Legit. Qst. regarding gun ownership.....

[nat4900]

A few days ago, Trump suggested his "strategy" to curb gun violence in Chicago; that is, to institute a "stop and frisk" policy throughout the crime-ridden city.

My question, however, is one of simple"logic": How can the same person be in favor of "open-carry" or "conceal-and-carry" of weapons, AND then also be in favor of "stop-n-frisk"?

If there is "logic" in that double-standard, the only logic would be all-out "profiling".....

 

[Auld Phart]

You think it's foolish to check if someone carrying a firearm has a permit?

 

[nat4900]

You think it's foolish to check if someone carrying a firearm has a permit?

Look up the meaning of "profiling"and THEN come back on the thread.

 

[Rustic]

You think it's foolish to check if someone carrying a firearm has a permit?

Look up the meaning of "profiling"and THEN come back on the thread.

Eskimos are not killing people in Chicago, so you have to start somewhere.

 

[TheOldSchool]

A few days ago, Trump suggested his "strategy" to curb gun violence in Chicago; that is, to institute a "stop and frisk" policy throughout the crime-ridden city.

My question, however, is one of simple"logic": How can the same person be in favor of "open-carry" or "conceal-and-carry" of weapons, AND then also be in favor of "stop-n-frisk"?

If there is "logic" in that double-standard, the only logic would be all-out "profiling".....

Sacrificing freedom for security is not an issue for Trump voters. Even though the founders of this country were diametrically opposed to that type of thinking.

 

[Auld Phart]

You think it's foolish to check if someone carrying a firearm has a permit?

Look up the meaning of "profiling"and THEN come back on the thread.

Yes, profiling


See a guy with his pants hanging under his ass, or a guy that has a bald head and a lot of tattoos,

I'd check them for drugs, guns, etc

 

[Rocko]

A few days ago, Trump suggested his "strategy" to curb gun violence in Chicago; that is, to institute a "stop and frisk" policy throughout the crime-ridden city.

My question, however, is one of simple"logic": How can the same person be in favor of "open-carry" or "conceal-and-carry" of weapons, AND then also be in favor of "stop-n-frisk"?

If there is "logic" in that double-standard, the only logic would be all-out "profiling".....

The purpose is stop and frisk is to do something about people carrying guns illegally.

 

[TheOldSchool]

Look how quickly republicans succumb to the idea of illegal search and seizure. Embarrassing.

 

[Rocko]

Look how quickly republicans succumb to the idea of illegal search and seizure. Embarrassing.

Stop and frisk has worked before. You don't like it, what are your ideas to stop the violence in Chicago?

 

[nat4900]

purpose is stop and frisk is to do something about people carrying guns illegally.

If a state has a "conceal-and-carry" statute, how can....and I'm being serious here....you also have a stop and frisk policy WITHOUT employing profiling?

 

[TheOldSchool]

Look how quickly republicans succumb to the idea of illegal search and seizure. Embarrassing.

Stop and frisk has worked before. You don't like it, what are your ideas to stop the violence in Chicago?

Lots of horrific things have worked before. What other unconstitutional things would you like to do besides stop and frisk? Are there certain groups you want to strip some freedoms from?

 

[BluesLegend]

If the crotch of your pants is dragging along the ground and you look like a thug up to no good plan on getting profiled.

 

[JBond]

A few days ago, Trump suggested his "strategy" to curb gun violence in Chicago; that is, to institute a "stop and frisk" policy throughout the crime-ridden city.

My question, however, is one of simple"logic": How can the same person be in favor of "open-carry" or "conceal-and-carry" of weapons, AND then also be in favor of "stop-n-frisk"?

If there is "logic" in that double-standard, the only logic would be all-out "profiling".....

I'd explain it, but based on past interactions you would still be lost.

 

[Rocko]

purpose is stop and frisk is to do something about people carrying guns illegally.

If a state has a "conceal-and-carry" statute, how can....and I'm being serious here....you also have a stop and frisk policy WITHOUT employing profiling?

And what's so bad about profiling? It's a necessary police tactic.

 

[Onyx]

You think it's foolish to check if someone carrying a firearm has a permit?

I do.

Do you believe civilians should only be allowed to bear arms when the government grants them a permit?

 

[Rocko]

Look how quickly republicans succumb to the idea of illegal search and seizure. Embarrassing.

Stop and frisk has worked before. You don't like it, what are your ideas to stop the violence in Chicago?

Lots of horrific things have worked before. What other unconstitutional things would you like to do besides stop and frisk? Are there certain groups you want to strip some freedoms from?

So you admit it works but you don't give a fuck about all the live being lost. Thanks for being honest.

 

[Auld Phart]

You think it's foolish to check if someone carrying a firearm has a permit?

I do.

Do you believe civilians should only be allowed to bear arms when the government grants them a permit?

depends on the state law

 

[Onyx]

depends on the state law

The question still applies.

Do you believe a state should be able to strip someone of their right to bear arms if they do not possess a government issued permit?

 

[ThunderKiss1965]

A few days ago, Trump suggested his "strategy" to curb gun violence in Chicago; that is, to institute a "stop and frisk" policy throughout the crime-ridden city.

My question, however, is one of simple"logic": How can the same person be in favor of "open-carry" or "conceal-and-carry" of weapons, AND then also be in favor of "stop-n-frisk"?

If there is "logic" in that double-standard, the only logic would be all-out "profiling".....

So tell us what you think should be done in Chicago. That the left won't consider racist profiling.

 

[Rocko]

depends on the state law

The question still applies.

Do you believe a state should be able to strip someone of their right to bear arms if they do not possess a government issued permit?

I believe everyone should follow the law even if they disagree with it.