Leting Bill's Wife Walk: An Explanation.

PoliticalChic

Diamond Member
Gold Supporting Member
Oct 6, 2008
125,093
60,647
2,300
Brooklyn, NY
It's a divided nation, and unlike the fraud now in office, it appears that President Trump actually wants to be the leader of all the people.

Hence....a tip of the hat to the half of the nation still enthralled with the congenital liar and career criminal.
Making one of his endeavors locking her up is like expecting the city SWAT Team to round up the creeps who don't pick up after their dogs.

We...the winners, should take a tip from the civil rights movement, and remember to Keep Our Eyes On The Prize.

This is the list that we voted for:
The Supreme Court,

Obamacare,

the debt,

rebuilding the military,

the Second Amendment,

school choice,

abortion,

reforming the tax code,

reexamining regulation,

energy exploration and production,

illegal immigration,

sanctuary cities,

Iran nuclear deal


These are the priorities.
 
Or the simpler, more plausible explanation.
The investigation was always purely political. It was meant to diminish Clinton's chances. There is no need for it any longer, so it's gone.
You fell for Trump's BS and now you're waiting on the curb for someone that's never coming.
 
Or the simpler, more plausible explanation.
The investigation was always purely political. It was meant to diminish Clinton's chances. There is no need for it any longer, so it's gone.
You fell for Trump's BS and now you're waiting on the curb for someone that's never coming.


"The investigation was always purely political."
And exactly the sort of head-in-the-sand Liberal that Trump is patting on the head, and rolling eyes at.
 
It's a divided nation, and unlike the fraud now in office, it appears that President Trump actually wants to be the leader of all the people.

Hence....a tip of the hat to the half of the nation still enthralled with the congenital liar and career criminal.
Making one of his endeavors locking her up is like expecting the city SWAT Team to round up the creeps who don't pick up after their dogs.

We...the winners, should take a tip from the civil rights movement, and remember to Keep Our Eyes On The Prize.

This is the list that we voted for:
The Supreme Court,

Obamacare,

the debt,

rebuilding the military,

the Second Amendment,

school choice,

abortion,

reforming the tax code,

reexamining regulation,

energy exploration and production,

illegal immigration,

sanctuary cities,

Iran nuclear deal


These are the priorities.

lolol, right on cue. I said a couple hours ago in another thread that it wouldn't be long before the Trumptards would flip to obediently agree with Trump on the Hillary investigation issue.
 
Or the simpler, more plausible explanation.
The investigation was always purely political. It was meant to diminish Clinton's chances. There is no need for it any longer, so it's gone.
You fell for Trump's BS and now you're waiting on the curb for someone that's never coming.


"The investigation was always purely political."
And exactly the sort of head-in-the-sand Liberal that Trump is patting on the head, and rolling eyes at.

Flip Flopper!! You are such a joke. A worn out joke.
 
Or the simpler, more plausible explanation.
The investigation was always purely political. It was meant to diminish Clinton's chances. There is no need for it any longer, so it's gone.
You fell for Trump's BS and now you're waiting on the curb for someone that's never coming.


"The investigation was always purely political."
And exactly the sort of head-in-the-sand Liberal that Trump is patting on the head, and rolling eyes at.

Trump just threw you under the bus, dear. Not me.
 
The republican Congress should just present President Donald with legislation that sets up an department of corruption detection and prevention so crooks like the Clintons can no longer ever get away with pay for play schemes.
 
Leting Bill's Wife Walk: An Explanation.
A feeble RATIONALIZATION, would be the title if you were capable of the truth.

The "Lock her up" lie is just another "campaign device" fed to SUCKERS like you.


Kinda like these?

June 5, 2008, in Cairo: "I will continue to be clear on the fact that an Iranian nuclear weapon would be profoundly destabilizing for the entire region.It is strongly in America's interest to prevent such a scenario."

June 8, 2008, to AIPAC: "The danger from Iran is grave, it is real, and my goal will be to eliminate this threat.... Finally, let there be no doubt: I will always keep the threat of military action on the table to defend our security and our ally Israel."

October 7 2008, in the second presidential debate: "We cannot allow Iran to get a nuclear weapon. It would be a game-changer in the region. Not only would it threaten Israel, our strongest ally in the region and one of our strongest allies in the world, but it would also create a possibility of nuclear weapons falling into the hands of terrorists. And so it's unacceptable. And I will do everything that's required to prevent it. And we will never take military options off the table,"

November 7, 2008, press conference: "Iran's development of a nuclear weapon, I believe, is unacceptable. And we have to mount an international effort to prevent that from happening."

February 27, 2009, speech at Camp Lejeune: "(W)e are focusing on al Qaeda in Afghanistan and Pakistan; developing a strategy to use all elements of American power to prevent Iran from developing a nuclear weapon; and actively seeking a lasting peace between Israel and the Arab world."

January 27, 2010, State of the Union address: "And as Iran's leaders continue to ignore their obligations, there should be no doubt: They, too, will face growing consequences. That is a promise."

July 1, /2010, at the signing of the Iran Sanctions Act: "There should be no doubt -- the United States and the international community are determined to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons."

May 19, 2011, speech on the Middle East: "Now, our opposition to Iran's intolerance and Iran's repressive measures, as well as its illicit nuclear program and its support of terror, is well known."

May 22, 2011, in an address to AIPAC: "You also see our commitment to our shared security in our determination to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons.... So let me be absolutely clear -- we remain committed to preventing Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons."

October 13,2011, press conference after meeting with South Korean president:"Now, we don't take any options off the table in terms of how we operate with Iran."

November 14, 2011, press conference: "So what I did was to speak with President Medvedev, as well as President Hu, and all three of us entirely agree on the objective, which is making sure that Iran does not weaponize nuclear power and that we don't trigger a nuclear arms race in the region. That's in the interests of all of us... I have said repeatedly and I will say it today, we are not taking any options off the table, because it's my firm belief that an Iran with a nuclear weapon would pose a security threat not only to the region but also to the United States."

December 8, 2011, press conference: (In response to question about pressuring Iran): "No options off the table means I'm considering all options."

December 16, 2011, speech to the General Assembly of the Union for Reform Judaism: "Another grave concern -- and a threat to the security of Israel, the United States and the world -- is Iran's nuclear program. And that's why our policy has been absolutely clear: We are determined to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons...and that's why, rest assured, we will take no options off the table. We have been clear."

January 24, 2012, State of the Union address: "Let there be no doubt: America is determined to prevent Iran from getting a nuclear weapon, and I will take no options off the table to achieve that goal."

March 2, 2012, interview with Goldblog: "I... don't, as a matter of sound policy, go around advertising exactly what our intentions are. But I think both the Iranian and the Israeli governments recognize that when the United States says it is unacceptable for Iran to have a nuclear weapon, we mean what we say."

March 4, 2012, speech to AIPAC: "I have said that when it comes to preventing Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon, I will take no options off the table, and I mean what I say That includes all elements of American power: A political effort aimed at isolating Iran; a diplomatic effort to sustain our coalition and ensure that the Iranian program is monitored; an economic effort that imposes crippling sanctions; and, yes, a military effort to be prepared for any contingency."

March 5, 2012, remarks after meeting with Benjamin Netanyahu: "... I reserve all options, and my policy here is not going to be one of containment. My policy is prevention of Iran obtaining nuclear weapons. And as I indicated yesterday in my speech, when I say all options are at the table, I mean it."

March 6, 2012, press conference: "And what I have said is, is that we will not countenance Iran getting a nuclear weapon. My policy is not containment; my policy is to prevent them from getting a nuclear weapon -- because if they get a nuclear weapon that could trigger an arms race in the region, it would undermine our non-proliferation goals, it could potentially fall into the hands of terrorists.

March 14, 2012, remarks after meeting with David Cameron: "...And as I said in a speech just a couple of weeks ago, I am determined not simply to contain Iran that is in possession of a nuclear weapon; I am determined to prevent Iran from getting a nuclear weapon -- in part for the reasons that David mentioned... We will do everything we can to resolve this diplomatically, but ultimately, we've got to have somebody on the other side of the table who's taking this seriously."


September 25, 2012, speech to the United Nations General Assembly: "Make no mistake: A nuclear-armed Iran is not a challenge that can be contained...the United States will do what we must to prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon."
Obama's Crystal-Clear Promise to Stop Iran From Getting a Nuclear Weapon


You must feel like quite the dunce, huh?
 
Clarify please.
He is not calling for a special prosecutor at all or at this time?
Does his comment mean never, at all?
Or not endorsed by him?
Are other enforcement agencies free to investigate if information warrants it?
 
It's a divided nation, and unlike the fraud now in office, it appears that President Trump actually wants to be the leader of all the people.

Hence....a tip of the hat to the half of the nation still enthralled with the congenital liar and career criminal.
Making one of his endeavors locking her up is like expecting the city SWAT Team to round up the creeps who don't pick up after their dogs.

We...the winners, should take a tip from the civil rights movement, and remember to Keep Our Eyes On The Prize.

This is the list that we voted for:
The Supreme Court,

Obamacare,

the debt,

rebuilding the military,

the Second Amendment,

school choice,

abortion,

reforming the tax code,

reexamining regulation,

energy exploration and production,

illegal immigration,

sanctuary cities,

Iran nuclear deal


These are the priorities.
Excellent post. :eusa_clap:

Trump has his priorities in the proper order. He knows it's going to take time to repair the damage Obama has caused, and prosecuting Hillary will only make it harder.
Trump wants what's best for everyone.
 
It's a divided nation, and unlike the fraud now in office, it appears that President Trump actually wants to be the leader of all the people.

Hence....a tip of the hat to the half of the nation still enthralled with the congenital liar and career criminal.
Making one of his endeavors locking her up is like expecting the city SWAT Team to round up the creeps who don't pick up after their dogs.

We...the winners, should take a tip from the civil rights movement, and remember to Keep Our Eyes On The Prize.

This is the list that we voted for:
The Supreme Court,

Obamacare,

the debt,

rebuilding the military,

the Second Amendment,

school choice,

abortion,

reforming the tax code,

reexamining regulation,

energy exploration and production,

illegal immigration,

sanctuary cities,

Iran nuclear deal


These are the priorities.

lolol, right on cue. I said a couple hours ago in another thread that it wouldn't be long before the Trumptards would flip to obediently agree with Trump on the Hillary investigation issue.

And yes I can prove I told you so:

Trump won't pursue Hillary investigation/prosecution...

Post 28.
 
The truth? There is no, and never was, a case against Clinton. There will be against Trump.
 
Or the simpler, more plausible explanation.
The investigation was always purely political. It was meant to diminish Clinton's chances. There is no need for it any longer, so it's gone.
You fell for Trump's BS and now you're waiting on the curb for someone that's never coming.


"The investigation was always purely political."
And exactly the sort of head-in-the-sand Liberal that Trump is patting on the head, and rolling eyes at.

Trump just threw you under the bus, dear. Not me.


And now for reality....better shut our little eyes.


Here's a full transcript of the exchange:
Gowdy: Good morning, Director Comey. Secretary Clinton said she never sent or received any classified information over her private e-mail, was that true?
Comey: Our investigation found that there was classified information sent.
Gowdy: It was not true?
Comey: That's what I said.
Gowdy: OK. Well, I'm looking for a shorter answer so you and I are not here quite as long. Secretary Clinton said there was nothing marked classified on her e-mails sent or received. Was that true?
Comey: That's not true. There were a small number of portion markings on I think three of the documents.
Gowdy: Secretary Clinton said "I did not e-mail any classified information to anyone on my e-mail there was no classified material." That is true?
Comey: There was classified information emailed.
Gowdy: Secretary Clinton used one device, was that true?
Comey: She used multiple devices during the four years of her term as Secretary of State.
Gowdy: Secretary Clinton said all work related emails were returned to the State Department. Was that true?
Comey: No. We found work related email, thousands, that were not returned.
Gowdy: Secretary Clinton said neither she or anyone else deleted work related emails from her personal account.
Comey: That's a harder one to answer. We found traces of work related emails in — on devices or in space. Whether they were deleted or when a server was changed out something happened to them, there's no doubt that the work related emails that were removed electronically from the email system.
Gowdy: Secretary Clinton said her lawyers read every one of the emails and were overly inclusive. Did her lawyers read the email content individually?
Comey: No.
Gowdy: Well, in the interest of time and because I have a plane to catch tomorrow afternoon, I'm not going to go through any more of the false statements but I am going to ask you to put on your old hat. Faults exculpatory statements are used for what?
Comey: Well, either for a substantive prosecution or evidence of intent in a criminal prosecution.
Gowdy: Exactly. Intent and consciousness of guilt, right?
Comey: That is right?



In your face, boyyyyyeeeeeeee!!!!
 
It's a divided nation, and unlike the fraud now in office, it appears that President Trump actually wants to be the leader of all the people.

Hence....a tip of the hat to the half of the nation still enthralled with the congenital liar and career criminal.
Making one of his endeavors locking her up is like expecting the city SWAT Team to round up the creeps who don't pick up after their dogs.

We...the winners, should take a tip from the civil rights movement, and remember to Keep Our Eyes On The Prize.

This is the list that we voted for:
The Supreme Court,

Obamacare,

the debt,

rebuilding the military,

the Second Amendment,

school choice,

abortion,

reforming the tax code,

reexamining regulation,

energy exploration and production,

illegal immigration,

sanctuary cities,

Iran nuclear deal


These are the priorities.

lolol, right on cue. I said a couple hours ago in another thread that it wouldn't be long before the Trumptards would flip to obediently agree with Trump on the Hillary investigation issue.
because it was never about locking her up, it was about winning the presidency. PERIOD. he got it. I look forward to Jan 20 and then beyond when the congress resubmits their paperwork to the newly sworn in Attorney General and the investigation happens just like Trump said, without Trump being involved. he never ever said he'd do it. He stated that she'd be in jail. So we'll see after Jan 20th.
 
The truth? There is no, and never was, a case against Clinton. There will be against Trump.
Yeah, we knew that as long as Obummer was in office. That all changes on Jan 20th 2017. I can't wait.
 
Or the simpler, more plausible explanation.
The investigation was always purely political. It was meant to diminish Clinton's chances. There is no need for it any longer, so it's gone.
You fell for Trump's BS and now you're waiting on the curb for someone that's never coming.

Well she did actually mishandle Classified information and made Comey into a dirty cop
 

Forum List

Back
Top