Liberals On Abortion

[Rustic]

I never lie....you know that.

But....speaking of lies.....


Are these accurate quotes of yours?


“It's not a child, and it's not alive. To refer to a zygote or a fetus….”

Pro-abortion? Why?


“…pretend that those who are not yet living, are alive and have rights.”

"My Body, My Choice": The Worst Abortion Talking Points


“…a zygote is not a human being.”

"My Body, My Choice": The Worst Abortion Talking Points


“ It's not a "human being", until it's sentient, aware, and able to breathe on its own. “

Which should have first priority: The woman, the fertilized egg, or the fetus?



“The fetus is NOT a human being. “

The Politics of Pregnancy.


Seriously consider changing your avi to ‘DeadLizard.’

When the child can breathe on its own, unassisted, it's a living breathing person. Until then it is NOT. Not in science and not in the Bible.

How many pregnancies have you had? How many children. Your abject ignorance and your willingess to abdicate your right to make such a life-altering and personal decision to the government is the absolute antithesis of "freedom" and "free will", both of which you CLAIM to believe in, but in actuality, you support government overreach into your most personal decisions.

You hypocrisy and your claims to moral high grounds is laughable, and your claims that the government should have this power over you, shows that you are not in fact, in favour of freedom or God given free will.

A woman I knew was adamantly opposed to abortion rights and she railed against me marching in the pro-choice march when I was 6 months pregnant. In fact, the march organizers took one look at me and put me at the head of the march, holding the "Don't Lose the Right to Choose" banner. I knew I was carrying a girl baby, and I marched for both of us. This conservative friend was mortified that I would do such a thing. She had her first abortion when she was 15 and I've lost track of the number of abortions she's had. Three that I know of, but she opposed these rights for others.

My choice has always been to have the baby. That is what being "pro-choice" means. But then I've never been single or pregnant, or poor and pregnant. I was married, gainfully employed, and living in a country which gave me paid maternity leave, universal health care, and income supports for young families. A country that lives "family values" instead of talking about them.

If you don't believe in abortion, DON'T HAVE AN ABORTION. As for the rest of the women in America, what they do is NONE OF YOUR BUSINESS.

So you admit you did post every one of those absurd statement.....'lies'?????


Witness has admitted her guilt.....


.....take her away.

Did they take your hockey helmet away so the rest of the kids wouldn't you know you're "developmentally delayed" when you went to school.

I'm not your "witness", and my statements are all true. There is no guilt here, at least not on my part.

I support your right to choose to be an Judas goat for stripping women of their God given rights, but I will not let you lie with inpunity.

We just proved you to be a liar and a fool.

Why are you back?

You stupid bitch, once again claiming victory for yourself when you've done nothing, proven nothing, and have nothing, to back yourself up.

We've seen every one of your loser dog and pony show posts wherein you claim you're not lying, which in and of itself is a lie, that you're not as stupid as your posts would lead us to believe, and you've somehow proven us wrong, with links to Russian websites and fake news blogs.

Try finding one credible scientific source to back you up in your assertions that a fetus is a living human being. The Bible states that God formed Adam, shaped him, and then "breathed life" into him.

"Then the LORD God formed a man from the dust of the ground and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life, and the man became a living being".

He was formed, he was complete, but he wasn't a living being until he received the "breathe of life". We die when we cease to breathe, our bodies will die and very quickly. Two or three minutes at most. Unless a child draws a breathe, they are not considered a person under the law.

So prove you're not an idiot and find your proof that you're right.

Lol
You’re relying on political correctness as your common sense… It really shows how stupid you really are...
Yeah and it’s best if you keep your opinion to yourself

 

[Dragonlady]

When the child can breathe on its own, unassisted, it's a living breathing person. Until then it is NOT. Not in science and not in the Bible.

How many pregnancies have you had? How many children. Your abject ignorance and your willingess to abdicate your right to make such a life-altering and personal decision to the government is the absolute antithesis of "freedom" and "free will", both of which you CLAIM to believe in, but in actuality, you support government overreach into your most personal decisions.

You hypocrisy and your claims to moral high grounds is laughable, and your claims that the government should have this power over you, shows that you are not in fact, in favour of freedom or God given free will.

A woman I knew was adamantly opposed to abortion rights and she railed against me marching in the pro-choice march when I was 6 months pregnant. In fact, the march organizers took one look at me and put me at the head of the march, holding the "Don't Lose the Right to Choose" banner. I knew I was carrying a girl baby, and I marched for both of us. This conservative friend was mortified that I would do such a thing. She had her first abortion when she was 15 and I've lost track of the number of abortions she's had. Three that I know of, but she opposed these rights for others.

My choice has always been to have the baby. That is what being "pro-choice" means. But then I've never been single or pregnant, or poor and pregnant. I was married, gainfully employed, and living in a country which gave me paid maternity leave, universal health care, and income supports for young families. A country that lives "family values" instead of talking about them.

If you don't believe in abortion, DON'T HAVE AN ABORTION. As for the rest of the women in America, what they do is NONE OF YOUR BUSINESS.

So you admit you did post every one of those absurd statement.....'lies'?????


Witness has admitted her guilt.....


.....take her away.

Did they take your hockey helmet away so the rest of the kids wouldn't you know you're "developmentally delayed" when you went to school.

I'm not your "witness", and my statements are all true. There is no guilt here, at least not on my part.

I support your right to choose to be an Judas goat for stripping women of their God given rights, but I will not let you lie with inpunity.

We just proved you to be a liar and a fool.

Why are you back?

You stupid bitch, once again claiming victory for yourself when you've done nothing, proven nothing, and have nothing, to back yourself up.

We've seen every one of your loser dog and pony show posts wherein you claim you're not lying, which in and of itself is a lie, that you're not as stupid as your posts would lead us to believe, and you've somehow proven us wrong, with links to Russian websites and fake news blogs.

Try finding one credible scientific source to back you up in your assertions that a fetus is a living human being. The Bible states that God formed Adam, shaped him, and then "breathed life" into him.

"Then the LORD God formed a man from the dust of the ground and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life, and the man became a living being".

He was formed, he was complete, but he wasn't a living being until he received the "breathe of life". We die when we cease to breathe, our bodies will die and very quickly. Two or three minutes at most. Unless a child draws a breathe, they are not considered a person under the law.

So prove you're not an idiot and find your proof that you're right.

Lol
You’re relying on political correctness as your common sense… It really shows how stupid you really are...
Yeah and it’s best if you keep your opinion to yourself

You first Evgeny.

I'm relying upon facts, evidence, and science, all of which fools like you and Political Hack deny.

 

[JoeB131]

We should definitely show Obama using his pen and his phone, applying governmental pressure on police and school systems, to make certain that minority thugs were not arrested, and, hence could not pass gun background checks, so that murderers like Nikolas Cruz could legally buy the gun he used to slaughter 17 innocents.

Again, the fact he could get a gun was the problem, not that they didn't arrest a privileged white boy for being a behavior problem, which they never do anyway.

If they were throwing white boys in prison for that kind of behavior, it would be a different story. They weren't.

 

[PoliticalChic]

"California Governor Clarifies That Free Healthcare Only Offered To Illegal Immigrants Who've Made It Safely Out Of The Womb
July 11th, 2019

SACRAMENTO, CA—California is offering free healthcare to illegal immigrants, once again becoming the first state in the nation to enact a wacky proposal that sounds like the right's satire of the left and not an actual policy.

But Governor Gavin Newsom was quickly forced to clarify that the free healthcare offer only applies to immigrants who've made it safely out of the womb. Immigrants who are still in the womb are still subject to killing at a moment's notice.

"We wanted to do the compassionate thing here," Newsom said at a press conference. "We have to pay for the healthcare of people who are coming here illegally, even though many of our own citizens don't have healthcare coverage."

Newsom said that once the announcement was made, however, unborn immigrant babies got the idea that they would be safe, protected, and cared for in the state. "Nothing could be further from the truth," he clarified. "If you're not born, you're fair game for having your brains suctioned out." The governor recommended that unborn babies evacuate the womb "as quickly as possible" in order to qualify for the free healthcare offer.

"If I were you, I'd be hightailing it out of there, because, hoo boy---we'll kill ya."
California Governor Clarifies That Free Healthcare Only Offered To Illegal Immigrants Who've Made It Safely Out Of The Womb

 

[BlindBoo]

"California Governor Clarifies That Free Healthcare Only Offered To Illegal Immigrants Who've Made It Safely Out Of The Womb
July 11th, 2019

SACRAMENTO, CA—California is offering free healthcare to illegal immigrants, once again becoming the first state in the nation to enact a wacky proposal that sounds like the right's satire of the left and not an actual policy.

But Governor Gavin Newsom was quickly forced to clarify that the free healthcare offer only applies to immigrants who've made it safely out of the womb. Immigrants who are still in the womb are still subject to killing at a moment's notice.

"We wanted to do the compassionate thing here," Newsom said at a press conference. "We have to pay for the healthcare of people who are coming here illegally, even though many of our own citizens don't have healthcare coverage."

Newsom said that once the announcement was made, however, unborn immigrant babies got the idea that they would be safe, protected, and cared for in the state. "Nothing could be further from the truth," he clarified. "If you're not born, you're fair game for having your brains suctioned out." The governor recommended that unborn babies evacuate the womb "as quickly as possible" in order to qualify for the free healthcare offer.

"If I were you, I'd be hightailing it out of there, because, hoo boy---we'll kill ya."
California Governor Clarifies That Free Healthcare Only Offered To Illegal Immigrants Who've Made It Safely Out Of The Womb

Fake News You Can Trust.

 

[Dana7360]

I mean real Liberals, those with integrity and a reputable view of the world, not the mind numbed variety that adhere to the Democrats no matter how insane their current agenda is.




1.Perhaps you’ve noticed that today the strongest Liberals/Democrats are those with the least ability to analyze what they are supporting. As a result, just as Orwell predicted in 1984, they can’t keep straight whether they are at war with Eastasia, or Eurasia. They need not keep track, they simply agree that the enemy at the moment is whoever the leadership says it is.
And today it is the unborn.

Hence, the Liberals were against gay marriage before they were for it. They opposed socialism before they were for it. And they opposed nuclear weapons for Iran before they were in favor of it.
So, no big deal to want to exterminate the defenseless.....

They are clueless to 180° turns by the party. Morons simply march lock-step via the party’s orders.





I came across an interesting real-Liberal essay opposing abortion, and it is instructive to peruse.


2.“Abortion: The Left has betrayed the sanctity of life From The Progressive magazine. Abortion: The Left has betrayed the sanctity of life
Consistency demands concern for the unborn

The abortion issue, more than most, illustrates the occasional tendency of the Left to become so enthusiastic over what is called a "reform" that it forgets to think the issue through. It is ironic that so many on the Left have done on abortion what the conservatives and Cold War liberals did on Vietnam: They marched off in the wrong direction, to fight the wrong war, against the wrong people.

3. Some of us … are now active in the right-to-life movement. We do not enjoy opposing our old friends on the abortion issue, but we feel that we have no choice. We are moved by what pro-life feminists call the "consistency thing" -- the belief that respect for human life demands opposition to abortion, capital punishment, euthanasia, and war. We don't think we have either the luxury or the right to choose some types of killing and say that they are all right, while others are not. A human life is a human life; and if equality means anything, it means that society may not value some human lives over others.




4. Until the last decade, people on the Left and Right generally agreed on one rule: We all protected the young. This was not merely agreement on an ethical question: It was also an expression of instinct, so deep and ancient that it scarcely required explanation. Protection of the young included protection of the unborn, for abortion was forbidden by state laws throughout the United States. Those laws reflected an ethical consensus, not based solely on religious tradition but also on scientific evidence that human life begins at conception. The prohibition of abortion in the ancient Hippocratic Oath is well known.

5. …it is important to ask why the Left in the United States generally accepted legalized abortion. One factor was the popular civil libertarian rationale for freedom of choice in abortion. Many feminists presented it as a right of women to control their own bodies. When the objection was raised that abortion ruins another person's body, they respond that a) it is not a body, just a "blob of protoplasm" (thereby displaying ignorance of biology); or b) it is not really a "person" until it is born.

When it was suggested that this is a wholly arbitrary decision, unsupported by any biology evidence, they said, "Well, that's your point of view. This is a matter of individual conscience, and in a pluralistic society people must be free to follow their consciences."




Thinking Liberals, largely an oxymoron today, continue embracing rectitude over party loyalty.

Abortion is murder. Simple as that.

Have you seen the latest meme...."Post-birth abortion"?

No I have not.

"We claim that killing a newborn could be ethically permissible in all the circumstances where abortion would be. Such circumstances include cases where the newborn has the potential to have an (at least) acceptable life, but the well-being of the family is at risk,” the article reads. “We propose to call this practice ‘after-birth abortion,’ rather than ‘infanticide,’ to emphasise that the moral status of the individual killed is comparable with that of a fetus (on which ‘abortions’ in the traditional sense are performed) rather than to that of a child.”
https://www.washingtonpost.com/blog...3/gIQADgiOsR_blog.html?utm_term=.76c7aaae55a8

Got anything from an actual American liberal or politicians who made this type of claim in the last 5 or 6 years?

An open letter from Giubilini and Minerva | Journal of Medical Ethics blog

An open letter from Giubilini and Minerva

"However, we never meant to suggest that after-birth abortion should become legal. This was not made clear enough in the paper. Laws are not just about rational ethical arguments, because there are many practical, emotional, social aspects that are relevant in policy making (such as respecting the plurality of ethical views, people’s emotional reactions etc). But we are not policy makers, we are philosophers, and we deal with concepts, not with legal policy.

Moreover, we did not suggest that after birth abortion should be permissible for months or years as the media erroneously reported.

If we wanted to suggest something about policy, we would have written, for example, a comment related the Groningen Protocol (in the Netherlands), which is a guideline that permits killing newborns under certain circumstances (e.g. when the newborn is affected by serious diseases). But we do not discuss guidelines in the paper. Rather we acknowledged the fact that such a protocol exists and this is a good reason to discuss the topic (and probably also for publishing papers on this topic).

However, the content of (the abstract of) the paper started to be picked up by newspapers, radio and on the web. What people understood was that we were in favour of killing people. This, of course, is not what we suggested. This is easier to see when our thesis is read in the context of the history of the debate........"

By definition it's impossible to abort a baby once it's born.

 

[anynameyouwish]

NorthKoreaChic doesn't want to live in a free society. Maybe she should move back to you know where.

Sez the native American Indian Chief? (I doubt it.)
Political Chic is an asset to America, dear. Put the bong down. Can you say the same for yourself?

political chic is a heartless barbarian who would "understand" if her political "enemies" were dealt with as the traitors she believes them to be.

If you agree with her then........shoe.....foot.....

 

[Bush92]

Abortion is murder. Simple as that.

Have you seen the latest meme...."Post-birth abortion"?

No I have not.

"We claim that killing a newborn could be ethically permissible in all the circumstances where abortion would be. Such circumstances include cases where the newborn has the potential to have an (at least) acceptable life, but the well-being of the family is at risk,” the article reads. “We propose to call this practice ‘after-birth abortion,’ rather than ‘infanticide,’ to emphasise that the moral status of the individual killed is comparable with that of a fetus (on which ‘abortions’ in the traditional sense are performed) rather than to that of a child.”
https://www.washingtonpost.com/blog...3/gIQADgiOsR_blog.html?utm_term=.76c7aaae55a8

Got anything from an actual American liberal or politicians who made this type of claim in the last 5 or 6 years?

An open letter from Giubilini and Minerva | Journal of Medical Ethics blog

An open letter from Giubilini and Minerva

"However, we never meant to suggest that after-birth abortion should become legal. This was not made clear enough in the paper. Laws are not just about rational ethical arguments, because there are many practical, emotional, social aspects that are relevant in policy making (such as respecting the plurality of ethical views, people’s emotional reactions etc). But we are not policy makers, we are philosophers, and we deal with concepts, not with legal policy.

Moreover, we did not suggest that after birth abortion should be permissible for months or years as the media erroneously reported.

If we wanted to suggest something about policy, we would have written, for example, a comment related the Groningen Protocol (in the Netherlands), which is a guideline that permits killing newborns under certain circumstances (e.g. when the newborn is affected by serious diseases). But we do not discuss guidelines in the paper. Rather we acknowledged the fact that such a protocol exists and this is a good reason to discuss the topic (and probably also for publishing papers on this topic).

However, the content of (the abstract of) the paper started to be picked up by newspapers, radio and on the web. What people understood was that we were in favour of killing people. This, of course, is not what we suggested. This is easier to see when our thesis is read in the context of the history of the debate........"

By definition it's impossible to abort a baby once it's born.

Liberals want to kill human life in the mother’s body. Sick.

 

[Bush92]

NorthKoreaChic doesn't want to live in a free society. Maybe she should move back to you know where.

Sez the native American Indian Chief? (I doubt it.)
Political Chic is an asset to America, dear. Put the bong down. Can you say the same for yourself?

political chic is a heartless barbarian who would "understand" if her political "enemies" were dealt with as the traitors she believes them to be.

If you agree with her then........shoe.....foot.....

Political Chic is correct in her beliefs and that makes her a decent human being.

 

[Bush92]

"California Governor Clarifies That Free Healthcare Only Offered To Illegal Immigrants Who've Made It Safely Out Of The Womb
July 11th, 2019

SACRAMENTO, CA—California is offering free healthcare to illegal immigrants, once again becoming the first state in the nation to enact a wacky proposal that sounds like the right's satire of the left and not an actual policy.

But Governor Gavin Newsom was quickly forced to clarify that the free healthcare offer only applies to immigrants who've made it safely out of the womb. Immigrants who are still in the womb are still subject to killing at a moment's notice.

"We wanted to do the compassionate thing here," Newsom said at a press conference. "We have to pay for the healthcare of people who are coming here illegally, even though many of our own citizens don't have healthcare coverage."

Newsom said that once the announcement was made, however, unborn immigrant babies got the idea that they would be safe, protected, and cared for in the state. "Nothing could be further from the truth," he clarified. "If you're not born, you're fair game for having your brains suctioned out." The governor recommended that unborn babies evacuate the womb "as quickly as possible" in order to qualify for the free healthcare offer.

"If I were you, I'd be hightailing it out of there, because, hoo boy---we'll kill ya."
California Governor Clarifies That Free Healthcare Only Offered To Illegal Immigrants Who've Made It Safely Out Of The Womb

This man is more dangerous to our American Republic than Putin, China, or Iran. Liberals exist to destroy our country.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Abortion is murder. Simple as that.

Have you seen the latest meme...."Post-birth abortion"?

No I have not.

"We claim that killing a newborn could be ethically permissible in all the circumstances where abortion would be. Such circumstances include cases where the newborn has the potential to have an (at least) acceptable life, but the well-being of the family is at risk,” the article reads. “We propose to call this practice ‘after-birth abortion,’ rather than ‘infanticide,’ to emphasise that the moral status of the individual killed is comparable with that of a fetus (on which ‘abortions’ in the traditional sense are performed) rather than to that of a child.”
https://www.washingtonpost.com/blog...3/gIQADgiOsR_blog.html?utm_term=.76c7aaae55a8

Got anything from an actual American liberal or politicians who made this type of claim in the last 5 or 6 years?

An open letter from Giubilini and Minerva | Journal of Medical Ethics blog

An open letter from Giubilini and Minerva

"However, we never meant to suggest that after-birth abortion should become legal. This was not made clear enough in the paper. Laws are not just about rational ethical arguments, because there are many practical, emotional, social aspects that are relevant in policy making (such as respecting the plurality of ethical views, people’s emotional reactions etc). But we are not policy makers, we are philosophers, and we deal with concepts, not with legal policy.

Moreover, we did not suggest that after birth abortion should be permissible for months or years as the media erroneously reported.

If we wanted to suggest something about policy, we would have written, for example, a comment related the Groningen Protocol (in the Netherlands), which is a guideline that permits killing newborns under certain circumstances (e.g. when the newborn is affected by serious diseases). But we do not discuss guidelines in the paper. Rather we acknowledged the fact that such a protocol exists and this is a good reason to discuss the topic (and probably also for publishing papers on this topic).

However, the content of (the abstract of) the paper started to be picked up by newspapers, radio and on the web. What people understood was that we were in favour of killing people. This, of course, is not what we suggested. This is easier to see when our thesis is read in the context of the history of the debate........"

By definition it's impossible to abort a baby once it's born.

Remedial education on the way:



"We claim that killing a newborn could be ethically permissible in all the circumstances where abortion would be. Such circumstances include cases where the newborn has the potential to have an (at least) acceptable life, but the well-being of the family is at risk,” the article reads. “We propose to call this practice ‘after-birth abortion,’ rather than ‘infanticide,’ to emphasise that the moral status of the individual killed is comparable with that of a fetus (on which ‘abortions’ in the traditional sense are performed) rather than to that of a child.”
https://www.washingtonpost.com/blog...3/gIQADgiOsR_blog.html?utm_term=.76c7aaae55a8



Abortion proponents like to paint pro-lifers as extremists who go to great lengths to take away the rights of women. However, many of these abortion activists have views that are legitimately extreme and quite frankly, horrifying. Take, for example, the position that abortion should be legal in cases where the parents conceive a girl but they wanted a boy. Some activists would say women should have the right to an abortion because they shouldn’t be forced to have a child they don’t want.
After-Birth Abortions: College Students Increasingly Support Infanticide | LifeNews.com

 

[BlindBoo]

By definition it's impossible to abort a baby once it's born.

No doubt. I'd say they were discussing the ethics of euthanasia, not after-birth abortion.

That's just a not "cutting edge" enough description I guess.

 

[Bush92]

NorthKoreaChic doesn't want to live in a free society. Maybe she should move back to you know where.

Sez the native American Indian Chief? (I doubt it.)
Political Chic is an asset to America, dear. Put the bong down. Can you say the same for yourself?

political chic is a heartless barbarian who would "understand" if her political "enemies" were dealt with as the traitors she believes them to be.

If you agree with her then........shoe.....foot.....

Political Chic doesn’t believe in the neo-Holocaust called “abortion.” Perhaps you should wake-up and look at what liberals are doing to a great country.

 

[BlindBoo]

"California Governor Clarifies That Free Healthcare Only Offered To Illegal Immigrants Who've Made It Safely Out Of The Womb
July 11th, 2019

SACRAMENTO, CA—California is offering free healthcare to illegal immigrants, once again becoming the first state in the nation to enact a wacky proposal that sounds like the right's satire of the left and not an actual policy.

But Governor Gavin Newsom was quickly forced to clarify that the free healthcare offer only applies to immigrants who've made it safely out of the womb. Immigrants who are still in the womb are still subject to killing at a moment's notice.

"We wanted to do the compassionate thing here," Newsom said at a press conference. "We have to pay for the healthcare of people who are coming here illegally, even though many of our own citizens don't have healthcare coverage."

Newsom said that once the announcement was made, however, unborn immigrant babies got the idea that they would be safe, protected, and cared for in the state. "Nothing could be further from the truth," he clarified. "If you're not born, you're fair game for having your brains suctioned out." The governor recommended that unborn babies evacuate the womb "as quickly as possible" in order to qualify for the free healthcare offer.

"If I were you, I'd be hightailing it out of there, because, hoo boy---we'll kill ya."
California Governor Clarifies That Free Healthcare Only Offered To Illegal Immigrants Who've Made It Safely Out Of The Womb

This man is more dangerous to our American Republic than Putin, China, or Iran. Liberals exist to destroy our country.

No. Stupid people are infinitely more dangerous.

 

[Bush92]

By definition it's impossible to abort a baby once it's born.

No doubt. I'd say they were discussing the ethics of euthanasia, not after-birth abortion.

That's just a not "cutting edge" enough description I guess.

Abortion is murder. Period. Euthanasia is up to an adult person making their own life choices. Unborn are helpless victims.

 

[Bush92]

"California Governor Clarifies That Free Healthcare Only Offered To Illegal Immigrants Who've Made It Safely Out Of The Womb
July 11th, 2019

SACRAMENTO, CA—California is offering free healthcare to illegal immigrants, once again becoming the first state in the nation to enact a wacky proposal that sounds like the right's satire of the left and not an actual policy.

But Governor Gavin Newsom was quickly forced to clarify that the free healthcare offer only applies to immigrants who've made it safely out of the womb. Immigrants who are still in the womb are still subject to killing at a moment's notice.

"We wanted to do the compassionate thing here," Newsom said at a press conference. "We have to pay for the healthcare of people who are coming here illegally, even though many of our own citizens don't have healthcare coverage."

Newsom said that once the announcement was made, however, unborn immigrant babies got the idea that they would be safe, protected, and cared for in the state. "Nothing could be further from the truth," he clarified. "If you're not born, you're fair game for having your brains suctioned out." The governor recommended that unborn babies evacuate the womb "as quickly as possible" in order to qualify for the free healthcare offer.

"If I were you, I'd be hightailing it out of there, because, hoo boy---we'll kill ya."
California Governor Clarifies That Free Healthcare Only Offered To Illegal Immigrants Who've Made It Safely Out Of The Womb

This man is more dangerous to our American Republic than Putin, China, or Iran. Liberals exist to destroy our country.

No. Stupid people are infinitely more dangerous.

Yes. Liberals. Thank you.

 

[BlindBoo]

By definition it's impossible to abort a baby once it's born.

No doubt. I'd say they were discussing the ethics of euthanasia, not after-birth abortion.

That's just a not "cutting edge" enough description I guess.

Abortion is murder. Period. Euthanasia is up to an adult person making their own life choices. Unborn are helpless victims.

Abortion is not murder. Euthanasia: the act or practice of killing or permitting the death of hopelessly sick or injured individuals (such as persons or domestic animals) in a relatively painless way for reasons of mercy.

Philosophers are the real danger here.

 

[Bush92]

"California Governor Clarifies That Free Healthcare Only Offered To Illegal Immigrants Who've Made It Safely Out Of The Womb
July 11th, 2019

SACRAMENTO, CA—California is offering free healthcare to illegal immigrants, once again becoming the first state in the nation to enact a wacky proposal that sounds like the right's satire of the left and not an actual policy.

But Governor Gavin Newsom was quickly forced to clarify that the free healthcare offer only applies to immigrants who've made it safely out of the womb. Immigrants who are still in the womb are still subject to killing at a moment's notice.

"We wanted to do the compassionate thing here," Newsom said at a press conference. "We have to pay for the healthcare of people who are coming here illegally, even though many of our own citizens don't have healthcare coverage."

Newsom said that once the announcement was made, however, unborn immigrant babies got the idea that they would be safe, protected, and cared for in the state. "Nothing could be further from the truth," he clarified. "If you're not born, you're fair game for having your brains suctioned out." The governor recommended that unborn babies evacuate the womb "as quickly as possible" in order to qualify for the free healthcare offer.

"If I were you, I'd be hightailing it out of there, because, hoo boy---we'll kill ya."
California Governor Clarifies That Free Healthcare Only Offered To Illegal Immigrants Who've Made It Safely Out Of The Womb

This man is more dangerous to our American Republic than Putin, China, or Iran. Liberals exist to destroy our country.

No. Stupid people are infinitely more dangerous.

How could anyone hold a baby in their arms at any point during their life and support abortion?

 

[BlindBoo]

"California Governor Clarifies That Free Healthcare Only Offered To Illegal Immigrants Who've Made It Safely Out Of The Womb
July 11th, 2019

SACRAMENTO, CA—California is offering free healthcare to illegal immigrants, once again becoming the first state in the nation to enact a wacky proposal that sounds like the right's satire of the left and not an actual policy.

But Governor Gavin Newsom was quickly forced to clarify that the free healthcare offer only applies to immigrants who've made it safely out of the womb. Immigrants who are still in the womb are still subject to killing at a moment's notice.

"We wanted to do the compassionate thing here," Newsom said at a press conference. "We have to pay for the healthcare of people who are coming here illegally, even though many of our own citizens don't have healthcare coverage."

Newsom said that once the announcement was made, however, unborn immigrant babies got the idea that they would be safe, protected, and cared for in the state. "Nothing could be further from the truth," he clarified. "If you're not born, you're fair game for having your brains suctioned out." The governor recommended that unborn babies evacuate the womb "as quickly as possible" in order to qualify for the free healthcare offer.

"If I were you, I'd be hightailing it out of there, because, hoo boy---we'll kill ya."
California Governor Clarifies That Free Healthcare Only Offered To Illegal Immigrants Who've Made It Safely Out Of The Womb

This man is more dangerous to our American Republic than Putin, China, or Iran. Liberals exist to destroy our country.

No. Stupid people are infinitely more dangerous.

Yes. Liberals. Thank you.

Stupid ones are. You're welcome.

 

[Bush92]

By definition it's impossible to abort a baby once it's born.

No doubt. I'd say they were discussing the ethics of euthanasia, not after-birth abortion.

That's just a not "cutting edge" enough description I guess.

Abortion is murder. Period. Euthanasia is up to an adult person making their own life choices. Unborn are helpless victims.

Abortion is not murder. Euthanasia: the act or practice of killing or permitting the death of hopelessly sick or injured individuals (such as persons or domestic animals) in a relatively painless way for reasons of mercy.

Philosophers are the real danger here.

Abortion is murder. Typical misguided narcissistic unethical liberal angle.