Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
Yes, you’re correct. The crime, the garbage piling up, his eating in public places without a Mask, etc. etcGov. Newsom is not a clown, he's very bright and concerned as much for his career as is he cares for the people of CA and our environment. The effort to recall Gov. Newsom is an example of the Republican Party costing California tax payers nearly a quarter of a billion dollars, when the primary election comes early 2022. How that for being fiscally responsible?
Compared to the Governors of Florida and Texas, and their attack on their constituents, Gov. Newsom is a saint.
It's an investment. Getting rid of Newsom is well worth it.Gov. Newsom is not a clown, he's very bright and concerned as much for his career as is he cares for the people of CA and our environment. The effort to recall Gov. Newsom is an example of the Republican Party costing California tax payers nearly a quarter of a billion dollars, when the primary election comes early 2022. How that for being fiscally responsible?
A "saint" who cuts deals with lobbyists at the French Laundry restaurant and who exempts his own businesses from closure due to covid worries.Compared to the Governors of Florida and Texas, and their attack on their constituents, Gov. Newsom is a saint.
They still have a slave mentality as the Dimm's are their masters.
Since slaves and their owners are all most likely dead by now, the reparations would go to their descendants. It's odd to have to answer such a dumb question.
Oh you're welcome to express you indictment of California. You may want to look up this word in a dictionary, "captious" since your post is trivial.Yes, you’re correct. The crime, the garbage piling up, his eating in public places without a Mask, etc. etc
No condemnation of the way a BLACK REPUBLICAN was treated? Thank you for exposing your double standard racism
www.theguardian.com
You might have a point if reparations were repayment for a sin instead of a debt. The country allowed all those slaves to be subjected to slavery despite the 14th amendment, so the country owes the repayment.Democrats bring back racism, now you bring back the sins of the fathers. It's not just the Taliban who want to live in the 7th century, it's you morons.
Define who collects your massive handouts and who pays for them exactly
Attacks on Elder show the desperation of the left.
You might have a point if reparations were repayment for a sin instead of a debt. The country allowed all those slaves to be subjected to slavery despite the 14th amendment, so the country owes the repayment.
You might have a point if reparations were repayment for a sin instead of a debt. The country allowed all those slaves to be subjected to slavery despite the 14th amendment, so the country owes the repayment.
Gov. Newsom is not a clown, he's very bright and concerned as much for his career as is he cares for the people of CA and our environment. The effort to recall Gov. Newsom is an example of the Republican Party costing California tax payers nearly a quarter of a billion dollars, when the primary election comes early 2022. How that for being fiscally responsible?
Compared to the Governors of Florida and Texas, and their attack on their constituents, Gov. Newsom is a saint.
I'm sure you can't tell the difference between what you wrote an a rational remark, but most can.Well, you live here, don't you? So write a check, bitch.
My father's estate is still responsible for any debts he owed. That's how it works. However, it's not individuals who owe that particular debt. It's the country as a whole.Gotcha.
So you aren't responsible for your father's sins, but you are responsible for his debts. That's why you don't want to live in the 7th century.
Huh. Same exact argument. Actually that is still you wanting to live in the 7th century.
I never owned slaves. Go fuck yourself, racist
Because he never said that. Using talking points fed to you by desperate partisans is never wise.Of course blacks are equal to whites. Elder's problem is that he thinks whites are somehow better, and he has exceded his blackness to become as good as whites. Why else would he say slave owners were deserving of reparations?
See #52. for a video of him saying exactly that.Because he never said that. Using talking points fed to you by desperate partisans is never wise.
Nope. He never said slave owners were deserving of reparations. He recounted the history that the UK gvt. paid slave owners reparations to avoid a civil war, and therefore "you could make an argument that the people that are owed reparations are not only just Black people but also the people whose 'property' was taken away after the end of the Civil War." HUGE difference for what you claimed. Huge.See #52. for a video of him saying exactly that.
Oh you're welcome to express you indictment of California. You may want to look up this word in a dictionary, "captious" since your post is trivial.
BTW, San Francisco is only 231 sq. miles and surrounded on three sides by water with a population of 883, 255, but grows when other people come to work in The City, Tourists flood the streets as do the homeless notwithstanding the laws passed (see last link, below).
Here are somethings which make SF what is has been and continue to be.
Emperor Norton: Emperor Norton - Wikipedia
This is an example of a city which continues to accept "different" people, a city where most natives accept no matter their color, creed or ethnicity. A city drawn by tourists to our weather, are restaurants, museums; pier 39 and the Embarcadero, the Golden Gate Bridge, Alcatraz, Golden Gate Park, the Cliff House, its architecture, Cable Cars and other easy Public Transportation and it's amazing vistas.
View attachment 537482
View attachment 537484
View attachment 537486
'It's barely a Band-Aid': life inside San Francisco's first sanctioned tent camp
Residents have access to meals, electricity to charge phones, toilets and healthcare. But for many it’s too little too late
I'm sure you can't tell the difference between what you wrote an a rational remark, but most can.
So the slaves weren't property? Are you sure about that?Nope. He never said slave owners were deserving of reparations. He recounted the history that the UK gvt. paid slave owners reparations to avoid a civil war, and therefore "you could make an argument that the people that are owed reparations are not only just Black people but also the people whose 'property' was taken away after the end of the Civil War." HUGE difference for what you claimed. Huge.
huh? He said that given the historical precedent "you could make an argument that" the slave owner are also due reparations, in addition to the slaves. Your claim that he said "slave owners were deserving of reparations?" is 100% false.So the slaves weren't property? Are you sure about that?
