Latest FBI Doc Release Shows They Knew Dossier Paid for By Hillary

Just think your man child Obama let it happen. The only good thing that faggot did for America.

Good thing?

Trumpers (or more likely Russian trolls) think the Trump campaign accepting help from Russia to elect a President is a "good thing"

Oh....
 
The OP is old news and widely reported. Nothing new. Opposition research is LEGAL.
So, opposition research is legal,
but, if you use the dirt that was dug up, it's illegal?

What's the point of opposition research then?

What makes fresh dirt collusion,
and old dirt politics?

Whether its fresh or old,
the dirt serves the same purpose...
influence voters!

oppo research is legal but receiving goods or services from agents of a foreign hostile adversarial government to specifically influence a US election is.
Then why did Obama let it happen, after he said a foriegn power couldn't affect the out come of our election? I guess he lied again.
 
Just think your man child Obama let it happen. The only good thing that faggot did for America.

Good thing?

Trumpers (or more likely Russian trolls) think the Trump campaign accepting help from Russia to elect a President is a "good thing"

Oh....
Obama knew about it, and did nothing. I guess he should be prosecuted.
 
Just think your man child Obama let it happen. The only good thing that faggot did for America.

Obama knew about it, and did nothing. I guess he should be prosecuted.

Yea...ya ought impeach Obama then huh? Fool

And no..we will NOT let you ignore what you posted. You think the Russians picking our President is a good thing.

You can NOT escape that
 
Just think your man child Obama let it happen. The only good thing that faggot did for America.

Obama knew about it, and did nothing. I guess he should be prosecuted.

Yea...ya ought impeach Obama then huh? Fool

And no..we will NOT let you ignore what you posted. You think the Russians picking our President is a good thing.

You can NOT escape that
If Putin wanted to pick our president, he would want Hillary dumbass. I mean she thinks half of america is a basket of deplorables. My God liberals are stupid.
 
The FBI's own written assessment States they KNEW foreign spy, Fusion GPS employee, AND FBI EMPLOYEE hated Donald Trump.

They also knew, the latest document they released shows, The Dossier they received was Russian-authored OPPOSITION RESEARCH PAID FOR BY HILLARY CLINTON!

(The Dossier was not even the 21st 'dossier' on / against Trump - the FBI reported the 1st was SO unbelievable they rejected it immediately.)

Steele said he did not know if any of it was true and it was never verified.

Evidence (US IG, Oher testimony, documents...) shows the FBI, DOJ, CIA, and FBI alluded the Dossier illegally, building the entire KNOWN FALSE accusation of 'illegal Russian Collusion' and the entire KNOWN FALSE case in order to deceive the FISA COURT to illegally get warrants to spy on the Trump team, to deceive Congress to get an investigation opened up, and to get co-conspirator Mueller appointed as Special Political Assassin.

(Oher testified he and Steele were already working with Mueller on the dossier before Mueller was appointed Special I am Counsel.)


This latest doc shows Comey knew the 'Dirt' on Trump Comey warned Candidate Trump about was opposition research from a foreign spy on the FBI's payroll working with Russians and that the opposition research this whole treasonous with hunt / coup has been based on was paid for by Hillary Clinton ... And Comey withheld that information!

FBI Releases Key Steele Dossier Document

"The summary shows that the FBI claimed Steele was working for “private clients,” when he was actually working for the DNC and Clinton campaign. It also noted that Steele relied on “identified and unidentified subsources” to fill out the dossier"

This was all reported to the FISA judges when applying for the warrants. Widely reported and nothing new.
Actually, as reported by several sources to include the US IG ... and now the FBI itself ... The fact that it was Russian-authored Opposition research bought from a foreign spy working with the DOJ and for the FBI -- PAID FOR BY HILLARY CLINTON - and NOT actually LEGITIMATE INTEL, as they briefed the FISA Court it was, was NEVER revealed to the FISA Court.

A Republican started the request for the dossier on behalf of his preferred candidate, but after his candidate lost out to Trump, the Republican initiator stop paying for it. Then, the DNC picked up where he left off and paid for the completion of the dossier. It was revealed to the FISA judges that the dossier was being funded by an opposing political party.

Your thread is dead.
Wrong. There was no dossier until Hillary started paying Fusion GPS.

"Steele was ultimately working for the Clinton campaign and DNC, not a private client. And Steele’s use of some “unidentified” sources could raise questions about his collection methods."

Steele was a busy little foreign spy - he worked with the Russians, worked with Fusion GPS, worked with the DOJ, worked for the FBI, worked for the DNC, and worked for Hillary Clinton....


It's even worse than that. The Clinton team was feeding information to Steele as he was compiling his fairy tale (dossier). Not only did the DNC pay for the fairy tale, they helped write it!

Clinton associates fed information to Trump dossier author Steele, memo says

Gentlemen, got a job for you guys because 2 of you 3 are always digging, and the 3rd is good at verifying.

JOB/QUESTION----------->

It is highly bandied about in closed political circles that the DOSSIER...………...is actually DOSSIERS!

What do I mean?

When the Obama Administration originally began querying the supposed closed data base for political information, nobody knew that Trump was going to be the eventual nominee. It was only AFTER he won the nomination, that the FISA was put unto effect.

BUT, before that, information was being gathered on MORE people than just Trump!,, and it was being gathered by multiple private contractors that the government gave what is...…...ILLEGAL...….access to said dat base.

Now then---------->who were those other people that political data was being gathered on?

We know who they were, and most of them were on stage at the same time, if you catch my drift!

And how do we know this is true?

By the UNMASKINGS! All you have to do is understand that the 100s of unmaskings because of the query into the database, has absolutely NOTHING to do with the Trump campaign, but surprising, many of them are tied to OTHERS; again, if you catch my drift-)

And so, the question has to be---------->if they were unmasked, they must have done something wrong, all those 100s of people; and yet Heir Mewler isn't prosecuting a one of them.

Why not!

ANSWER--------------> because the people that they are tied do, DID NOT win the Republican nomination for President, Donald Trump did!

And so, do the research and that COULD be the longest thread ever posted on USMB! It would also drive the Left crazy, because it proves beyond a shadow of a doubt how NAZI like and CRIMINAL, the Obysmal administration was-)
 
Yeah, we tend to fixate on rogue government officials who violate the Constitutional rights of the opposition party candidate.

The FISA warrant allowed the Obama administration to review every phone call made by everybody in the Trump campaign. Your ignorance of the capabilities of NSA phone and email monitoring isn't a convincing argument.

The Steele "dossier" was the main evidence. That's been demonstrated repeatedly.

All you proved is that you're a dumbass that is only capable of mindlessly repeating DNC propaganda.

Obviously that's bullshit since the FISA warrant concerned only Page

And no...the infamous Nunes Memo showed that it was Papadopoulos that was the reason that the investigation of Russian involvement into the Trump campaign began.

Stop lying
You're an ignorant moron. A FISA warrant gives the FBI permission to spy on the target, to spy on everyone the target has had contact with, and everyone those people have had contact with. It therefore gave the FBI permission to spy on everyone in the Trump campaign.

The Claim about Popodopolous being the initial cause of the investigation is pure crap.


With the Page origination story cratering, Team Obama tried to save the day with Origination Story 2.0: Papadopoulos did it. In this account, George Papadopoulos, an even more obscure Trump-campaign aide than Page, triggered the investigation by telling Australian diplomat Alexander Downer, in May 2016, that he’d heard from a Kremlin-connected academic, Josef Mifsud, that Russia had thousands of emails potentially damaging to Clinton.

But this rickety tale had the signs of an after-the-fact rationalization, an effort to downplay the dossier and the role of Obama officials in the genesis of the probe. There were curious questions about how the twentysomething Papadopoulos came to be meeting with Australia’s highest-ranking diplomat in the United Kingdom, and about how and when, exactly, this Australian information came to be transmitted to the FBI.

Moreover, there are two basic flaws in version 2.0. First, Papadopoulos’s story is actually exculpatory of the Trump campaign: If Russia already had the emails and was alerting the Trump campaign to that fact, the campaign could not have been involved in the hacking. Second, there is confusion about exactly what Mifsud was referring to when he told Papadopoulos that the Russians had emails that could damage Clinton. Democrats suggest that Mifsud was referring to the Democratic National Committee emails. They need this to be true because (a) these are the emails that were hacked by Russian operatives, and (b) it was WikiLeaks’ publication of these hacked DNC emails in July 2016 that spurred the Aussies to report to their American counterparts about the encounter, two months earlier, between Papadopoulos and Downer — to whom Papadopoulos reported Mifsud’s emails story. But if the Australians really did infer that Mifsud and Papadopoulos must have been talking about the hacked DNC emails, the inference is unlikely. As the Daily Caller’s Chuck Ross has reported, Papadopoulos maintains that he understood Mifsud to be talking about the 30,000-plus emails that Hillary Clinton had deleted from her homebrew server. That makes more sense — it was those emails that Donald Trump harped on throughout the campaign and that were in the news when Mifsud spoke with Papadopoulos in April 2016. While there are grounds for concern that Clinton’s emails were hacked, there is no proof that it happened; Clinton’s 30,000 emails are not the hacked DNC emails on which the “collusion” narrative is based.

There was also the curiosity of why, if Papadopoulos was so central, the FBI had not bothered to interview him until late January 2017 — after Trump had already taken office.
 
You're an ignorant moron. A FISA warrant gives the FBI permission to spy on the target, to spy on everyone the target has had contact with, and everyone those people have had contact with. It therefore gave the FBI permission to spy on everyone in the Trump campaign.

Bullshit

FISA warrants are forward facing. They do not allow surveillance of previous contacts.

That would require a FISA warrant of its own.

I'd ask you to prove your claim but that has always proven pointless
 
Yeah, we tend to fixate on rogue government officials who violate the Constitutional rights of the opposition party candidate.

The FISA warrant allowed the Obama administration to review every phone call made by everybody in the Trump campaign. Your ignorance of the capabilities of NSA phone and email monitoring isn't a convincing argument.

The Steele "dossier" was the main evidence. That's been demonstrated repeatedly.

All you proved is that you're a dumbass that is only capable of mindlessly repeating DNC propaganda.

Obviously that's bullshit since the FISA warrant concerned only Page

And no...the infamous Nunes Memo showed that it was Papadopoulos that was the reason that the investigation of Russian involvement into the Trump campaign began.

Stop lying
You're an ignorant moron. A FISA warrant gives the FBI permission to spy on the target, to spy on everyone the target has had contact with, and everyone those people have had contact with. It therefore gave the FBI permission to spy on everyone in the Trump campaign.

The Claim about Popodopolous being the initial cause of the investigation is pure crap.


With the Page origination story cratering, Team Obama tried to save the day with Origination Story 2.0: Papadopoulos did it. In this account, George Papadopoulos, an even more obscure Trump-campaign aide than Page, triggered the investigation by telling Australian diplomat Alexander Downer, in May 2016, that he’d heard from a Kremlin-connected academic, Josef Mifsud, that Russia had thousands of emails potentially damaging to Clinton.

But this rickety tale had the signs of an after-the-fact rationalization, an effort to downplay the dossier and the role of Obama officials in the genesis of the probe. There were curious questions about how the twentysomething Papadopoulos came to be meeting with Australia’s highest-ranking diplomat in the United Kingdom, and about how and when, exactly, this Australian information came to be transmitted to the FBI.

Moreover, there are two basic flaws in version 2.0. First, Papadopoulos’s story is actually exculpatory of the Trump campaign: If Russia already had the emails and was alerting the Trump campaign to that fact, the campaign could not have been involved in the hacking. Second, there is confusion about exactly what Mifsud was referring to when he told Papadopoulos that the Russians had emails that could damage Clinton. Democrats suggest that Mifsud was referring to the Democratic National Committee emails. They need this to be true because (a) these are the emails that were hacked by Russian operatives, and (b) it was WikiLeaks’ publication of these hacked DNC emails in July 2016 that spurred the Aussies to report to their American counterparts about the encounter, two months earlier, between Papadopoulos and Downer — to whom Papadopoulos reported Mifsud’s emails story. But if the Australians really did infer that Mifsud and Papadopoulos must have been talking about the hacked DNC emails, the inference is unlikely. As the Daily Caller’s Chuck Ross has reported, Papadopoulos maintains that he understood Mifsud to be talking about the 30,000-plus emails that Hillary Clinton had deleted from her homebrew server. That makes more sense — it was those emails that Donald Trump harped on throughout the campaign and that were in the news when Mifsud spoke with Papadopoulos in April 2016. While there are grounds for concern that Clinton’s emails were hacked, there is no proof that it happened; Clinton’s 30,000 emails are not the hacked DNC emails on which the “collusion” narrative is based.

There was also the curiosity of why, if Papadopoulos was so central, the FBI had not bothered to interview him until late January 2017 — after Trump had already taken office.
Mischaracterization, half truths, outright lies

From NBC

But it's already been established by the House Intelligence Committee (That's the GOP House) that the Russia investigation began after the FBI learned that another campaign aide, George Papadopoulos, had been approached by a Russian agent. The agent told Papadopoulos the Russians had incriminating information about Hillary Clinton, including emails, according to court documents.. Papadopoulos then mentioned to an Australian diplomat that the Russians had "dirt" on Clinton, the Australians contacted the U.S. government, and the FBI began to take a look.
 
And again..it was a FISA application concerning Carter Page only...months after he left the Trump Campaign

Know why he left the Trump campaign?

Because it became known that he was in Putin's pocket
 
Just think your man child Obama let it happen. The only good thing that faggot did for America.

Good thing?

Trumpers (or more likely Russian trolls) think the Trump campaign accepting help from Russia to elect a President is a "good thing"

Oh....
PutinEncourageAliens.jpg
 
You're an ignorant moron. A FISA warrant gives the FBI permission to spy on the target, to spy on everyone the target has had contact with, and everyone those people have had contact with. It therefore gave the FBI permission to spy on everyone in the Trump campaign.

Bullshit

FISA warrants are forward facing. They do not allow surveillance of previous contacts.

That would require a FISA warrant of its own.

I'd ask you to prove your claim but that has always proven pointless
Wrongo, dumbass! They can look forward, and they can query the NSA database for all past communications. And I didn't say previous contacts. I said previous communications. The contacts current at the time were all the members of the Trump campaign.

You're a gullible moron who is easily manipulated by the deep state.
 
And again..it was a FISA application concerning Carter Page only...months after he left the Trump Campaign

Know why he left the Trump campaign?

Because it became known that he was in Putin's pocket
We all know you're full of shit. It has been proven over and over again.
 
Wrongo, dumbass! They can look forward, and they can query the NSA database for all past communications. And I didn't say previous contacts. I said previous communications. The contacts current at the time were all the members of the Trump campaign.

You're a gullible moron who is easily manipulated by the deep state.

OK..post a link
 
Yeah, we tend to fixate on rogue government officials who violate the Constitutional rights of the opposition party candidate.

The FISA warrant allowed the Obama administration to review every phone call made by everybody in the Trump campaign. Your ignorance of the capabilities of NSA phone and email monitoring isn't a convincing argument.

The Steele "dossier" was the main evidence. That's been demonstrated repeatedly.

All you proved is that you're a dumbass that is only capable of mindlessly repeating DNC propaganda.

Obviously that's bullshit since the FISA warrant concerned only Page

And no...the infamous Nunes Memo showed that it was Papadopoulos that was the reason that the investigation of Russian involvement into the Trump campaign began.

Stop lying
You're an ignorant moron. A FISA warrant gives the FBI permission to spy on the target, to spy on everyone the target has had contact with, and everyone those people have had contact with. It therefore gave the FBI permission to spy on everyone in the Trump campaign.

The Claim about Popodopolous being the initial cause of the investigation is pure crap.


With the Page origination story cratering, Team Obama tried to save the day with Origination Story 2.0: Papadopoulos did it. In this account, George Papadopoulos, an even more obscure Trump-campaign aide than Page, triggered the investigation by telling Australian diplomat Alexander Downer, in May 2016, that he’d heard from a Kremlin-connected academic, Josef Mifsud, that Russia had thousands of emails potentially damaging to Clinton.

But this rickety tale had the signs of an after-the-fact rationalization, an effort to downplay the dossier and the role of Obama officials in the genesis of the probe. There were curious questions about how the twentysomething Papadopoulos came to be meeting with Australia’s highest-ranking diplomat in the United Kingdom, and about how and when, exactly, this Australian information came to be transmitted to the FBI.

Moreover, there are two basic flaws in version 2.0. First, Papadopoulos’s story is actually exculpatory of the Trump campaign: If Russia already had the emails and was alerting the Trump campaign to that fact, the campaign could not have been involved in the hacking. Second, there is confusion about exactly what Mifsud was referring to when he told Papadopoulos that the Russians had emails that could damage Clinton. Democrats suggest that Mifsud was referring to the Democratic National Committee emails. They need this to be true because (a) these are the emails that were hacked by Russian operatives, and (b) it was WikiLeaks’ publication of these hacked DNC emails in July 2016 that spurred the Aussies to report to their American counterparts about the encounter, two months earlier, between Papadopoulos and Downer — to whom Papadopoulos reported Mifsud’s emails story. But if the Australians really did infer that Mifsud and Papadopoulos must have been talking about the hacked DNC emails, the inference is unlikely. As the Daily Caller’s Chuck Ross has reported, Papadopoulos maintains that he understood Mifsud to be talking about the 30,000-plus emails that Hillary Clinton had deleted from her homebrew server. That makes more sense — it was those emails that Donald Trump harped on throughout the campaign and that were in the news when Mifsud spoke with Papadopoulos in April 2016. While there are grounds for concern that Clinton’s emails were hacked, there is no proof that it happened; Clinton’s 30,000 emails are not the hacked DNC emails on which the “collusion” narrative is based.

There was also the curiosity of why, if Papadopoulos was so central, the FBI had not bothered to interview him until late January 2017 — after Trump had already taken office.
Mischaracterization, half truths, outright lies

From NBC

But it's already been established by the House Intelligence Committee (That's the GOP House) that the Russia investigation began after the FBI learned that another campaign aide, George Papadopoulos, had been approached by a Russian agent. The agent told Papadopoulos the Russians had incriminating information about Hillary Clinton, including emails, according to court documents.. Papadopoulos then mentioned to an Australian diplomat that the Russians had "dirt" on Clinton, the Australians contacted the U.S. government, and the FBI began to take a look.
NBC - enough said - fake news.

I just posted the evidence that your theory is wrong. NBC publishes the bullshit the deep state minions are pumping out.
 
And again..it was a FISA application concerning Carter Page only...months after he left the Trump Campaign

Know why he left the Trump campaign?

Because it became known that he was in Putin's pocket
JonesDragons.jpg
 
Wrongo, dumbass! They can look forward, and they can query the NSA database for all past communications. And I didn't say previous contacts. I said previous communications. The contacts current at the time were all the members of the Trump campaign.

You're a gullible moron who is easily manipulated by the deep state.

OK..post a link
You post a link.
 
The OP is old news and widely reported. Nothing new. Opposition research is LEGAL.
So, opposition research is legal,
but, if you use the dirt that was dug up, it's illegal?

What's the point of opposition research then?

What makes fresh dirt collusion,
and old dirt politics?

Whether its fresh or old,
the dirt serves the same purpose...
influence voters!

oppo research is legal but receiving goods or services from agents of a foreign hostile adversarial government to specifically influence a US election is.
Paying Russian spies to manufacture dirt on a candidate in an American election definitely isn't legal. The Trump campaign received no goods or services from a foreign hostile adversarial government as the Hillary campaign did.

simply anticipating that one will receive dirt on hillary is a crime. whether they got ripped off matters not. you not understanding that is expected from a poorly educated deplorable that trump loves long time.

what's funny is that some things in the dossier have not been proven, & some the feds already knew about... BUT NOTHING in the dossier has been proven to be untrue... there is no foreign hostile government agent responsible for the dossier AND the individual in that dossier that went to prague most likely already told mueller about the dirty deeds he performed there for his boss. oopsie... real first person collaboration would go a looooooooooong way in proving trump's treason.
 
Last edited:
Wrongo, dumbass! They can look forward, and they can query the NSA database for all past communications. And I didn't say previous contacts. I said previous communications. The contacts current at the time were all the members of the Trump campaign.

You're a gullible moron who is easily manipulated by the deep state.

OK..post a link
You post a link.
You made a claim...that you obviously can't support.

I can find NOTHING that says a FISA warrant allows "backwards surveillance".
 

Forum List

Back
Top