Key Democratic Officials Now Warning Base Not to Expect Evidence of Trump/Russia Collusion

[Weatherman2020]

The lie has run its course.

The principal problem for Democrats is that so many media figures and online charlatans are personally benefiting from feeding the base increasingly unhinged, fact-free conspiracies — just as right-wing media polemicists did after both Bill Clinton and Obama were elected — that there are now millions of partisan soldiers absolutely convinced of a Trump/Russia conspiracy for which, at least as of now, there is no evidence. And they are all waiting for the day, which they regard as inevitable and imminent, when this theory will be proven and Trump will be removed.

Key Democratic Officials Now Warning Base Not to Expect Evidence of Trump/Russia Collusion.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Finally, an Alt Right admission by weatherman - "just as right-wing media polemicists did [feeding the base increasingly unhinged, fact-free conspiracies] after both Bill Clinton and Obama were elected" - of what he does here.

 

[Tresha91203]

All while crying and demanding evidence of a literal telephone wire tap.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

SURPRISE!!!!!

Not

 

[tinydancer]

I just read that Senator Devin Nunes said this morning on a talk show that there is no evidence right up until this morning that there was no collusion.

What a monumental waste of freaking time.

Washington (AFP) – The chairman of a US congressional committee on intelligence said Sunday that he has seen “no evidence” that President Donald Trump’s campaign colluded with Russia during the runup to the 2016 election.

'No evidence of collusion' between Trump campaign, Russia - Breitbart

 

[tinydancer]

All while crying and demanding evidence of a literal telephone wire tap.

"wiretapping". In quotation marks. By definition it's not just tapping a phone line.

 

[Coyote]

No evidence cellular of Trump colluding with Russia.
No evidence of Obama wiretapping Trump.
Considerable evidence of Russia attempting get to influence our elections.

All from the same sources.

 

[Disir]

There is no evidence. This was a scam the Democrats desperately needed to shift away from their BS.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

No evidence cellular of Trump colluding with Russia.
No evidence of Obama wiretapping Trump.
Considerable evidence of Russia attempting get to influence our elections.

All from the same sources.

The narrative is dead...as we told you it would be. Four months this garbage went on and in the end? Nuthin.

A complete waste of time and nothing gained by it

 

[Coyote]

I just read that Senator Devin Nunes said this morning on a talk show that there is no evidence right up until this morning that there was no collusion.

What a monumental waste of freaking time.

Washington (AFP) – The chairman of a US congressional committee on intelligence said Sunday that he has seen “no evidence” that President Donald Trump’s campaign colluded with Russia during the runup to the 2016 election.

'No evidence of collusion' between Trump campaign, Russia - Breitbart

Monumental waste of time...like Benghazi, like Obama supposedly wire tapping Trump...like a lot of stuff lately.

 

[Disir]

I just read that Senator Devin Nunes said this morning on a talk show that there is no evidence right up until this morning that there was no collusion.

What a monumental waste of freaking time.

Washington (AFP) – The chairman of a US congressional committee on intelligence said Sunday that he has seen “no evidence” that President Donald Trump’s campaign colluded with Russia during the runup to the 2016 election.

'No evidence of collusion' between Trump campaign, Russia - Breitbart

Monumental waste of time...like Benghazi, like Obama supposedly wire tapping Trump...like a lot of stuff lately.

Which, of course, makes it ok.

 

[JakeStarkey]

breitbart did have the decency to include the second paragraph below

Based on “everything I have up to this morning — no evidence of collusion,” said US Representative Devin Nunes, head of the House Intelligence Committee, speaking to the Fox News Sunday television program.

He made his remarks one day before FBI director James Comey is due to appear before his panel, facing lawmakers seeking answers about Trump’s potential Russia ties and the president’s extraordinary accusation of wiretapping by his predecessor.

 

[Coyote]

I just read that Senator Devin Nunes said this morning on a talk show that there is no evidence right up until this morning that there was no collusion.

What a monumental waste of freaking time.

Washington (AFP) – The chairman of a US congressional committee on intelligence said Sunday that he has seen “no evidence” that President Donald Trump’s campaign colluded with Russia during the runup to the 2016 election.

'No evidence of collusion' between Trump campaign, Russia - Breitbart

Monumental waste of time...like Benghazi, like Obama supposedly wire tapping Trump...like a lot of stuff lately.

Which, of course, makes it ok.

Makes what ok?

 

[RetiredGySgt]

I just read that Senator Devin Nunes said this morning on a talk show that there is no evidence right up until this morning that there was no collusion.

What a monumental waste of freaking time.

Washington (AFP) – The chairman of a US congressional committee on intelligence said Sunday that he has seen “no evidence” that President Donald Trump’s campaign colluded with Russia during the runup to the 2016 election.

'No evidence of collusion' between Trump campaign, Russia - Breitbart

Monumental waste of time...like Benghazi, like Obama supposedly wire tapping Trump...like a lot of stuff lately.

Which, of course, makes it ok.

Makes what ok?

You deflected from the lie that Trump was in bed with the Russians.

 

[Fang]

If Liberals have nothing (and we know they don't), then as far as I'm concerned the wiretap claim is fair play whether it's true or not. The Republicans have someone in the White House who can beat Liberals at their own game.

 

[Tresha91203]

No evidence cellular of Trump colluding with Russia.
No evidence of Obama wiretapping Trump.
Considerable evidence of Russia attempting get to influence our elections.

All from the same sources.

Which is nothing new and nothing we don't do to them.

 

[Coyote]

There is no evidence. This was a scam the Democrats desperately needed to shift away from their BS.

I disagree. With Russia's involvement in trying to influence our election, and the fact there are various ties between Russia and Trump officials, it SHOULD be examined. If nothing wrong is found, move on. Just like what SHOULD have been done with Clinton's emails, and what should be done with claims of Obama wiretapping.

But will we move on? Doubt it. There will be fresh hatching of conspiracy theories.

 

[Eaglewings]

The lie has run its course.

The principal problem for Democrats is that so many media figures and online charlatans are personally benefiting from feeding the base increasingly unhinged, fact-free conspiracies — just as right-wing media polemicists did after both Bill Clinton and Obama were elected — that there are now millions of partisan soldiers absolutely convinced of a Trump/Russia conspiracy for which, at least as of now, there is no evidence. And they are all waiting for the day, which they regard as inevitable and imminent, when this theory will be proven and Trump will be removed.

Key Democratic Officials Now Warning Base Not to Expect Evidence of Trump/Russia Collusion.

Looks like the Reds like Morrells lies only when they are in their favor... In a Blog story...lol




Former CIA Director Mike Morrell Is A Lying Liar (VIDEO)


Former CIA Director Mike Morrell Is A Lying Liar

Security Contractor, DIA Docs Debunk Michael Morell’s Benghazi Narrative - Breitbart

 

[Coyote]

No evidence cellular of Trump colluding with Russia.
No evidence of Obama wiretapping Trump.
Considerable evidence of Russia attempting get to influence our elections.

All from the same sources.

Which is nothing new and nothing we don't do to them.

Not entirely true. It is taken to a new level. Should it be ignored?

I doubt that many of those brushing it under the rug would do so if their candidate had lost and the hacking had released negative info on THEIR candidate.

What's disturbing is not who won or lost but a deliberate attack on our democratic system and an erosion of trust in it.

So fine, say everyone does it. That makes it ok?

 

[CrusaderFrank]

If the Republicans were smart, they pivot immediately to who committed the felony in releasing Flynn's end of the wiretap