[
you are talking to an ignorant leftard who has never had a gun in his hands. ever - and therefore they will buy the idiocy of the shotgun in a glove compartment of the Civic ( sic!!!!)
they do not understand what you are talking about.
The same people will advertise the limit to the magazines as if that is an obstacle for somebody really well trained
however, I do not agree with you that the tragedy did not occur.
It did.
It is simply stuck to the wrong person.
Dumbass, I was in the Army for 11 years. Qualified on the M16, M1911A1, M60 and M2 machine gun. I've handled more guns than most gun fetishists ever dream about.
Frankly, I never heard about the 'Shotgun in the glove compartment" argument from anyone but you. Maybe Skoobie, but I normally have him on ignore.
Oh, I agree, that just limiting magazine sizes is not a solution.
What we need it to make sure that ALL gun owners are background checked, licensed, bonded and insured.
And if someone has a mentally ill child in the home, they should be required by law to turn in their weapons.
You are a god damn idiot. Instead of disarming the poor, because what you suggest would make it an infringement on the poor to own a firearm. Why not increase the prison time for anyone who uses a gun in a crime and if you kill someone you will die also.
And thew last part would make it that there would be a lot of crazy people living on the street or the state would take care of them.
But no an idiot wants to infringe on peoples rights and give criminals a pass.
Last edited: