Lol, Liberals Want Laws Against Global Warming Deniers.

Despite the pathetic deflection attempt, all conservative deniers on this board are still proud Stalinist ratfucks. Without exception, they've all called for the imprisonment of scientists like Dr. Mann, while a Republican attorney general actually tried to prosecute. If you contradict the dogma of DerPartieRepublikkan, conservatives want you in the gulag.

In direct contrast, no liberal on this board has called for anyone to be jailed. When asked, they'll all point out what a dumbass Kennedy was. It's that liberty thing. Liberals value it, conservatives spit on it, being it gets in the way of their control fetish.

If any conservative here wishes to show how they, as an individual, are not a Stalinist like the rest of their party, it's very easy to do. Simply be the first conservative on this board to condemn the Republican party and the deniers here for trying to jail scientists for the crime of doing science. If you're not willing to show even that minimum level of decency, then you clearly are a proud Stalinist.

Martybegan, given your vehemence and claims to love liberty, you especially should weigh in. Do you condemn the Stalinist tactics which most deniers and Republicans embrace, or do you too joyfully embrace such thuggery?

They sued to get records to investigate possible fraud with regards to public research money. He was not being prosecuted for his Ideas.
If he ended up being charged with something, it would have been Fraud, and the only reason is due to his funding by government money.

Why didn't Mann want the documents released?
 
In Michigan, a PAC supporting Gary Peters (D) paints Terri Lynn Land (R) as being in the pocket of the Koch Brothers. Some terrible chemical that is polluting Michigan they tell us. Turns out Peters owns $19,000 in stock of the company producing the chemical in question.
Koch is the best word to get a libtard to wet herself.
 
So, Marty joins the ranks of proud Stalinists who wants scientists tossed in the gulag for doing science.

No surprise. He's a conservative. I still haven't found even one conservative on this board who'll criticize their party's Stalinist tactics here. Instead, they all double down on the Stalinism, declaring that those scientists are criminals and EnemiesOfTheState who deserve to be in the gulag. You know, exactly like the actual Stalinists did.

The lesson? Scratch a conservative, find a Stalinist. After all, not even one of them here will dare speak up against their party's Stalinism.
 
So, Marty joins the ranks of proud Stalinists who wants scientists tossed in the gulag for doing science.

No surprise. He's a conservative. I still haven't found even one conservative on this board who'll criticize their party's Stalinist tactics here. Instead, they all double down on the Stalinism, declaring that those scientists are criminals and EnemiesOfTheState who deserve to be in the gulag. You know, exactly like the actual Stalinists did.

The lesson? Scratch a conservative, find a Stalinist. After all, not even one of them here will dare speak up against their party's Stalinism.

^ Crap like that used to bother me, then I realized that Progressives are pathological liars
 
So, Marty joins the ranks of proud Stalinists who wants scientists tossed in the gulag for doing science.

No surprise. He's a conservative. I still haven't found even one conservative on this board who'll criticize their party's Stalinist tactics here. Instead, they all double down on the Stalinism, declaring that those scientists are criminals and EnemiesOfTheState who deserve to be in the gulag. You know, exactly like the actual Stalinists did.

The lesson? Scratch a conservative, find a Stalinist. After all, not even one of them here will dare speak up against their party's Stalinism.

How was Mann going to be tossed in Jail for his Beliefs? He was being asked to produce raw data from a governmentally funded program. All of this was court drama related to an investigation, a politically motivated one to be sure, but BOTH sides do that crap. Your entire previous post, was quite frankly, bullshit.

Also, you motherfucking asshole, don't put words in my fucking mouth, or if you do be man enough to do it to my fucking face.
 
In Michigan, a PAC supporting Gary Peters (D) paints Terri Lynn Land (R) as being in the pocket of the Koch Brothers. Some terrible chemical that is polluting Michigan they tell us. Turns out Peters owns $19,000 in stock of the company producing the chemical in question.

Point? Did he know it, or did his financial advisor buy it for him?
 
So, Marty joins the ranks of proud Stalinists who wants scientists tossed in the gulag for doing science.

No surprise. He's a conservative. I still haven't found even one conservative on this board who'll criticize their party's Stalinist tactics here. Instead, they all double down on the Stalinism, declaring that those scientists are criminals and EnemiesOfTheState who deserve to be in the gulag. You know, exactly like the actual Stalinists did.

The lesson? Scratch a conservative, find a Stalinist. After all, not even one of them here will dare speak up against their party's Stalinism.

^ Crap like that used to bother me, then I realized that Progressives are pathological liars

The only reason it bothered you is because it's true. Who but a conservative would require a women seeking an abortion to subject herself to invasive degrading tests? Oh, of course, STALIN.
 
So, Marty joins the ranks of proud Stalinists who wants scientists tossed in the gulag for doing science.

No surprise. He's a conservative. I still haven't found even one conservative on this board who'll criticize their party's Stalinist tactics here. Instead, they all double down on the Stalinism, declaring that those scientists are criminals and EnemiesOfTheState who deserve to be in the gulag. You know, exactly like the actual Stalinists did.

The lesson? Scratch a conservative, find a Stalinist. After all, not even one of them here will dare speak up against their party's Stalinism.

^ Crap like that used to bother me, then I realized that Progressives are pathological liars

The only reason it bothered you is because it's true. Who but a conservative would require a women seeking an abortion to subject herself to invasive degrading tests? Oh, of course, STALIN.

Find one post where I support laws requiring sonograms prior to abortions.
 
Personally I don't give a fuck about the Jonestown KoolAid snorting AGWCult. If they would shut the fuck up and leave me alone I'd be perfectly happy with them and their stupid, idiotic beliefs. However, they are far worse that the Hari Krishnas at an airport. They just refuse to shut the fuck up and they spend every waking minute trying to convert or wish death upon the non-believers who they call "DENIERS!!!!!"
 
Typical commie thinking from the leftist dogs.

This country needs a purge via some catastrophe. The only people left standing will be people that aren't liberal pussies.
 
I do wish their was a law that when a politician speaks he would be held to account for lying in an official capacity. I know its a long shot but some of these ads and comments are flat out lying on both sides and then the paper, websites, blogs etc quote them then it becomes its own animal.

A lie gets half way around the world before the truth gets his pants on

We have freedom of speech and with that comes everyone's own responsibilities not laws.
You should see some of newspapers back in 1700 and early 1800's about political attack ads.
It makes the ones today seem tame.
This is why our founders emphasized heavily on the voters to be well informed on the issues, because when they are well informed the attack ads become a non issue.
 
I do wish their was a law that when a politician speaks he would be held to account for lying in an official capacity. I know its a long shot but some of these ads and comments are flat out lying on both sides and then the paper, websites, blogs etc quote them then it becomes its own animal.

A lie gets half way around the world before the truth gets his pants on

We have freedom of speech and with that comes everyone's own responsibilities not laws.
You should see some of newspapers back in 1700 and early 1800's about political attack ads.
It makes the ones today seem tame.
This is why our founders emphasized heavily on the voters to be well informed on the issues, because when they are well informed the attack ads become a non issue.

I understand that but as you can see the public aint well informed. How do we deal with that moving forward knowing that just hoping they pay attention to political matters and not American Idol aint gonna happen?
 
How many liberals have disagreed with Kennedy's desire to make it illegal to not buy into the man made global warming, climate change, climate disruption scam?
Just when you thought there was no way for liberals to possibly get more insidiously moronic, they have to claim this.
=========================================================

Robert F. Kennedy Jr., one of climate change’s loudest activists, said there should be a law that lets authorities punish skeptics and deniers - those who engage in “selling out the public trust,” he said, in an interview with Climate Depot during New York City’s recent People’s Climate March.

“I wish there were a law you could punish them with,” he said, in the videotaped interview. “I don’t think there is a law that you can punish these politicians under … [and skeptical politicians are] selling out the public trust.”

He accused politicians who failed to act on climate change policy as serving special interests.

“Those guys are doing the Koch Brothers bidding and are against all the evidence of the rational mind, saying global warming does not exist,” Mr. Kennedy said, Climate Depot reported. “They are contemptible human beings.”

He then turned his attacks directly at the Koch Brothers, accusing them of “polluting our atmosphere,” he said, the blog reported.

“I think it’s treason. Do I think the Koch Brothers are treasonous — yes, I do,” Mr. Kennedy said, Climate Depot reported.



Read more: Robert Kennedy Jr. We need laws to punish global warming skeptics - Washington Times
Follow us: @washtimes on Twitter


5d64fcfa02c7941e5b0f6a706700a0b5_c0-50-1878-1144_s561x327.jpg



^^^^Look at his stupid face taking a picture with his slut Curb Your Enthusiasm wife.
---------------------------------------------------------------------

He is a pure Stalinist tyrant who has no respect for freedom of speech. If you don't believe in his global warmist ideology, government should squash you.

The immediate past president of the Czech Republic, Dr. Vaclav Klaus, hit the nail on the head when he observed that the global warmists were ''a budding totalitarian ideology that is the greatest threat to freedom, democracy, and prosperity in the world today''.
I see you have a heavy case of stupid on board ....

Rob Kennedy said those words, do you refute that he said them?

On the contrary, he should get a Peace Prize for saying it.


We would have all been better off if you were flushed or swallowed.

i-d20729cf9e0d847cadd13df24cc9eedc-rodney-dangerfield-picture-01.jpg


No offense.
 
Just when you thought there was no way for liberals to possibly get more insidiously moronic, they have to claim this.
=========================================================

Robert F. Kennedy Jr., one of climate change’s loudest activists, said there should be a law that lets authorities punish skeptics and deniers - those who engage in “selling out the public trust,” he said, in an interview with Climate Depot during New York City’s recent People’s Climate March.

“I wish there were a law you could punish them with,” he said, in the videotaped interview. “I don’t think there is a law that you can punish these politicians under … [and skeptical politicians are] selling out the public trust.”

He accused politicians who failed to act on climate change policy as serving special interests.

“Those guys are doing the Koch Brothers bidding and are against all the evidence of the rational mind, saying global warming does not exist,” Mr. Kennedy said, Climate Depot reported. “They are contemptible human beings.”

He then turned his attacks directly at the Koch Brothers, accusing them of “polluting our atmosphere,” he said, the blog reported.

“I think it’s treason. Do I think the Koch Brothers are treasonous — yes, I do,” Mr. Kennedy said, Climate Depot reported.



Read more: Robert Kennedy Jr. We need laws to punish global warming skeptics - Washington Times
Follow us: @washtimes on Twitter


5d64fcfa02c7941e5b0f6a706700a0b5_c0-50-1878-1144_s561x327.jpg



^^^^Look at his stupid face taking a picture with his slut Curb Your Enthusiasm wife.
---------------------------------------------------------------------

He is a pure Stalinist tyrant who has no respect for freedom of speech. If you don't believe in his global warmist ideology, government should squash you.

The immediate past president of the Czech Republic, Dr. Vaclav Klaus, hit the nail on the head when he observed that the global warmists were ''a budding totalitarian ideology that is the greatest threat to freedom, democracy, and prosperity in the world today''.

RGK, Jr. "wished" there were a law, but in reality - something which challenges bigots and conservatives, but I repeat myself - he is not advocating such a law. Yet the author of the OP uses RFK, Jr's comment to castigate the man and call his wife a slut. I wish there was a law to send posters filled with hate into therapy, clearly the author of this thread needs it.

Just "wishing" for that law makes a person a Statist Asshat.

Your attempt at nuance is fail. He IS advocating silencing critics.

Thanks for sharing: why call his wife a slut? Why do you even care if he did advocate silencing critics, you do, or at least try.

How do I try to silence my critics? Where have I advocated jailing of people who disagree with me politically? Where have I posted support for someone who WANTS to jail people for political reasons?

And stick to my posts when you make a criticism of it, not someone else's post.

Attacking a person's wife is one way to silence someone; calling people Libtards is another. Ad hominem strategy is a failure, and something ubiquitous to the posts by the far right crazy fringe.
You say that as if liberals hardly ever use ad hominem. How clever.
 
So, Marty joins the ranks of proud Stalinists who wants scientists tossed in the gulag for doing science.

No surprise. He's a conservative. I still haven't found even one conservative on this board who'll criticize their party's Stalinist tactics here. Instead, they all double down on the Stalinism, declaring that those scientists are criminals and EnemiesOfTheState who deserve to be in the gulag. You know, exactly like the actual Stalinists did.

The lesson? Scratch a conservative, find a Stalinist. After all, not even one of them here will dare speak up against their party's Stalinism.

^ Crap like that used to bother me, then I realized that Progressives are pathological liars

The only reason it bothered you is because it's true. Who but a conservative would require a women seeking an abortion to subject herself to invasive degrading tests? Oh, of course, STALIN.

Find one post where I support laws requiring sonograms prior to abortions.

Why should I, I didn't name you. Please try to read with some comprehension. "But who but a conservative" does not even imply all conservatives, only those who advocate such procedures, and all who do to my knowledge are conservatives. Not all conservatives are so ... much like a Nazi (I tried to think of a better discription, to no avail).
 
So, Marty joins the ranks of proud Stalinists who wants scientists tossed in the gulag for doing science.

No surprise. He's a conservative. I still haven't found even one conservative on this board who'll criticize their party's Stalinist tactics here. Instead, they all double down on the Stalinism, declaring that those scientists are criminals and EnemiesOfTheState who deserve to be in the gulag. You know, exactly like the actual Stalinists did.

The lesson? Scratch a conservative, find a Stalinist. After all, not even one of them here will dare speak up against their party's Stalinism.

^ Crap like that used to bother me, then I realized that Progressives are pathological liars

The only reason it bothered you is because it's true. Who but a conservative would require a women seeking an abortion to subject herself to invasive degrading tests? Oh, of course, STALIN.

Find one post where I support laws requiring sonograms prior to abortions.

A sonograms is not an invastive procedure; that said, "who but a conservative..." does not imply all conservatives. Learn to read.
 
RGK, Jr. "wished" there were a law, but in reality - something which challenges bigots and conservatives, but I repeat myself - he is not advocating such a law. Yet the author of the OP uses RFK, Jr's comment to castigate the man and call his wife a slut. I wish there was a law to send posters filled with hate into therapy, clearly the author of this thread needs it.

Just "wishing" for that law makes a person a Statist Asshat.

Your attempt at nuance is fail. He IS advocating silencing critics.

Thanks for sharing: why call his wife a slut? Why do you even care if he did advocate silencing critics, you do, or at least try.

How do I try to silence my critics? Where have I advocated jailing of people who disagree with me politically? Where have I posted support for someone who WANTS to jail people for political reasons?

And stick to my posts when you make a criticism of it, not someone else's post.

Attacking a person's wife is one way to silence someone; calling people Libtards is another. Ad hominem strategy is a failure, and something ubiquitous to the posts by the far right crazy fringe.
You say that as if liberals hardly ever use ad hominem. How clever.

I can't speak for all liberals, but I attempt to argue without name calling when a conservative posts something close to a rational argument; some people (CrusaderFrank comes to mind) never offer an argument - he's too stupid I suspect - and simply posts over and over, "ain't it awful" (it being any Democratic President, Policy, candidate or not a fellow member of the echo chamber). Thus I consider him to be a dimwit, that is, a wit somewhat dumber than a half-wit; especially when he dresses in dresses and post as Stephanie.

See, when I post an ad hominem I add a little flare, some humor and still make my point.
 

Forum List

Back
Top