Kyle Rittenhouse is doing well

[EvilCat Breath]

Yes, it has a specific definition, which Rittenhouse met, if the jury got to hear the evidence.

If you know of evidence withheld from the jury, tell someone. It's an automatic mistrial.

 

[CarsomyrPlusSix]

Uh, he didn't lose his shit... he was shot by a drug addled racist.

He lost his temper and attacked someone who hadn’t used force on him, only asked him questions.

Whether or not you think the person he attacked is a racist is entirely immaterial. Another idiot who brought his fists to a gun fight.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

I see the problem. You live in a different universe. In this one, when some asshole attacks you, you can legally shoot them in self-defense.

Incel Joe would much more likely be the one attacking an innocent human being, and needing to be shot in self-defense, than the one being attacked and needing to shoot in self-defense. Except that he's too much of a coward and a weakling to pose an actual threat to anyone.

His sympathies are always with the criminal, never with the actual human being. That tells us all that we ever need to know about his ethical character.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

Incel Joe would much more likely be the one attacking an innocent human being, and needing to be shot in self-defense, than the one being attacked and needing to shoot in self-defense. Except that he's too much of a coward and a weakling to pose an actual threat to anyone.

His sympathies are always with the criminal, never with the actual human being. That tells us all that we ever need to know about his ethical character.

Quod erat demonstrandum…

What do you think about Rosenbaum's Child Molestation conviction?

That he made a dumb mistake as an adolescent and went to prison for it.

 

[toobfreak]

It didn't take me too long via Google to find out who she is. Her name is Skyler Bergoon, apparently a somewhat accomplished model, and also apparently, in a dating relationship with Kyle Rittenhouse.

Looks like Kyle is doing OK.

 

[Soupnazi630]

That he made a dumb mistake as an adolescent and went to prison for it.



Because it wasn't relevant to Rittenhouse's action. Rittenhouse didn't know he had been convicted of anything.



Uh, he didn't lose his shit... he was shot by a drug addled racist.

uh wrong

He dis lose his shit. He attempted to assault a man with a gun and for no valid reason

 

[JoeB131]

Why would you think that?

Rittenhouse seemed well informed, and Rosenbaum's history of Paedophilia was well publicized.

Well, if he hunted down Rosenbuam personally, that would indicate premeditation...

But that's an absurd argument, that even a Pollock wouldn't make.

 

[JoeB131]

If you know of evidence withheld from the jury, tell someone. It's an automatic mistrial.

Nope, that only works for convictions. If a criminal is acquitted due to incompetence, malice or fraud, he gets away scot-free because double jeopardy is attached. Prosecutors only get one bite at the apple. Jesus, do none of you people watch Law and Order?

would much more likely be the one attacking an innocent human being, and needing to be shot in self-defense, than the one being attacked and needing to shoot in self-defense. Except that he's too much of a coward and a weakling to pose an actual threat to anyone.

Except Rittenhouse didn't need to shoot in self defense. He could have just stayed home in Antioch.
And no one would have died in Kenosha had Rittenhouse hadn't shown up. That's the point. There would have been a few more days of demonstrations and then everyone would have went home.

His sympathies are always with the criminal, never with the actual human being. That tells us all that we ever need to know about his ethical character.

Uh, guy, here's the thing. If we dug into your life, we could find something negative.

It kind of depends how the media spins it.

100 Million Americans have a police record. (I don't).

The jury didn't get to hear about how Rittenhouse beat up a 14 year old girls, are said he wanted to shoot some black people leaving a CVS.

He dis lose his shit. He attempted to assault a man with a gun and for no valid reason

Uh, no, he was walking home from the store and some weirdo was stalking him. Zimmerman never identified himself as neighborhood watch.

 

[Hollie]

Nope, that only works for convictions. If a criminal is acquitted due to incompetence, malice or fraud, he gets away scot-free because double jeopardy is attached. Prosecutors only get one bite at the apple. Jesus, do none of you people watch Law and Order?



Except Rittenhouse didn't need to shoot in self defense. He could have just stayed home in Antioch.
And no one would have died in Kenosha had Rittenhouse hadn't shown up. That's the point. There would have been a few more days of demonstrations and then everyone would have went home.



Uh, guy, here's the thing. If we dug into your life, we could find something negative.

It kind of depends how the media spins it.

100 Million Americans have a police record. (I don't).

The jury didn't get to hear about how Rittenhouse beat up a 14 year old girls, are said he wanted to shoot some black people leaving a CVS.



Uh, no, he was walking home from the store and some weirdo was stalking him. Zimmerman never identified himself as neighborhood watch.

''Except Rittenhouse didn't need to shoot in self defense. He could have just stayed home in Antioch.''

Except Rosenbaum didn't need to go looking for someone to attack. He could have stayed home, spent his time looking for children to molest.

The facts are, your hero Rosenbaum attacked Rittenhouse. I understand you are repulsed by facts, but it is comical to see you reinvent history to lessen the damage to your tender leftist sensibilities.


The diseased leftist mind.

 

[JoeB131]

Except Rosenbaum didn't need to go looking for someone to attack. He could have stayed home,

Rosenbaum was home. He resided in the Kenosha area... He was currently living on the street because he had a mental breakdown and couldn't get a refill on his meds.

The facts are, your hero Rosenbaum attacked Rittenhouse. I understand you are repulsed by facts, but it is comical to see you reinvent history to lessen the damage to your tender leftist sensibilities.

He yelled at Rittenhouse, who shit his pants and started shooting into a crowd.

 

[Polishprince]

Rosenbaum was home. He resided in the Kenosha area... He was currently living on the street because he had a mental breakdown and couldn't get a refill on his meds.



He yelled at Rittenhouse, who shit his pants and started shooting into a crowd.

Interesting. So Rosenbaum wasn't even taking the medicine designed to quell his paedophilic urges.

The minor child Rittenhouse had a lot of reason to be concerned, particularly if Rosenbaum figured that he was under 18,

 

[Hollie]

Rosenbaum was home. He resided in the Kenosha area... He was currently living on the street because he had a mental breakdown and couldn't get a refill on his meds.



He yelled at Rittenhouse, who shit his pants and started shooting into a crowd.

Your tale of events is typically skewed, far fetched and not consistent with the facts.

Rosenbaum assaulted Rittenhouse. A jury found Rittenhouse innocent of the charges against him.

Rittenhouse was shooting into a crowd? Just another of your pointless tirades.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

Uh, guy, here's the thing. If we dug into your life, we could find something negative.

Likely true. I'm not perfect, but you'd have to dig pretty hard to find any of my serious faults.

You wave your evil and madness around in the open as if it is some proud banner. No effort is needed at all to see what a foul, depraved, subhuman piece of shit you are.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Nope, that only works for convictions. If a criminal is acquitted due to incompetence, malice or fraud, he gets away scot-free because double jeopardy is attached. Prosecutors only get one bite at the apple. Jesus, do none of you people watch Law and Order?



Except Rittenhouse didn't need to shoot in self defense. He could have just stayed home in Antioch.
And no one would have died in Kenosha had Rittenhouse hadn't shown up. That's the point. There would have been a few more days of demonstrations and then everyone would have went home.



Uh, guy, here's the thing. If we dug into your life, we could find something negative.

It kind of depends how the media spins it.

Rittenhouse had the right to be there and his actions did not cause them to attack him

 

[hadit]

Do you hear a wet fart?



Hey, what's George Zimmerman doing these days? It's been 10 years since he murdered Trayvon Martin, how is his life going?

I have no idea because he doesn't bother me and I don't worry about him. Something tells me, however, that you are following his life closely, desperately hoping he'll be miserable and waiting for that chance that you know is coming when you can be on the jury that sends him away, just like you fantasize every night. Let's see now, so far that's at least two judges and juries that you think do not match your legal acumen and should have let you decide the cases. How's your batting average going these days?

Oh, and while you change your underwear, you still have failed to demonstrate any of this phantom "Marketing to crazies" that you insist the gun industry is doing INTENTIONALLY.

 

[Viktor]

Civil has a much lower standard. He's going to get chewed up.

His not guilty verdict was based on self defense and his possession of the gun was legal. Those facts will be introduced by the defense. I doubt a jury will rule for the plaintiff.

 

[Rigby5]

If you know of evidence withheld from the jury, tell someone. It's an automatic mistrial.

There obviously was evidence withheld from the jury, because the judge illegally claimed it was legal for Kyle to be in possession of the rifle, even though he was under 18 and it clearly is illegal.
Then once Kyle was in the commission of a crime by being armed, the jury would have be forced to admit that everyone else was then justified in trying to take the gun from Kyle, in order to stop is irresponsible, dangerous, and illegal actions.

 

[Rigby5]

Interesting. So Rosenbaum wasn't even taking the medicine designed to quell his paedophilic urges.

The minor child Rittenhouse had a lot of reason to be concerned, particularly if Rosenbaum figured that he was under 18,

Under 18 and therefore illegal to be armed.

 

[Soupnazi630]

There obviously was evidence withheld from the jury, because the judge illegally claimed it was legal for Kyle to be in possession of the rifle, even though he was under 18 and it clearly is illegal.
Then once Kyle was in the commission of a crime by being armed, the jury would have be forced to admit that everyone else was then justified in trying to take the gun from Kyle, in order to stop is irresponsible, dangerous, and illegal actions.

Wrong

There was no evidence withheld. The judeg never made any such claim.

No one was justified in disarming him

 

[Soupnazi630]

Under 18 and therefore illegal to be armed.

Wrong he was legally armed