Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I said the same thing when I heard that idiot Boehner...What a moron. The Republicans have to get rid of this guy, he's a joke. Obama plays him like the fool that he is
And you will be saying the same thing about the next failed Republican. Same way Republicans threw Romney under the bus the moment he lost the general election. When was the last time Republicans nominated a candidate they liked?
Republicans hate most of their own candidates more than they hate Democrats.
We like that!
Levin is a moron. Moving on.
I forgot more than he knows. Levin is a talk show host an entertainer like all the rest.
I forgot more than he knows. Levin is a talk show host an entertainer like all the rest.
You never new diddly dick.
He is far more than just an entertainer although he is very entertaining.
He is immeasurably smarter than you and your Obamessiah combined.
He is not just a lawyer but a constitutional lawyer and litigator. He worked in the Reagan Administration. He is an author and a very good one at that. He grasps political philosophy, history and nuances which guys like you cannot begin to fathom.
Since you have no hope of ever refuting one of his points, you do the typical third grade "oh yeah? well he's a poopy head" routine.
You are laughable.
One of the first motives to civil society, and which becomes one of its fundamental rules, is that no man should be judge in his own cause. By this each person has at once divested himself of the first fundamental right of uncovenanted man, that is, to judge for himself, and to assert his own cause. He abdicates all right to be his own governor. He inclusively, in a great measure, abandons the right of self-defence, the first law of nature. Man cannot enjoy the rights of an uncivil and of a civil state together. That he may obtain justice, he gives up his right of determining what it is in points the most essential to him. That he may secure some liberty, he makes a surrender in trust of the whole of it.
Government is not made in virtue of natural rights, which may and do exist in total independence of it; and exist in much greater clearness, and in a much greater degree of abstract perfection; but their abstract perfection is their practical defect. By having a right to everything, they want everything. Government is a contrivance of human wisdom to provide for human wants. Men have a right that these wants should be provided for by this wisdom. Among these wants is to be reckoned the want, out of civil society, of a sufficient restraint upon their passions. Society requires not only that the passions of individuals should be subjected, but that even in the mass and body as well as in the individuals, the inclinations of men should frequently be thwarted, their will controlled, and their passions brought into subjection. This can only be done by a power out of themselves; and not, in the exercise of its function, subject to that will and to those passions which it is its office to bridle and subdue. In this sense the restraints on men, as well as their liberties, are to be reckoned among their rights. But as the liberties and the restrictions vary with times and circumstances, and admit of infinite modifications, they cannot be settled upon any abstract rule; and nothing is so foolish as to discuss them upon that principle.
--Edmund Burke; from Reflections on the Revolution in France
You just called me a liberal lol. Rep request granted.
I forgot more than he knows. Levin is a talk show host an entertainer like all the rest.
You never new diddly dick.
He is far more than just an entertainer although he is very entertaining.
He is immeasurably smarter than you and your Obamessiah combined.
He is not just a lawyer but a constitutional lawyer and litigator. He worked in the Reagan Administration. He is an author and a very good one at that. He grasps political philosophy, history and nuances which guys like you cannot begin to fathom.
Since you have no hope of ever refuting one of his points, you do the typical third grade "oh yeah? well he's a poopy head" routine.
You are laughable.
Didn't he attribute modern conservatism to Edmund Burke?
One of the first motives to civil society, and which becomes one of its fundamental rules, is that no man should be judge in his own cause. By this each person has at once divested himself of the first fundamental right of uncovenanted man, that is, to judge for himself, and to assert his own cause. He abdicates all right to be his own governor. He inclusively, in a great measure, abandons the right of self-defence, the first law of nature. Man cannot enjoy the rights of an uncivil and of a civil state together. That he may obtain justice, he gives up his right of determining what it is in points the most essential to him. That he may secure some liberty, he makes a surrender in trust of the whole of it.
Government is not made in virtue of natural rights, which may and do exist in total independence of it; and exist in much greater clearness, and in a much greater degree of abstract perfection; but their abstract perfection is their practical defect. By having a right to everything, they want everything. Government is a contrivance of human wisdom to provide for human wants. Men have a right that these wants should be provided for by this wisdom. Among these wants is to be reckoned the want, out of civil society, of a sufficient restraint upon their passions. Society requires not only that the passions of individuals should be subjected, but that even in the mass and body as well as in the individuals, the inclinations of men should frequently be thwarted, their will controlled, and their passions brought into subjection. This can only be done by a power out of themselves; and not, in the exercise of its function, subject to that will and to those passions which it is its office to bridle and subdue. In this sense the restraints on men, as well as their liberties, are to be reckoned among their rights. But as the liberties and the restrictions vary with times and circumstances, and admit of infinite modifications, they cannot be settled upon any abstract rule; and nothing is so foolish as to discuss them upon that principle.
--Edmund Burke; from Reflections on the Revolution in France
he's either ignorant or a liar
You just called me a liberal lol. Rep request granted.
Ok. Then substitute "flaming asshole" for "liberal."
Damn. You are not just a douche, but a butthurt douche.
Now, go cry it off, you pussy.
You just called me a liberal lol. Rep request granted.
Ok. Then substitute "flaming asshole" for "liberal."
Damn. You are not just a douche, but a butthurt douche.
Now, go cry it off, you pussy.
And yet again! You will probably whine butthurt comments this time as well. If you don't want it don't ask.
You never new diddly dick.
He is far more than just an entertainer although he is very entertaining.
He is immeasurably smarter than you and your Obamessiah combined.
He is not just a lawyer but a constitutional lawyer and litigator. He worked in the Reagan Administration. He is an author and a very good one at that. He grasps political philosophy, history and nuances which guys like you cannot begin to fathom.
Since you have no hope of ever refuting one of his points, you do the typical third grade "oh yeah? well he's a poopy head" routine.
You are laughable.
Didn't he attribute modern conservatism to Edmund Burke?
One of the first motives to civil society, and which becomes one of its fundamental rules, is that no man should be judge in his own cause. By this each person has at once divested himself of the first fundamental right of uncovenanted man, that is, to judge for himself, and to assert his own cause. He abdicates all right to be his own governor. He inclusively, in a great measure, abandons the right of self-defence, the first law of nature. Man cannot enjoy the rights of an uncivil and of a civil state together. That he may obtain justice, he gives up his right of determining what it is in points the most essential to him. That he may secure some liberty, he makes a surrender in trust of the whole of it.
Government is not made in virtue of natural rights, which may and do exist in total independence of it; and exist in much greater clearness, and in a much greater degree of abstract perfection; but their abstract perfection is their practical defect. By having a right to everything, they want everything. Government is a contrivance of human wisdom to provide for human wants. Men have a right that these wants should be provided for by this wisdom. Among these wants is to be reckoned the want, out of civil society, of a sufficient restraint upon their passions. Society requires not only that the passions of individuals should be subjected, but that even in the mass and body as well as in the individuals, the inclinations of men should frequently be thwarted, their will controlled, and their passions brought into subjection. This can only be done by a power out of themselves; and not, in the exercise of its function, subject to that will and to those passions which it is its office to bridle and subdue. In this sense the restraints on men, as well as their liberties, are to be reckoned among their rights. But as the liberties and the restrictions vary with times and circumstances, and admit of infinite modifications, they cannot be settled upon any abstract rule; and nothing is so foolish as to discuss them upon that principle.
--Edmund Burke; from Reflections on the Revolution in France
he's either ignorant or a liar
In fairness. much of the political philosophy espoused by Edmund Burke has become a basis for what we today recognize as conservatism.
He cherished the right of the individual and he valued the personal ownership of property as an expression of individual liberty.
Liberals of our day are kind of put-off by such notions. They scoff at discussions of "the civil society" and they tend to view "government" as a magical cure all for out societal ills rather than as one of the causes of such problems.
Burke would HAMMER President Obama's perpetual bullshit rhetoric about "the rich" needing to pay "their fair share."
