Kerry signs U.N. Arms Trade Treaty

It's been real.....................gotta get some sleep..................I work for a living unlike posters who post 24/7 like you...................

Got to help build shit to make evil gasoline................so you can drive in your car and bitch about the evil's of fossil fuels................

:flameth:
Can't wait until we finish pumping all of that black death, and are forced to grow up...

And I stopped working when I stated consulting. The hours and pay are better.
 
Kerry signs U.N. Arms Trade Treaty

You mean that fucking traitor sold us down the river again? I see why Obama the communist appointed him. He'll gladly do anything he's told.
 
Illegals don't vote, and we already know you have guns. Welcome to Big Data...

Big Data has no clue if or how many weapons I have.
So you might believe. Guns need ammo, and accessories, it's not rocket science. Just your Google history tells them most of what they need to know.

I spoof MAC & IP address at will & remote hack internet service from others. I have never bought guns or ammo online. If I have weapons or ammo they were bought with cash & most would be dispersed, hidden or buried underground in watertight tubes.
 
Illegals don't vote, and we already know you have guns. Welcome to Big Data...

Big Data has no clue if or how many weapons I have.
So you might believe. Guns need ammo, and accessories, it's not rocket science. Just your Google history tells them most of what they need to know.

I spoof MAC & IP address at will & remote hack internet service from others. I have never bought guns or ammo online. If I have weapons or ammo they were bought with cash & most would be dispersed, hidden or buried underground in watertight tubes.
What you believe hides you, doesn't. They just don't care, yet. The deep web isn't deep, to them...
 
Illegals don't vote, and we already know you have guns. Welcome to Big Data...

Big Data has no clue if or how many weapons I have.
So you might believe. Guns need ammo, and accessories, it's not rocket science. Just your Google history tells them most of what they need to know.

I spoof MAC & IP address at will & remote hack internet service from others. I have never bought guns or ammo online. If I have weapons or ammo they were bought with cash & most would be dispersed, hidden or buried underground in watertight tubes.

What you believe hides you, doesn't. They just don't care, yet. The deep web isn't deep, to them...

It's not deep web, it's untraceable fake identity & location. My online identity can only be located while posting. They would have to use radio direction finding to locate the transmitter I remote through & I can detect them closing in on it. The transmitter is not near me or mine nor located on property of anyone I have associated with. They will zero in on the wrong internet customer & I will know to halt transmission. Their tracking ability will end.
 
Don't feel like looking it up right now.......................was on another troll thread....................

You ever paint your house rainbow colors yet.................You were so proud of the White House and all....................or did you apply for a gov't grant to pay for the paint and labor to go rainbow.
I could paint my house to look like this:
images

And no one would notice, until UPS delivered a package. They have the gate code, one of the few.
That house is so unyou....................man you need to get with the movement and paint the rainbow.........................recommended by libtards every where.......

:itsok:
Never been big on rainbows actually. They're kind of gay...
Isn't that the point...............your side has always been kinda gay hasn't it............
Nope. We wrote the Second Amendment, among other things.


'We wrote the Second Amendment'

then why do so many of you have such a hard time understanding it?
 
I could paint my house to look like this:
images

And no one would notice, until UPS delivered a package. They have the gate code, one of the few.
That house is so unyou....................man you need to get with the movement and paint the rainbow.........................recommended by libtards every where.......

:itsok:
Never been big on rainbows actually. They're kind of gay...
Isn't that the point...............your side has always been kinda gay hasn't it............
Nope. We wrote the Second Amendment, among other things.


'We wrote the Second Amendment'

then why do so many of you have such a hard time understanding it?
We don't, we just don't live 230 years ago.
 
So Kerry signs a treaty that requires the exporting country be provided information on the end user and claims no infringement on constitutional rights. Give me a freaking break.

Kerry signs U.N. Arms Trade Treaty, says won't harm U.S. rights

Your thoughts?
You're wrong.

Your opinion is motivated by partisanism, completely devoid of the facts.

From your link.

'The practical implications for U.S. arms manufacturers are likely to be limited since, as Kerry noted, the United States already has in place the kind of strict export controls for weapons that are outlined in the treaty.

"We are talking about the kind of export controls that for decades have not diminished one iota our ability in the United States as Americans to exercise our rights under the constitution," he said.

"This treaty will not diminish anyone's freedom, in fact the treaty recognizes the freedom of both individuals and states to obtain, possess and use arms for legitimate purposes," Kerry said after signing the treaty.

"Make no mistake, we would never think about supporting a treaty that is inconsistent with the rights of Americans, the rights of American citizens to be able to exercise their guaranteed rights under our constitution," he said.'

The treaty has no bearing whatsoever on American citizens, their fundamental right to possess firearms, and Second Amendment jurisprudence – any claims that the treaty will 'jeopardize' the freedoms of Americans is a lie.
It's hard to say if the US constitution guaranteed gun owners the right to not register weapons. This treaty may have an impact.

Federal law prohibits a federal registration.
Federal law says you aren't supposed to be living here illegally. The law is one thing, reality is another...

Yep, especially when you have a dictator wannabe in the WH. Not enforcing immigration or gun laws and wanting more. One to make it easier on criminal aliens and the second to make things harder for law abiding citizens.
 
So Kerry signs a treaty that requires the exporting country be provided information on the end user and claims no infringement on constitutional rights. Give me a freaking break.

Kerry signs U.N. Arms Trade Treaty, says won't harm U.S. rights

Your thoughts?
You're wrong.

Your opinion is motivated by partisanism, completely devoid of the facts.

From your link.

'The practical implications for U.S. arms manufacturers are likely to be limited since, as Kerry noted, the United States already has in place the kind of strict export controls for weapons that are outlined in the treaty.

"We are talking about the kind of export controls that for decades have not diminished one iota our ability in the United States as Americans to exercise our rights under the constitution," he said.

"This treaty will not diminish anyone's freedom, in fact the treaty recognizes the freedom of both individuals and states to obtain, possess and use arms for legitimate purposes," Kerry said after signing the treaty.

"Make no mistake, we would never think about supporting a treaty that is inconsistent with the rights of Americans, the rights of American citizens to be able to exercise their guaranteed rights under our constitution," he said.'

The treaty has no bearing whatsoever on American citizens, their fundamental right to possess firearms, and Second Amendment jurisprudence – any claims that the treaty will 'jeopardize' the freedoms of Americans is a lie.
It's hard to say if the US constitution guaranteed gun owners the right to not register weapons. This treaty may have an impact.

Federal law prohibits a federal registration.
The countries who banned guns all started with a Registry.....................they wanted to know who had the guns first...............

UN BS doesn't trump our laws or constitution..............we have no reason to honor any of their BS............The leftist want to take all guns here and have been trying for a long time to do so...........If they ever succeed...................we'll hand over the bullets first...............
Shooting at a tank, or a drone, or a robot isn't going to do you much good. By the time they come for them, that will be your adversary, no humans in jackboots required...

You're assuming we'll wait for them to come to us. :ack-1:
 
So Kerry signs a treaty that requires the exporting country be provided information on the end user and claims no infringement on constitutional rights. Give me a freaking break.

Kerry signs U.N. Arms Trade Treaty, says won't harm U.S. rights

Your thoughts?
You're wrong.

Your opinion is motivated by partisanism, completely devoid of the facts.

From your link.

'The practical implications for U.S. arms manufacturers are likely to be limited since, as Kerry noted, the United States already has in place the kind of strict export controls for weapons that are outlined in the treaty.

"We are talking about the kind of export controls that for decades have not diminished one iota our ability in the United States as Americans to exercise our rights under the constitution," he said.

"This treaty will not diminish anyone's freedom, in fact the treaty recognizes the freedom of both individuals and states to obtain, possess and use arms for legitimate purposes," Kerry said after signing the treaty.

"Make no mistake, we would never think about supporting a treaty that is inconsistent with the rights of Americans, the rights of American citizens to be able to exercise their guaranteed rights under our constitution," he said.'

The treaty has no bearing whatsoever on American citizens, their fundamental right to possess firearms, and Second Amendment jurisprudence – any claims that the treaty will 'jeopardize' the freedoms of Americans is a lie.
It's hard to say if the US constitution guaranteed gun owners the right to not register weapons. This treaty may have an impact.

Federal law prohibits a federal registration.
The countries who banned guns all started with a Registry.....................they wanted to know who had the guns first...............

UN BS doesn't trump our laws or constitution..............we have no reason to honor any of their BS............The leftist want to take all guns here and have been trying for a long time to do so...........If they ever succeed...................we'll hand over the bullets first...............
Shooting at a tank, or a drone, or a robot isn't going to do you much good. By the time they come for them, that will be your adversary, no humans in jackboots required...
You incorrectly assume we citizens don't have, or can't rapidly make un-maned servo operated guns, armed drones, armed ROV's, IED's, etc.
 
What Constitutional rights could be infringed?

How about our right to privacy, if you buy a firearm made in another country the treaty requires the exporting country be given your personal information, as the end user.
Right to privacy has been dead since Reagan and the War on Drugs...Same with due process...

Right to privacy has been dead since the creation of the IRS. Wow, you're off on that timeline. And Reagan created the War on Drugs? LOL. History wasn't your subject, Holmes...
 
You're wrong.

Your opinion is motivated by partisanism, completely devoid of the facts.

From your link.

'The practical implications for U.S. arms manufacturers are likely to be limited since, as Kerry noted, the United States already has in place the kind of strict export controls for weapons that are outlined in the treaty.

"We are talking about the kind of export controls that for decades have not diminished one iota our ability in the United States as Americans to exercise our rights under the constitution," he said.

"This treaty will not diminish anyone's freedom, in fact the treaty recognizes the freedom of both individuals and states to obtain, possess and use arms for legitimate purposes," Kerry said after signing the treaty.

"Make no mistake, we would never think about supporting a treaty that is inconsistent with the rights of Americans, the rights of American citizens to be able to exercise their guaranteed rights under our constitution," he said.'

The treaty has no bearing whatsoever on American citizens, their fundamental right to possess firearms, and Second Amendment jurisprudence – any claims that the treaty will 'jeopardize' the freedoms of Americans is a lie.
It's hard to say if the US constitution guaranteed gun owners the right to not register weapons. This treaty may have an impact.

Federal law prohibits a federal registration.
The countries who banned guns all started with a Registry.....................they wanted to know who had the guns first...............

UN BS doesn't trump our laws or constitution..............we have no reason to honor any of their BS............The leftist want to take all guns here and have been trying for a long time to do so...........If they ever succeed...................we'll hand over the bullets first...............
Shooting at a tank, or a drone, or a robot isn't going to do you much good. By the time they come for them, that will be your adversary, no humans in jackboots required...
You incorrectly assume we citizens don't have, or can't rapidly make un-maned servo operated guns, armed drones, armed ROV's, IED's, etc.
I assume that by the time that comes about, your guns will be as useless as tits on a board...
 
What Constitutional rights could be infringed?

How about our right to privacy, if you buy a firearm made in another country the treaty requires the exporting country be given your personal information, as the end user.
Right to privacy has been dead since Reagan and the War on Drugs...Same with due process...

Right to privacy has been dead since the creation of the IRS. Wow, you're off on that timeline. And Reagan created the War on Drugs? LOL. History wasn't your subject, Holmes...
No, he ramped it up to despot level....
 
oh yes..john kerry (kohn)..another jew with a fake name who has infiltrated gvt..Go look it up..."Kerry"...GTFO...his grandfather dropped a pencil on a map and it landed on Kerry Ireland..so he changed his name from kohn to "kerry"..
 
So Kerry signs a treaty that requires the exporting country be provided information on the end user and claims no infringement on constitutional rights. Give me a freaking break.

Kerry signs U.N. Arms Trade Treaty, says won't harm U.S. rights

Your thoughts?
my first is that you likely have a warped view of what the treaty requires.

Wow, who the hell could argue with such a considered and well documented opinion, ....................................oh wait! There was no real thought or any documentation for your bullshit is there? Fuck off child.
 
What Constitutional rights could be infringed?

How about our right to privacy, if you buy a firearm made in another country the treaty requires the exporting country be given your personal information, as the end user.
Right to privacy has been dead since Reagan and the War on Drugs...Same with due process...

Right to privacy has been dead since the creation of the IRS. Wow, you're off on that timeline. And Reagan created the War on Drugs? LOL. History wasn't your subject, Holmes...
No, he ramped it up to despot level....

I guess that sounds good to you
 

Forum List

Back
Top