- Sep 12, 2008
- 14,201
- 3,567
- 185
I think I would trust Barkley's ski lessons more than Krugman's economics. As long as I am not between him and a basketball hoop, I don't worry he would try and do me deliberate harm. Krugman, he seems a sadist.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Like who?...The people at NY Times who are running the paper into the ground?Krugman knows about how bidness works in Actual Reality as much as Charles Barkley can tell me about downhill skiing.
Well apparently those far more educated and experienced than you disagree with your assesment.
I think I would trust Barkley's ski lessons more than Krugman's economics. As long as I am not between him and a basketball hoop, I don't worry he would try and do me deliberate harm. Krugman, he seems a sadist.
So what if any truth teller is an idiot?
The truth is Medicare is bankrupting the country.
Who denies that?
No one.
Republicans have become a dysfunctional party to make 2 of those to date.
Problem being that Krugman wouldn't know the truth if it bit him.So what if any truth teller is an idiot?
The truth is Medicare is bankrupting the country.
Who denies that?
No one.
Republicans have become a dysfunctional party to make 2 of those to date.
Let me see...they say he's a newspaper man, they say he's a drunk, he makes girlyman/boy types (Felix?) go off the deep end...Who is Paul Krugman?
Is he that guy from the Odd Couple?
Yea but anyone with common sense knows that Krugman is a Lunatic Liberal Nutter. He falls under Gollum Emanuel's wise assessment..."Liberal activists are F*cking Retards." Well said Mr. Emanuel.
RWL @ USMB Alert!
another empty attack. proof positive again that without a talking point memo, the right is bankrupt of ideas and a defense .
and
thank you for sharing
D.
Of course you do. He is a scamster, dealer in half truths and out right lies, a fraud, a sneak, he changes the past on a daily basis to suit his needs. It is obvious you would admire him. Just like every sand lot little leager admires Cal Ripkin, Joe Dimaggio, Ted Williams and Hank Arron, you admire the modern Elmer Gantry types like Krugman and OlbermanI'm starting to like Paul Krugman more and more as time goes on.Today's NYT:
Republicans are now posing as staunch defenders of a program they have hated ever since the days when Ronald Reagan warned that Medicare would destroy America's freedom.
Nor is it even the fact that, as House speaker, Mr. Gingrich personally tried to ram through deep cuts in Medicare - and, in 1995, went so far as to shut down the federal government in an attempt to bully Bill Clinton into accepting those cuts.
After all, you could explain this about-face by supposing that Republicans have had a change of heart, that they have finally realized just how much good Medicare does.
And if you believe that, I've got some mortgage-backed securities you might want to buy.
No, what's truly mind-boggling is this: Even as Republicans denounce modest proposals to rein in Medicare's rising costs, they are, themselves, seeking to dismantle the whole program.
Ferret Face writes partisan loon op-eds, not dispassionate and factually based analyses of policies...He's very much like you disgorging your usual inane spittle about Reagan and Rand.Dissapointment is too light a phrase for what I feel here. I thought you, Baruch, came armed with argument and all you have is a foreskin in your hand.
tsk, tsk, tsk...
Paul beats you all. Page 2, and still no rational or reasoned refutation of Krugman's words.
I think we need to cut everything. Not elimate but cut the budget. All of it. Take government and strip it bare.
No whining it's done.
Ferret Face writes partisan loon op-eds, not dispassionate and factually based analyses of policies...He's very much like you disgorging your usual inane spittle about Reagan and Rand.Dissapointment is too light a phrase for what I feel here. I thought you, Baruch, came armed with argument and all you have is a foreskin in your hand.
tsk, tsk, tsk...
Paul beats you all. Page 2, and still no rational or reasoned refutation of Krugman's words.
One need go no farther than the byline to disprove him.
This is the same Paul Krugman who describes anyone who challenges him a "lunatic", "crazy", "irrational", etc? Krugman is a battered
Keynesian who still clings to the falsehood that the calamaties of the 70's were caused solely by rising oil prices and political instability in the middle east.
e's almost always waaaaay off the mark.
Next.
I'm starting to like Paul Krugman more and more as time goes on.Today's NYT:
Republicans are now posing as staunch defenders of a program they have hated ever since the days when Ronald Reagan warned that Medicare would destroy America's freedom.
Nor is it even the fact that, as House speaker, Mr. Gingrich personally tried to ram through deep cuts in Medicare - and, in 1995, went so far as to shut down the federal government in an attempt to bully Bill Clinton into accepting those cuts.
After all, you could explain this about-face by supposing that Republicans have had a change of heart, that they have finally realized just how much good Medicare does.
And if you believe that, I've got some mortgage-backed securities you might want to buy.
No, what's truly mind-boggling is this: Even as Republicans denounce modest proposals to rein in Medicare's rising costs, they are, themselves, seeking to dismantle the whole program.