Legal experts: Feds' viral arrest in Portland violated the Fourth Amendment

The feds arrested a man because someone somewhere near him allegedly pointed a laser at police.
Guilt by association has been ruled to be no grounds for arrest.
The man was released 20 minutes after questioning because the Feds had nothing on him



~~~~~~
He was detained but not arrested. Totally legal.....

"The Fourth Amendment applies to “seizures” and it is not necessary that a detention be a formal arrest in order to bring to bear the requirements of warrants, or probable cause in instances in which warrants are not required."
.
 
The feds arrested a man because someone somewhere near him allegedly pointed a laser at police.
Guilt by association has been ruled to be no grounds for arrest.
The man was released 20 minutes after questioning because the Feds had nothing on him

Yes, people in riot zones not obeying police can be detained. Then they sort out the criminals they want to charge.
 
The feds arrested a man because someone somewhere near him allegedly pointed a laser at police.
Guilt by association has been ruled to be no grounds for arrest.
The man was released 20 minutes after questioning because the Feds had nothing on him



~~~~~~
He was detained but not arrested. Totally legal.....
Why do you presume that "he" was detained in the first place? Furthermore, who is "he"? Do you even know his name?
 
The feds arrested a man because someone somewhere near him allegedly pointed a laser at police.
Guilt by association has been ruled to be no grounds for arrest.
The man was released 20 minutes after questioning because the Feds had nothing on him



~~~~~~
He was detained but not arrested. Totally legal.....
Why do you presume that "he" was detained in the first place? Furthermore, who is "he"? Do you even know his name?

Cons won't make up their confused minds.
One said the man was "detained, not arrested".
Then you say he wasn't detained at all. LOL.
Ask the first con who "he" is.
 
The feds arrested a man because someone somewhere near him allegedly pointed a laser at police.
Guilt by association has been ruled to be no grounds for arrest.
The man was released 20 minutes after questioning because the Feds had nothing on him



~~~~~~
He was detained but not arrested. Totally legal.....
Why do you presume that "he" was detained in the first place? Furthermore, who is "he"? Do you even know his name?

Cons won't make up their confused minds.
One said the man was "detained, not arrested".
Then you say he wasn't detained at all. LOL.
Ask the first con who "he" is.
Fuck off. You started the thread. Therefore, logically, the onus is on you to back up your unsupported assertions.
 
The feds arrested a man because someone somewhere near him allegedly pointed a laser at police.
Guilt by association has been ruled to be no grounds for arrest.
The man was released 20 minutes after questioning because the Feds had nothing on him



~~~~~~
He was detained but not arrested. Totally legal.....

"The Fourth Amendment applies to “seizures” and it is not necessary that a detention be a formal arrest in order to bring to bear the requirements of warrants, or probable cause in instances in which warrants are not required."
.

The Fourth Amendment does not seem to apply to people who ride brooms to work, but if they were born with 10 fingers and 10 toes, they gotta be good or accept the questioning they receive with grace and not malice nor seeking to get away with murder, etc.
 
The feds arrested a man because someone somewhere near him allegedly pointed a laser at police.
Guilt by association has been ruled to be no grounds for arrest.
The man was released 20 minutes after questioning because the Feds had nothing on him



~~~~~~
He was detained but not arrested. Totally legal.....
Why do you presume that "he" was detained in the first place? Furthermore, who is "he"? Do you even know his name?

Cons won't make up their confused minds.
One said the man was "detained, not arrested".
Then you say he wasn't detained at all. LOL.
Ask the first con who "he" is.

We're not confused. It just takes longer to follow justice codes, and you are sitting there in your impatience hoping to behead some stranger without cause other than the DNC talking points built upon one lie after another.
 
The feds arrested a man because someone somewhere near him allegedly pointed a laser at police.
Guilt by association has been ruled to be no grounds for arrest.
The man was released 20 minutes after questioning because the Feds had nothing on him



~~~~~~
He was detained but not arrested. Totally legal.....
Why do you presume that "he" was detained in the first place? Furthermore, who is "he"? Do you even know his name?

Cons won't make up their confused minds.
One said the man was "detained, not arrested".
Then you say he wasn't detained at all. LOL.
Ask the first con who "he" is.

Ah, whats the matter?

They let him go and ruined your one chance at winning a talking point here in USMB and now you are all pouty.
 
The feds arrested a man because someone somewhere near him allegedly pointed a laser at police.
Guilt by association has been ruled to be no grounds for arrest.
The man was released 20 minutes after questioning because the Feds had nothing on him
And?

They released him. They had the wrong guy.

Why are you crying about this?
Who is this "him" that you are referring to? :dunno:
 
I vividly recall how leftards cheered on the Bureau of Land Management's draconian and fascist tactics against the Bundy family. How leftards cheered the shooting in the back of Lavoy Finicum. They reveled in the Fed's tactics against those protesting on behalf of the Hammond family. They sent dildos to the protesters.

Now look at these fucking whiners about the tactics used to stop the rioting and looting of spoiled little SJW snowflakes protesting the alleged death of thug George Floyd that happened 1,700 miles away. Suck it hard, leftards....you had it jammed right up your hypocritical asses.
 
The feds arrested a man because someone somewhere near him allegedly pointed a laser at police.
Guilt by association has been ruled to be no grounds for arrest.
The man was released 20 minutes after questioning because the Feds had nothing on him



~~~~~~
He was detained but not arrested. Totally legal.....


No it isn't. This is why in part we are having the protests to start with.
 
I vividly recall how leftards cheered on the Bureau of Land Management's draconian and fascist tactics against the Bundy family. How leftards cheered the shooting in the back of Lavoy Finicum. They reveled in the Fed's tactics against those protesting on behalf of the Hammond family. They sent dildos to the protesters.

Now look at these fucking whiners about the tactics used to stop the rioting and looting of spoiled little SJW snowflakes protesting the alleged death of thug George Floyd that happened 1,700 miles away. Suck it hard, leftards....you had it jammed right up your hypocritical asses.

So you have decided to be as bad as the people you condemn? And this makes sense to you somehow?
 

Forum List

Back
Top