Las Vegas shooting: Reports of shooter at Mandalay Bay Casino

[Skull Pilot]

Of course it holds water.

You want to ban a weapon because it's used in mass murder which is only 1% of all murder. It doesn't matter to you that 99.995% of people who own semiautomatic rifles will never even bump fire one never mind turn it on a crowd.

This must lusted after ban of yours will do absolutely nothing to lower the murder rate.

. So you could give a crap less about 600 people being mowed down in 10 minutes by a lone gunman all due to him legally purchasing the tools in which modified the weapons in order to do such a thing ?? Gotta keep that dam bumpstock legal eh ? To hell with the damage it caused eh ?? If it we're up to you, then seatbelts would have never been created and/or would have never gotten the chance to prove that lives can be saved by just clicking it in, and this after they were installed. If it we're up to you, then helmets would have never been created for motorcycle riders, and they wouldn't be there to save lives as they do today. Many things were resisted until the results started rolling in, and creating the very stats in which you love to reference here.

His weapons were not modified.
And the point you can't seem to grasp is that only the person who committed the crime is responsible for the crime.

99.995% of people who won semiautomatic rifles will never kill anyone but you don't give a shit about their rights you would rather let the actions of a few be the reason to deny the many of a protected right.

It doesn't matter to you that he could have done the same or worse with pipe bombs, or a big ass truck and a snow plow

. Hard to get those items up stairs to a perch over looking thousands in order to slaughter as much as he could, so your comparisons in order to try and spin this are moot points at best. Do you think that there are never any precautions to be taken in order to stop such a thing from happening again ??

You don't drive a big ass truck with a snowplow into a hotel room you fucking moron.

. No crap Sherlock, so why bring it up in the way that you did ? We are talking about a weapon that was turned into an automatic weapon in order to mow down as many as one could in the situation. You don't want to address that for fear of a slippery slope, but I ask this are your fears justified ?

It wasn't "turned into an automatic weapon". But since you don't know shit about rifles you wouldn't know that.

 

[Skull Pilot]

Of course it holds water.

You want to ban a weapon because it's used in mass murder which is only 1% of all murder. It doesn't matter to you that 99.995% of people who own semiautomatic rifles will never even bump fire one never mind turn it on a crowd.

This must lusted after ban of yours will do absolutely nothing to lower the murder rate.

. So you could give a crap less about 600 people being mowed down in 10 minutes by a lone gunman all due to him legally purchasing the tools in which modified the weapons in order to do such a thing ?? Gotta keep that dam bumpstock legal eh ? To hell with the damage it caused eh ?? If it we're up to you, then seatbelts would have never been created and/or would have never gotten the chance to prove that lives can be saved by just clicking it in, and this after they were installed. If it we're up to you, then helmets would have never been created for motorcycle riders, and they wouldn't be there to save lives as they do today. Many things were resisted until the results started rolling in, and creating the very stats in which you love to reference here.

His weapons were not modified.
And the point you can't seem to grasp is that only the person who committed the crime is responsible for the crime.

99.995% of people who won semiautomatic rifles will never kill anyone but you don't give a shit about their rights you would rather let the actions of a few be the reason to deny the many of a protected right.

It doesn't matter to you that he could have done the same or worse with pipe bombs, or a big ass truck and a snow plow

. Bottom line is you could care less about those people who lost their lives like that, just as long as you can keep your dam bumpstock, and no telling what else you think you need to battle the U.S. military one day. Good grief.

Hey Fucknut, I don't have a bump stock, never will have a bump stock. And I have no desire to battle the government. I happen to be a very responsible gun owner and have been since I was given my first BB gun at 8 years old.

It is beyond asinine to tell 99.995% of people who own firearms that they can't own semiautomatic rifles because some other asshole killed some people with one.

. Who said anything about rifles idiot. Bumpstocks aren't rifles. Good grief.

The push here is to ban semiautomatic weapons and don't fucking deny it.

 

[beagle9]

Can we effectively battle the U.S. military and win ?? Germany fell with outside help, but your point is good.

You can keep it from even being attempted if you keep the population armed. The big problem comes when the extremists are trying to take control....they beat up and murder anyone who gets in their way....which is made easier when their opposition is unarmed and helpless......it is harder to silence the political opposition with goons when the can be shot by normal people.

. So how do we keep Mandalay from happening again ???

We can't.

No law will ever stop some asshole hell bent on murder.

Ban semiautomatic rifles and he'll wear a bomb vest, or use a truck or one of many other ways to cause mass casualties.

Stupid argument. Of course laws reduce the occurrence of the prohibited activity. You know you have gone down the rabbit hole, when you're making this idiotic argument.

The prohibited activity

You mean like the laws against murder?

FYI banning semiautomatic rifles won;t to shit to lower the murder rate

Banning the bumpstock would give the poor souls at least a sporting chance against a sniper with a bumpstock that allowed him to lay down fire upon them at a rate that was unexceptable, and ended up killing them like shooting fish in a barrel. Just saying.

 

[Skull Pilot]

You can keep it from even being attempted if you keep the population armed. The big problem comes when the extremists are trying to take control....they beat up and murder anyone who gets in their way....which is made easier when their opposition is unarmed and helpless......it is harder to silence the political opposition with goons when the can be shot by normal people.

. So how do we keep Mandalay from happening again ???

We can't.

No law will ever stop some asshole hell bent on murder.

Ban semiautomatic rifles and he'll wear a bomb vest, or use a truck or one of many other ways to cause mass casualties.

Stupid argument. Of course laws reduce the occurrence of the prohibited activity. You know you have gone down the rabbit hole, when you're making this idiotic argument.

The prohibited activity

You mean like the laws against murder?

FYI banning semiautomatic rifles won;t to shit to lower the murder rate

Banning the bumpstock would give the poor souls at least a sporting chance against a sniper with a bumpstock that allowed him to lay down fire upon them at a rate that was unexceptable, and ended up killing them like shooting fish in a barrel. Just saying.

You can bump fire a semiautomatic without a bump stock but of course you didn't know that.

 

[beagle9]

. So you could give a crap less about 600 people being mowed down in 10 minutes by a lone gunman all due to him legally purchasing the tools in which modified the weapons in order to do such a thing ?? Gotta keep that dam bumpstock legal eh ? To hell with the damage it caused eh ?? If it we're up to you, then seatbelts would have never been created and/or would have never gotten the chance to prove that lives can be saved by just clicking it in, and this after they were installed. If it we're up to you, then helmets would have never been created for motorcycle riders, and they wouldn't be there to save lives as they do today. Many things were resisted until the results started rolling in, and creating the very stats in which you love to reference here.

His weapons were not modified.
And the point you can't seem to grasp is that only the person who committed the crime is responsible for the crime.

99.995% of people who won semiautomatic rifles will never kill anyone but you don't give a shit about their rights you would rather let the actions of a few be the reason to deny the many of a protected right.

It doesn't matter to you that he could have done the same or worse with pipe bombs, or a big ass truck and a snow plow

. Bottom line is you could care less about those people who lost their lives like that, just as long as you can keep your dam bumpstock, and no telling what else you think you need to battle the U.S. military one day. Good grief.

Hey Fucknut, I don't have a bump stock, never will have a bump stock. And I have no desire to battle the government. I happen to be a very responsible gun owner and have been since I was given my first BB gun at 8 years old.

It is beyond asinine to tell 99.995% of people who own firearms that they can't own semiautomatic rifles because some other asshole killed some people with one.

. Who said anything about rifles idiot. Bumpstocks aren't rifles. Good grief.

The push here is to ban semiautomatic weapons and don't fucking deny it.

. Nope, just anything that makes that semi go auto.

 

[beagle9]

. So how do we keep Mandalay from happening again ???

We can't.

No law will ever stop some asshole hell bent on murder.

Ban semiautomatic rifles and he'll wear a bomb vest, or use a truck or one of many other ways to cause mass casualties.

Stupid argument. Of course laws reduce the occurrence of the prohibited activity. You know you have gone down the rabbit hole, when you're making this idiotic argument.

The prohibited activity

You mean like the laws against murder?

FYI banning semiautomatic rifles won;t to shit to lower the murder rate

Banning the bumpstock would give the poor souls at least a sporting chance against a sniper with a bumpstock that allowed him to lay down fire upon them at a rate that was unexceptable, and ended up killing them like shooting fish in a barrel. Just saying.

You can bump fire a semiautomatic without a bump stock but of course you didn't know that.

. Yeah, but I bet it isn't as efficient of a method, but do tell.

 

[Skull Pilot]

His weapons were not modified.
And the point you can't seem to grasp is that only the person who committed the crime is responsible for the crime.

99.995% of people who won semiautomatic rifles will never kill anyone but you don't give a shit about their rights you would rather let the actions of a few be the reason to deny the many of a protected right.

It doesn't matter to you that he could have done the same or worse with pipe bombs, or a big ass truck and a snow plow

. Bottom line is you could care less about those people who lost their lives like that, just as long as you can keep your dam bumpstock, and no telling what else you think you need to battle the U.S. military one day. Good grief.

Hey Fucknut, I don't have a bump stock, never will have a bump stock. And I have no desire to battle the government. I happen to be a very responsible gun owner and have been since I was given my first BB gun at 8 years old.

It is beyond asinine to tell 99.995% of people who own firearms that they can't own semiautomatic rifles because some other asshole killed some people with one.

. Who said anything about rifles idiot. Bumpstocks aren't rifles. Good grief.

The push here is to ban semiautomatic weapons and don't fucking deny it.

. Nope, just anything that makes that semi go auto.

The only way to make a semi auto to "go auto" is to ILLEGALLY modify the firing mechanism but you wouldn't know that would you?

 

[beagle9]

. So you could give a crap less about 600 people being mowed down in 10 minutes by a lone gunman all due to him legally purchasing the tools in which modified the weapons in order to do such a thing ?? Gotta keep that dam bumpstock legal eh ? To hell with the damage it caused eh ?? If it we're up to you, then seatbelts would have never been created and/or would have never gotten the chance to prove that lives can be saved by just clicking it in, and this after they were installed. If it we're up to you, then helmets would have never been created for motorcycle riders, and they wouldn't be there to save lives as they do today. Many things were resisted until the results started rolling in, and creating the very stats in which you love to reference here.

His weapons were not modified.
And the point you can't seem to grasp is that only the person who committed the crime is responsible for the crime.

99.995% of people who won semiautomatic rifles will never kill anyone but you don't give a shit about their rights you would rather let the actions of a few be the reason to deny the many of a protected right.

It doesn't matter to you that he could have done the same or worse with pipe bombs, or a big ass truck and a snow plow

. Hard to get those items up stairs to a perch over looking thousands in order to slaughter as much as he could, so your comparisons in order to try and spin this are moot points at best. Do you think that there are never any precautions to be taken in order to stop such a thing from happening again ??

You don't drive a big ass truck with a snowplow into a hotel room you fucking moron.

. No crap Sherlock, so why bring it up in the way that you did ? We are talking about a weapon that was turned into an automatic weapon in order to mow down as many as one could in the situation. You don't want to address that for fear of a slippery slope, but I ask this are your fears justified ?

It wasn't "turned into an automatic weapon". But since you don't know shit about rifles you wouldn't know that.

. I guess millions were misled by what they heard, and what the results were eh ?

 

[Skull Pilot]

We can't.

No law will ever stop some asshole hell bent on murder.

Ban semiautomatic rifles and he'll wear a bomb vest, or use a truck or one of many other ways to cause mass casualties.

Stupid argument. Of course laws reduce the occurrence of the prohibited activity. You know you have gone down the rabbit hole, when you're making this idiotic argument.

The prohibited activity

You mean like the laws against murder?

FYI banning semiautomatic rifles won;t to shit to lower the murder rate

Banning the bumpstock would give the poor souls at least a sporting chance against a sniper with a bumpstock that allowed him to lay down fire upon them at a rate that was unexceptable, and ended up killing them like shooting fish in a barrel. Just saying.

You can bump fire a semiautomatic without a bump stock but of course you didn't know that.

. Yeah, but I bet it isn't as efficient of a method, but do tell.

it's no different at all once you get the technique down but then again since you don't know shit about rifles you wouldn't know that

 

[Skull Pilot]

His weapons were not modified.
And the point you can't seem to grasp is that only the person who committed the crime is responsible for the crime.

99.995% of people who won semiautomatic rifles will never kill anyone but you don't give a shit about their rights you would rather let the actions of a few be the reason to deny the many of a protected right.

It doesn't matter to you that he could have done the same or worse with pipe bombs, or a big ass truck and a snow plow

. Hard to get those items up stairs to a perch over looking thousands in order to slaughter as much as he could, so your comparisons in order to try and spin this are moot points at best. Do you think that there are never any precautions to be taken in order to stop such a thing from happening again ??

You don't drive a big ass truck with a snowplow into a hotel room you fucking moron.

. No crap Sherlock, so why bring it up in the way that you did ? We are talking about a weapon that was turned into an automatic weapon in order to mow down as many as one could in the situation. You don't want to address that for fear of a slippery slope, but I ask this are your fears justified ?

It wasn't "turned into an automatic weapon". But since you don't know shit about rifles you wouldn't know that.

. I guess millions were misled by what they heard, and what the results were eh ?

Those millions are all just as fucking ignorant as you are

 

[beagle9]

. Bottom line is you could care less about those people who lost their lives like that, just as long as you can keep your dam bumpstock, and no telling what else you think you need to battle the U.S. military one day. Good grief.

Hey Fucknut, I don't have a bump stock, never will have a bump stock. And I have no desire to battle the government. I happen to be a very responsible gun owner and have been since I was given my first BB gun at 8 years old.

It is beyond asinine to tell 99.995% of people who own firearms that they can't own semiautomatic rifles because some other asshole killed some people with one.

. Who said anything about rifles idiot. Bumpstocks aren't rifles. Good grief.

The push here is to ban semiautomatic weapons and don't fucking deny it.

. Nope, just anything that makes that semi go auto.

The only way to make a semi auto to "go auto" is to ILLEGALLY modify the firing mechanism but you wouldn't know that would you?

. There was a way around that, it's called the bumpstock.

 

[Skull Pilot]

Hey Fucknut, I don't have a bump stock, never will have a bump stock. And I have no desire to battle the government. I happen to be a very responsible gun owner and have been since I was given my first BB gun at 8 years old.

It is beyond asinine to tell 99.995% of people who own firearms that they can't own semiautomatic rifles because some other asshole killed some people with one.

. Who said anything about rifles idiot. Bumpstocks aren't rifles. Good grief.

The push here is to ban semiautomatic weapons and don't fucking deny it.

. Nope, just anything that makes that semi go auto.

The only way to make a semi auto to "go auto" is to ILLEGALLY modify the firing mechanism but you wouldn't know that would you?

. There was a way around that, it's called the bumpstock.

Once again YOU DO NOT NEED A BUMP STOCK TO BUMP FIRE A SEMIAUTOMATIC RIFLE.

 

[beagle9]

. Who said anything about rifles idiot. Bumpstocks aren't rifles. Good grief.

The push here is to ban semiautomatic weapons and don't fucking deny it.

. Nope, just anything that makes that semi go auto.

The only way to make a semi auto to "go auto" is to ILLEGALLY modify the firing mechanism but you wouldn't know that would you?

. There was a way around that, it's called the bumpstock.

Once again YOU DO NOT NEED A BUMP STOCK TO BUMP FIRE A SEMIAUTOMATIC RIFLE.

. So your saying keep our hands off Paddocks bumpstocks eh ?

 

[Skull Pilot]

The push here is to ban semiautomatic weapons and don't fucking deny it.

. Nope, just anything that makes that semi go auto.

The only way to make a semi auto to "go auto" is to ILLEGALLY modify the firing mechanism but you wouldn't know that would you?

. There was a way around that, it's called the bumpstock.

Once again YOU DO NOT NEED A BUMP STOCK TO BUMP FIRE A SEMIAUTOMATIC RIFLE.

. So your saying keep our hands off Paddocks bumpstocks eh ?

It matters not if you ban bump stocks go ahead for all I fucking care because it won't stop one single person from bump firing a semiautomatic weapon but you're too fucking stupid to realize that.

 

[Chuz Life]

You can keep it from even being attempted if you keep the population armed. The big problem comes when the extremists are trying to take control....they beat up and murder anyone who gets in their way....which is made easier when their opposition is unarmed and helpless......it is harder to silence the political opposition with goons when the can be shot by normal people.

. So how do we keep Mandalay from happening again ???

We can't.

No law will ever stop some asshole hell bent on murder.

Ban semiautomatic rifles and he'll wear a bomb vest, or use a truck or one of many other ways to cause mass casualties.

Stupid argument. Of course laws reduce the occurrence of the prohibited activity. You know you have gone down the rabbit hole, when you're making this idiotic argument.

The prohibited activity

You mean like the laws against murder?

FYI banning semiautomatic rifles won;t to shit to lower the murder rate

Banning the bumpstock would give the poor souls at least a sporting chance against a sniper with a bumpstock that allowed him to lay down fire upon them at a rate that was unexceptable, and ended up killing them like shooting fish in a barrel. Just saying.

Dafuq?

Please explain how banning bumpsticks will keep mass murdering criminals from getting one or making one!

 

[Skull Pilot]

. So how do we keep Mandalay from happening again ???

We can't.

No law will ever stop some asshole hell bent on murder.

Ban semiautomatic rifles and he'll wear a bomb vest, or use a truck or one of many other ways to cause mass casualties.

Stupid argument. Of course laws reduce the occurrence of the prohibited activity. You know you have gone down the rabbit hole, when you're making this idiotic argument.

The prohibited activity

You mean like the laws against murder?

FYI banning semiautomatic rifles won;t to shit to lower the murder rate

Banning the bumpstock would give the poor souls at least a sporting chance against a sniper with a bumpstock that allowed him to lay down fire upon them at a rate that was unexceptable, and ended up killing them like shooting fish in a barrel. Just saying.

Dafuq?

Please e,plain how banning bumpsticks will keep mass murderer criminals from getting one or making one!

You don't need to have a bump stock to bump fire a semiautomatic rifle.

Don't be fooled here these idiots want to ban semiautomatic rifles

 

[Chuz Life]

We can't.

No law will ever stop some asshole hell bent on murder.

Ban semiautomatic rifles and he'll wear a bomb vest, or use a truck or one of many other ways to cause mass casualties.

Stupid argument. Of course laws reduce the occurrence of the prohibited activity. You know you have gone down the rabbit hole, when you're making this idiotic argument.

The prohibited activity

You mean like the laws against murder?

FYI banning semiautomatic rifles won;t to shit to lower the murder rate

Banning the bumpstock would give the poor souls at least a sporting chance against a sniper with a bumpstock that allowed him to lay down fire upon them at a rate that was unexceptable, and ended up killing them like shooting fish in a barrel. Just saying.

You can bump fire a semiautomatic without a bump stock but of course you didn't know that.

. Yeah, but I bet it isn't as efficient of a method, but do tell.

 

[beagle9]

. So how do we keep Mandalay from happening again ???

We can't.

No law will ever stop some asshole hell bent on murder.

Ban semiautomatic rifles and he'll wear a bomb vest, or use a truck or one of many other ways to cause mass casualties.

Stupid argument. Of course laws reduce the occurrence of the prohibited activity. You know you have gone down the rabbit hole, when you're making this idiotic argument.

The prohibited activity

You mean like the laws against murder?

FYI banning semiautomatic rifles won;t to shit to lower the murder rate

Banning the bumpstock would give the poor souls at least a sporting chance against a sniper with a bumpstock that allowed him to lay down fire upon them at a rate that was unexceptable, and ended up killing them like shooting fish in a barrel. Just saying.

Dafuq?

Please explain how banning bumpsticks will keep mass murdering criminals from getting one or making one!

. It won't, but just like our vehicles are equipped with the capability to go 100 mph in a 35, but do we do it ?? Yes some do, but when caught there is a law to reference that says you will not drive your vehicle over 35 in a 35, and if you do here is the fine or punishment for it. Paddock went the equivalent of 100 in a 35 with his actions, and the question is did the bumpstock enable him to do that ?? Now we haven't banned cars from going 100 in a 35, and this by placing devices on them that removes that ability from the driver, but if someone were to do such a thing, and they were to kill up a bunch of people, would that be what the citizens would be calling for next ?? Probably so, and the tech industry is poised to give it to them. Look I don't want us to lose our freedoms no more than the rest of you, but if this nation doesn't get tough on the criminals, then we all end up suffering. The bumpstock was sought to be placed on the sacrifice table in order to preserve the semi-automatic rifle in the situation I figured, and I agree that we just need to get this nation working to preserve our freedoms again, but the only way to do it is to stop the bleeding.

 

[beagle9]

Stupid argument. Of course laws reduce the occurrence of the prohibited activity. You know you have gone down the rabbit hole, when you're making this idiotic argument.

The prohibited activity

You mean like the laws against murder?

FYI banning semiautomatic rifles won;t to shit to lower the murder rate

Banning the bumpstock would give the poor souls at least a sporting chance against a sniper with a bumpstock that allowed him to lay down fire upon them at a rate that was unexceptable, and ended up killing them like shooting fish in a barrel. Just saying.

You can bump fire a semiautomatic without a bump stock but of course you didn't know that.

. Yeah, but I bet it isn't as efficient of a method, but do tell.

. Is what is shown here legal ??

 

[Chuz Life]

The prohibited activity

You mean like the laws against murder?

FYI banning semiautomatic rifles won;t to shit to lower the murder rate

Banning the bumpstock would give the poor souls at least a sporting chance against a sniper with a bumpstock that allowed him to lay down fire upon them at a rate that was unexceptable, and ended up killing them like shooting fish in a barrel. Just saying.

You can bump fire a semiautomatic without a bump stock but of course you didn't know that.

. Yeah, but I bet it isn't as efficient of a method, but do tell.

. Is what is shown here legal ??

100%

That's why your proposed ban on bumpstocks is such a fucking joke.