Kyle Rittenhouse sued by estate of Joseph Rosenbaum

Do you know the obvious differences between the civilian AR-15 and the M16 used by the military? The fact that you identified two different rifles is one clue to the differences.
That's from the USMilitary history. Argue with them.
 
  • Winner
Reactions: IM2
That's from the USMilitary history. Argue with them.
Oh, that turrible .223 gun. :auiqs.jpg:

iu


All it is is a faster, flatter shooting .22. :rolleyes-41:

Idiot. And yes a .22 will still kill a human being. What do ya think that one on the right would do to a deer or human?

They do make semi-auto 30-.06s you know.
 
Oh, that turrible .223 gun. :auiqs.jpg:

iu


All it is is a faster, flatter shooting .22. :rolleyes-41:

Idiot. And yes a .22 will still kill a human being. What do ya think that one on the right would do to a deer or human?

They do make semi-auto 30-.06s you know.
I stand by my statement , prove the US Military wrong.
 
The weapons charge was thrown out and the jury held that Kyle acted in self defense and that pissed you stupid hate filled Moon Bats to no end. Stop bitching about it. It just makes you look like a butthurt whinny asshole.

By the way, since you are confused, the charges against Kyle's friend for illegally purchasing the rifle for Kyle were also dropped.

We will see how the civil case goes. It all depends on the jury pool. If they are stupid uneducated hate filled Leftest assholes like you are then who knows what will happen.

The facts are overwhelming the same that Kyle acted in self defense in the civil case as in the criminal trial so don't get your hopes up too much Moon Bat. You may be just as disappointed as you were in the criminal case.

Kyle should counter sue the family for raising a piece of pedo shit that tried to kill him.
The family undoubtedly has no shame, because to bring up their son's debauchery in a public venue makes them look like what ? Like total hillbillies from hell that's what.

It's all about the Benjamin's, and if we had anti-political judges serving on the benches today, then it would be thrown out of court with extreme prejudice on the judges part.
 
The family undoubtedly has no shame, because to bring up their son's debauchery in a public venue makes them look like what ? Like total hillbillies from hell that's what.

It's all about the Benjamin's, and if we had anti-political judges serving on the benches today, then it would be thrown out of court with extreme prejudice on the judges part.
Some scumbag lawyer convinced the trash family to sue hoping to get a settlement from Kyle to make it go away.

Given the overwhelming evidence that Kyle acted in self defense and Rosenbaum's history of being a world class pedo shithead they are going to have a tough time convincing any reasonable jury that Kyle did anything wrong.
 
I'm suggesting you support your argument. The military does not use AR15's. Obviously, the military dos not consider the AR-15 to be a 'military grade' rifle.
Obviously if it's in their history they did at one time and they referred to it as an assault rifle for infrantrimen. I looked into it further and it's a complicated history, simply put Colt bought out Amalite's design for the AR-15 in 1959 and created their version of it and called it an M16. Perhaps you've heard of those too. Home | NC Newsline>2022/07/11 Monday numbers: The Military History and Civilian Tragedy of the AR-15. Stop lying. Come clean, do you work for the NRA or something.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: IM2
Obviously if it's in their history they did at one time and they referred to it as an assault rifle for infrantrimen. I looked into it further and it's a complicated history, simply put Colt bought out Amalite's design for the AR-15 in 1959 and created their version of it and called it an M16. Perhaps you've heard of those too. Home | NC Newsline>2022/07/11 Monday numbers: The Military History and Civilian Tragedy of the AR-15. Stop lying. Come clean, do you work for the NRA or something.
Clicked on your link.

Lot of articles, none on the AR-15.

was it on page 2, maybe?
 
You don't shoot unarmed people in self-defense.
The first was beating the crap out of him, the second attacked him with a skateboard. the third pulled a gun the state said he was not allowed to own, much less carry.

all 3 shots self defense.
 

Forum List

Back
Top