LILY ASSED WHITE

[ptbw forever]

We should get rid of welfare all together.

What will white people do if they get rid of welfare? It was created for them.

The white birth rate would skyrocket.

 

[Asclepias]

Nope. Whats being said here is that there are more whites on welfare than anyone else. Didnt you read the OP?

Yep, and I assumed he was just flaming.

Nailed it again.
,.

Obviously you didnt read the OP because for starters I didnt make the post and secondly you didnt understand what was being said. The only thing you have ever nailed was your finger.

Yes, you've really got one over on us here.

Everyone is very impressed, really, I promise.
.

You shouldnt be impressed because I pointed out your deflections.

But you're very smart to. We're all really crestfallen.

My white half is just drowning in shame and guilt now.

You really are intimidating.
.

Pointing out your deflections is easy and not something you should get intimidated over me doing.

 

[MACAULAY]

Hey, if there's a higher percentage of whites on welfare than blacks, then that's that.

That would mean that there's a higher likelihood that an individual white person is on welfare than an individual black person.

Is that what is being said here?
.

________________________

NO. You are about to fall for a common trick they like to play.

There is a much higher percentage of Blacks on Welfare than Whites.

But, there are so many more Whites...over 200 million...compared to around 40 million Blacks...that only 11% of Whites on Welfare would be the a bit more people 50% of Blacks on Welfare.

Half a century of The War on Poverty, The Great Society, and Affirmative Action....and Blacks are in worse shape than ever...more illegitimate babies who don't know who their father is...more crime.

And, still blaming Whitey for every problem they have.
_________

 

[Mac1958]

Hey everybody, there are more white people on welfare than, uh, minorities.

Just TRY looking in the mirror NOW, crackas.

 

[Asclepias]

We should get rid of welfare all together.

What will white people do if they get rid of welfare? It was created for them.

The white birth rate would skyrocket.

Youre dumber than i previously thought.

 

[Hossfly]

NEW REPORT: The States Doling Out The Most Welfare Are Lily-Assed White
June 1, 2016Dylan Hock Politics



If you have trouble understanding systemic racism, take note—this is one of many forms it can take. According to research in Disciplining the Poor, by Joe Soss, Richard C. Fording and Sanford F. Schram, states where a majority of citizens on welfare are white offer better assistance, longer, than in states where a majority of citizens on welfare are black or people of color.

Featured in The Atlantic, researchers in the book also claim “the political party in charge of the state legislature has a big influence on how generous that state is with welfare benefits.” States with higher average incomes lean toward offering those in need a better handle on the next rung up on the ladder to success: “states that have the highest percentage of white people on welfare are the most reluctant to cut people off.” If you’re black in a poor staterun by Republicans, however, for example—good luck to you.



Fun Fact
Take Oregon, for example, where whites make up 87 percent of the state’s population. There, they also make up 64 percent of folks on Temporary Aid to Needy Families (TANF). If you’re hard-up in Oregon, you can expect to receive benefits for as many as 60 months. After that, if you’re still struggling, your kids can continue to receive benefits at the very least. “[Forty-six] out of every 100 families with children in poverty are on TANF, one of the highest ratios in the country. Compare that to Louisiana, as The Atlantic did, where strapped families receive only 24 months of assistance, and when you’re cut off in Louisiana, you’re cut off. Benefits do not continue for your children just because you are poor. In fact, Louisiana comes in entirely last. The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities (CBPP) claims only 4.2 families out of every 100 receive assistance in Louisiana. Over in Vermont, however, “where 95 percent of the people and 95 percent of TANF recipients are white, 78.4 percent of families with children in poverty are getting benefits.”

Starting to see the picture?

In the wake of Bill Clinton signing the welfare reform bill back in 1996, states were given stronger control over welfare management. Many states chose to gut their programs, which comes as no surprise, but states such as Oregon decided to “fill in the holes.” Where the lines have been drawn since, and how, is quite revealing of the systemic racism so prevalent in the U.S., and let’s face it, the results of the research in Disciplining the Poor are, sadly, anything but surprising.

Just one example. Let's look at Vermont. 95% are white, 1% are black.
Your statistics are misleading. The link is all Vermont statistics.

Population Demographics for Vermont 2016 and 2015




List of Counties and Cities in Vermont

Population By Races
Race Population % of Total
Total Population 625,741 100
White 596,292 95
Two or More Races 10,753 1
Hispanic or Latino 9,208 1
Asian 7,947 1
Black or African American 6,277 1
American Indian 2,207 Below 1%
Some Other Race 2,105 Below 1%
Three or more races 610 Below 1%
Native Hawaiian Pacific Islander 160 Below 1%


Vermont Population demographics 2016, 2015

Are most of the people in Vermont on welfare white? Yes or no?

Yes, because there almost 600 thousand whites and around 6 thousand are black. What is the percentage of each race on welfare? They don't match your apples and oranges statistics.

 

[Yousaidwhat]

We should get rid of welfare all together.

What will white people do if they get rid of welfare? It was created for them.

The Lily whites can get jobs.

 

[ptbw forever]

NEW REPORT: The States Doling Out The Most Welfare Are Lily-Assed White
June 1, 2016Dylan Hock Politics



If you have trouble understanding systemic racism, take note—this is one of many forms it can take. According to research in Disciplining the Poor, by Joe Soss, Richard C. Fording and Sanford F. Schram, states where a majority of citizens on welfare are white offer better assistance, longer, than in states where a majority of citizens on welfare are black or people of color.

Featured in The Atlantic, researchers in the book also claim “the political party in charge of the state legislature has a big influence on how generous that state is with welfare benefits.” States with higher average incomes lean toward offering those in need a better handle on the next rung up on the ladder to success: “states that have the highest percentage of white people on welfare are the most reluctant to cut people off.” If you’re black in a poor staterun by Republicans, however, for example—good luck to you.



Fun Fact
Take Oregon, for example, where whites make up 87 percent of the state’s population. There, they also make up 64 percent of folks on Temporary Aid to Needy Families (TANF). If you’re hard-up in Oregon, you can expect to receive benefits for as many as 60 months. After that, if you’re still struggling, your kids can continue to receive benefits at the very least. “[Forty-six] out of every 100 families with children in poverty are on TANF, one of the highest ratios in the country. Compare that to Louisiana, as The Atlantic did, where strapped families receive only 24 months of assistance, and when you’re cut off in Louisiana, you’re cut off. Benefits do not continue for your children just because you are poor. In fact, Louisiana comes in entirely last. The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities (CBPP) claims only 4.2 families out of every 100 receive assistance in Louisiana. Over in Vermont, however, “where 95 percent of the people and 95 percent of TANF recipients are white, 78.4 percent of families with children in poverty are getting benefits.”

Starting to see the picture?

In the wake of Bill Clinton signing the welfare reform bill back in 1996, states were given stronger control over welfare management. Many states chose to gut their programs, which comes as no surprise, but states such as Oregon decided to “fill in the holes.” Where the lines have been drawn since, and how, is quite revealing of the systemic racism so prevalent in the U.S., and let’s face it, the results of the research in Disciplining the Poor are, sadly, anything but surprising.

Could this have something to do with higher taxes and cost of living being higher in those "white" states? Duh!

Nope. kentucky has a low cost of living and by far most of the welfare recipients are white.

It won't be that way for much longer.

Minorities on welfare in Louisville are quickly catching up to the rest of the state.

 

[Asclepias]

Hey, if there's a higher percentage of whites on welfare than blacks, then that's that.

That would mean that there's a higher likelihood that an individual white person is on welfare than an individual black person.

Is that what is being said here?
.

________________________

NO. You are about to fall for a common trick they like to play.

There is a much higher percentage of Blacks on Welfare than Whites.

But, there are so many more Whites...over 200 million...compared to around 40 million Blacks...that only 11% of Whites on Welfare would be the a bit more people 50% of Blacks on Welfare.

Half a century of The War on Poverty, The Great Society, and Affirmative Action....and Blacks are in worse shape than ever...more illegitimate babies who don't know who their father is...more crime.

And, still blaming Whitey for every problem they have.
_________

A fact is not a trick no matter how many ways you attempt to deflect.

 

[Asclepias]

We should get rid of welfare all together.

What will white people do if they get rid of welfare? It was created for them.

The Lily whites can get jobs.

Why havent they done that before now? No one seriously believes they will get jobs.

 

[Asclepias]

NEW REPORT: The States Doling Out The Most Welfare Are Lily-Assed White
June 1, 2016Dylan Hock Politics



If you have trouble understanding systemic racism, take note—this is one of many forms it can take. According to research in Disciplining the Poor, by Joe Soss, Richard C. Fording and Sanford F. Schram, states where a majority of citizens on welfare are white offer better assistance, longer, than in states where a majority of citizens on welfare are black or people of color.

Featured in The Atlantic, researchers in the book also claim “the political party in charge of the state legislature has a big influence on how generous that state is with welfare benefits.” States with higher average incomes lean toward offering those in need a better handle on the next rung up on the ladder to success: “states that have the highest percentage of white people on welfare are the most reluctant to cut people off.” If you’re black in a poor staterun by Republicans, however, for example—good luck to you.



Fun Fact
Take Oregon, for example, where whites make up 87 percent of the state’s population. There, they also make up 64 percent of folks on Temporary Aid to Needy Families (TANF). If you’re hard-up in Oregon, you can expect to receive benefits for as many as 60 months. After that, if you’re still struggling, your kids can continue to receive benefits at the very least. “[Forty-six] out of every 100 families with children in poverty are on TANF, one of the highest ratios in the country. Compare that to Louisiana, as The Atlantic did, where strapped families receive only 24 months of assistance, and when you’re cut off in Louisiana, you’re cut off. Benefits do not continue for your children just because you are poor. In fact, Louisiana comes in entirely last. The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities (CBPP) claims only 4.2 families out of every 100 receive assistance in Louisiana. Over in Vermont, however, “where 95 percent of the people and 95 percent of TANF recipients are white, 78.4 percent of families with children in poverty are getting benefits.”

Starting to see the picture?

In the wake of Bill Clinton signing the welfare reform bill back in 1996, states were given stronger control over welfare management. Many states chose to gut their programs, which comes as no surprise, but states such as Oregon decided to “fill in the holes.” Where the lines have been drawn since, and how, is quite revealing of the systemic racism so prevalent in the U.S., and let’s face it, the results of the research in Disciplining the Poor are, sadly, anything but surprising.

Could this have something to do with higher taxes and cost of living being higher in those "white" states? Duh!

Nope. kentucky has a low cost of living and by far most of the welfare recipients are white.

It won't be that way for much longer.

Minorities on welfare in Louisville are quickly catching up to the rest of the state.

Which has nothing to do with the current situation no matter how much you try to deflect now does it?

 

[Mac1958]

Holy crap, I can just FEEL the White Guilt just EXPLODING here after that shocking news!


.

 

[Asclepias]

Holy crap, I can just FEEL the White Guilt just EXPLODING here after that shocking news!


.

You shouldnt feel guilty over facts white or otherwise.

 

[Hossfly]

We should get rid of welfare all together.

What will white people do if they get rid of welfare? It was created for them.

The Lily whites can get jobs.

Why havent they done that before now? No one seriously believes they will get jobs.

 

[Mac1958]

Holy crap, I can just FEEL the White Guilt just EXPLODING here after that shocking news!


.

You shouldnt feel guilty over facts white or otherwise.

You certainly are trying hard here.

I complimented you on your breathtaking grasp of the obvious! The LEAST you could do is THANK me.
.

 

[Yousaidwhat]

We should get rid of welfare all together.

What will white people do if they get rid of welfare? It was created for them.

The Lily whites can get jobs.

Why havent they done that before now? No one seriously believes they will get jobs.

You are correct. I'd like to know why also. And I seriously believe that they have no intention of getting jobs either.

Luckily for me I am gainfully employed with the knowledge that some have no intention of becoming employed and will continuously rely on the rest of us.

 

[ptbw forever]

NEW REPORT: The States Doling Out The Most Welfare Are Lily-Assed White
June 1, 2016Dylan Hock Politics



If you have trouble understanding systemic racism, take note—this is one of many forms it can take. According to research in Disciplining the Poor, by Joe Soss, Richard C. Fording and Sanford F. Schram, states where a majority of citizens on welfare are white offer better assistance, longer, than in states where a majority of citizens on welfare are black or people of color.

Featured in The Atlantic, researchers in the book also claim “the political party in charge of the state legislature has a big influence on how generous that state is with welfare benefits.” States with higher average incomes lean toward offering those in need a better handle on the next rung up on the ladder to success: “states that have the highest percentage of white people on welfare are the most reluctant to cut people off.” If you’re black in a poor staterun by Republicans, however, for example—good luck to you.



Fun Fact
Take Oregon, for example, where whites make up 87 percent of the state’s population. There, they also make up 64 percent of folks on Temporary Aid to Needy Families (TANF). If you’re hard-up in Oregon, you can expect to receive benefits for as many as 60 months. After that, if you’re still struggling, your kids can continue to receive benefits at the very least. “[Forty-six] out of every 100 families with children in poverty are on TANF, one of the highest ratios in the country. Compare that to Louisiana, as The Atlantic did, where strapped families receive only 24 months of assistance, and when you’re cut off in Louisiana, you’re cut off. Benefits do not continue for your children just because you are poor. In fact, Louisiana comes in entirely last. The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities (CBPP) claims only 4.2 families out of every 100 receive assistance in Louisiana. Over in Vermont, however, “where 95 percent of the people and 95 percent of TANF recipients are white, 78.4 percent of families with children in poverty are getting benefits.”

Starting to see the picture?

In the wake of Bill Clinton signing the welfare reform bill back in 1996, states were given stronger control over welfare management. Many states chose to gut their programs, which comes as no surprise, but states such as Oregon decided to “fill in the holes.” Where the lines have been drawn since, and how, is quite revealing of the systemic racism so prevalent in the U.S., and let’s face it, the results of the research in Disciplining the Poor are, sadly, anything but surprising.

Could this have something to do with higher taxes and cost of living being higher in those "white" states? Duh!

Nope. kentucky has a low cost of living and by far most of the welfare recipients are white.

It won't be that way for much longer.

Minorities on welfare in Louisville are quickly catching up to the rest of the state.

Which has nothing to do with the current situation no matter how much you try to deflect now does it?

The current reality is that a much higher percentage of minorities are on welfare than whites.

In the future the number of white welfare recipients won't even be a drop in the bucket compared to non-whites.

 

[Asclepias]

Holy crap, I can just FEEL the White Guilt just EXPLODING here after that shocking news!


.

You shouldnt feel guilty over facts white or otherwise.

You certainly are trying hard herhe.

I complimented you on your breathtaking grasp of the obvious! The LEAST you could do is THANK me.
.

Thank you for what? You only admitted that you were intimidated. I wouldnt thank anyone for that.

 

[Asclepias]

NEW REPORT: The States Doling Out The Most Welfare Are Lily-Assed White
June 1, 2016Dylan Hock Politics



If you have trouble understanding systemic racism, take note—this is one of many forms it can take. According to research in Disciplining the Poor, by Joe Soss, Richard C. Fording and Sanford F. Schram, states where a majority of citizens on welfare are white offer better assistance, longer, than in states where a majority of citizens on welfare are black or people of color.

Featured in The Atlantic, researchers in the book also claim “the political party in charge of the state legislature has a big influence on how generous that state is with welfare benefits.” States with higher average incomes lean toward offering those in need a better handle on the next rung up on the ladder to success: “states that have the highest percentage of white people on welfare are the most reluctant to cut people off.” If you’re black in a poor staterun by Republicans, however, for example—good luck to you.



Fun Fact
Take Oregon, for example, where whites make up 87 percent of the state’s population. There, they also make up 64 percent of folks on Temporary Aid to Needy Families (TANF). If you’re hard-up in Oregon, you can expect to receive benefits for as many as 60 months. After that, if you’re still struggling, your kids can continue to receive benefits at the very least. “[Forty-six] out of every 100 families with children in poverty are on TANF, one of the highest ratios in the country. Compare that to Louisiana, as The Atlantic did, where strapped families receive only 24 months of assistance, and when you’re cut off in Louisiana, you’re cut off. Benefits do not continue for your children just because you are poor. In fact, Louisiana comes in entirely last. The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities (CBPP) claims only 4.2 families out of every 100 receive assistance in Louisiana. Over in Vermont, however, “where 95 percent of the people and 95 percent of TANF recipients are white, 78.4 percent of families with children in poverty are getting benefits.”

Starting to see the picture?

In the wake of Bill Clinton signing the welfare reform bill back in 1996, states were given stronger control over welfare management. Many states chose to gut their programs, which comes as no surprise, but states such as Oregon decided to “fill in the holes.” Where the lines have been drawn since, and how, is quite revealing of the systemic racism so prevalent in the U.S., and let’s face it, the results of the research in Disciplining the Poor are, sadly, anything but surprising.

Could this have something to do with higher taxes and cost of living being higher in those "white" states? Duh!

Nope. kentucky has a low cost of living and by far most of the welfare recipients are white.

It won't be that way for much longer.

Minorities on welfare in Louisville are quickly catching up to the rest of the state.

Which has nothing to do with the current situation no matter how much you try to deflect now does it?

The current reality is that a much higher percentage of minorities are on welfare than whites.

In the future the number of white welfare recipients won't even be a drop in the bucket compared to non-whites.

The current reality is that there are more whites on welfare than Blacks. Sorry.

 

[Mac1958]

Somebody get in a big fight with Asclepias, my shin is getting sore from the leg humping.

He's trying desperately to anger everyone, and no one is taking him seriously.

Go! Fake it if you have to! He's probably used to that.
.