🌟 Exclusive 2024 Prime Day Deals! 🌟

Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁

Liberal profs admit they’d discriminate against conservatives in hiring, advancement

I said it was NOT discrimination to choose a person for a job based on their politics when they were EQUALLY QUALIFIED. That was the premise of the study question.

How could it be? If you think it is, tell us why, in detail.

How can if be discrimination to chose a more qualified white man over a less qualified black one?

Are you a racist? Why are you having trouble answering that question?

It's not discrimination to choose a more qualified white man. However, if a court determination has been made that past discrimination warrants a remedy, affirmative action to the benefit of the black man might be the remedy.

Discrimination is a remedy for discrimination? Does that make murder a remedy for murder? Can I use slavery to stop slavery?
 
I already explained that. Reread my posts.

Are you a racist or not?

You think it is a propaganda piece because you don't like the conclusion, and think that they should emphasize the people who lied.

Fine, at least 60% of college professors are willing to lie about how they discriminate against people they do not like, is that a better title?

Your assumption that the 60% of the professors who said they wouldn't discriminate are lying allows us to logically conclude, by your reasoning,

that all conservatives are lying when they claim they aren't racist.

Are you a racist?

I assumed that 30% of the professors were lying, not 60%.
 
The most widely used method to screen new teachers was a simple question: Do you believe the world is round or flat. Most applicants would say round and a few, flat, both were immediatly shown the door. The correct answer was, "I can teach it either way."
Those are the types of teachers most districts look for. They cause no problems and parents love them. They were flexible in their beliefs, as is Romney in his campaign mode.
 
How can if be discrimination to chose a more qualified white man over a less qualified black one?

Are you a racist? Why are you having trouble answering that question?

It's not discrimination to choose a more qualified white man. However, if a court determination has been made that past discrimination warrants a remedy, affirmative action to the benefit of the black man might be the remedy.

Discrimination is a remedy for discrimination? Does that make murder a remedy for murder? Can I use slavery to stop slavery?

We use imprisonment as a punishment for kidnaping.:lol::lol::lol: Stop flailing you sound like a fool.

Why won't you answer the question? Are you a racist? I'm assuming your refusal to answer must mean you are.
 
You think it is a propaganda piece because you don't like the conclusion, and think that they should emphasize the people who lied.

Fine, at least 60% of college professors are willing to lie about how they discriminate against people they do not like, is that a better title?

Your assumption that the 60% of the professors who said they wouldn't discriminate are lying allows us to logically conclude, by your reasoning,

that all conservatives are lying when they claim they aren't racist.

Are you a racist?

I assumed that 30% of the professors were lying, not 60%.

Then I guess the other half of your schizo personality wrote this:


"Fine, at least 60% of college professors are willing to lie about how they discriminate against people they do not like, is that a better title?"

lol
 
How can if be discrimination to chose a more qualified white man over a less qualified black one?

Are you a racist? Why are you having trouble answering that question?

It's not discrimination to choose a more qualified white man. However, if a court determination has been made that past discrimination warrants a remedy, affirmative action to the benefit of the black man might be the remedy.

Discrimination is a remedy for discrimination? Does that make murder a remedy for murder? Can I use slavery to stop slavery?

Do you want affirmative action for hiring conservative teachers?
 
conservatives are persecuted.

waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah


how could this have happened?

i thought the libruls were the pussies, the conservative had the guns, and were the majority?
 
Are you a racist? Why are you having trouble answering that question?

It's not discrimination to choose a more qualified white man. However, if a court determination has been made that past discrimination warrants a remedy, affirmative action to the benefit of the black man might be the remedy.

Discrimination is a remedy for discrimination? Does that make murder a remedy for murder? Can I use slavery to stop slavery?

We use imprisonment as a punishment for kidnaping.:lol::lol::lol: Stop flailing you sound like a fool.

Why won't you answer the question? Are you a racist? I'm assuming your refusal to answer must mean you are.

We use prison as a punishment for running away too, what's your point?
 
Your assumption that the 60% of the professors who said they wouldn't discriminate are lying allows us to logically conclude, by your reasoning,

that all conservatives are lying when they claim they aren't racist.

Are you a racist?

I assumed that 30% of the professors were lying, not 60%.

Then I guess the other half of your schizo personality wrote this:


"Fine, at least 60% of college professors are willing to lie about how they discriminate against people they do not like, is that a better title?"

lol

That doesn't mean I assumed they were lying, it just means I use hyperbole to make absurd points.
 
Are you a racist? Why are you having trouble answering that question?

It's not discrimination to choose a more qualified white man. However, if a court determination has been made that past discrimination warrants a remedy, affirmative action to the benefit of the black man might be the remedy.

Discrimination is a remedy for discrimination? Does that make murder a remedy for murder? Can I use slavery to stop slavery?

Do you want affirmative action for hiring conservative teachers?

Were did I ever say I wanted affirmative action?
 
Discrimination is a remedy for discrimination? Does that make murder a remedy for murder? Can I use slavery to stop slavery?

We use imprisonment as a punishment for kidnaping.:lol::lol::lol: Stop flailing you sound like a fool.

Why won't you answer the question? Are you a racist? I'm assuming your refusal to answer must mean you are.

We use prison as a punishment for running away too, what's your point?

My point is that you don't seem to understand that the courts ruled that affirmative action could be used to remedy past discrimination.
 
conservatives are persecuted.

waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah


how could this have happened?

i thought the libruls were the pussies, the conservative had the guns, and were the majority?

The same conservatives who think that a restaurant ought to be able to refuse service to a black person are screaming discrimination!!!!!!!!! to the high heavens because they think colleges are not hiring enough conservatives.
 
What the hell are you babbling? Who would deny a black person service?

You are a victim of a uber-liberal education. You should demand your money back.
 
I said it was NOT discrimination to choose a person for a job based on their politics when they were EQUALLY QUALIFIED. That was the premise of the study question.

How could it be? If you think it is, tell us why, in detail.

How can if be discrimination to chose a more qualified white man over a less qualified black one?

Are you a racist? Why are you having trouble answering that question?

It's not discrimination to choose a more qualified white man. However, if a court determination has been made that past discrimination warrants a remedy, affirmative action to the benefit of the black man might be the remedy.
So, the proper response to racism is...more racism.

Brilliant! :clap2:
 
conservatives are persecuted.

waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah


how could this have happened?

i thought the libruls were the pussies, the conservative had the guns, and were the majority?

The same conservatives who think that a restaurant ought to be able to refuse service to a black person are screaming discrimination!!!!!!!!! to the high heavens because they think colleges are not hiring enough conservatives.
Yeah? Who's that? Names.

And don't puss out yet again.
 
conservatives are persecuted.

waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah


how could this have happened?

i thought the libruls were the pussies, the conservative had the guns, and were the majority?

The same conservatives who think that a restaurant ought to be able to refuse service to a black person are screaming discrimination!!!!!!!!! to the high heavens because they think colleges are not hiring enough conservatives.
Yeah? Who's that? Names.

And don't puss out yet again.


dave, jim-bob, caylene, tucker, bobby-lou, and their moms.
 
The same conservatives who think that a restaurant ought to be able to refuse service to a black person are screaming discrimination!!!!!!!!! to the high heavens because they think colleges are not hiring enough conservatives.
Yeah? Who's that? Names.

And don't puss out yet again.


dave, jim-bob, caylene, tucker, bobby-lou, and their moms.

You're getting better. That was almost funny.
 
We use imprisonment as a punishment for kidnaping.:lol::lol::lol: Stop flailing you sound like a fool.

Why won't you answer the question? Are you a racist? I'm assuming your refusal to answer must mean you are.

We use prison as a punishment for running away too, what's your point?

My point is that you don't seem to understand that the courts ruled that affirmative action could be used to remedy past discrimination.

I understand that the courts ruled that, I just don't understand what it has to do with the discussion.
 
Great piece from PJM on this very topic:

And this is a great shame because it means that in the place above all others ostensibly set aside for the challenging of received ideas and the unfettered pursuit of truth, one finds instead conformity and caution, self-righteous declaration rather than reasoned debate. Post-secondary education should provide a space for learning unlike any other — uniquely protected, though not divorced from, the rest of the world and prizing above all else the practice of intellectual freedom. When the approved thought is clearly marked off from the disreputable and the despised, however, free inquiry is quashed. And the intellectual blinders that students inherit from their professors soon infect the arenas traditionally shaped by university graduates: government, the media, and the judiciary.

The result, in our public discourse as a whole, is a widening of what is deemed unthinkable, and the replacement of reasoned judgment about the good with unthinking collective piety. Under such circumstances, the cornerstone of liberal democracy — freedom of expression — is profoundly threatened, perhaps already lost. That it has been willingly and even enthusiastically surrendered may be the greatest shame of all.

PJ Media » Captive Minds: Conformity and Campus Intellectuals
 

Forum List

Back
Top