Kerry signs U.N. Arms Trade Treaty

[PaintMyHouse]

It's hard to say if the US constitution guaranteed gun owners the right to not register weapons.

It's not hard to say at all, it doesn't.

 

[OKTexas]

So Kerry signs a treaty that requires the exporting country be provided information on the end user and claims no infringement on constitutional rights. Give me a freaking break.

Kerry signs U.N. Arms Trade Treaty, says won't harm U.S. rights

Your thoughts?

You're wrong.

Your opinion is motivated by partisanism, completely devoid of the facts.

From your link.

'The practical implications for U.S. arms manufacturers are likely to be limited since, as Kerry noted, the United States already has in place the kind of strict export controls for weapons that are outlined in the treaty.

"We are talking about the kind of export controls that for decades have not diminished one iota our ability in the United States as Americans to exercise our rights under the constitution," he said.

"This treaty will not diminish anyone's freedom, in fact the treaty recognizes the freedom of both individuals and states to obtain, possess and use arms for legitimate purposes," Kerry said after signing the treaty.

"Make no mistake, we would never think about supporting a treaty that is inconsistent with the rights of Americans, the rights of American citizens to be able to exercise their guaranteed rights under our constitution," he said.'

The treaty has no bearing whatsoever on American citizens, their fundamental right to possess firearms, and Second Amendment jurisprudence – any claims that the treaty will 'jeopardize' the freedoms of Americans is a lie.

So you buy Kerry's sales pitch, who would have ever suspected that? ROFLMFAO

 

[OKTexas]

So Kerry signs a treaty that requires the exporting country be provided information on the end user and claims no infringement on constitutional rights. Give me a freaking break.

Kerry signs U.N. Arms Trade Treaty, says won't harm U.S. rights

Your thoughts?

You're wrong.

Your opinion is motivated by partisanism, completely devoid of the facts.

From your link.

'The practical implications for U.S. arms manufacturers are likely to be limited since, as Kerry noted, the United States already has in place the kind of strict export controls for weapons that are outlined in the treaty.

"We are talking about the kind of export controls that for decades have not diminished one iota our ability in the United States as Americans to exercise our rights under the constitution," he said.

"This treaty will not diminish anyone's freedom, in fact the treaty recognizes the freedom of both individuals and states to obtain, possess and use arms for legitimate purposes," Kerry said after signing the treaty.

"Make no mistake, we would never think about supporting a treaty that is inconsistent with the rights of Americans, the rights of American citizens to be able to exercise their guaranteed rights under our constitution," he said.'

The treaty has no bearing whatsoever on American citizens, their fundamental right to possess firearms, and Second Amendment jurisprudence – any claims that the treaty will 'jeopardize' the freedoms of Americans is a lie.

It's hard to say if the US constitution guaranteed gun owners the right to not register weapons. This treaty may have an impact.

Federal law prohibits a federal registration.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

So Kerry signs a treaty that requires the exporting country be provided information on the end user and claims no infringement on constitutional rights. Give me a freaking break.

Kerry signs U.N. Arms Trade Treaty, says won't harm U.S. rights

Your thoughts?

You're wrong.

Your opinion is motivated by partisanism, completely devoid of the facts.

From your link.

'The practical implications for U.S. arms manufacturers are likely to be limited since, as Kerry noted, the United States already has in place the kind of strict export controls for weapons that are outlined in the treaty.

"We are talking about the kind of export controls that for decades have not diminished one iota our ability in the United States as Americans to exercise our rights under the constitution," he said.

"This treaty will not diminish anyone's freedom, in fact the treaty recognizes the freedom of both individuals and states to obtain, possess and use arms for legitimate purposes," Kerry said after signing the treaty.

"Make no mistake, we would never think about supporting a treaty that is inconsistent with the rights of Americans, the rights of American citizens to be able to exercise their guaranteed rights under our constitution," he said.'

The treaty has no bearing whatsoever on American citizens, their fundamental right to possess firearms, and Second Amendment jurisprudence – any claims that the treaty will 'jeopardize' the freedoms of Americans is a lie.

It's hard to say if the US constitution guaranteed gun owners the right to not register weapons. This treaty may have an impact.

Federal law prohibits a federal registration.

Federal law says you aren't supposed to be living here illegally. The law is one thing, reality is another...

 

[eagle1462010]

So Kerry signs a treaty that requires the exporting country be provided information on the end user and claims no infringement on constitutional rights. Give me a freaking break.

Kerry signs U.N. Arms Trade Treaty, says won't harm U.S. rights

Your thoughts?

You're wrong.

Your opinion is motivated by partisanism, completely devoid of the facts.

From your link.

'The practical implications for U.S. arms manufacturers are likely to be limited since, as Kerry noted, the United States already has in place the kind of strict export controls for weapons that are outlined in the treaty.

"We are talking about the kind of export controls that for decades have not diminished one iota our ability in the United States as Americans to exercise our rights under the constitution," he said.

"This treaty will not diminish anyone's freedom, in fact the treaty recognizes the freedom of both individuals and states to obtain, possess and use arms for legitimate purposes," Kerry said after signing the treaty.

"Make no mistake, we would never think about supporting a treaty that is inconsistent with the rights of Americans, the rights of American citizens to be able to exercise their guaranteed rights under our constitution," he said.'

The treaty has no bearing whatsoever on American citizens, their fundamental right to possess firearms, and Second Amendment jurisprudence – any claims that the treaty will 'jeopardize' the freedoms of Americans is a lie.

It's hard to say if the US constitution guaranteed gun owners the right to not register weapons. This treaty may have an impact.

Federal law prohibits a federal registration.

The countries who banned guns all started with a Registry.....................they wanted to know who had the guns first...............

UN BS doesn't trump our laws or constitution..............we have no reason to honor any of their BS............The leftist want to take all guns here and have been trying for a long time to do so...........If they ever succeed...................we'll hand over the bullets first...............

 

[eagle1462010]

So Kerry signs a treaty that requires the exporting country be provided information on the end user and claims no infringement on constitutional rights. Give me a freaking break.

Kerry signs U.N. Arms Trade Treaty, says won't harm U.S. rights

Your thoughts?

You're wrong.

Your opinion is motivated by partisanism, completely devoid of the facts.

From your link.

'The practical implications for U.S. arms manufacturers are likely to be limited since, as Kerry noted, the United States already has in place the kind of strict export controls for weapons that are outlined in the treaty.

"We are talking about the kind of export controls that for decades have not diminished one iota our ability in the United States as Americans to exercise our rights under the constitution," he said.

"This treaty will not diminish anyone's freedom, in fact the treaty recognizes the freedom of both individuals and states to obtain, possess and use arms for legitimate purposes," Kerry said after signing the treaty.

"Make no mistake, we would never think about supporting a treaty that is inconsistent with the rights of Americans, the rights of American citizens to be able to exercise their guaranteed rights under our constitution," he said.'

The treaty has no bearing whatsoever on American citizens, their fundamental right to possess firearms, and Second Amendment jurisprudence – any claims that the treaty will 'jeopardize' the freedoms of Americans is a lie.

It's hard to say if the US constitution guaranteed gun owners the right to not register weapons. This treaty may have an impact.

Federal law prohibits a federal registration.

Federal law says you aren't supposed to be living here illegally. The law is one thing, reality is another...

The Reality is that if you ever get your WET LIBERAL DREAMS inacted...............that you'll get your civil war...........I suggest you volunteer to be a gun grabber should that ever occur...................and put your ass on the line to take all THOSE EVIL WEAPONS AWAY BITCH.................WE'll be nice and give you the ammo first to prove our guns are unloaded......................

 

[PaintMyHouse]

So Kerry signs a treaty that requires the exporting country be provided information on the end user and claims no infringement on constitutional rights. Give me a freaking break.

Kerry signs U.N. Arms Trade Treaty, says won't harm U.S. rights

Your thoughts?

You're wrong.

Your opinion is motivated by partisanism, completely devoid of the facts.

From your link.

'The practical implications for U.S. arms manufacturers are likely to be limited since, as Kerry noted, the United States already has in place the kind of strict export controls for weapons that are outlined in the treaty.

"We are talking about the kind of export controls that for decades have not diminished one iota our ability in the United States as Americans to exercise our rights under the constitution," he said.

"This treaty will not diminish anyone's freedom, in fact the treaty recognizes the freedom of both individuals and states to obtain, possess and use arms for legitimate purposes," Kerry said after signing the treaty.

"Make no mistake, we would never think about supporting a treaty that is inconsistent with the rights of Americans, the rights of American citizens to be able to exercise their guaranteed rights under our constitution," he said.'

The treaty has no bearing whatsoever on American citizens, their fundamental right to possess firearms, and Second Amendment jurisprudence – any claims that the treaty will 'jeopardize' the freedoms of Americans is a lie.

It's hard to say if the US constitution guaranteed gun owners the right to not register weapons. This treaty may have an impact.

Federal law prohibits a federal registration.

The countries who banned guns all started with a Registry.....................they wanted to know who had the guns first...............

UN BS doesn't trump our laws or constitution..............we have no reason to honor any of their BS............The leftist want to take all guns here and have been trying for a long time to do so...........If they ever succeed...................we'll hand over the bullets first...............

Shooting at a tank, or a drone, or a robot isn't going to do you much good. By the time they come for them, that will be your adversary, no humans in jackboots required...

 

[PaintMyHouse]

So Kerry signs a treaty that requires the exporting country be provided information on the end user and claims no infringement on constitutional rights. Give me a freaking break.

Kerry signs U.N. Arms Trade Treaty, says won't harm U.S. rights

Your thoughts?

You're wrong.

Your opinion is motivated by partisanism, completely devoid of the facts.

From your link.

'The practical implications for U.S. arms manufacturers are likely to be limited since, as Kerry noted, the United States already has in place the kind of strict export controls for weapons that are outlined in the treaty.

"We are talking about the kind of export controls that for decades have not diminished one iota our ability in the United States as Americans to exercise our rights under the constitution," he said.

"This treaty will not diminish anyone's freedom, in fact the treaty recognizes the freedom of both individuals and states to obtain, possess and use arms for legitimate purposes," Kerry said after signing the treaty.

"Make no mistake, we would never think about supporting a treaty that is inconsistent with the rights of Americans, the rights of American citizens to be able to exercise their guaranteed rights under our constitution," he said.'

The treaty has no bearing whatsoever on American citizens, their fundamental right to possess firearms, and Second Amendment jurisprudence – any claims that the treaty will 'jeopardize' the freedoms of Americans is a lie.

It's hard to say if the US constitution guaranteed gun owners the right to not register weapons. This treaty may have an impact.

Federal law prohibits a federal registration.

Federal law says you aren't supposed to be living here illegally. The law is one thing, reality is another...

The Reality is that if you ever get your WET LIBERAL DREAMS inacted...............that you'll get your civil war...........I suggest you volunteer to be a gun grabber should that ever occur...................and put your ass on the line to take all THOSE EVIL WEAPONS AWAY BITCH.................WE'll be nice and give you the ammo first to prove our guns are unloaded......................

Why would you think they'd knock on the door? Here's how it would happen, you'd either send the women and children out first, and the guns out second, or the drone would make doing either unnecessary. You think for some reason that it would be a fair fight, and there's not a chance in hell that it would be...

Surrender or die, your call...

 

[eagle1462010]

So Kerry signs a treaty that requires the exporting country be provided information on the end user and claims no infringement on constitutional rights. Give me a freaking break.

Kerry signs U.N. Arms Trade Treaty, says won't harm U.S. rights

Your thoughts?

You're wrong.

Your opinion is motivated by partisanism, completely devoid of the facts.

From your link.

'The practical implications for U.S. arms manufacturers are likely to be limited since, as Kerry noted, the United States already has in place the kind of strict export controls for weapons that are outlined in the treaty.

"We are talking about the kind of export controls that for decades have not diminished one iota our ability in the United States as Americans to exercise our rights under the constitution," he said.

"This treaty will not diminish anyone's freedom, in fact the treaty recognizes the freedom of both individuals and states to obtain, possess and use arms for legitimate purposes," Kerry said after signing the treaty.

"Make no mistake, we would never think about supporting a treaty that is inconsistent with the rights of Americans, the rights of American citizens to be able to exercise their guaranteed rights under our constitution," he said.'

The treaty has no bearing whatsoever on American citizens, their fundamental right to possess firearms, and Second Amendment jurisprudence – any claims that the treaty will 'jeopardize' the freedoms of Americans is a lie.

It's hard to say if the US constitution guaranteed gun owners the right to not register weapons. This treaty may have an impact.

Federal law prohibits a federal registration.

The countries who banned guns all started with a Registry.....................they wanted to know who had the guns first...............

UN BS doesn't trump our laws or constitution..............we have no reason to honor any of their BS............The leftist want to take all guns here and have been trying for a long time to do so...........If they ever succeed...................we'll hand over the bullets first...............

Shooting at a tank, or a drone, or a robot isn't going to do you much good. By the time they come for them, that will be your adversary, no humans in jackboots required...

Yeah right Macho man...................You leftist tools would be using this gun...........or of course hiding under your bed.............

 

[eagle1462010]

You're wrong.

Your opinion is motivated by partisanism, completely devoid of the facts.

From your link.

'The practical implications for U.S. arms manufacturers are likely to be limited since, as Kerry noted, the United States already has in place the kind of strict export controls for weapons that are outlined in the treaty.

"We are talking about the kind of export controls that for decades have not diminished one iota our ability in the United States as Americans to exercise our rights under the constitution," he said.

"This treaty will not diminish anyone's freedom, in fact the treaty recognizes the freedom of both individuals and states to obtain, possess and use arms for legitimate purposes," Kerry said after signing the treaty.

"Make no mistake, we would never think about supporting a treaty that is inconsistent with the rights of Americans, the rights of American citizens to be able to exercise their guaranteed rights under our constitution," he said.'

The treaty has no bearing whatsoever on American citizens, their fundamental right to possess firearms, and Second Amendment jurisprudence – any claims that the treaty will 'jeopardize' the freedoms of Americans is a lie.

It's hard to say if the US constitution guaranteed gun owners the right to not register weapons. This treaty may have an impact.

Federal law prohibits a federal registration.

Federal law says you aren't supposed to be living here illegally. The law is one thing, reality is another...

The Reality is that if you ever get your WET LIBERAL DREAMS inacted...............that you'll get your civil war...........I suggest you volunteer to be a gun grabber should that ever occur...................and put your ass on the line to take all THOSE EVIL WEAPONS AWAY BITCH.................WE'll be nice and give you the ammo first to prove our guns are unloaded......................

Why would you think they'd knock on the door? Here's how it would happen, you'd either send the women and children out first, and the guns out second, or the drone would make doing either unnecessary. You think for some reason that it would be a fair fight, and there's not a chance in hell that it would be...

Surrender or die, your call...

Better to die than to accept the tyranny of people like you who will be far from the fray drinking liberal Kool aide........

That would be you...........and too stupid to unload them first....................enjoy the bon fire.

 

[eagle1462010]

 

[The Irish Ram]

Right to privacy has been dead since Reagan and the War on Drugs...Same with due process...

Long before that. These morons are just worried that if they have to register their guns we'll know where they are, which we already do. The registry just makes it easier to figure out how big a drone to use when they start their own private war...

I always buy mine on the sly....

Then announce it to the world.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

It's hard to say if the US constitution guaranteed gun owners the right to not register weapons. This treaty may have an impact.

Federal law prohibits a federal registration.

Federal law says you aren't supposed to be living here illegally. The law is one thing, reality is another...

The Reality is that if you ever get your WET LIBERAL DREAMS inacted...............that you'll get your civil war...........I suggest you volunteer to be a gun grabber should that ever occur...................and put your ass on the line to take all THOSE EVIL WEAPONS AWAY BITCH.................WE'll be nice and give you the ammo first to prove our guns are unloaded......................

Why would you think they'd knock on the door? Here's how it would happen, you'd either send the women and children out first, and the guns out second, or the drone would make doing either unnecessary. You think for some reason that it would be a fair fight, and there's not a chance in hell that it would be...

Surrender or die, your call...

Better to die than to accept the tyranny of people like you who will be far from the fray drinking liberal Kool aide........

That would be you...........and too stupid to unload them first....................enjoy the bon fire.

I use guns, I don't pray to them. Regardless, what I said is true. You are preparing for this:

instead of this:

Good luck, Rambo, you'll need it, in the next life...

 

[eagle1462010]

Federal law prohibits a federal registration.

Federal law says you aren't supposed to be living here illegally. The law is one thing, reality is another...

The Reality is that if you ever get your WET LIBERAL DREAMS inacted...............that you'll get your civil war...........I suggest you volunteer to be a gun grabber should that ever occur...................and put your ass on the line to take all THOSE EVIL WEAPONS AWAY BITCH.................WE'll be nice and give you the ammo first to prove our guns are unloaded......................

Why would you think they'd knock on the door? Here's how it would happen, you'd either send the women and children out first, and the guns out second, or the drone would make doing either unnecessary. You think for some reason that it would be a fair fight, and there's not a chance in hell that it would be...

Surrender or die, your call...

Better to die than to accept the tyranny of people like you who will be far from the fray drinking liberal Kool aide........

That would be you...........and too stupid to unload them first....................enjoy the bon fire.

I use guns, I don't pray to them. Regardless, what I said is true. You are preparing for this:

instead of this:

Good luck, Rambo, you'll need it, in the next life...

Then I'll die for Freedom.......................what will you die for.......................imposing your will on others and say that's real Freedom....................Mr. Jr. Hitler....................................riddle me this............................Die hard battery..............a few components..........................why did your phone just melt down............................................Do you think you will be fighting retards dumb ass..........................

Pass the gun grabber law bitch.........and you will get your civil war.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Do you think you will be fighting retards dumb ass...

That's not even open for debate. You brought an AR-15, to a drone fight...

 

[KissMy]

So Kerry signs a treaty that requires the exporting country be provided information on the end user and claims no infringement on constitutional rights. Give me a freaking break.

Kerry signs U.N. Arms Trade Treaty, says won't harm U.S. rights

Your thoughts?

You're wrong.

Your opinion is motivated by partisanism, completely devoid of the facts.

From your link.

'The practical implications for U.S. arms manufacturers are likely to be limited since, as Kerry noted, the United States already has in place the kind of strict export controls for weapons that are outlined in the treaty.

"We are talking about the kind of export controls that for decades have not diminished one iota our ability in the United States as Americans to exercise our rights under the constitution," he said.

"This treaty will not diminish anyone's freedom, in fact the treaty recognizes the freedom of both individuals and states to obtain, possess and use arms for legitimate purposes," Kerry said after signing the treaty.

"Make no mistake, we would never think about supporting a treaty that is inconsistent with the rights of Americans, the rights of American citizens to be able to exercise their guaranteed rights under our constitution," he said.'

The treaty has no bearing whatsoever on American citizens, their fundamental right to possess firearms, and Second Amendment jurisprudence – any claims that the treaty will 'jeopardize' the freedoms of Americans is a lie.

It's hard to say if the US constitution guaranteed gun owners the right to not register weapons. This treaty may have an impact.

Federal law prohibits a federal registration.

What part of the 2nd amendment prohibits gun registration? "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."

 

[eagle1462010]

Do you think you will be fighting retards dumb ass...

That's not even open for debate. You brought an AR-15, to a drone fight...

LOL

Mr. Internet troll.......................the only time you agree with the use of force is against your own people..........if you are actually an American..........Hell you even said we shouldn't have fought in WWII.................tells all I need to know about you..........................

Primarily you are nothing more than a troll who feeds off flaming threads with your BS

 

[eagle1462010]

So Kerry signs a treaty that requires the exporting country be provided information on the end user and claims no infringement on constitutional rights. Give me a freaking break.

Kerry signs U.N. Arms Trade Treaty, says won't harm U.S. rights

Your thoughts?

You're wrong.

Your opinion is motivated by partisanism, completely devoid of the facts.

From your link.

'The practical implications for U.S. arms manufacturers are likely to be limited since, as Kerry noted, the United States already has in place the kind of strict export controls for weapons that are outlined in the treaty.

"We are talking about the kind of export controls that for decades have not diminished one iota our ability in the United States as Americans to exercise our rights under the constitution," he said.

"This treaty will not diminish anyone's freedom, in fact the treaty recognizes the freedom of both individuals and states to obtain, possess and use arms for legitimate purposes," Kerry said after signing the treaty.

"Make no mistake, we would never think about supporting a treaty that is inconsistent with the rights of Americans, the rights of American citizens to be able to exercise their guaranteed rights under our constitution," he said.'

The treaty has no bearing whatsoever on American citizens, their fundamental right to possess firearms, and Second Amendment jurisprudence – any claims that the treaty will 'jeopardize' the freedoms of Americans is a lie.

It's hard to say if the US constitution guaranteed gun owners the right to not register weapons. This treaty may have an impact.

Federal law prohibits a federal registration.

What part of the 2nd amendment prohibits gun registration? "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."

It is the first step to gun confiscation at a later date, which is why you will be opposed at every step in the gun grabber agenda.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Hell you even said we shouldn't have fought in WWII.

Not I. You probably confused me with someone else, or my denouncement of our use of terror on civilians as isolationism, which it isn't...

 

[PaintMyHouse]

It is the first step to gun confiscation at a later date, which is why you will be opposed at every step in the gun grabber agenda.

That just makes the tacking of the guns easier. We already know who the gun nuts are, like you. After all, you told us, right here among other places...