Key Democrat Confuses Free Speach with Treason

[busybee01]

Poor little moronic commie, Tucker has an opinion show, not news.

.

There is very little n ews on Fox as they have very few journalists at the network. Even the supposed news shows are propaganda.

 

[busybee01]

Ignorant of history much?


Benjamin Franklin pleaded for the French's help against the hated British...that's for starters..

It's no difference if Trump asked for help against America's enemy with in....



The hated liberals


.

Pressuring a foreign country to investigate a political rival is not a starter.

Republicans are the ene4my of this country.

 

[Wyatt earp]

Pressuring a foreign country to investigate a political rival is not a starter.

Republicans are the ene4my of this country.

Nope the enemy is people who are so confused they don't know what bathroom to go to, think killing a baby is not murder and new technology is 150 year old electric cars

 

[Lastamender]

There have been no fraudulent elections.

Try WI.

 

[abu afak]

Aided Trump how, by posting some shit on Facebook that nobody ever reads? Russia was toying with our elections like we toy with elections in other countries. Ask DumBama about that with Israel. Saying that Russia had anything to do with the outcome of that election is as silly as taking every sarcastic thing Trump says and turning it into Gospel.

Senate Russia report proves Trump Collusion was very real. But do voters care?​

Trump and Biden's contrasting positions on Russian interference in American elections are clear. Whether voters care about these differences, however, is not as obvious.
Aug. 22, 2020, NBC
By Michael McFaul, former U.S. ambassador to Russia

The Senate Intelligence Committee should be applauded for releasing the fifth and final volume of its investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 U.S. presidential election.

With over 200 witness interviews and roughly 1 million documents reviewed, the nearly 1,000-page report documents in detail the comprehensive campaign conducted by Russian President Vladimir Putin and his proxies to seek influence within President Donald Trump's campaign, help Trump win the 2016 presidential election and amplify polarization and division within American society.

Far from a hoax, as the president so often claimed, the report reveals how the Trump campaign willingly engaged with Russian operatives implementing the influence effort.
For instance, the report exposes interactions and information exchanged between Russian intelligence officer Konstantin Kilimnik and then-Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort. According to the report, campaign figures “presented attractive targets for foreign influence, creating notable counterintelligence vulnerabilities.".........

[....................]

Opinion | Why the Senate's Russia report should be one of America's biggest stories

Trump and Biden's contrasting positions on Russian interference in American elections are clear. Whether voters care about these differences, however, is not as obvious.

www.nbcnews.com

`

 

[abu afak]

Aided Trump how, by posting some shit on Facebook that nobody ever reads? Russia was toying with our elections like we toy with elections in other countries. Ask DumBama about that with Israel. Saying that Russia had anything to do with the outcome of that election is as silly as taking every sarcastic thing Trump says and turning it into Gospel.

THE NATIONAL INTEREST AUG. 18, 2020

Bipartisan Senate Report Shows How Trump Colluded With Russia in 2016​

By Jonathan Chait

Photo: Mikhail Klimentyev/SPUTNIK/AFP via Getty Images

"....Since the Mueller report came out last year, Trump and his minions have insisted it found no evidence of collusion. In fact, Mueller explicitly wrote that he was not investigating collusion at all. (“We did not address ‘collusion,’ which is not a legal term. Rather, we focused on whether the evidence was sufficient to charge any member of the campaign with taking part in a criminal conspiracy.”)

Unlike Mueller’s tightly circumscribed criminal probe, the Senate Intelligence Committee report did investigate collusion.
The most important evidence of collusion has either already been exposed (Trump officials taking a meeting with a Russian agent offering Vladimir Putin’s help with the campaign) or happened right in front of our eyes (Trump going on television to ask Russia to steal and publish Hillary Clinton’s emails). The real question is how extensively or tightly Trump’s campaign managed to coordinate its activity with Russia. And while it lacked the broad-ranging investigative powers Mueller could have used if he wanted, the Senate Intelligence Committee turned up damning evidence.

The primary locus of Russian interference was Russian hacking of Democratic emails and then leaking them in order to benefit Trump’s campaign. Two Trump advisers seem likely to have been involved in this scheme: campaign manager Paul Manafort and outside adviser Roger Stone.

Manafort had previously run a pro-Russian presidential campaign in Ukraine before signing up with Trump (for free). His business partner, Konstantin Kilimnik, was and is a Russian intelligence agent. “On numerous occasions, Manafort sought to secretly share internal Campaign information with Kilimnik,” the report finds.....
[..............]

Bipartisan Senate Report Shows How Trump Colluded With Russia in 2016

Trump and his advisers acted guilty because they were.

nymag.com

`

 

[theHawk]

As close as Dems get to committing treason, it's amazing they don't know the real definition of the word.

Sorry Claire, Tucker has a right to free speech.

---Claire McCaskill: FNC’s Tucker Carlson ‘Really, Really Close to Treason’---

Claire McCaskill: FNC's Tucker Carlson 'Really, Really Close to Treason'

Former Sen. Claire McCaskill (D-MO) said Monday on MSNBC's "Deadline" that she believed Fox News host Tucker Carlson is "really, really close to treason" because he was "parroting" Russian propaganda. | Clips

www.breitbart.com

LOL Dems, always accusing others of what they are guilty of.

 

[bripat9643]

Do you work on being ignorant or are you naturally lazy?

Russian Facebook Fake News Attacks Hit ‘Billions’ Of Post Shares, Far Worse Than Revealed, New Study Says

The Russian fake news and propaganda attack using Facebook against American voters was far more successful and influential than investigators are currently aware — so successful that fake news stories and ads posted by Russia-linked Facebook accounts were shared hundreds of millions, likely...

www.inquisitr.com

You have reached new heights of gullibility. Claiming that Putin did X, Y or Z that benefitted Trump is meaningless unless the later did something in exchange for it.

The only thing we know is that Hillary paid Russians to produce dirt on Trump, and she paid other Russians to spread it around.

 

[bripat9643]

It is not close to treason. It is treason. Putin is our enemy as he has attacked this country's election process.

No more than the Democrat party attacked our election process. We are not at war with Russia. We especially were not at war with Russia in 2016.

 

[OKTexas]

That is a lie. They were supporting Trump. The reason is simple. They clearly understood Trump better than anyone in this country. They knew he was a authoritarian who would divide America. Trump attempted to use the DOJ and the military to keep himself in power.

Poor little uninformed commie, from the commie news network:

The ads -- both traditional advertisements and sponsored posts -- were intended to sow discord among the American electorate by amplifying "divisive social and political messages," Stamos said. These ranged from "LGBT matters to race issues to immigration to gun rights."

Facebook says it sold ads to Russian 'troll farm' during 2016 campaign

Facebook told congressional investigators on Wednesday that it sold political ads during the 2016 U.S. presidential election to a Russian "troll farm" that was looking to target American voters.

money.cnn.com

Now run along ignorant ass.

.

 

[OKTexas]

There is very little n ews on Fox as they have very few journalists at the network. Even the supposed news shows are propaganda.

The same can be said about the LSM. You really are an ignorant ass, ain't ya?

.

 

[OKTexas]

Senate Russia report proves Trump Collusion was very real. But do voters care?​

Trump and Biden's contrasting positions on Russian interference in American elections are clear. Whether voters care about these differences, however, is not as obvious.
Aug. 22, 2020, NBC
By Michael McFaul, former U.S. ambassador to Russia

The Senate Intelligence Committee should be applauded for releasing the fifth and final volume of its investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 U.S. presidential election.

With over 200 witness interviews and roughly 1 million documents reviewed, the nearly 1,000-page report documents in detail the comprehensive campaign conducted by Russian President Vladimir Putin and his proxies to seek influence within President Donald Trump's campaign, help Trump win the 2016 presidential election and amplify polarization and division within American society.

Far from a hoax, as the president so often claimed, the report reveals how the Trump campaign willingly engaged with Russian operatives implementing the influence effort.
For instance, the report exposes interactions and information exchanged between Russian intelligence officer Konstantin Kilimnik and then-Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort. According to the report, campaign figures “presented attractive targets for foreign influence, creating notable counterintelligence vulnerabilities.".........

[....................]

Opinion | Why the Senate's Russia report should be one of America's biggest stories

Trump and Biden's contrasting positions on Russian interference in American elections are clear. Whether voters care about these differences, however, is not as obvious.

www.nbcnews.com

`

One persons opinion, got it.

.

 

[Wyatt earp]

THE NATIONAL INTEREST AUG. 18, 2020

Bipartisan Senate Report Shows How Trump Colluded With Russia in 2016​

By Jonathan Chait

Photo: Mikhail Klimentyev/SPUTNIK/AFP via Getty Images

"....Since the Mueller report came out last year, Trump and his minions have insisted it found no evidence of collusion. In fact, Mueller explicitly wrote that he was not investigating collusion at all. (“We did not address ‘collusion,’ which is not a legal term. Rather, we focused on whether the evidence was sufficient to charge any member of the campaign with taking part in a criminal conspiracy.”)

Unlike Mueller’s tightly circumscribed criminal probe, the Senate Intelligence Committee report did investigate collusion.
The most important evidence of collusion has either already been exposed (Trump officials taking a meeting with a Russian agent offering Vladimir Putin’s help with the campaign) or happened right in front of our eyes (Trump going on television to ask Russia to steal and publish Hillary Clinton’s emails). The real question is how extensively or tightly Trump’s campaign managed to coordinate its activity with Russia. And while it lacked the broad-ranging investigative powers Mueller could have used if he wanted, the Senate Intelligence Committee turned up damning evidence.

The primary locus of Russian interference was Russian hacking of Democratic emails and then leaking them in order to benefit Trump’s campaign. Two Trump advisers seem likely to have been involved in this scheme: campaign manager Paul Manafort and outside adviser Roger Stone.

Manafort had previously run a pro-Russian presidential campaign in Ukraine before signing up with Trump (for free). His business partner, Konstantin Kilimnik, was and is a Russian intelligence agent. “On numerous occasions, Manafort sought to secretly share internal Campaign information with Kilimnik,” the report finds.....
[..............]

Bipartisan Senate Report Shows How Trump Colluded With Russia in 2016

Trump and his advisers acted guilty because they were.

nymag.com

`

With silly face book memes? That no one remembers or seen?

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Hate to you is anything you disagree with. The n \ews media has been telling the truth for thew last 5 years. They don't have to make it up. They just need to quote Republicans.

No, they don't have to make it up.

CNN, MSNBC said ‘racist’ more than 4,100 times from July 14-21

CNN and MSNBC said the word “racist” more than 4,100 times from July 14-21, according to a tally by Grabien Media, an online media production and news prep service.The tally is based on…

thehill.com

Media Trump Hatred Shows In 92% Negative Coverage Of His Presidency: Study

The big TV networks don't hide their contempt for President Trump. So it's no surprise a new study shows 92% of the media's Trump coverage is negative.

www.investors.com

Evening News Spin: 100% Negative on Trump Defense, 95% Positive Dems

A Media Research Center study of broadcast evening news coverage of the opening arguments of both sides, found ABC, CBS, and NBC did not live up to the standard they demanded of Republicans. They gave Democrats double the airtime and showered their arguments with mostly praise, while expressing...

www.newsbusters.org

Media ups the ante on negative coverage of Trump

Liberals are beginning to swagger around as if the 2020 election is already over. Eugene Robinson at The Washington Post exclaimed that President Trump’s re-election campaign is “beginn…

www.bostonherald.com

Biden received less negative media coverage than any president on record while Trump received most: study - Washington Examiner

A new study shows President Joe Biden has received less negative coverage from U.S. media than any president in the last 30 years.The study found that about 19% of the coverage of Biden’s fir 60 days days has been negative over the first 60 days of his administration, which ranked best among...

www.washingtonexaminer.com

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Do you work on being ignorant or are you naturally lazy?

Russian Facebook Fake News Attacks Hit ‘Billions’ Of Post Shares, Far Worse Than Revealed, New Study Says

The Russian fake news and propaganda attack using Facebook against American voters was far more successful and influential than investigators are currently aware — so successful that fake news stories and ads posted by Russia-linked Facebook accounts were shared hundreds of millions, likely...

www.inquisitr.com

Yeah right. Ads seen billions of times but I didn't see one of them. Only a moron would vote based on what they seen on Facebook.

 

[lennypartiv]

There is very little n ews on Fox as they have very few journalists at the network. Even the supposed news shows are propaganda.

Fox is head and shoulders above the fake news channels you liberals watch.

 

[Big Bend Texas]

As close as Dems get to committing treason, it's amazing they don't know the real definition of the word.

Sorry Claire, Tucker has a right to free speech.

---Claire McCaskill: FNC’s Tucker Carlson ‘Really, Really Close to Treason’---

Claire McCaskill: FNC's Tucker Carlson 'Really, Really Close to Treason'

Former Sen. Claire McCaskill (D-MO) said Monday on MSNBC's "Deadline" that she believed Fox News host Tucker Carlson is "really, really close to treason" because he was "parroting" Russian propaganda. | Clips

www.breitbart.com

There's a lot of that flying back and forth from both sides right now from people who are absolutely clueless apparently as to the meaning of the word, "Treason".

Voicing dissent is as American as it gets and the First Amendment protects that right for all whether we agree with them or not.

 

[Lesh]

She's no more a "key Democrat" than Tucker is a "key Republican"

Oh wait...

 

[Big Bend Texas]

Even if it doesn’t fit some legal definition, obviously that sack of garbage you worship is a traitor.

Only if you imagine everyone you disagree with to be a traitor.

Study up on the First Amendment.

 

[Big Bend Texas]

She's no more a "key Democrat" than Tucker is a "key Republican"

Oh wait...

Tucker is a mostly Libertarian Talking Head.