Let's test abortion theory, what about a surrogate when the couple changes their mind....

[jknowgood]

If liberals are consistent, it's the woman's body and they can't make her do anything. If they make her get the abortion they show their hatred for babies.

 

[playtime]

The pregnant female gets the final decision in all cases.

 

[playtime]

It would all depend on contract language.

Actually the contract would become null & void if the female who is pregnant contests it. The 'alternative' would be to physically restrain her & cause a termination of her pregnancy. That will never be allowed to happen.

 

[playtime]

And the surrogate could possibly sue for child support.

Sperm donors are protected so the parents could be likewise protected.

Very different situations. Mom usually never knows who the Sperm donner is because the donation is processed through a Sperm bank. But you still may be right. The courts will someday decide.

That clause could be written in a contract.

 

[Syriusly]

So...if the couple using a surrogate to have a baby.....if they change their mind, can they force the woman to abort the baby? Even if she will assume the responsibility?


I saw a column at American thinker about the abortion decision....and they mentioned the next step might be ordering surrogates to abort babies.......

Articles: Heart of Darkness: the Evil at the Core of Modern Liberalism

While women are often coerced by the men who use them to have abortions it is still illegal in the U.S., unlike China, to force a woman to have an abortion if she doesn’t want one -- though liberals are pushing to change that in surrogacy cases.





Read more: Articles: Heart of Darkness: the Evil at the Core of Modern Liberalism
Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook

Not complicated for anyone who doesn't believe in slavery of women.

A surrogate cannot be forced to carry a fetus to term, nor be forced to abort the fetus.

 

[alang1216]

If liberals are consistent, it's the woman's body and they can't make her do anything. If they make her get the abortion they show their hatred for babies.

Seems like you have your answer. We are consistent.

 

[JoeMoma]

And the surrogate could possibly sue for child support.

Sperm donors are protected so the parents could be likewise protected.

Very different situations. Mom usually never knows who the Sperm donner is because the donation is processed through a Sperm bank. But you still may be right. The courts will someday decide.

That clause could be written in a contract.

And a judge could rule the clause not binding because the walfare of the child (once born) supercedes a clause in a contract.

 

[playtime]

And the surrogate could possibly sue for child support.

Sperm donors are protected so the parents could be likewise protected.

Very different situations. Mom usually never knows who the Sperm donner is because the donation is processed through a Sperm bank. But you still may be right. The courts will someday decide.

That clause could be written in a contract.

And a judge could rule the clause not binding because the walfare of the child (once born) supercedes a clause in a contract.

That very well could be & that would be a chance the couple supplying the ingredients will have to take. However, that doesn't change the fact that the final decision on whether a pregnancy comes to term still lies with the female with the oven.

 

[aris2chat]

Surrogate can keep the child when born or can abort the fetus. Till the child is handed to the parents it is the property of the surrogate

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

It would all depend on contract language.

Actually the contract would become null & void if the female who is pregnant contests it. The 'alternative' would be to physically restrain her & cause a termination of her pregnancy. That will never be allowed to happen.

Not if she signs on to the contract and it's notarized.

 

[playtime]

It would all depend on contract language.

Actually the contract would become null & void if the female who is pregnant contests it. The 'alternative' would be to physically restrain her & cause a termination of her pregnancy. That will never be allowed to happen.

Not if she signs on to the contract and it's notarized.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

It would all depend on contract language.

Actually the contract would become null & void if the female who is pregnant contests it. The 'alternative' would be to physically restrain her & cause a termination of her pregnancy. That will never be allowed to happen.

Not if she signs on to the contract and it's notarized.

Uh huh.

 

[playtime]

It would all depend on contract language.

Actually the contract would become null & void if the female who is pregnant contests it. The 'alternative' would be to physically restrain her & cause a termination of her pregnancy. That will never be allowed to happen.

Not if she signs on to the contract and it's notarized.

Uh huh.

you make a lousy troll.

uh-huh.

 

[koshergrl]

The baby murder advocates here will justify forcing the surrogate to be sent to those unregulated abortion clinics. where the SCOTUS said unqualified doctors working in unsanitary conditions are allowed to rip the baby from her womb.

Bingo.

 

[koshergrl]

It would all depend on contract language.

Actually the contract would become null & void if the female who is pregnant contests it. The 'alternative' would be to physically restrain her & cause a termination of her pregnancy. That will never be allowed to happen.

Not if she signs on to the contract and it's notarized.

You realize that in the world that's considered contract killing, and in every other instance, it's a capitol offense for the people who take out the contract?

 

[Ridgerunner]

Till the child is handed to the parents it is the property of the surrogate

Property? Can we find a better word to use for a human?

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

It would all depend on contract language.

Actually the contract would become null & void if the female who is pregnant contests it. The 'alternative' would be to physically restrain her & cause a termination of her pregnancy. That will never be allowed to happen.

Not if she signs on to the contract and it's notarized.

You realize that in the world that's considered contract killing, and in every other instance, it's a capitol offense for the people who take out the contract?

It's all about the semantics.

 

[Coyote]

So...if the couple using a surrogate to have a baby.....if they change their mind, can they force the woman to abort the baby? Even if she will assume the responsibility?


I saw a column at American thinker about the abortion decision....and they mentioned the next step might be ordering surrogates to abort babies.......

Articles: Heart of Darkness: the Evil at the Core of Modern Liberalism

While women are often coerced by the men who use them to have abortions it is still illegal in the U.S., unlike China, to force a woman to have an abortion if she doesn’t want one -- though liberals are pushing to change that in surrogacy cases.





Read more: Articles: Heart of Darkness: the Evil at the Core of Modern Liberalism
Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook

Just as no woman should be forced to carry an unwanted pregnancy, no woman should be forced to have an abortion.

Never.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

So...if the couple using a surrogate to have a baby.....if they change their mind, can they force the woman to abort the baby? Even if she will assume the responsibility?


I saw a column at American thinker about the abortion decision....and they mentioned the next step might be ordering surrogates to abort babies.......

Articles: Heart of Darkness: the Evil at the Core of Modern Liberalism

While women are often coerced by the men who use them to have abortions it is still illegal in the U.S., unlike China, to force a woman to have an abortion if she doesn’t want one -- though liberals are pushing to change that in surrogacy cases.





Read more: Articles: Heart of Darkness: the Evil at the Core of Modern Liberalism
Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook

Just as no woman should be forced to carry an unwanted pregnancy, no woman should be forced to have an abortion.

Never.

No woman is forced to carry an unwanted baby unless she is raped.

 

[Coyote]

So...if the couple using a surrogate to have a baby.....if they change their mind, can they force the woman to abort the baby? Even if she will assume the responsibility?


I saw a column at American thinker about the abortion decision....and they mentioned the next step might be ordering surrogates to abort babies.......

Articles: Heart of Darkness: the Evil at the Core of Modern Liberalism

While women are often coerced by the men who use them to have abortions it is still illegal in the U.S., unlike China, to force a woman to have an abortion if she doesn’t want one -- though liberals are pushing to change that in surrogacy cases.





Read more: Articles: Heart of Darkness: the Evil at the Core of Modern Liberalism
Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook

Just as no woman should be forced to carry an unwanted pregnancy, no woman should be forced to have an abortion.

Never.

No woman is forced to carry an unwanted baby unless she is raped.

Wrong.