Seawytch
Information isnt Advocacy
- Aug 5, 2010
- 42,407
- 7,739
Gee, I married to have a biological family and raise them.[the discussion is immaterial to this thread since children have no bearing on civil marriage.
The rest you were in your own world tripping, your reading skills are horrendous. But as for this, so what is the purpose of government marriage? If government marriage has nothing to do with children, what is the purpose? Is it to validate you and who you sleep with?
This may be the strongest statement I've ever read against gay marriage as being pointless to society.
It's not children. If it were, they'd be required before you get one, right? The "purpose" of civil marriage was primarily about property rights...but what it was isn't what it is. Now it's about a lot more and means something different to each person. Gays marry for all the same reasons straight people do. (like you for example, civilly married guy)
So that's a lie.
We've already been over the state's interest in promoting child-bearing couples. Since you are incapable of understanding the argument it doesnt bear repeating.
Your personal reason does not apply to all. My brother and his wife did not get married to have children and knew it when they married.
How come your "but, but the children" argument keeps losing? (And was laughed at by the SCOTUS)