theHawk
Registered Conservative
- Sep 20, 2005
- 53,644
- 55,521
Clearly he thinks we should all kiss China’s ass like he does. He thinks China is a “role model” for the world.So what should Americans do, OP?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Clearly he thinks we should all kiss China’s ass like he does. He thinks China is a “role model” for the world.So what should Americans do, OP?
It's becoming painfully obvious that you don't understand how any of this works.It's become painfully obvious "you can't fix stupid" applies to your comment.That's about SARS-COVID-2. Do you have one about COVID-19?
The research that produced COVID-19 was conducted on SARS-cov-2, which occurs in nature. The COVID-19 mutation was caused by researchers mutating the naturally-occurring virus to purposely get it to mutate, so they can study the mutations.
So, tell me. Can you fix your own stupid?
.
That article doesn’t refute what I said. They claim it has markers that aren’t that deadly, yet it is deadly and spreads very easily.Nope.Manipulated by scientists in a lab, certainly a possibility and actually very probable
No, the coronavirus wasn’t made in a lab. A genetic analysis shows it’s from nature
Scientists took conspiracy theories seriously and analyzed the coronavirus to reveal its natural origins.www.sciencenews.org
The best evidence so far is that the virus originated in China. Why is the left so desperate to defend China these days? Is it proof that TDS is real?
There's a theory being promoted, not just by RWM but by members of the admin, that COVID is a man-made virus that "escaped from the lab." The implication being from at least some quarters that China intentionally unleashed the virus on the world (and themselves) for nefarious purposes. Oddly, at least one member of the admin has spoken out of both sides of his mouth as to COVID's origin.
Let's flush this out.
First, what does science say about whether it's man-made or not?
No, the coronavirus wasn’t made in a lab. A genetic analysis shows it’s from nature
No, the coronavirus wasn’t made in a lab. A genetic analysis shows it’s from nature
Scientists took conspiracy theories seriously and analyzed the coronavirus to reveal its natural origins.www.sciencenews.org
"The coronavirus pandemic circling the globe is caused by a natural virus, not one made in a lab, a new study says.
The virus’s genetic makeup reveals that SARS-CoV-2 isn’t a mishmash of known viruses, as might be expected if it were human-made. And it has unusual features that have only recently been identified in scaly anteaters called pangolins, evidence that the virus came from nature, Kristian Andersen and his colleagues report March 17 in Nature Medicine."
Fauci: No scientific evidence the coronavirus was made in a Chinese lab
In an exclusive interview, the face of America’s COVID-19 response cautions against the rush for states to reopen, and offers his tips for handling the pandemic's information deluge.www.nationalgeographic.com
So, not man-made.
..........................................................................................................................
At this point is gets a bit weird. Because what the "escaped from the lab" theory actually seems to imply is the Chinese were experimenting on viruses and COVID got out. The language is important here since the word "escaped" suggests the Chinese didn't let the virus spread intentionally. Rather, "escaped" suggests it was a horrible mistake. A scenario whereby a scientist working in the lab was infected and unwittingly infected people outside. There is no evidence of this. Also, I wanted to add that if you believe China did this intentionally you must admit is was monumentally stupid of them to release it so close to a lab. Why not 1K miles away from a lab to throw the international community off their tracks?
The more probable scenario is..............
The coronavirus likely came from China’s wet markets. They’re reopening anyway.
...................................................................................................................................................The coronavirus likely came from China’s wet markets. They’re reopening anyway.
Should wet markets be banned? It’s more complicated than it seems.www.vox.com
Under either scenario a case can be made for China being negligent. Wet animal markets have long been recognized as a potential incubator for these types of viruses. If the virus "escaped" from the lab near Wuhan then they again bear responsibility for being negligent. Additionally, there is no dispute that under any circumstance the Chinese government is culpable for not informing the world about what was happening in China when the virus began to spread. That is unequivocal.
.................................................................................................................................................
However, the admin and its media lackeys needs to be more precise about what China is being accused of relative to why the virus began to spread. Chinese authorities are undoubtedly guilty of carelessness and of covering up COVID's early spread. For political purposes, China's culpability is being exploited by the admin in seeking a scapegoat for its own inadequate, inconsistent, and generally bungled response. But for the sake of accuracy, the evidence so far shows the COVID pandemic came about as the result of a tragic sequence of events, not on purpose.
Completely man-made, no.
Manipulated by scientists in a lab, certainly a possibility and actually very probable considering how evil Communist China is.
Luckily for you, they have.As have no advanced degree in medicine or any other field that could lend authority to any claim, will just have to wait until the political screaming slows down & those who do have expertise start coming to some conclusion.
OH GOOD GOD MAN ....Your proof?China spends billions of dollars every year bribing the law making bodies of various nations. The US Federal government is probably at least 50% compromised by illicit chinese funding.
As I thought, you've got nothing to substantiate this...........The US Federal government is probably at least 50% compromised by illicit chinese funding.OH GOOD GOD MAN ....Your proof?China spends billions of dollars every year bribing the law making bodies of various nations. The US Federal government is probably at least 50% compromised by illicit chinese funding.
DO YOUR OWN GOOGLING.....THIS SUBJECT IS TWENTY YEARS OLD.
JO
There's a theory being promoted, not just by RWM but by members of the admin, that COVID is a man-made virus that "escaped from the lab." The implication being from at least some quarters that China intentionally unleashed the virus on the world (and themselves) for nefarious purposes. Oddly, at least one member of the admin has spoken out of both sides of his mouth as to COVID's origin.
Let's flush this out.
First, what does science say about whether it's man-made or not?
No, the coronavirus wasn’t made in a lab. A genetic analysis shows it’s from nature
No, the coronavirus wasn’t made in a lab. A genetic analysis shows it’s from nature
Scientists took conspiracy theories seriously and analyzed the coronavirus to reveal its natural origins.www.sciencenews.org
"The coronavirus pandemic circling the globe is caused by a natural virus, not one made in a lab, a new study says.
The virus’s genetic makeup reveals that SARS-CoV-2 isn’t a mishmash of known viruses, as might be expected if it were human-made. And it has unusual features that have only recently been identified in scaly anteaters called pangolins, evidence that the virus came from nature, Kristian Andersen and his colleagues report March 17 in Nature Medicine."
Fauci: No scientific evidence the coronavirus was made in a Chinese lab
In an exclusive interview, the face of America’s COVID-19 response cautions against the rush for states to reopen, and offers his tips for handling the pandemic's information deluge.www.nationalgeographic.com
So, not man-made.
..........................................................................................................................
At this point is gets a bit weird. Because what the "escaped from the lab" theory actually seems to imply is the Chinese were experimenting on viruses and COVID got out. The language is important here since the word "escaped" suggests the Chinese didn't let the virus spread intentionally. Rather, "escaped" suggests it was a horrible mistake. A scenario whereby a scientist working in the lab was infected and unwittingly infected people outside. There is no evidence of this. Also, I wanted to add that if you believe China did this intentionally you must admit is was monumentally stupid of them to release it so close to a lab. Why not 1K miles away from a lab to throw the international community off their tracks?
The more probable scenario is..............
The coronavirus likely came from China’s wet markets. They’re reopening anyway.
...................................................................................................................................................The coronavirus likely came from China’s wet markets. They’re reopening anyway.
Should wet markets be banned? It’s more complicated than it seems.www.vox.com
Under either scenario a case can be made for China being negligent. Wet animal markets have long been recognized as a potential incubator for these types of viruses. If the virus "escaped" from the lab near Wuhan then they again bear responsibility for being negligent. Additionally, there is no dispute that under any circumstance the Chinese government is culpable for not informing the world about what was happening in China when the virus began to spread. That is unequivocal.
.................................................................................................................................................
However, the admin and its media lackeys needs to be more precise about what China is being accused of relative to why the virus began to spread. Chinese authorities are undoubtedly guilty of carelessness and of covering up COVID's early spread. For political purposes, China's culpability is being exploited by the admin in seeking a scapegoat for its own inadequate, inconsistent, and generally bungled response. But for the sake of accuracy, the evidence so far shows the COVID pandemic came about as the result of a tragic sequence of events, not on purpose.
I don't give a flying fuck if the virus came from the butts of flying rainbow-colored unicorns. It still came from Communist China, it's still the Communist Chinese Wuhan Virus, and the blame still rests squarely on the CHICOMs.
President Trump and the right-wing media had nothing to do with it, and it's you liberals who overreacted by shutting everything down and destroying the American economy.
Heard last night an "expert" saying that the local "wet market" in Wuhan did NOT sell bats for human consumption.
Classic case of "experts" having contradictory "facts." And we, the non-experts, have to sort it out.
1 for "believe the experts"..As have no advanced degree in medicine or any other field that could lend authority to any claim, will just have to wait until the political screaming slows down & those who do have expertise start coming to some conclusion.
What you posted is pure fucking propaganda and the banal strawman arguments we've come to expect from you.Sorry for noticing, but that bit of gratuitous insults does not in any way refute what I wrote. Care to try again?You're a good little commie bootlicker....Bet you have your local tattletale number on speed dial too, huh?
For cryin' out loud, read this.Heard last night an "expert" saying that the local "wet market" in Wuhan did NOT sell bats for human consumption.
Classic case of "experts" having contradictory "facts." And we, the non-experts, have to sort it out.
I do not know the science, but I have read experts who have said humans can not get COVID-19 directly from bats in any way.
They say there has to be some other link between bats and humans, that as not been proven yet.
But the first suggestion was pangolins.
But again, that is not proven to be even possible, much less a fact.