Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
LOLYes, not evidence. The credibility of the witnesses is established in part by EVIDENCE / FACTS. One's CLAIM is neither 'Evidence' or 'fact' until proven BY / WITH EVIDENCE.Moore’s accusers are witnesses.You are obviously not a lawyer because you do not know the difference between an 'accuser' and 'evidence'.Again, no offense intended, but arguing with a non lawyer about what constitutes “evidence” is a zero sum game for me.
Having a discussion with someone smarter than you is a 'zero sum gain' for you, as has been proven.
Here we agree. The four women provided evidence. The evidence is their quotes. In the Washington Post story. They are witnesses. Witnesses provide evidence. I thought you were asking “where’s the evidence?” I referred you to the WaPost account of the four women providing stories and you appeared to say that their stories are not evidence. Even when I said that the jury (in this case the voters) decide on the persuasive nature of the evidence. Sounds like we now agree.I don't have to. 4 women coming forward and accusing someone of a crime is not 'evidence', as you claimed. They are 'accusers' who have to provide 'evidence' that a crime was committed.... you can’t change the definition of “evidence.”
You aren't Bill Clinton, and we aren't arguing the definition of the word 'is'. You lose. Next.....
5 womenI don't have to. 4 women coming forward and accusing someone of a crime is not 'evidence', as you claimed. They are 'accusers' who have to provide 'evidence' that a crime was committed.... you can’t change the definition of “evidence.”
You aren't Bill Clinton, and we aren't arguing the definition of the word 'is'. You lose. Next.....
getting a BJ from a 21 year old adult isn't criminal nor is it being a sexual predator
damn you're stupid
*edit* i'll also point out, you sub literate twit, that monica Lewinsky never ever complained about it. it was her so-called friend, linda tripp.... what a disgusting thing to do to a young woman.... make her the center of that. create a situation where all anyone remembers about her is she gave a blow job to the president.
vile deplorables.
the one woman who accused Clinton of rape testified under oath that he didn’t.getting a BJ from a 21 year old adult isn't criminal nor is it being a sexual predator
damn you're stupid
*edit* i'll also point out, you sub literate twit, that monica Lewinsky never ever complained about it. it was her so-called friend, linda tripp.... what a disgusting thing to do to a young woman.... make her the center of that. create a situation where all anyone remembers about her is she gave a blow job to the president.
vile deplorables.
Monica was an intern who was half his age! Yes, that is predatory behavior and not only that, there were actual allegations of RAPE against Clinton. It was all hunky-dory for liberals back then. These were called "bimbo eruptions" and dismissed. Not a single one of you ever spoke out against him or his sexual dalliances. Accusations simply didn't constitute guilt or presumption of guilt.... but now they do. Oh, but ONLY if it's a Republican! There is a Democrat member of the House, right now, under criminal investigation for sex trafficking and we've heard not one single peep from you on that. No calls for his resignation, no public outcry.... you simply don't give a shit because he is a Democrat.
calling another man, “dear” is creepy and gay. I’d appreciate it if you would please keep your homoerotic fantasies with me to yourself.According to cretins like you, not the law.There is evidence Hillary broke the law.
No, dear.
The FBI has thousands of official e-mails and documents they recovered from Hillary's server she never turned in, as per required by the FOIA and the Federal Records Act. Only ignorant / partisan liberals like yourself continue to argue these are not crimes perpetrated by Hillary.
FBI Director Comey himself declared Hillary was extremely negligent'. Last week I posted the exact law, with links, explaining how that is a CRIME. Comey changed his words because he even realized he had just pointed out Hillary had broken the law.
Hillary was proven to have given her maid, someone who had no security clearance, access to classified, asking her to print it out for her. That is a crime.
Destroying classified documents and devices not according to the specific law that governs it is a crime.
The FACT that Hillary ... and others .. broke numerous laws has been presented to delusional / denial nutters like you over and over .Continuing to do so on your part does not make it any less criminal now as when you tried doing so months ago. It just makes you look insanely partisan, overwhelmed by hate, or just nuts.
The problem is not that there is no evidence sufficient enough to convict Hillary, it is that nutters like you are SO partisan that even Hillary's conviction, if it were to happen, would not be proof enough for you that she broke the law.
That aside, Hillary was never proven guilty of any crime. Your delusions to the contrary are yours to deal with. And sans a criminal conviction, chanting, “lock her up,” as you did, is completely ignoring her presumption of innocence.
And of course, being the abject hypocrite you are, you demand presumption of innocence for Moore.
Not at all true. A case can certainly proceed against a defendant based on nothing but the victim’s own personal account, leaving it up to a jury to decide who’s telling the truth.
getting a BJ from a 21 year old adult isn't criminal nor is it being a sexual predator
damn you're stupid
*edit* i'll also point out, you sub literate twit, that monica Lewinsky never ever complained about it. it was her so-called friend, linda tripp.... what a disgusting thing to do to a young woman.... make her the center of that. create a situation where all anyone remembers about her is she gave a blow job to the president.
vile deplorables.
Monica was an intern who was half his age! Yes, that is predatory behavior and not only that, there were actual allegations of RAPE against Clinton. It was all hunky-dory for liberals back then. These were called "bimbo eruptions" and dismissed. Not a single one of you ever spoke out against him or his sexual dalliances. Accusations simply didn't constitute guilt or presumption of guilt.... but now they do. Oh, but ONLY if it's a Republican! There is a Democrat member of the House, right now, under criminal investigation for sex trafficking and we've heard not one single peep from you on that. No calls for his resignation, no public outcry.... you simply don't give a shit because he is a Democrat.
When she grinds on daddy's lap.Whe does a daughter get too old to set in dad's lap and to give him a kiss on the cheek? Is the daughter too old when she begins to look Hot?
the one woman who accused Clinton of rape testified under oath that he didn’t.getting a BJ from a 21 year old adult isn't criminal nor is it being a sexual predator
damn you're stupid
*edit* i'll also point out, you sub literate twit, that monica Lewinsky never ever complained about it. it was her so-called friend, linda tripp.... what a disgusting thing to do to a young woman.... make her the center of that. create a situation where all anyone remembers about her is she gave a blow job to the president.
vile deplorables.
Monica was an intern who was half his age! Yes, that is predatory behavior and not only that, there were actual allegations of RAPE against Clinton. It was all hunky-dory for liberals back then. These were called "bimbo eruptions" and dismissed. Not a single one of you ever spoke out against him or his sexual dalliances. Accusations simply didn't constitute guilt or presumption of guilt.... but now they do. Oh, but ONLY if it's a Republican! There is a Democrat member of the House, right now, under criminal investigation for sex trafficking and we've heard not one single peep from you on that. No calls for his resignation, no public outcry.... you simply don't give a shit because he is a Democrat.
What is pathetic is how much you lie for a traitor and criminal who never has and never will give a damn about you.[no, snookums, no such thing was every proven. you need to stop making up stuff. seriously. it's pathetic
Oh my God - stop the presses! You did it! A daughter sitting on her father's lap. Call the police. Call the FBI. Call CNN.When she grinds on daddy's lap.Whe does a daughter get too old to set in dad's lap and to give him a kiss on the cheek? Is the daughter too old when she begins to look Hot?
Moron... witness testimony IS evidence.Not at all true. A case can certainly proceed against a defendant based on nothing but the victim’s own personal account, leaving it up to a jury to decide who’s telling the truth.
Gee, and how do they make up their mind, what sways them? oh yeah, EVIDENCE. Next
When she grinds on daddy's lap.Whe does a daughter get too old to set in dad's lap and to give him a kiss on the cheek? Is the daughter too old when she begins to look Hot?
Oh my God - stop the presses! You did it! A daughter sitting on her father's lap. Call the police. Call the FBI. Call CNN.When she grinds on daddy's lap.Whe does a daughter get too old to set in dad's lap and to give him a kiss on the cheek? Is the daughter too old when she begins to look Hot?
Bwuhahahaha.
Desperate, triggered Dims...
And by "a very good proposition" you mean a twitter account by someone who got caught lying about the number of purple hearts he has.Moore's accuser is a 53 year old woman, not a 14 year old girl. There is a very good proposition that she is on the DNC payroll. I don't believe any of it happened.
The legal age of consent in Alabama, then and now, is 16. Under Alabama law in 1979, and today, a person who is at least 19 years old who has sexual contact with someone older than 12 and younger than 15 has committed sexual abuse in the second degree. Sexual contact is defined as touching of sexual or intimate parts. The crime is a misdemeanor punishable by up to one year in jail.The whole point is, he never broke any law. This is just smear, that's all.If Moore broke the law, he should face the consequences.
The legal age of consent in Alabama, then and now, is 16. Under Alabama law in 1979, and today, a person who is at least 19 years old who has sexual contact with someone older than 12 and younger than 15 has committed sexual abuse in the second degree. Sexual contact is defined as touching of sexual or intimate parts. The crime is a misdemeanor punishable by up to one year in jail.The whole point is, he never broke any law. This is just smear, that's all.If Moore broke the law, he should face the consequences.
The law then and now also includes a section on enticing a child younger than 16 to enter a home with the purpose of proposing sexual intercourse or fondling of sexual and genital parts. That is a felony punishable by up to 10 years in prison.
A lie started on twitter by a person who got caught lying about how many purple hearts he got!!!A thousand bucks for a statement.WAPO even admits these two vulturs spent 4 months looking for women to accuse Moore, and if allegations are correct, they also offered to pay for any such allegations.
