thing was declared by the Jewish leaders.

4. When the war came to an end England did not keep her promise. Indeed, the Allies placed Palestine under the Mandate system and entrusted England with [the task of carrying it out], in accordance with a document providing for the administration of the country, in the interests of its inhabitants and its preparation for the independence which the Covenant of the League of Nations recognised that Palestine was qualified to have.

5. England administered Palestine in a manner which enabled the Jews to flood it with immigrants and helped them to settle in the country. [This was so] notwithstanding the fact that it was proved that the density of the population in Palestine had exceeded the economic capacity of the country to absorb additional immigrants. England did not pay regard to the interests or rights of the Arab inhabitants, the lawful owners of the country. Although they used to express, by various means, their concern and indignation on account of this state of affairs which was harmful to their being and their future, they [invariably] were met by indifference, imprisonment and oppression.

5 Arab League declaration on the invasion of Pales
So Arabs basically were against the formation of any Jewish state whatsoever in a land that used to belong to the Ottoman Empire, issued a false statement and then attacked the newly formed Jewish state.
 
The Governments of the Arab League States issued a statement on 15 May 1948, as their forces were advancing into Palestine:

1. Palestine was part of the former Ottoman Empire subject to its law and represented in its parliament. The overwhelming majority of the population of Palestine were Arabs. There was in it a small minority of Jews that enjoyed the same rights and bore the same responsibilities as the [other] inhabitants, and did not suffer any ill-treatment on account of its religious beliefs. The holy places were inviolable and the freedom of access to them was guaranteed.

2. The Arabs have always asked for their freedom and independence. On the outbreak of the First World War, and when the Allies declared that they were fighting for the liberation of peoples, the Arabs joined them and fought on their side with a view to realising their national aspirations and obtaining their independence. England pledged herself to recognise the independence of the Arab countries in Asia, including Palestine. The Arabs played a remarkable part in the achievement of final victory and the Allies have admitted this.

3. In 1917 England issued a declaration in which she expressed her sympathy with the establishment of a National Home for the Jews in Palestine. When the Arabs knew of this they protested against it, but England reassured them by affirming to them that this would not prejudice the right of their countries to freedom and independence or affect the political status of the Arabs in Palestine. Notwithstanding the legally void character of this declaration, it was interpreted by England to aim at no more than the establishment of a spiritual centre for the Jews in Palestine, and to conceal no ulterior political aims, such as the establishment of a Jewish State. The same thing was declared by the Jewish leaders.

4. When the war came to an end England did not keep her promise. Indeed, the Allies placed Palestine under the Mandate system and entrusted England with [the task of carrying it out], in accordance with a document providing for the administration of the country, in the interests of its inhabitants and its preparation for the independence which the Covenant of the League of Nations recognised that Palestine was qualified to have.

5. England administered Palestine in a manner which enabled the Jews to flood it with immigrants and helped them to settle in the country. [This was so] notwithstanding the fact that it was proved that the density of the population in Palestine had exceeded the economic capacity of the country to absorb additional immigrants. England did not pay regard to the interests or rights of the Arab inhabitants, the lawful owners of the country. Although they used to express, by various means, their concern and indignation on account of this state of affairs which was harmful to their being and their future, they [invariably] were met by indifference, imprisonment and oppression.

5 Arab League declaration on the invasion of Pales
So Arabs basically were against the formation of any Jewish state whatsoever in a land that used to belong to the Ottoman Empire, issued a false statement and then attacked the newly formed Jewish state.

Hard to say because the zionuts never tried to negotiate something, they just took land by force, which is never a popular option.
 
Jordan did not exist until 1921 when Winston Churchill invented it.

Demand Jordan cease to exist because it was created by the same powers that created Israel
Jordan was even named "Arab Palestine" while Israel was named "Jewish Palestine". so many Arab Muslim countries were formed at the time Israel and Jordan were created. But apparently the only entity the Arabs have a problem with is the non Muslim one. Anybody who tells you this conflict is not about Muslim intolerance and Islamic religious hatred and bigotry is on drugs.

Amin Al Husseini: Nazi Father of Jihad, Al Qaeda, Arafat, Saddam Hussein and the Muslim Brotherhood - Tell The Children The Truth - Homepage

"There will be peace in the area when Arab mothers love their children more than they hate Jews" - mangled(?) paraphrase/quote of Golda
 
The Governments of the Arab League States issued a statement on 15 May 1948, as their forces were advancing into Palestine:

1. Palestine was part of the former Ottoman Empire subject to its law and represented in its parliament. The overwhelming majority of the population of Palestine were Arabs. There was in it a small minority of Jews that enjoyed the same rights and bore the same responsibilities as the [other] inhabitants, and did not suffer any ill-treatment on account of its religious beliefs. The holy places were inviolable and the freedom of access to them was guaranteed.

2. The Arabs have always asked for their freedom and independence. On the outbreak of the First World War, and when the Allies declared that they were fighting for the liberation of peoples, the Arabs joined them and fought on their side with a view to realising their national aspirations and obtaining their independence. England pledged herself to recognise the independence of the Arab countries in Asia, including Palestine. The Arabs played a remarkable part in the achievement of final victory and the Allies have admitted this.

3. In 1917 England issued a declaration in which she expressed her sympathy with the establishment of a National Home for the Jews in Palestine. When the Arabs knew of this they protested against it, but England reassured them by affirming to them that this would not prejudice the right of their countries to freedom and independence or affect the political status of the Arabs in Palestine. Notwithstanding the legally void character of this declaration, it was interpreted by England to aim at no more than the establishment of a spiritual centre for the Jews in Palestine, and to conceal no ulterior political aims, such as the establishment of a Jewish State. The same thing was declared by the Jewish leaders.

4. When the war came to an end England did not keep her promise. Indeed, the Allies placed Palestine under the Mandate system and entrusted England with [the task of carrying it out], in accordance with a document providing for the administration of the country, in the interests of its inhabitants and its preparation for the independence which the Covenant of the League of Nations recognised that Palestine was qualified to have.

5. England administered Palestine in a manner which enabled the Jews to flood it with immigrants and helped them to settle in the country. [This was so] notwithstanding the fact that it was proved that the density of the population in Palestine had exceeded the economic capacity of the country to absorb additional immigrants. England did not pay regard to the interests or rights of the Arab inhabitants, the lawful owners of the country. Although they used to express, by various means, their concern and indignation on account of this state of affairs which was harmful to their being and their future, they [invariably] were met by indifference, imprisonment and oppression.

5 Arab League declaration on the invasion of Pales
So Arabs basically were against the formation of any Jewish state whatsoever in a land that used to belong to the Ottoman Empire, issued a false statement and then attacked the newly formed Jewish state.

Hard to say because the zionuts never tried to negotiate something, they just took land by force, which is never a popular option.
What's there to negotiate? The land was Ottoman land for the last 600 years, by admission of the attacking Arabs themselves. The Ottoman Empire falls, the land is controlled by the British and some parts the French. The. The land gets divided into many Arab Muslim states, and one, one, Jewish state which happens to be in the ancestral land of the Jews. Arabs didn't seem to have any problems with all the other divided lands but they state very clearly, "there cannot be a Jewish state here", they attack it, and get their butts handed to them.
 
So Arabs basically were against the formation of any Jewish state whatsoever in a land that used to belong to the Ottoman Empire, issued a false statement and then attacked the newly formed Jewish state.

Hard to say because the zionuts never tried to negotiate something, they just took land by force, which is never a popular option.
What's there to negotiate? The land was Ottoman land for the last 600 years, by admission of the attacking Arabs themselves. The Ottoman Empire falls, the land is controlled by the British and some parts the French. The. The land gets divided into many Arab Muslim states, and one, one, Jewish state which happens to be in the ancestral land of the Jews. Arabs didn't seem to have any problems with all the other divided lands but they state very clearly, "there cannot be a Jewish state here", they attack it, and get their butts handed to them.

What I'm saying is that that war isn't over yet and the Jews should use this opportunity to make peace before the arabs nuke up. I want peace, you don't, which makes you part of the problem, not the solution.
 

Forum List

Back
Top