Liberals Aren’t Liking This Newly-Discovered Photo Of The 1924 Democratic Convention…

[Pogo]

The stuff I posted about FDR and Germany is simply a fact. Anyone who has read much about the war knows it.FDR was a demagogue who ran against American involvement into the war and then immediately started trying to sucker the voters into the war the minute he was elected. He's the lowest kind of douche bag politician, which is the reason leftwing cockroaches like you love him.

You remain an imbecile. I feel sorry for you.

Once again you're showing that a cockroach has more capacity to reason than you.

Spits the abject imbecile who doesn't know the difference between Madison, Wisconsin and Madison Square Garden.

The cockroach tells another lie.

Nope, You really did post a photo of a KKK march in Madison, Wisconsin, believing they were marching at Madison Square Garden.

You really are as rightarded as you appear.

I recall from childhood listening to basketball games from Madison Square Garden. Yet somehow I can't recall the ones that got interrupted because some player tripped over the trolley tracks....

 

[Syriusly]

Well you have to understand- PC has a big hard on about Roosevelt and starts at least a thread a week on the same inane crap about Roosevelt.

She just can't stand that Roosevelt led America to victory in World War 2, and was not only one of our most popular Presidents- elected 4 times- each time with a majority of Jewish votes- but is considered by historians to be one of our greatest Presidents.

"...Roosevelt led America to victory in World War 2,..."

1. Roosevelt turned over management of Allied war efforts to Stalin.
Stalin got to choose the attack via Normandy, rather than through Italy, so that the Red Army could occupy Eastern Europe.

2. Because he allowed Stalin to make the military diecisions, FDR extended the war by years, and cost thousands of American lives.

I hate to have to break this to your pathetically revisionist-history fixated ass but --- nobody in World War Two did more, paid more or suffered more in defeating Nazi Germany than did the USSR. The US was in no position to "turn over management" TO Stalin. That implies FDR was in some position of managing the European war in the first place.

I mean holy SHIT this is profound ignorance.



(/completely offtopic)

--- But hey, perhaps you can enlighten us all on what Forney Johnston's role was.

The USSR partnered with Nazi Germany with carving up Poland. They also invaded Finland. They were hardly better than Nazi Germany.

"hardly better than Nazi Germany" except for a couple things:
a) The USSR didn't attack the United States and
b) The USSR was allies with the United States and Great Britain in defeating Nazi Germany.

No doubt Stalin was every bit as much of a murdering asshole as Hitler. But we were not at war with that murderous asshole.

Nazi Germany didn't attack the United States.

We were allies with them only because the commie lover Roosevelt chose to be allies with them.

Why am I not surprised that Brip is so ignorant?

1. The USS Reuben James was sunk by U-552 on 31 October 1941
2. Nazi Germany declared war on the United States- after its ally- Japan- attacked the United States.
3. The Nazi's concentrated attacks on American shipping immediately:The first U-boats reached U.S. waters on January 13, 1942. By the time they withdrew on February 6, they had sunk 156,939 tonnes of shipping without loss.

We were allies with the USSR because the Nazi's had invaded the USSR- and the USSR and England were the only remaining combatants fighting the Nazi's.

You being such a staunch 'anti-commie'- we can be certain you would have preferred the Nazi's to have won, rather than the United States being allied with the USSR and England.

 

[Syriusly]

I confess- you are a gullible idiot.

Justice Black was not a KKK member when he was appointed to the Supreme Court.

You know this- but you keep lying that he was.

Just more of your typical lies.

From the Smithsonian:

"SMARTNEWS Keeping you current
This Supreme Court Justice Was a KKK Member"

Read more: This Supreme Court Justice Was a KKK Member | Smart News | Smithsonian
Give the gift of Smithsonian magazine for only $12! Give the gift of Smithsonian
Follow us: @SmithsonianMag on Twitter



That's right, you low-life lying gutter snipe....

FDR made a KKKer his first nominee to the Supreme Court.

That's a fact.

Nope- just you lying again.
Remember- you lied and claimed that the Democrats placed a KKK member on the Supreme Court.

I pointed out your lie- by pointing out that Hugo Black was not a KKK member- and had not been a KKK member for over a decade when appointed to the Supreme Court.

You were just lying again.

But FDR did appoint the second Jewish Supreme Court Justice- and yes- he was actually Jewish when he was appointed.

"What U.S. President appointed members of the KKK to the U.S. Supreme Court?
7 Answers



Jerry Mc Kenna, Avid birder and amateur astronomer

Answered 11d ago

FDR appointed former KKK member Hugo Black in 1937. He said he left the KKK and he claims that he regretted joining. Hugo Black - Wikipedia

He was actively anti-Catholic.

"Hugo Black, a KKK member and US senator, gave fiery anti-Catholic speeches before going on to become a defender of civil liberties on the supreme court bench." (America's dark and not-very-distant history of hating Catholics)

Anti-Catholic bigotry was fashionable among what we would call liberals today."

https://www.quora.com/What-U-S-President-appointed-members-of-the-KKK-to-the-U-S-Supreme-Court



FDR appointed a KKKer as his first nominee to the Supreme Court.
And,...you're an imbecile.

Both of those are facts.

Quoting you:
FDR appointed former KKK member Hugo Black in 1937. He said he left the KKK and he claims that he regretted joining. Hugo Black - Wikipedia

'former KKK member'

Again- you are just lying.

As you always do.

Once a KKK member, always a KKK member.

Once a racist, always a racist....
Inside the government’s racial bias case against Donald Trump’s company, and how he fought it


Politics
Inside the government’s racial bias case against Donald Trump’s company, and how he fought it

 

[Syriusly]

FDR's troubling view of Jews

What FDR said about Jews in private
His personal sentiments about Jews may help explain America's tepid response to the Holocaust.

President Franklin Roosevelt sits at the steering wheel of his automobile… (Associated Press )

In May 1943, President Franklin Roosevelt met with British Prime Minister Winston Churchill at the White House. It was 17 months after Pearl Harbor and a little more than a year before D-Day. The two Allied leaders reviewed the war effort to date and exchanged thoughts on their plans for the postwar era. At one point in the discussion, FDR offered what he called "the best way to settle the Jewish question."

Vice President Henry Wallace, who noted the conversation in his diary, said Roosevelt spoke approvingly of a plan (recommended by geographer and Johns Hopkins University President Isaiah Bowman) "to spread the Jews thin all over the world." The diary entry adds: "The president said he had tried this out in [Meriwether] County, Georgia [where Roosevelt lived in the 1920s] and at Hyde Park on the basis of adding four or five Jewish families at each place. He claimed that the local population would have no objection if there were no more than that."

Roosevelt's "best way" remark is condescending and distasteful, and coming from anyone else it would probably be regarded as anti-Semitism. But more than that, FDR's support for "spreading the Jews thin" may hold the key to understanding a subject that has been at the center of controversy for decades: the American government's tepid response to the Holocaust.

Here's the paradox. The U.S. immigration system severely limited the number of German Jews admitted during the Nazi years to about 26,000 annually — but even that quota was less than 25% filled during most of the Hitler era, because the Roosevelt administration piled on so many extra requirements for would-be immigrants. For example, starting in 1941, merely leaving behind a close relative in Europe would be enough to disqualify an applicant — on the absurd assumption that the Nazis could threaten the relative and thereby force the immigrant into spying for Hitler.

Why did the administration actively seek to discourage and disqualify Jewish refugees from coming to the United States? Why didn't the president quietly tell his State Department (which administered the immigration system) to fill the quotas for Germany and Axis-occupied countries to the legal limit? That alone could have saved 190,000 lives. It would not have required a fight with Congress or the anti-immigration forces; it would have involved minimal political risk to the president.

Every president's policy decisions are shaped by a variety of factors, some political, some personal. In Roosevelt's case, a pattern of private remarks about Jews, some of which I recently discovered at the Central Zionist Archives in Jerusalem and from other sources, may be significant.

In 1923, as a member of the Harvard board of directors, Roosevelt decided there were too many Jewish students at the college and helped institute a quota to limit the number admitted. In 1938, he privately suggested that Jews in Poland were dominating the economy and were therefore to blame for provoking anti-Semitism there. In 1941, he remarked at a Cabinet meeting that there were too many Jews among federal employees in Oregon. In 1943, he told government officials in Allied-liberated North Africa that the number of local Jews in various professions "should be definitely limited" so as to "eliminate the specific and understandable complaints which the Germans bore towards the Jews in Germany."

. . . . . .
​

Why do you feel the need to use debunked lies to support your argument? I mean I used plain fact. Basic things that are proven. Here you have the quota (actually there was never one put on paper anywhere according to a study buy Richard Breitman and Alan J Lichtman). So why do you feel the need to keep reusing lies that have not been found to be true.

Why do you keep saying what someone says in private is more important than their actual actions they take? Did he follow through with the "lets spread them out" Idea? Of course not. Oswego and NYC became two large spots where they were allowed to choose to live together. But hey, he said "lets spread them out" so that's what matters, right? Not the reality of him choosing to do the opposite?

By your belief system, Bill Cosby could be a nice guy as long as at some point in his private life someone said he said he respects women. Then all the rapes don't matter anymore because it's right there in a diary.

In what way is "severely limiting" the Jewish Refugees actually taking in a full quarter of them. That's right, more than any other allied or neutral country by far. But because it wasn't unlimited, lets call the LARGEST intake of refugees a severe limitation right? The US has taken in about 19,000 syrian Refugees out of 5 million. FDR took in over 130,000 Jewish Refugees out of just over 500,000. I mean we've taken in less than .4% of Syrian refugees. He took in about 25% of Jewish Refugees despite his isolationist leanings.

You are saying that's proof he was a racist. Ok, what refugee crisis has the US answered better? What foreign refugee crisis did a president step up and say "we'll take more than FDR took"?? Because if the LARGEST refugee adoption in US history (though not the largest worldwide refugee crisis) was FDR taking in the jews, it's not making him look anti-semitic is it?


WHEN YOU HAVE TO CREATE OR RE-USE LIES TO SUPPORT YOUR ARGUMENT IT RUINS YOUR ARGUMENT.

Yeah- it is pretty odd.

In order to support there argument that FDR was an anti-semite- they want to portray him as blocking Jewish refugees from Europe.

But Donald Trump ran on a platform of blocking Muslim refugees from the Middle East- and they will argue on and on that that is not bigoted at all.

Donald Trump said that Mexicans are rapists. FDR never called Jews rapists.

"....of blocking Muslim refugees...."


I know you're an imbecile...but equating Jewish folk who wanted nothing more than being allowed to live with 7th century savages who dedicate their existence to the slaughter of innocent human being....

...well...makes you the perfect 'reliable Democrat voter.'

LOLOL

WTF?? The Muslim refugees coming here are 7th century savages, slaughtering innocent people??

Over 18,000 from Syria alone came here while Obama was president. How many of them are 7th century savages, slaughtering innocent people...?

What a disgusting pig you are.

They're all 7th century savages. .

Anyone other than myself find Brip claims about the Muslims eerily similar to what the Nazi's said about the Jews?

 

[Syriusly]

I hate to have to break this to your pathetically revisionist-history fixated ass but --- nobody in World War Two did more, paid more or suffered more in defeating Nazi Germany than did the USSR. The US was in no position to "turn over management" TO Stalin. That implies FDR was in some position of managing the European war in the first place.

I mean holy SHIT this is profound ignorance.



(/completely offtopic)

--- But hey, perhaps you can enlighten us all on what Forney Johnston's role was.

The USSR partnered with Nazi Germany with carving up Poland. They also invaded Finland. They were hardly better than Nazi Germany.

"hardly better than Nazi Germany" except for a couple things:
a) The USSR didn't attack the United States and
b) The USSR was allies with the United States and Great Britain in defeating Nazi Germany.

No doubt Stalin was every bit as much of a murdering asshole as Hitler. But we were not at war with that murderous asshole.

Nazi Germany didn't attack the United States.

We were allies with them only because the commie lover Roosevelt chose to be allies with them.

You know you're among the dumbest posters on this site, right?

Germany aligned themselves with Japan and declared war on us.

They didn't attack us, numskull. .

What the Nazi Fan Boys call "they didn't attack us"

The first U-boats reached U.S. waters on January 13, 1942. By the time they withdrew on February 6, they had sunk 156,939 tonnes of shipping without loss.

 

[Syriusly]

Yeah- it is pretty odd.

In order to support there argument that FDR was an anti-semite- they want to portray him as blocking Jewish refugees from Europe.

But Donald Trump ran on a platform of blocking Muslim refugees from the Middle East- and they will argue on and on that that is not bigoted at all.

Donald Trump said that Mexicans are rapists. FDR never called Jews rapists.

"....of blocking Muslim refugees...."


I know you're an imbecile...but equating Jewish folk who wanted nothing more than being allowed to live with 7th century savages who dedicate their existence to the slaughter of innocent human being....

...well...makes you the perfect 'reliable Democrat voter.'

LOLOL

WTF?? The Muslim refugees coming here are 7th century savages, slaughtering innocent people??

Over 18,000 from Syria alone came here while Obama was president. How many of them are 7th century savages, slaughtering innocent people...?

What a disgusting pig you are.

They're all 7th century savages. The only reason they don't slaughter anyone is the fact that they are vastly outnumbered. Once the achieve a certain strength in numbers, the slaughter begins.

Yeah- it is pretty odd.

In order to support there argument that FDR was an anti-semite- they want to portray him as blocking Jewish refugees from Europe.

But Donald Trump ran on a platform of blocking Muslim refugees from the Middle East- and they will argue on and on that that is not bigoted at all.

Donald Trump said that Mexicans are rapists. FDR never called Jews rapists.

"....of blocking Muslim refugees...."


I know you're an imbecile...but equating Jewish folk who wanted nothing more than being allowed to live with 7th century savages who dedicate their existence to the slaughter of innocent human being....

...well...makes you the perfect 'reliable Democrat voter.'

LOLOL

WTF?? The Muslim refugees coming here are 7th century savages, slaughtering innocent people??

Over 18,000 from Syria alone came here while Obama was president. How many of them are 7th century savages, slaughtering innocent people...?

What a disgusting pig you are.

They're all 7th century savages. The only reason they don't slaughter anyone is the fact that they are vastly outnumbered. Once the achieve a certain strength in numbers, the slaughter begins.

^^^ another disgusting pig.

Notice how almost all of the bigots on this site are on the right?

Wrong. According to your own criteria, you are a bigot. You have expressed your contempt for Christians and Southerners numerous times. Snowflakes have no problem flinging all manner of insult at Christian, but say one negative thing about Muslims and you bring the snowflake Jihad down on your head.

Hmmm how is pointing out that the KKK was founded by Southern white Christians bigoted?

Now if I said that all Christians were members of the KKK- now that would be as much of a lie as your lie that all Muslims are 7th century savages.

Frankly your claims about Muslims sound waaaaay too much like what the Nazi's said about Jews

 

[Syriusly]

"hardly better than Nazi Germany" except for a couple things:
a) The USSR didn't attack the United States and
b) The USSR was allies with the United States and Great Britain in defeating Nazi Germany.

No doubt Stalin was every bit as much of a murdering asshole as Hitler. But we were not at war with that murderous asshole.

Nazi Germany didn't attack the United States.

We were allies with them only because the commie lover Roosevelt chose to be allies with them.

You know you're among the dumbest posters on this site, right?

Germany aligned themselves with Japan and declared war on us.

They didn't attack us, numskull. FDR had been making war on them for over 2 years before they declared war on us.

How ironic thata snowflake with the reasoning capacity of a cockroach is calling me stupid.

Numbnuts... they aligned with the country which had just attacked us and they declared war against us. Just how fucking rightarded are you??

Roosevelt was trying to instigate war with Germany ever since it invaded Poland. American destroyers were using depth charges on German submarines the whole time. He also deliberately pushed Japan into attacking us.

Someone is still upset that the United States helped defeat Nazi Germany and Imperial Japan.......

 

[Syriusly]

You know you're among the dumbest posters on this site, right?

Germany aligned themselves with Japan and declared war on us.

They didn't attack us, numskull. FDR had been making war on them for over 2 years before they declared war on us.

How ironic thata snowflake with the reasoning capacity of a cockroach is calling me stupid.

Numbnuts... they aligned with the country which had just attacked us and they declared war against us. Just how fucking rightarded are you??

Roosevelt was trying to instigate war with Germany ever since it invaded Poland. American destroyers were using depth charges on German submarines the whole time. He also deliberately pushed Japan into attacking us.

Why do you insist on proving to the forum you're batshit insane? Everything you post, from that photo you idiotically claim was from the 1924 DNC, to this, is nothing but craziness from you.

The stuff I posted about FDR and Germany is simply a fact. Anyone who has read much about the war knows it.FDR was a demagogue who ran against American involvement into the war and then immediately started trying to sucker the voters into the war the minute he was elected. He's the lowest kind of douche bag politician, which is the reason leftwing cockroaches like you love him.

FDR was probably our most popular President ever- and led America to victory over Imperial- Fascist- Japan- and Nazi Germany, which is the reason contard assholes like you hate him.

 

[Syriusly]

You remain an imbecile. I feel sorry for you.

Once again you're showing that a cockroach has more capacity to reason than you.

Spits the abject imbecile who doesn't know the difference between Madison, Wisconsin and Madison Square Garden.

The cockroach tells another lie.

Nope, You really did post a photo of a KKK march in Madison, Wisconsin, believing they were marching at Madison Square Garden.

You really are as rightarded as you appear.

I'm not discussing this anymore, cockroach.

Typical cowardly contard.

 

[bripat9643]

"...Roosevelt led America to victory in World War 2,..."

1. Roosevelt turned over management of Allied war efforts to Stalin.
Stalin got to choose the attack via Normandy, rather than through Italy, so that the Red Army could occupy Eastern Europe.

2. Because he allowed Stalin to make the military diecisions, FDR extended the war by years, and cost thousands of American lives.

I hate to have to break this to your pathetically revisionist-history fixated ass but --- nobody in World War Two did more, paid more or suffered more in defeating Nazi Germany than did the USSR. The US was in no position to "turn over management" TO Stalin. That implies FDR was in some position of managing the European war in the first place.

I mean holy SHIT this is profound ignorance.



(/completely offtopic)

--- But hey, perhaps you can enlighten us all on what Forney Johnston's role was.

The USSR partnered with Nazi Germany with carving up Poland. They also invaded Finland. They were hardly better than Nazi Germany.

"hardly better than Nazi Germany" except for a couple things:
a) The USSR didn't attack the United States and
b) The USSR was allies with the United States and Great Britain in defeating Nazi Germany.

No doubt Stalin was every bit as much of a murdering asshole as Hitler. But we were not at war with that murderous asshole.

Nazi Germany didn't attack the United States.

We were allies with them only because the commie lover Roosevelt chose to be allies with them.

Why am I not surprised that Brip is so ignorant?

1. The USS Reuben James was sunk by U-552 on 31 October 1941
2. Nazi Germany declared war on the United States- after its ally- Japan- attacked the United States.
3. The Nazi's concentrated attacks on American shipping immediately:The first U-boats reached U.S. waters on January 13, 1942. By the time they withdrew on February 6, they had sunk 156,939 tonnes of shipping without loss.

We were allies with the USSR because the Nazi's had invaded the USSR- and the USSR and England were the only remaining combatants fighting the Nazi's.

You being such a staunch 'anti-commie'- we can be certain you would have preferred the Nazi's to have won, rather than the United States being allied with the USSR and England.

The Rueban James had been hunting German submarines for over a year. It dropped depth charges on them. That's an act of war.

FDR and Churchill pushed Japan into attacking by cutting off its supply of oil. They did it deliberately to produce that result.

 

[bripat9643]

From the Smithsonian:

"SMARTNEWS Keeping you current
This Supreme Court Justice Was a KKK Member"

Read more: This Supreme Court Justice Was a KKK Member | Smart News | Smithsonian
Give the gift of Smithsonian magazine for only $12! Give the gift of Smithsonian
Follow us: @SmithsonianMag on Twitter



That's right, you low-life lying gutter snipe....

FDR made a KKKer his first nominee to the Supreme Court.

That's a fact.

Nope- just you lying again.
Remember- you lied and claimed that the Democrats placed a KKK member on the Supreme Court.

I pointed out your lie- by pointing out that Hugo Black was not a KKK member- and had not been a KKK member for over a decade when appointed to the Supreme Court.

You were just lying again.

But FDR did appoint the second Jewish Supreme Court Justice- and yes- he was actually Jewish when he was appointed.

"What U.S. President appointed members of the KKK to the U.S. Supreme Court?
7 Answers



Jerry Mc Kenna, Avid birder and amateur astronomer

Answered 11d ago

FDR appointed former KKK member Hugo Black in 1937. He said he left the KKK and he claims that he regretted joining. Hugo Black - Wikipedia

He was actively anti-Catholic.

"Hugo Black, a KKK member and US senator, gave fiery anti-Catholic speeches before going on to become a defender of civil liberties on the supreme court bench." (America's dark and not-very-distant history of hating Catholics)

Anti-Catholic bigotry was fashionable among what we would call liberals today."

https://www.quora.com/What-U-S-President-appointed-members-of-the-KKK-to-the-U-S-Supreme-Court



FDR appointed a KKKer as his first nominee to the Supreme Court.
And,...you're an imbecile.

Both of those are facts.

Quoting you:
FDR appointed former KKK member Hugo Black in 1937. He said he left the KKK and he claims that he regretted joining. Hugo Black - Wikipedia

'former KKK member'

Again- you are just lying.

As you always do.

Once a KKK member, always a KKK member.

Once a racist, always a racist....
Inside the government’s racial bias case against Donald Trump’s company, and how he fought it


Politics
Inside the government’s racial bias case against Donald Trump’s company, and how he fought it

The Washington Post - fake news.

 

[bripat9643]

Why do you feel the need to use debunked lies to support your argument? I mean I used plain fact. Basic things that are proven. Here you have the quota (actually there was never one put on paper anywhere according to a study buy Richard Breitman and Alan J Lichtman). So why do you feel the need to keep reusing lies that have not been found to be true.

Why do you keep saying what someone says in private is more important than their actual actions they take? Did he follow through with the "lets spread them out" Idea? Of course not. Oswego and NYC became two large spots where they were allowed to choose to live together. But hey, he said "lets spread them out" so that's what matters, right? Not the reality of him choosing to do the opposite?

By your belief system, Bill Cosby could be a nice guy as long as at some point in his private life someone said he said he respects women. Then all the rapes don't matter anymore because it's right there in a diary.

In what way is "severely limiting" the Jewish Refugees actually taking in a full quarter of them. That's right, more than any other allied or neutral country by far. But because it wasn't unlimited, lets call the LARGEST intake of refugees a severe limitation right? The US has taken in about 19,000 syrian Refugees out of 5 million. FDR took in over 130,000 Jewish Refugees out of just over 500,000. I mean we've taken in less than .4% of Syrian refugees. He took in about 25% of Jewish Refugees despite his isolationist leanings.

You are saying that's proof he was a racist. Ok, what refugee crisis has the US answered better? What foreign refugee crisis did a president step up and say "we'll take more than FDR took"?? Because if the LARGEST refugee adoption in US history (though not the largest worldwide refugee crisis) was FDR taking in the jews, it's not making him look anti-semitic is it?


WHEN YOU HAVE TO CREATE OR RE-USE LIES TO SUPPORT YOUR ARGUMENT IT RUINS YOUR ARGUMENT.

Yeah- it is pretty odd.

In order to support there argument that FDR was an anti-semite- they want to portray him as blocking Jewish refugees from Europe.

But Donald Trump ran on a platform of blocking Muslim refugees from the Middle East- and they will argue on and on that that is not bigoted at all.

Donald Trump said that Mexicans are rapists. FDR never called Jews rapists.

"....of blocking Muslim refugees...."


I know you're an imbecile...but equating Jewish folk who wanted nothing more than being allowed to live with 7th century savages who dedicate their existence to the slaughter of innocent human being....

...well...makes you the perfect 'reliable Democrat voter.'

LOLOL

WTF?? The Muslim refugees coming here are 7th century savages, slaughtering innocent people??

Over 18,000 from Syria alone came here while Obama was president. How many of them are 7th century savages, slaughtering innocent people...?

What a disgusting pig you are.

They're all 7th century savages. .

Anyone other than myself find Brip claims about the Muslims eerily similar to what the Nazi's said about the Jews?

How many people did the Jews kill?

 

[bripat9643]

The USSR partnered with Nazi Germany with carving up Poland. They also invaded Finland. They were hardly better than Nazi Germany.

"hardly better than Nazi Germany" except for a couple things:
a) The USSR didn't attack the United States and
b) The USSR was allies with the United States and Great Britain in defeating Nazi Germany.

No doubt Stalin was every bit as much of a murdering asshole as Hitler. But we were not at war with that murderous asshole.

Nazi Germany didn't attack the United States.

We were allies with them only because the commie lover Roosevelt chose to be allies with them.

You know you're among the dumbest posters on this site, right?

Germany aligned themselves with Japan and declared war on us.

They didn't attack us, numskull. .

What the Nazi Fan Boys call "they didn't attack us"

The first U-boats reached U.S. waters on January 13, 1942. By the time they withdrew on February 6, they had sunk 156,939 tonnes of shipping without loss.

The U.S. had already declared war on Germany by that time, and U.S. were depth charging German submarines long before Dec 7, 1941.

 

[bripat9643]

They didn't attack us, numskull. FDR had been making war on them for over 2 years before they declared war on us.

How ironic thata snowflake with the reasoning capacity of a cockroach is calling me stupid.

Numbnuts... they aligned with the country which had just attacked us and they declared war against us. Just how fucking rightarded are you??

Roosevelt was trying to instigate war with Germany ever since it invaded Poland. American destroyers were using depth charges on German submarines the whole time. He also deliberately pushed Japan into attacking us.

Why do you insist on proving to the forum you're batshit insane? Everything you post, from that photo you idiotically claim was from the 1924 DNC, to this, is nothing but craziness from you.

The stuff I posted about FDR and Germany is simply a fact. Anyone who has read much about the war knows it.FDR was a demagogue who ran against American involvement into the war and then immediately started trying to sucker the voters into the war the minute he was elected. He's the lowest kind of douche bag politician, which is the reason leftwing cockroaches like you love him.

FDR was probably our most popular President ever- and led America to victory over Imperial- Fascist- Japan- and Nazi Germany, which is the reason contard assholes like you hate him.

Servile morons like you love goose stepping demagogues like FDR.

 

[Faun]

Yeah- it is pretty odd.

In order to support there argument that FDR was an anti-semite- they want to portray him as blocking Jewish refugees from Europe.

But Donald Trump ran on a platform of blocking Muslim refugees from the Middle East- and they will argue on and on that that is not bigoted at all.

Donald Trump said that Mexicans are rapists. FDR never called Jews rapists.

"....of blocking Muslim refugees...."


I know you're an imbecile...but equating Jewish folk who wanted nothing more than being allowed to live with 7th century savages who dedicate their existence to the slaughter of innocent human being....

...well...makes you the perfect 'reliable Democrat voter.'

LOLOL

WTF?? The Muslim refugees coming here are 7th century savages, slaughtering innocent people??

Over 18,000 from Syria alone came here while Obama was president. How many of them are 7th century savages, slaughtering innocent people...?

What a disgusting pig you are.

They're all 7th century savages. .

Anyone other than myself find Brip claims about the Muslims eerily similar to what the Nazi's said about the Jews?

How many people did the Jews kill?

Now it all makes sense. You're a fucking anti-Semitic kraut-defending nazi.

 

[bripat9643]

"....of blocking Muslim refugees...."


I know you're an imbecile...but equating Jewish folk who wanted nothing more than being allowed to live with 7th century savages who dedicate their existence to the slaughter of innocent human being....

...well...makes you the perfect 'reliable Democrat voter.'

LOLOL

WTF?? The Muslim refugees coming here are 7th century savages, slaughtering innocent people??

Over 18,000 from Syria alone came here while Obama was president. How many of them are 7th century savages, slaughtering innocent people...?

What a disgusting pig you are.

They're all 7th century savages. .

Anyone other than myself find Brip claims about the Muslims eerily similar to what the Nazi's said about the Jews?

How many people did the Jews kill?

Now it all makes sense. You're a fucking anti-Semitic kraut-defending nazi.

No, I'm simply not a brainwashed cockroach like you. I don't accept the leftwing PC version of history without question.

 

[Faun]

LOLOL

WTF?? The Muslim refugees coming here are 7th century savages, slaughtering innocent people??

Over 18,000 from Syria alone came here while Obama was president. How many of them are 7th century savages, slaughtering innocent people...?

What a disgusting pig you are.

They're all 7th century savages. .

Anyone other than myself find Brip claims about the Muslims eerily similar to what the Nazi's said about the Jews?

How many people did the Jews kill?

Now it all makes sense. You're a fucking anti-Semitic kraut-defending nazi.

No, I'm simply not a brainwashed cockroach like you. I don't accept the leftwing PC version of history without question.

You revealed your true colors when you blamed America and Jews, you POS.

 

[bripat9643]

They're all 7th century savages. .

Anyone other than myself find Brip claims about the Muslims eerily similar to what the Nazi's said about the Jews?

How many people did the Jews kill?

Now it all makes sense. You're a fucking anti-Semitic kraut-defending nazi.

No, I'm simply not a brainwashed cockroach like you. I don't accept the leftwing PC version of history without question.

You revealed your true colors when you blamed America and Jews, you POS.

I blamed FDR, and that's all. Of course, Americans are gullible and easily duped.

 

[Pogo]

Nope- just you lying again.
Remember- you lied and claimed that the Democrats placed a KKK member on the Supreme Court.

I pointed out your lie- by pointing out that Hugo Black was not a KKK member- and had not been a KKK member for over a decade when appointed to the Supreme Court.

You were just lying again.

But FDR did appoint the second Jewish Supreme Court Justice- and yes- he was actually Jewish when he was appointed.

"What U.S. President appointed members of the KKK to the U.S. Supreme Court?
7 Answers



Jerry Mc Kenna, Avid birder and amateur astronomer

Answered 11d ago

FDR appointed former KKK member Hugo Black in 1937. He said he left the KKK and he claims that he regretted joining. Hugo Black - Wikipedia

He was actively anti-Catholic.

"Hugo Black, a KKK member and US senator, gave fiery anti-Catholic speeches before going on to become a defender of civil liberties on the supreme court bench." (America's dark and not-very-distant history of hating Catholics)

Anti-Catholic bigotry was fashionable among what we would call liberals today."

https://www.quora.com/What-U-S-President-appointed-members-of-the-KKK-to-the-U-S-Supreme-Court



FDR appointed a KKKer as his first nominee to the Supreme Court.
And,...you're an imbecile.

Both of those are facts.

Quoting you:
FDR appointed former KKK member Hugo Black in 1937. He said he left the KKK and he claims that he regretted joining. Hugo Black - Wikipedia

'former KKK member'

Again- you are just lying.

As you always do.

Once a KKK member, always a KKK member.

Once a racist, always a racist....
Inside the government’s racial bias case against Donald Trump’s company, and how he fought it


Politics
Inside the government’s racial bias case against Donald Trump’s company, and how he fought it

The Washington Post - fake news.

Translation:​

 

[Syriusly]

LOLOL

WTF?? The Muslim refugees coming here are 7th century savages, slaughtering innocent people??

Over 18,000 from Syria alone came here while Obama was president. How many of them are 7th century savages, slaughtering innocent people...?

What a disgusting pig you are.

They're all 7th century savages. .

Anyone other than myself find Brip claims about the Muslims eerily similar to what the Nazi's said about the Jews?

How many people did the Jews kill?

Now it all makes sense. You're a fucking anti-Semitic kraut-defending nazi.

No, I'm simply not a brainwashed cockroach like you. I don't accept the leftwing PC version of history without question.

Of course not- because you are a brainwashed right wing cockroach- and you only believe the 'version' of history that your Dear Leaders tell you to believe.