Liberals Trying To Start A Race War Over Ferguson

[PaintMyHouse]

It's the jury system they want to do away with. It has failed them by finding non blacks innocent. The Duke Lacrosse boys walked. George Zimmerman walked. Darren Wilson didn't even have enough evidence to charge. Justice by mob. Instantly. No expensive trials.

It's why blacks aren't responsible enough to be in power. They reacts to things without thinking.

Stupid ******* eh? Got it.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

I've been looking at tumblr all evening and nonsense about murder and injustice is plastered all over the place.

I'm sure it's the same all over Twitter.

These assholes are trying to start a race-war.

Well I wish they would stop fucking around and get on with it.
I mean seriously,do they think tearing down their own neighborhoods is going to piss us off?
They can come on out to my house when they get serious,because right now all I see is a bunch of amateurs.

 

[paulitician]

The Democratic Party is solely responsible for creating this 'Grievance/Entitlement' Nation we've become.' They've created Millions & Millions of programmed robots who see themselves as permanent victims with endless grievances. These bots truly believe the deserve something because they're 'poor victims.'

It really is all about the Community (Communist) Organizing. People really should read up on Saul Alinsky's 'Rules for Radicals.' They need to get better-informed on the Communist/Democrat agenda.

Better yet just read the damn book, it's not what you've been told.

We have become a 'Grievance/Entitlement' Nation. And that's exactly what the Communists/Democrats have always wanted. Millions & Millions of people rushing to claim they're 'victims' of something. It is what it is.

American is a nation of selfish children, that's what is.

Yeah, it seems everyone wants to play the victim these days. Gotta have a grievance. It justifies them demanding something for nothing. Because after all, they are 'victims' right?

 

[PaintMyHouse]

The Democratic Party is solely responsible for creating this 'Grievance/Entitlement' Nation we've become.' They've created Millions & Millions of programmed robots who see themselves as permanent victims with endless grievances. These bots truly believe the deserve something because they're 'poor victims.'

It really is all about the Community (Communist) Organizing. People really should read up on Saul Alinsky's 'Rules for Radicals.' They need to get better-informed on the Communist/Democrat agenda.

Better yet just read the damn book, it's not what you've been told.

We have become a 'Grievance/Entitlement' Nation. And that's exactly what the Communists/Democrats have always wanted. Millions & Millions of people rushing to claim they're 'victims' of something. It is what it is.

American is a nation of selfish children, that's what is.

Yeah, it seems everyone wants to play the victim these days. Gotta have a grievance. It justifies them demanding something for nothing. Because after all, they are 'victims' right?

The conservative Christians sure believe themselves to be.

 

[SwimExpert]

Didn't you know that the Trayvon Martin Case and the Michael Brown case have been promoted by the Liberal Media in order to brainwash the people to accept the abolition of Trial by Jury?

I think I made three threads on this during the Trayvon Martin Cases.

And all this time I thought it was just the media's way of trying to rack up ratings and make themselves millions of dollars. What was I thinking?

 

[Theowl32]

The Democratic Party is solely responsible for creating this 'Grievance/Entitlement' Nation we've become.' They've created Millions & Millions of programmed robots who see themselves as permanent victims with endless grievances. These bots truly believe the deserve something because they're 'poor victims.'

It really is all about the Community (Communist) Organizing. People really should read up on Saul Alinsky's 'Rules for Radicals.' They need to get better-informed on the Communist/Democrat agenda.

Everything the democrats do is about establishing socialism. This has been the goal for a long time. Since the ACLU was established by Roger Baldwin.

They have been winning the minds of the young impressionable minds, who always think they know everything.

 

[jc456]

Michael Brown died for your sins. Black on black crime is the bigger issue, why no riots on that?

because it is the white cops that is the problem. It's ok to kill a black if you're black.

 

[jc456]

The Democratic Party is solely responsible for creating this 'Grievance/Entitlement' Nation we've become.' They've created Millions & Millions of programmed robots who see themselves as permanent victims with endless grievances. These bots truly believe the deserve something because they're 'poor victims.'

It really is all about the Community (Communist) Organizing. People really should read up on Saul Alinsky's 'Rules for Radicals.' They need to get better-informed on the Communist/Democrat agenda.

Better yet just read the damn book, it's not what you've been told.

We have become a 'Grievance/Entitlement' Nation. And that's exactly what the Communists/Democrats have always wanted. Millions & Millions of people rushing to claim they're 'victims' of something. It is what it is.

American is a nation of selfish children, that's what is.

Yeah, it seems everyone wants to play the victim these days. Gotta have a grievance. It justifies them demanding something for nothing. Because after all, they are 'victims' right?

The conservative Christians sure believe themselves to be.

that's because we know it's right to listen to an officer of the law and we know not to attack them. Questions?

That seems to be a concept lost on the majority of black men, eh?

 

[jc456]

The Democratic Party is solely responsible for creating this 'Grievance/Entitlement' Nation we've become.' They've created Millions & Millions of programmed robots who see themselves as permanent victims with endless grievances. These bots truly believe the deserve something because they're 'poor victims.'

It really is all about the Community (Communist) Organizing. People really should read up on Saul Alinsky's 'Rules for Radicals.' They need to get better-informed on the Communist/Democrat agenda.

Everything the democrats do is about establishing socialism. This has been the goal for a long time. Since the ACLU was established by Roger Baldwin.

They have been winning the minds of the young impressionable minds, who always think they know everything.

and after fifty years those poor black folks are still nowhere where they should be. I think it is quite obvious the problem!!! eh?

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Better yet just read the damn book, it's not what you've been told.

We have become a 'Grievance/Entitlement' Nation. And that's exactly what the Communists/Democrats have always wanted. Millions & Millions of people rushing to claim they're 'victims' of something. It is what it is.

American is a nation of selfish children, that's what is.

Yeah, it seems everyone wants to play the victim these days. Gotta have a grievance. It justifies them demanding something for nothing. Because after all, they are 'victims' right?

The conservative Christians sure believe themselves to be.

that's because we know it's right to listen to an officer of the law and we know not to attack them. Questions?

That seems to be a concept lost on the majority of black men, eh?

Stupid *******, right?

 

[jc456]

We have become a 'Grievance/Entitlement' Nation. And that's exactly what the Communists/Democrats have always wanted. Millions & Millions of people rushing to claim they're 'victims' of something. It is what it is.

American is a nation of selfish children, that's what is.

Yeah, it seems everyone wants to play the victim these days. Gotta have a grievance. It justifies them demanding something for nothing. Because after all, they are 'victims' right?

The conservative Christians sure believe themselves to be.

that's because we know it's right to listen to an officer of the law and we know not to attack them. Questions?

That seems to be a concept lost on the majority of black men, eh?

Stupid *******, right?

yep, they have the democrats and black leaders to thank. I don't know, just seems sort of stupid to me.

Even those on the news reporting this, just stupid, gloss over the fact that at the time the two met, Brown was a suspect and attacked the cop. He, wait for it, attacked the cop. Not the other way around. This nutjob on the news last night was like why did the cop, why did the cop. And the reporter was no, what about the fact. (fact here) that brown attacked the cop. It doesn't matter in the land of the democrats!! It was because he was a white cop. That damn white cop made that black man attack him because the white cop told brown to get out of the street. But, nope white cop fault. I guess ignore him, eh?

 

[saintmichaeldefendthem]

It's the jury system they want to do away with. It has failed them by finding non blacks innocent. The Duke Lacrosse boys walked. George Zimmerman walked. Darren Wilson didn't even have enough evidence to charge. Justice by mob. Instantly. No expensive trials.

It's why blacks aren't responsible enough to be in power. They reacts to things without thinking.

Stupid ******* eh? Got it.

They've been rioting and burning down their own communities since the 1960's, and no other race has done that, not even mine. (N.A.) Yes, I think that rioting blacks are stupid *******. What of it?

 

[jc456]

It's the jury system they want to do away with. It has failed them by finding non blacks innocent. The Duke Lacrosse boys walked. George Zimmerman walked. Darren Wilson didn't even have enough evidence to charge. Justice by mob. Instantly. No expensive trials.

It's why blacks aren't responsible enough to be in power. They reacts to things without thinking.

Stupid ******* eh? Got it.

They've been rioting and burning down their own communities since the 1960's, and no other race has done that, not even mine. (N.A.) Yes, I think that rioting blacks are stupid *******. What of it?

yep and listening to those black leaders and democrats to lead them to the promise land. Yet the promise land never comes fifty years, so stupid is not lost on these folks. They're like, let's keep followng these democrats that keep us impoverished. And, they're more upset at one black death by the hands of white cop, then they are losing 70 at the hands of their own. how stupid is that? There is so much stupid going on, it's......

 

[HenryBHough]

OK, libs have removed all doubt that they favor mob rule.

 

[NoNukes]

Obama's Remarks on Ferguson Grand Jury Designed to 'Feed the Rage'

By Jack Coleman | November 25, 2014 | 8:20 PM EST

Seldom-heard praise for President Obama from Rush Limbaugh today -- wrapped within withering analysis of Obama's disingenuous remarks last night after a grand jury decided against indicting Ferguson, Mo., police officer Darren Wilson for the shooting death of Michael Brown in August.

Yet again, Obama fails to live up to his billing as a unifying figure, Limbaugh pointed out. Instead, he's just the opposite (audio) --

The grand jury system, I was kind of surprised. I know the legal beagles that I've listened to, a lot of legal people for whom I have great respect said, Rush, this is a slam dunk. There is, we've seen the evidence, as much as we've seen and as much as we've heard about, the testimony, there's no way this cop gets indicted. And I said yeah but that's not the way things happen in the country anymore. Everybody, episodes like this need sacrificial lambs and everybody's going to be focused on keeping the peace and everybody's going to be focused on, you know, just make the problem go away.

So I was surprised, grand jury system worked, despite enormous pressures exerted by the president's representative, Eric Holder, the attorney general. A police officer was not indicted and the president let it be known last night that if some people don't think justice was done, he understands. If some people are deeply upset and they don't think justice happened last night or the last two months, then he understands they're being upset. I think he missed a golden opportunity, I can't tell you how many golden opportunities this man has missed. He missed an opportunity last night, if he really cared about unity, he could have done a lot for it last night. If he really cares about bringing people together, if he really cares about a functioning, orderly society, even if he wants to transform it, he had a golden opportunity last night -- and he punted. He had 20 minutes of inane ramblings that were designed subtly to feed the rage. And he could have done so much. You do have to admit that he is, when he applies himself, a very persuasive and talented speaker and orator, when he applies himself. If it's on the teleprompter and the words he wants to use are there, then he can do it really well. Didn't even try. Didn't even try, it was just the exact opposite, it was so disappointing to me.

But then I had to stop and realize, that's not what Obama's about. Obama, transforming America, he knows it's going to be messy and he knows it's going to be filled with strife and he knows there's going to be a certain amount of chaos, that's unavoidable given the scope of the change he desires. He knows people aren't going to just sit idly by and let it happen, they're going to fight it, those who don't agree with it. And that is what community organizers do, they agitate, and that's what Obama sadly did last night was agitate. And he had a chance, he had a golden opportunity to do exact opposite, and he - didn't - even - try.

You see, to me what happened in Ferguson last night -- if you say, as the president did, it's an understandable reaction that there are Americans deeply upset, even angry, it's an understandable reaction -- how is it understandable? What if the rage and what if the anger is not legitimate? What if it's the product of, this is my whole point, the Democrat party, the American left, has created in its base supporters a degree of anger and rage that borders on the irrational. And they do it about everything! They do it about the Iraq war, they're doing it about the war on terror, they're doing it about virtually everything! And they keep their base supporters in a fevered pitch where their base supporters think virtually everybody is out to get 'em, that the deck is so unfairly stacked that they don't even have a chance, even with a man who is as historic as president, the first African-American. That doesn't even matter. You create this hopelessness, you create a circumstance where the foregone conclusion is disaster.

But why should the reaction last night be understandable when it isn't, really. I have to define understandable in the way Obama meant it. He meant it in a way of justifying it and that's where he missed a golden opportunity, but this is unnecessary and it's not going to change anything. It's not going to improve circumstances for anybody, it's going to make them worse for practically everybody involved -- other than the people that benefit from this. Who benefits from this chaos? Who benefits from this strife? Who benefits from the continuing racial strife in America? Who benefits from this? If you answer that question, you'll find out who's responsible for it. And don't doubt somebody benefits from it or it wouldn't happen.​

Yeah, he definitely has you in mind, Al Sharpton.



Right out of the gate when Obama made his remarks last night after the grand jury's decision was announced, he referred to two different responses -- "There are Americans who agree with it and there are Americans who are deeply disappointed, even angry. It's an understandable reaction."

... While agreeing with the grand jury is simply not an "understandable reaction," at least not to Obama and like-minded leftists. The signal is duly sent to the mob -- rampage away. After all, looting is merely socialism in a hurry.

Still, this pales compared to the shabby editorializing of NBC Nightly News anchor Brian Williams when he reported that the grand jury "failed" to bring charges against Officer Wilson. Kinda like when the U.S. Senate "failed" to convict Clinton in 1999?

- See more at: Rush Limbaugh Obama s Remarks on Ferguson Grand Jury Designed to Feed the Rage

You are turning into another Political Chic with these lengthy posts.

Why thank you!!!

Yo

Obama's Remarks on Ferguson Grand Jury Designed to 'Feed the Rage'

By Jack Coleman | November 25, 2014 | 8:20 PM EST

Seldom-heard praise for President Obama from Rush Limbaugh today -- wrapped within withering analysis of Obama's disingenuous remarks last night after a grand jury decided against indicting Ferguson, Mo., police officer Darren Wilson for the shooting death of Michael Brown in August.

Yet again, Obama fails to live up to his billing as a unifying figure, Limbaugh pointed out. Instead, he's just the opposite (audio) --

The grand jury system, I was kind of surprised. I know the legal beagles that I've listened to, a lot of legal people for whom I have great respect said, Rush, this is a slam dunk. There is, we've seen the evidence, as much as we've seen and as much as we've heard about, the testimony, there's no way this cop gets indicted. And I said yeah but that's not the way things happen in the country anymore. Everybody, episodes like this need sacrificial lambs and everybody's going to be focused on keeping the peace and everybody's going to be focused on, you know, just make the problem go away.

So I was surprised, grand jury system worked, despite enormous pressures exerted by the president's representative, Eric Holder, the attorney general. A police officer was not indicted and the president let it be known last night that if some people don't think justice was done, he understands. If some people are deeply upset and they don't think justice happened last night or the last two months, then he understands they're being upset. I think he missed a golden opportunity, I can't tell you how many golden opportunities this man has missed. He missed an opportunity last night, if he really cared about unity, he could have done a lot for it last night. If he really cares about bringing people together, if he really cares about a functioning, orderly society, even if he wants to transform it, he had a golden opportunity last night -- and he punted. He had 20 minutes of inane ramblings that were designed subtly to feed the rage. And he could have done so much. You do have to admit that he is, when he applies himself, a very persuasive and talented speaker and orator, when he applies himself. If it's on the teleprompter and the words he wants to use are there, then he can do it really well. Didn't even try. Didn't even try, it was just the exact opposite, it was so disappointing to me.

But then I had to stop and realize, that's not what Obama's about. Obama, transforming America, he knows it's going to be messy and he knows it's going to be filled with strife and he knows there's going to be a certain amount of chaos, that's unavoidable given the scope of the change he desires. He knows people aren't going to just sit idly by and let it happen, they're going to fight it, those who don't agree with it. And that is what community organizers do, they agitate, and that's what Obama sadly did last night was agitate. And he had a chance, he had a golden opportunity to do exact opposite, and he - didn't - even - try.

You see, to me what happened in Ferguson last night -- if you say, as the president did, it's an understandable reaction that there are Americans deeply upset, even angry, it's an understandable reaction -- how is it understandable? What if the rage and what if the anger is not legitimate? What if it's the product of, this is my whole point, the Democrat party, the American left, has created in its base supporters a degree of anger and rage that borders on the irrational. And they do it about everything! They do it about the Iraq war, they're doing it about the war on terror, they're doing it about virtually everything! And they keep their base supporters in a fevered pitch where their base supporters think virtually everybody is out to get 'em, that the deck is so unfairly stacked that they don't even have a chance, even with a man who is as historic as president, the first African-American. That doesn't even matter. You create this hopelessness, you create a circumstance where the foregone conclusion is disaster.

But why should the reaction last night be understandable when it isn't, really. I have to define understandable in the way Obama meant it. He meant it in a way of justifying it and that's where he missed a golden opportunity, but this is unnecessary and it's not going to change anything. It's not going to improve circumstances for anybody, it's going to make them worse for practically everybody involved -- other than the people that benefit from this. Who benefits from this chaos? Who benefits from this strife? Who benefits from the continuing racial strife in America? Who benefits from this? If you answer that question, you'll find out who's responsible for it. And don't doubt somebody benefits from it or it wouldn't happen.​

Yeah, he definitely has you in mind, Al Sharpton.



Right out of the gate when Obama made his remarks last night after the grand jury's decision was announced, he referred to two different responses -- "There are Americans who agree with it and there are Americans who are deeply disappointed, even angry. It's an understandable reaction."

... While agreeing with the grand jury is simply not an "understandable reaction," at least not to Obama and like-minded leftists. The signal is duly sent to the mob -- rampage away. After all, looting is merely socialism in a hurry.

Still, this pales compared to the shabby editorializing of NBC Nightly News anchor Brian Williams when he reported that the grand jury "failed" to bring charges against Officer Wilson. Kinda like when the U.S. Senate "failed" to convict Clinton in 1999?

- See more at: Rush Limbaugh Obama s Remarks on Ferguson Grand Jury Designed to Feed the Rage

You are turning into another Political Chic with these lengthy posts.

Why thank you!!!

u have always aspired to be a boring twit? I thought better of you.

 

[candycorn]

Obama's Remarks on Ferguson Grand Jury Designed to 'Feed the Rage'

By Jack Coleman | November 25, 2014 | 8:20 PM EST

Seldom-heard praise for President Obama from Rush Limbaugh today -- wrapped within withering analysis of Obama's disingenuous remarks last night after a grand jury decided against indicting Ferguson, Mo., police officer Darren Wilson for the shooting death of Michael Brown in August.

Yet again, Obama fails to live up to his billing as a unifying figure, Limbaugh pointed out. Instead, he's just the opposite (audio) --

The grand jury system, I was kind of surprised. I know the legal beagles that I've listened to, a lot of legal people for whom I have great respect said, Rush, this is a slam dunk. There is, we've seen the evidence, as much as we've seen and as much as we've heard about, the testimony, there's no way this cop gets indicted. And I said yeah but that's not the way things happen in the country anymore. Everybody, episodes like this need sacrificial lambs and everybody's going to be focused on keeping the peace and everybody's going to be focused on, you know, just make the problem go away.

So I was surprised, grand jury system worked, despite enormous pressures exerted by the president's representative, Eric Holder, the attorney general. A police officer was not indicted and the president let it be known last night that if some people don't think justice was done, he understands. If some people are deeply upset and they don't think justice happened last night or the last two months, then he understands they're being upset. I think he missed a golden opportunity, I can't tell you how many golden opportunities this man has missed. He missed an opportunity last night, if he really cared about unity, he could have done a lot for it last night. If he really cares about bringing people together, if he really cares about a functioning, orderly society, even if he wants to transform it, he had a golden opportunity last night -- and he punted. He had 20 minutes of inane ramblings that were designed subtly to feed the rage. And he could have done so much. You do have to admit that he is, when he applies himself, a very persuasive and talented speaker and orator, when he applies himself. If it's on the teleprompter and the words he wants to use are there, then he can do it really well. Didn't even try. Didn't even try, it was just the exact opposite, it was so disappointing to me.

But then I had to stop and realize, that's not what Obama's about. Obama, transforming America, he knows it's going to be messy and he knows it's going to be filled with strife and he knows there's going to be a certain amount of chaos, that's unavoidable given the scope of the change he desires. He knows people aren't going to just sit idly by and let it happen, they're going to fight it, those who don't agree with it. And that is what community organizers do, they agitate, and that's what Obama sadly did last night was agitate. And he had a chance, he had a golden opportunity to do exact opposite, and he - didn't - even - try.

You see, to me what happened in Ferguson last night -- if you say, as the president did, it's an understandable reaction that there are Americans deeply upset, even angry, it's an understandable reaction -- how is it understandable? What if the rage and what if the anger is not legitimate? What if it's the product of, this is my whole point, the Democrat party, the American left, has created in its base supporters a degree of anger and rage that borders on the irrational. And they do it about everything! They do it about the Iraq war, they're doing it about the war on terror, they're doing it about virtually everything! And they keep their base supporters in a fevered pitch where their base supporters think virtually everybody is out to get 'em, that the deck is so unfairly stacked that they don't even have a chance, even with a man who is as historic as president, the first African-American. That doesn't even matter. You create this hopelessness, you create a circumstance where the foregone conclusion is disaster.

But why should the reaction last night be understandable when it isn't, really. I have to define understandable in the way Obama meant it. He meant it in a way of justifying it and that's where he missed a golden opportunity, but this is unnecessary and it's not going to change anything. It's not going to improve circumstances for anybody, it's going to make them worse for practically everybody involved -- other than the people that benefit from this. Who benefits from this chaos? Who benefits from this strife? Who benefits from the continuing racial strife in America? Who benefits from this? If you answer that question, you'll find out who's responsible for it. And don't doubt somebody benefits from it or it wouldn't happen.​

Yeah, he definitely has you in mind, Al Sharpton.



Right out of the gate when Obama made his remarks last night after the grand jury's decision was announced, he referred to two different responses -- "There are Americans who agree with it and there are Americans who are deeply disappointed, even angry. It's an understandable reaction."

... While agreeing with the grand jury is simply not an "understandable reaction," at least not to Obama and like-minded leftists. The signal is duly sent to the mob -- rampage away. After all, looting is merely socialism in a hurry.

Still, this pales compared to the shabby editorializing of NBC Nightly News anchor Brian Williams when he reported that the grand jury "failed" to bring charges against Officer Wilson. Kinda like when the U.S. Senate "failed" to convict Clinton in 1999?

- See more at: Rush Limbaugh Obama s Remarks on Ferguson Grand Jury Designed to Feed the Rage

You,yourself defined blacks (an entire race) as "the problem". The only people trying to start a race war are conservatives. The only reason you think it is now a problem is that there are riots in the streets.

When you guys used to just gang up on people and lynch them...was that a "war" then or is it only a war when people fight back?

 

[Geaux4it]

This was just a trial run for when the financial collapse comes.

-Geaux

 

[Wildman]

The race war needs no start, it has been alive and well since we brought the ******* here in chains.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

plus...... .............................................

 

[Wildman]

It's the jury system they want to do away with. It has failed them by finding non blacks innocent. The Duke Lacrosse boys walked. George Zimmerman walked. Darren Wilson didn't even have enough evidence to charge. Justice by mob. Instantly. No expensive trials.

The men who killed little black girls walked. That's life in racist America...

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

IT IS ONLY RACIST IF YOU WANT IT TO BE !!

.........................................

 

[skookerasbil]

Im laughing.............

Here just 48 hours after the announcement, nobody is caring about these protests. In 2014, people have seen this retread movie before.......the savages go ballistic for a day or two and return to the tree's.

Lets face it.....at the end of the day, blacks know this beats Africa any day!! We'll always get a blip here and there and the media will pump it up for all its worth to get the ratings. A huge majority of the population got it even before the announcement.......nigga nigged and got his hat knocked off.