Look what I found

From the link;
Read more: Why haven't Kyle Rittenhouse' Attackers been Arrested and Charged?
Under Creative Commons License: Attribution
Follow us: @Ammoland on Twitter | Ammoland on Facebook

"Numerous felonies appear to have been committed against Rittenhouse by the three attackers. One attacker, Anthony Huber, is dead.

What charges might be brought against the other two attackers?
As there were multiple, coordinated attacks, they could be charged with conspiracy to commit a felony, under Wisconsin statutes 939.31.

The first, unknown attacker, clearly committed battery against Kyle Rittenhouse with the flying kick attack; because it was countered, the damage may not have been great, making it a Class A misdemeanor under Wisconsin statutes 940.19.

Huber committed a battery, but Huber is dead, so he will not be charged. Because he died, however, in the commission of a crime, the other two combatants may be charged with felony murder, Wisconsin statute 940.30. All three attackers were acting in concert, so the felony murder statute is likely to apply.

Grosskreutz could be charged under the endangering safety by use of a deadly weapon, statute, 941.20, for his actions with the semi-automatic pistol. 941.20 has an exception for defense of privilege of self-defense, or defense of others, which Grosskreutz might claim, and which Rittenhouse is already claiming in his lawyers' statement.

The Kenosha County Prosecutor has decided to press charges against Kyle Rittenhouse, and not against his attackers. This shows a reluctance, almost certainly due to political pressure, not to charge the rioters. All three attackers appear to be from Wisconsin, so there is no interstate nexus for federal charges, unless it can be shown that they received funding or direction from out of state, which would be difficult to prove.

The case shows the incredible power of prosecutors to decide who will be charged, and who will not. The voters have the ultimate authority to place or remove prosecutors. Prosecutors are almost never removed unless their crimes are blatant.

Kenosha County District Attorney Michael D. Graveley may be contacted at (262) 653-2400. Email can be sent through a email wizard at the Kenosha County website.

The Assistant DA who signed the criminal complaint against Kyle Rittenhouse is Angelina Gabriele. Her email is:
[email protected]"
They chased a criminal who had just killed someone and fled the scene.
They should have beat the crap out of him
Should have strung him up from a streetlight as a warning to others wannabe vigilantes.
You guys really can't stand the way this kid exposed what a bunch of vicious predatory criminals are out roaming around starting fires and causing chaos, can you?

Cat's out of the bag, now..... "peaceful protestors" my ass.



LOL
The vicious predatory criminal crossed a state line with an illegal firearm looking for someone to shoot.
Except, not really.
 

Sign it, and then share it, far and wide.




There are 2 things that have shown to be successful in deterring rioters and neither have been tried except in isolated cases (when they have been, they have been hugely successful though), and that is aggressively prosecuting people for rioting, rather than just playing catch and release, and just shooting them dead.
I think we need to put some pressure on these prosecutors and municipalities, and convince them they need to start aggressively putting rioters in prison, and leaving people who are just defending themselves and their property alone. Because I don't want things to get to where all we can do is shoot them all.

I been there, done that...... and I don't think ya'll are going to like it much.
Why would you prosecute a prosecutor for doing his job?
Abuse of power and denial of civil rights under color of law is a crime.

Why wouldn't you prosecute someone for that?
They have video of the murder. How is he being denied anything?
No one was murdered on any of the video.


Have you seen a doctor about these delusions you're having?
Are you blind?
Are you wholly and completely ignorant of what constitutes self defense?

Because it sure seems like it.
 

Sign it, and then share it, far and wide.




There are 2 things that have shown to be successful in deterring rioters and neither have been tried except in isolated cases (when they have been, they have been hugely successful though), and that is aggressively prosecuting people for rioting, rather than just playing catch and release, and just shooting them dead.
I think we need to put some pressure on these prosecutors and municipalities, and convince them they need to start aggressively putting rioters in prison, and leaving people who are just defending themselves and their property alone. Because I don't want things to get to where all we can do is shoot them all.

I been there, done that...... and I don't think ya'll are going to like it much.
"552 SIGNED"

LOLOL

You go get 'em, girl.

:lmao:
So?


Would more signatures make the prosecutors less wrong, or something?
Lots more signatures might get some attention. Might even show people agree. But I refreshed and now it's up to 553.

0.6% there! :lmao:

At this rate, they'll hit their goal in March. The teen murderer might already be convicted by then.
I just found it about 5 this morning. I could share it faster if I had social media like FB or Twatter, but I don't.
Because they're biased too.


Anyone know why the board won't let me copy and paste an image?
 
From the link;
Read more: Why haven't Kyle Rittenhouse' Attackers been Arrested and Charged?
Under Creative Commons License: Attribution
Follow us: @Ammoland on Twitter | Ammoland on Facebook

"Numerous felonies appear to have been committed against Rittenhouse by the three attackers. One attacker, Anthony Huber, is dead.

What charges might be brought against the other two attackers?
As there were multiple, coordinated attacks, they could be charged with conspiracy to commit a felony, under Wisconsin statutes 939.31.

The first, unknown attacker, clearly committed battery against Kyle Rittenhouse with the flying kick attack; because it was countered, the damage may not have been great, making it a Class A misdemeanor under Wisconsin statutes 940.19.

Huber committed a battery, but Huber is dead, so he will not be charged. Because he died, however, in the commission of a crime, the other two combatants may be charged with felony murder, Wisconsin statute 940.30. All three attackers were acting in concert, so the felony murder statute is likely to apply.

Grosskreutz could be charged under the endangering safety by use of a deadly weapon, statute, 941.20, for his actions with the semi-automatic pistol. 941.20 has an exception for defense of privilege of self-defense, or defense of others, which Grosskreutz might claim, and which Rittenhouse is already claiming in his lawyers' statement.

The Kenosha County Prosecutor has decided to press charges against Kyle Rittenhouse, and not against his attackers. This shows a reluctance, almost certainly due to political pressure, not to charge the rioters. All three attackers appear to be from Wisconsin, so there is no interstate nexus for federal charges, unless it can be shown that they received funding or direction from out of state, which would be difficult to prove.

The case shows the incredible power of prosecutors to decide who will be charged, and who will not. The voters have the ultimate authority to place or remove prosecutors. Prosecutors are almost never removed unless their crimes are blatant.

Kenosha County District Attorney Michael D. Graveley may be contacted at (262) 653-2400. Email can be sent through a email wizard at the Kenosha County website.

The Assistant DA who signed the criminal complaint against Kyle Rittenhouse is Angelina Gabriele. Her email is:
[email protected]"
They chased a criminal who had just killed someone and fled the scene.
They should have beat the crap out of him

Bullshit. He was attacked by the rioters, shot two of them dead, and blew the arm off another who had pointed a pistol at him.

Clear case of self-defense...

Kyle-Rittenhouse-Was-Being-Hunted-By-Rioters-After-Clashes-With-Militias-Guarding-Gas-Stations-672x420.jpg


Kyle-Rittenhouse-attacked-with-skateboard.jpg


Watch the video...

Lawyer of alleged Kenosha shooter Kyle Rittenhouse claims self-defense as video emerges
Rittenhouse shot a man before these people attacked him he ran from the scene of the first shooting after calling a buddy to tell him he killed someone. ( bragging?).

So it could be said these people were trying to stop him from killing anyone else

First of all, that would be vigilantism. Something the leftards are against.

Second - They all knew who he was. They were engaged with him and his friends at the gas station - all of them.

Third - that makes them acting in the capacity of judge, jury and executioner.

Ritttenhouse was breaking the law so whatever happened to him was ultimately his own fault
False.

That's like saying if someone attacks you while you're jaywalking you can't defend yourself.

Quit embarrassing yourself.
Great, post the Wisconsin law that indicates jaywalking is a misdemeanor...
 
From the link;
Read more: Why haven't Kyle Rittenhouse' Attackers been Arrested and Charged?
Under Creative Commons License: Attribution
Follow us: @Ammoland on Twitter | Ammoland on Facebook

"Numerous felonies appear to have been committed against Rittenhouse by the three attackers. One attacker, Anthony Huber, is dead.

What charges might be brought against the other two attackers?
As there were multiple, coordinated attacks, they could be charged with conspiracy to commit a felony, under Wisconsin statutes 939.31.

The first, unknown attacker, clearly committed battery against Kyle Rittenhouse with the flying kick attack; because it was countered, the damage may not have been great, making it a Class A misdemeanor under Wisconsin statutes 940.19.

Huber committed a battery, but Huber is dead, so he will not be charged. Because he died, however, in the commission of a crime, the other two combatants may be charged with felony murder, Wisconsin statute 940.30. All three attackers were acting in concert, so the felony murder statute is likely to apply.

Grosskreutz could be charged under the endangering safety by use of a deadly weapon, statute, 941.20, for his actions with the semi-automatic pistol. 941.20 has an exception for defense of privilege of self-defense, or defense of others, which Grosskreutz might claim, and which Rittenhouse is already claiming in his lawyers' statement.

The Kenosha County Prosecutor has decided to press charges against Kyle Rittenhouse, and not against his attackers. This shows a reluctance, almost certainly due to political pressure, not to charge the rioters. All three attackers appear to be from Wisconsin, so there is no interstate nexus for federal charges, unless it can be shown that they received funding or direction from out of state, which would be difficult to prove.

The case shows the incredible power of prosecutors to decide who will be charged, and who will not. The voters have the ultimate authority to place or remove prosecutors. Prosecutors are almost never removed unless their crimes are blatant.

Kenosha County District Attorney Michael D. Graveley may be contacted at (262) 653-2400. Email can be sent through a email wizard at the Kenosha County website.

The Assistant DA who signed the criminal complaint against Kyle Rittenhouse is Angelina Gabriele. Her email is:
[email protected]"
They chased a criminal who had just killed someone and fled the scene.
They should have beat the crap out of him
If he shot someone wearing a Trump hat they would have bought him a cup of coffee.
Murder is murder

Except when it's self defense, Wingbat

After you shot someone and ran away, it is not self defense if you also shoot the people trying to catch you
When the first guy is trying to attack you and the ones chasing you are trying to attack you, it really is self-defense.
 

Sign it, and then share it, far and wide.




There are 2 things that have shown to be successful in deterring rioters and neither have been tried except in isolated cases (when they have been, they have been hugely successful though), and that is aggressively prosecuting people for rioting, rather than just playing catch and release, and just shooting them dead.
I think we need to put some pressure on these prosecutors and municipalities, and convince them they need to start aggressively putting rioters in prison, and leaving people who are just defending themselves and their property alone. Because I don't want things to get to where all we can do is shoot them all.

I been there, done that...... and I don't think ya'll are going to like it much.
"552 SIGNED"

LOLOL

You go get 'em, girl.

:lmao:
So?


Would more signatures make the prosecutors less wrong, or something?
Lots more signatures might get some attention. Might even show people agree. But I refreshed and now it's up to 553.

0.6% there! :lmao:

At this rate, they'll hit their goal in March. The teen murderer might already be convicted by then.
the date the petition started was the 29th
So? That was 4 days ago. At this rate they'll hit their target of 100,000 in March; but they only have 8 weeks to reach their goal. :mm:
 
From the link;
Read more: Why haven't Kyle Rittenhouse' Attackers been Arrested and Charged?
Under Creative Commons License: Attribution
Follow us: @Ammoland on Twitter | Ammoland on Facebook

"Numerous felonies appear to have been committed against Rittenhouse by the three attackers. One attacker, Anthony Huber, is dead.

What charges might be brought against the other two attackers?
As there were multiple, coordinated attacks, they could be charged with conspiracy to commit a felony, under Wisconsin statutes 939.31.

The first, unknown attacker, clearly committed battery against Kyle Rittenhouse with the flying kick attack; because it was countered, the damage may not have been great, making it a Class A misdemeanor under Wisconsin statutes 940.19.

Huber committed a battery, but Huber is dead, so he will not be charged. Because he died, however, in the commission of a crime, the other two combatants may be charged with felony murder, Wisconsin statute 940.30. All three attackers were acting in concert, so the felony murder statute is likely to apply.

Grosskreutz could be charged under the endangering safety by use of a deadly weapon, statute, 941.20, for his actions with the semi-automatic pistol. 941.20 has an exception for defense of privilege of self-defense, or defense of others, which Grosskreutz might claim, and which Rittenhouse is already claiming in his lawyers' statement.

The Kenosha County Prosecutor has decided to press charges against Kyle Rittenhouse, and not against his attackers. This shows a reluctance, almost certainly due to political pressure, not to charge the rioters. All three attackers appear to be from Wisconsin, so there is no interstate nexus for federal charges, unless it can be shown that they received funding or direction from out of state, which would be difficult to prove.

The case shows the incredible power of prosecutors to decide who will be charged, and who will not. The voters have the ultimate authority to place or remove prosecutors. Prosecutors are almost never removed unless their crimes are blatant.

Kenosha County District Attorney Michael D. Graveley may be contacted at (262) 653-2400. Email can be sent through a email wizard at the Kenosha County website.

The Assistant DA who signed the criminal complaint against Kyle Rittenhouse is Angelina Gabriele. Her email is:
[email protected]"
They chased a criminal who had just killed someone and fled the scene.
They should have beat the crap out of him

Bullshit. He was attacked by the rioters, shot two of them dead, and blew the arm off another who had pointed a pistol at him.

Clear case of self-defense...

Kyle-Rittenhouse-Was-Being-Hunted-By-Rioters-After-Clashes-With-Militias-Guarding-Gas-Stations-672x420.jpg


Kyle-Rittenhouse-attacked-with-skateboard.jpg


Watch the video...

Lawyer of alleged Kenosha shooter Kyle Rittenhouse claims self-defense as video emerges
Rittenhouse shot a man before these people attacked him he ran from the scene of the first shooting after calling a buddy to tell him he killed someone. ( bragging?).

So it could be said these people were trying to stop him from killing anyone else

First of all, that would be vigilantism. Something the leftards are against.

Second - They all knew who he was. They were engaged with him and his friends at the gas station - all of them.

Third - that makes them acting in the capacity of judge, jury and executioner.

Ritttenhouse was breaking the law so whatever happened to him was ultimately his own fault
False.

That's like saying if someone attacks you while you're jaywalking you can't defend yourself.

Quit embarrassing yourself.
Great, post the Wisconsin law that indicates jaywalking is a misdemeanor...
Why bother?

I could post irrefutable proof that what you're saying is wrong and you will never accept it. I could bring every member of the Supreme Court to your house and every single one of them could explain to you why you're wrong and ignorant and that the law doesn't work the way you really really want it to, and you'd still never stop.

You're fucked in the head, lady.
 
All of the historical revision and denial in the world isn't going to change the violent past that your party has to wear around their necks, like a stinking dead albatross. Maybe that's why you're so eager to hide your despicable past by tearing down the statues you Democrats erected in the first place.

That's quite a burden of guilt you're forced to carry around on your shoulders. No wonder you people are so unhinged and unstable.
Are you saying it wasn't whites who committed this heinous crimes? Who's revising history here? Me or you?

I'm not white. It's only mobs of white thugs calling themselves the KKK who went around lynching innocent black people for merely being black.

There was a whole Civil Rights Movement that resulted from this.

As a black person, I'm not on the wrong side of history, or anything here, only you as a white supremacist is.

Facts!
You voted with the same party of the kkk lol blacks overwhelmingly voted with the Democratic Party during the years of the KKK lynching Lol
Still vote with them, and they want my respect? Fk that
 
From the link;
Read more: Why haven't Kyle Rittenhouse' Attackers been Arrested and Charged?
Under Creative Commons License: Attribution
Follow us: @Ammoland on Twitter | Ammoland on Facebook

"Numerous felonies appear to have been committed against Rittenhouse by the three attackers. One attacker, Anthony Huber, is dead.

What charges might be brought against the other two attackers?
As there were multiple, coordinated attacks, they could be charged with conspiracy to commit a felony, under Wisconsin statutes 939.31.

The first, unknown attacker, clearly committed battery against Kyle Rittenhouse with the flying kick attack; because it was countered, the damage may not have been great, making it a Class A misdemeanor under Wisconsin statutes 940.19.

Huber committed a battery, but Huber is dead, so he will not be charged. Because he died, however, in the commission of a crime, the other two combatants may be charged with felony murder, Wisconsin statute 940.30. All three attackers were acting in concert, so the felony murder statute is likely to apply.

Grosskreutz could be charged under the endangering safety by use of a deadly weapon, statute, 941.20, for his actions with the semi-automatic pistol. 941.20 has an exception for defense of privilege of self-defense, or defense of others, which Grosskreutz might claim, and which Rittenhouse is already claiming in his lawyers' statement.

The Kenosha County Prosecutor has decided to press charges against Kyle Rittenhouse, and not against his attackers. This shows a reluctance, almost certainly due to political pressure, not to charge the rioters. All three attackers appear to be from Wisconsin, so there is no interstate nexus for federal charges, unless it can be shown that they received funding or direction from out of state, which would be difficult to prove.

The case shows the incredible power of prosecutors to decide who will be charged, and who will not. The voters have the ultimate authority to place or remove prosecutors. Prosecutors are almost never removed unless their crimes are blatant.

Kenosha County District Attorney Michael D. Graveley may be contacted at (262) 653-2400. Email can be sent through a email wizard at the Kenosha County website.

The Assistant DA who signed the criminal complaint against Kyle Rittenhouse is Angelina Gabriele. Her email is:
[email protected]"
They chased a criminal who had just killed someone and fled the scene.
They should have beat the crap out of him
If he shot someone wearing a Trump hat they would have bought him a cup of coffee.
Murder is murder

Except when it's self defense, Wingbat

After you shot someone and ran away, it is not self defense if you also shoot the people trying to catch you
When the first guy is trying to attack you and the ones chasing you are trying to attack you, it really is self-defense.
No he was just supposed to let them kill him! Ask them
 
From the link;
Read more: Why haven't Kyle Rittenhouse' Attackers been Arrested and Charged?
Under Creative Commons License: Attribution
Follow us: @Ammoland on Twitter | Ammoland on Facebook

"Numerous felonies appear to have been committed against Rittenhouse by the three attackers. One attacker, Anthony Huber, is dead.

What charges might be brought against the other two attackers?
As there were multiple, coordinated attacks, they could be charged with conspiracy to commit a felony, under Wisconsin statutes 939.31.

The first, unknown attacker, clearly committed battery against Kyle Rittenhouse with the flying kick attack; because it was countered, the damage may not have been great, making it a Class A misdemeanor under Wisconsin statutes 940.19.

Huber committed a battery, but Huber is dead, so he will not be charged. Because he died, however, in the commission of a crime, the other two combatants may be charged with felony murder, Wisconsin statute 940.30. All three attackers were acting in concert, so the felony murder statute is likely to apply.

Grosskreutz could be charged under the endangering safety by use of a deadly weapon, statute, 941.20, for his actions with the semi-automatic pistol. 941.20 has an exception for defense of privilege of self-defense, or defense of others, which Grosskreutz might claim, and which Rittenhouse is already claiming in his lawyers' statement.

The Kenosha County Prosecutor has decided to press charges against Kyle Rittenhouse, and not against his attackers. This shows a reluctance, almost certainly due to political pressure, not to charge the rioters. All three attackers appear to be from Wisconsin, so there is no interstate nexus for federal charges, unless it can be shown that they received funding or direction from out of state, which would be difficult to prove.

The case shows the incredible power of prosecutors to decide who will be charged, and who will not. The voters have the ultimate authority to place or remove prosecutors. Prosecutors are almost never removed unless their crimes are blatant.

Kenosha County District Attorney Michael D. Graveley may be contacted at (262) 653-2400. Email can be sent through a email wizard at the Kenosha County website.

The Assistant DA who signed the criminal complaint against Kyle Rittenhouse is Angelina Gabriele. Her email is:
[email protected]"
They chased a criminal who had just killed someone and fled the scene.
They should have beat the crap out of him

Bullshit. He was attacked by the rioters, shot two of them dead, and blew the arm off another who had pointed a pistol at him.

Clear case of self-defense...

Kyle-Rittenhouse-Was-Being-Hunted-By-Rioters-After-Clashes-With-Militias-Guarding-Gas-Stations-672x420.jpg


Kyle-Rittenhouse-attacked-with-skateboard.jpg


Watch the video...

Lawyer of alleged Kenosha shooter Kyle Rittenhouse claims self-defense as video emerges
Rittenhouse shot a man before these people attacked him he ran from the scene of the first shooting after calling a buddy to tell him he killed someone. ( bragging?).

So it could be said these people were trying to stop him from killing anyone else

First of all, that would be vigilantism. Something the leftards are against.

Second - They all knew who he was. They were engaged with him and his friends at the gas station - all of them.

Third - that makes them acting in the capacity of judge, jury and executioner.

Ritttenhouse was breaking the law so whatever happened to him was ultimately his own fault
False.

That's like saying if someone attacks you while you're jaywalking you can't defend yourself.

Quit embarrassing yourself.
Great, post the Wisconsin law that indicates jaywalking is a misdemeanor...
Why bother?

I could post irrefutable proof that what you're saying is wrong and you will never accept it. I could bring every member of the Supreme Court to your house and every single one of them could explain to you why you're wrong and ignorant and that the law doesn't work the way you really really want it to, and you'd still never stop.

You're fucked in the head, lady.
"Why bother?"

LOL

Translation: Ya got me, I can't. There's no such law. :eusa_doh:
Are you saying there's no law against jaywalking anywhere in that state?

I've never been there, but that seems awfully unlikely.


And btw, we all know you're trying to deflect from the topic and argue about inanities so you don't have to defend your ridiculous bullshit but you go ahead.
 
From the link;
Read more: Why haven't Kyle Rittenhouse' Attackers been Arrested and Charged?
Under Creative Commons License: Attribution
Follow us: @Ammoland on Twitter | Ammoland on Facebook

"Numerous felonies appear to have been committed against Rittenhouse by the three attackers. One attacker, Anthony Huber, is dead.

What charges might be brought against the other two attackers?
As there were multiple, coordinated attacks, they could be charged with conspiracy to commit a felony, under Wisconsin statutes 939.31.

The first, unknown attacker, clearly committed battery against Kyle Rittenhouse with the flying kick attack; because it was countered, the damage may not have been great, making it a Class A misdemeanor under Wisconsin statutes 940.19.

Huber committed a battery, but Huber is dead, so he will not be charged. Because he died, however, in the commission of a crime, the other two combatants may be charged with felony murder, Wisconsin statute 940.30. All three attackers were acting in concert, so the felony murder statute is likely to apply.

Grosskreutz could be charged under the endangering safety by use of a deadly weapon, statute, 941.20, for his actions with the semi-automatic pistol. 941.20 has an exception for defense of privilege of self-defense, or defense of others, which Grosskreutz might claim, and which Rittenhouse is already claiming in his lawyers' statement.

The Kenosha County Prosecutor has decided to press charges against Kyle Rittenhouse, and not against his attackers. This shows a reluctance, almost certainly due to political pressure, not to charge the rioters. All three attackers appear to be from Wisconsin, so there is no interstate nexus for federal charges, unless it can be shown that they received funding or direction from out of state, which would be difficult to prove.

The case shows the incredible power of prosecutors to decide who will be charged, and who will not. The voters have the ultimate authority to place or remove prosecutors. Prosecutors are almost never removed unless their crimes are blatant.

Kenosha County District Attorney Michael D. Graveley may be contacted at (262) 653-2400. Email can be sent through a email wizard at the Kenosha County website.

The Assistant DA who signed the criminal complaint against Kyle Rittenhouse is Angelina Gabriele. Her email is:
[email protected]"
They chased a criminal who had just killed someone and fled the scene.
They should have beat the crap out of him
Realistically, he shouldn't have been "on the scene" at all.
 
From the link;
Read more: Why haven't Kyle Rittenhouse' Attackers been Arrested and Charged?
Under Creative Commons License: Attribution
Follow us: @Ammoland on Twitter | Ammoland on Facebook

"Numerous felonies appear to have been committed against Rittenhouse by the three attackers. One attacker, Anthony Huber, is dead.

What charges might be brought against the other two attackers?
As there were multiple, coordinated attacks, they could be charged with conspiracy to commit a felony, under Wisconsin statutes 939.31.

The first, unknown attacker, clearly committed battery against Kyle Rittenhouse with the flying kick attack; because it was countered, the damage may not have been great, making it a Class A misdemeanor under Wisconsin statutes 940.19.

Huber committed a battery, but Huber is dead, so he will not be charged. Because he died, however, in the commission of a crime, the other two combatants may be charged with felony murder, Wisconsin statute 940.30. All three attackers were acting in concert, so the felony murder statute is likely to apply.

Grosskreutz could be charged under the endangering safety by use of a deadly weapon, statute, 941.20, for his actions with the semi-automatic pistol. 941.20 has an exception for defense of privilege of self-defense, or defense of others, which Grosskreutz might claim, and which Rittenhouse is already claiming in his lawyers' statement.

The Kenosha County Prosecutor has decided to press charges against Kyle Rittenhouse, and not against his attackers. This shows a reluctance, almost certainly due to political pressure, not to charge the rioters. All three attackers appear to be from Wisconsin, so there is no interstate nexus for federal charges, unless it can be shown that they received funding or direction from out of state, which would be difficult to prove.

The case shows the incredible power of prosecutors to decide who will be charged, and who will not. The voters have the ultimate authority to place or remove prosecutors. Prosecutors are almost never removed unless their crimes are blatant.

Kenosha County District Attorney Michael D. Graveley may be contacted at (262) 653-2400. Email can be sent through a email wizard at the Kenosha County website.

The Assistant DA who signed the criminal complaint against Kyle Rittenhouse is Angelina Gabriele. Her email is:
[email protected]"
They chased a criminal who had just killed someone and fled the scene.
They should have beat the crap out of him





He fled TOO THE POLICE you lying prick.
 
From the link;
Read more: Why haven't Kyle Rittenhouse' Attackers been Arrested and Charged?
Under Creative Commons License: Attribution
Follow us: @Ammoland on Twitter | Ammoland on Facebook

"Numerous felonies appear to have been committed against Rittenhouse by the three attackers. One attacker, Anthony Huber, is dead.

What charges might be brought against the other two attackers?
As there were multiple, coordinated attacks, they could be charged with conspiracy to commit a felony, under Wisconsin statutes 939.31.

The first, unknown attacker, clearly committed battery against Kyle Rittenhouse with the flying kick attack; because it was countered, the damage may not have been great, making it a Class A misdemeanor under Wisconsin statutes 940.19.

Huber committed a battery, but Huber is dead, so he will not be charged. Because he died, however, in the commission of a crime, the other two combatants may be charged with felony murder, Wisconsin statute 940.30. All three attackers were acting in concert, so the felony murder statute is likely to apply.

Grosskreutz could be charged under the endangering safety by use of a deadly weapon, statute, 941.20, for his actions with the semi-automatic pistol. 941.20 has an exception for defense of privilege of self-defense, or defense of others, which Grosskreutz might claim, and which Rittenhouse is already claiming in his lawyers' statement.

The Kenosha County Prosecutor has decided to press charges against Kyle Rittenhouse, and not against his attackers. This shows a reluctance, almost certainly due to political pressure, not to charge the rioters. All three attackers appear to be from Wisconsin, so there is no interstate nexus for federal charges, unless it can be shown that they received funding or direction from out of state, which would be difficult to prove.

The case shows the incredible power of prosecutors to decide who will be charged, and who will not. The voters have the ultimate authority to place or remove prosecutors. Prosecutors are almost never removed unless their crimes are blatant.

Kenosha County District Attorney Michael D. Graveley may be contacted at (262) 653-2400. Email can be sent through a email wizard at the Kenosha County website.

The Assistant DA who signed the criminal complaint against Kyle Rittenhouse is Angelina Gabriele. Her email is:
[email protected]"
They chased a criminal who had just killed someone and fled the scene.
They should have beat the crap out of him
Realistically, he shouldn't have been "on the scene" at all.
And college girls probably shouldn't go to frat parties but if someone attacks them while they're there, we don't pretend THEY'RE the rapist.
 
From the link;
Read more: Why haven't Kyle Rittenhouse' Attackers been Arrested and Charged?
Under Creative Commons License: Attribution
Follow us: @Ammoland on Twitter | Ammoland on Facebook

"Numerous felonies appear to have been committed against Rittenhouse by the three attackers. One attacker, Anthony Huber, is dead.

What charges might be brought against the other two attackers?
As there were multiple, coordinated attacks, they could be charged with conspiracy to commit a felony, under Wisconsin statutes 939.31.

The first, unknown attacker, clearly committed battery against Kyle Rittenhouse with the flying kick attack; because it was countered, the damage may not have been great, making it a Class A misdemeanor under Wisconsin statutes 940.19.

Huber committed a battery, but Huber is dead, so he will not be charged. Because he died, however, in the commission of a crime, the other two combatants may be charged with felony murder, Wisconsin statute 940.30. All three attackers were acting in concert, so the felony murder statute is likely to apply.

Grosskreutz could be charged under the endangering safety by use of a deadly weapon, statute, 941.20, for his actions with the semi-automatic pistol. 941.20 has an exception for defense of privilege of self-defense, or defense of others, which Grosskreutz might claim, and which Rittenhouse is already claiming in his lawyers' statement.

The Kenosha County Prosecutor has decided to press charges against Kyle Rittenhouse, and not against his attackers. This shows a reluctance, almost certainly due to political pressure, not to charge the rioters. All three attackers appear to be from Wisconsin, so there is no interstate nexus for federal charges, unless it can be shown that they received funding or direction from out of state, which would be difficult to prove.

The case shows the incredible power of prosecutors to decide who will be charged, and who will not. The voters have the ultimate authority to place or remove prosecutors. Prosecutors are almost never removed unless their crimes are blatant.

Kenosha County District Attorney Michael D. Graveley may be contacted at (262) 653-2400. Email can be sent through a email wizard at the Kenosha County website.

The Assistant DA who signed the criminal complaint against Kyle Rittenhouse is Angelina Gabriele. Her email is:
[email protected]"
They chased a criminal who had just killed someone and fled the scene.
They should have beat the crap out of him

Bullshit. He was attacked by the rioters, shot two of them dead, and blew the arm off another who had pointed a pistol at him.

Clear case of self-defense...

Kyle-Rittenhouse-Was-Being-Hunted-By-Rioters-After-Clashes-With-Militias-Guarding-Gas-Stations-672x420.jpg


Kyle-Rittenhouse-attacked-with-skateboard.jpg


Watch the video...

Lawyer of alleged Kenosha shooter Kyle Rittenhouse claims self-defense as video emerges
Rittenhouse shot a man before these people attacked him he ran from the scene of the first shooting after calling a buddy to tell him he killed someone. ( bragging?).

So it could be said these people were trying to stop him from killing anyone else

First of all, that would be vigilantism. Something the leftards are against.

Second - They all knew who he was. They were engaged with him and his friends at the gas station - all of them.

Third - that makes them acting in the capacity of judge, jury and executioner.

Ritttenhouse was breaking the law so whatever happened to him was ultimately his own fault
False.

That's like saying if someone attacks you while you're jaywalking you can't defend yourself.

Quit embarrassing yourself.
Great, post the Wisconsin law that indicates jaywalking is a misdemeanor...
Why bother?

I could post irrefutable proof that what you're saying is wrong and you will never accept it. I could bring every member of the Supreme Court to your house and every single one of them could explain to you why you're wrong and ignorant and that the law doesn't work the way you really really want it to, and you'd still never stop.

You're fucked in the head, lady.
"Why bother?"

LOL

Translation: Ya got me, I can't. There's no such law. :eusa_doh:
Are you saying there's no law against jaywalking anywhere in that state?

I've never been there, but that seems awfully unlikely.


And btw, we all know you're trying to deflect from the topic and argue about inanities so you don't have to defend your ridiculous bullshit but you go ahead.
You're the one who equated it with illegally carrying a firearm by a minor, which is a misdemeanor. That's your claim -- that makes it your claim to prove... so post the Wisconsin law which states jaywalking is a misdemeanor....

G'head, while I enjoy my popcorn.

:popcorn:
 
From the link;
Read more: Why haven't Kyle Rittenhouse' Attackers been Arrested and Charged?
Under Creative Commons License: Attribution
Follow us: @Ammoland on Twitter | Ammoland on Facebook

"Numerous felonies appear to have been committed against Rittenhouse by the three attackers. One attacker, Anthony Huber, is dead.

What charges might be brought against the other two attackers?
As there were multiple, coordinated attacks, they could be charged with conspiracy to commit a felony, under Wisconsin statutes 939.31.

The first, unknown attacker, clearly committed battery against Kyle Rittenhouse with the flying kick attack; because it was countered, the damage may not have been great, making it a Class A misdemeanor under Wisconsin statutes 940.19.

Huber committed a battery, but Huber is dead, so he will not be charged. Because he died, however, in the commission of a crime, the other two combatants may be charged with felony murder, Wisconsin statute 940.30. All three attackers were acting in concert, so the felony murder statute is likely to apply.

Grosskreutz could be charged under the endangering safety by use of a deadly weapon, statute, 941.20, for his actions with the semi-automatic pistol. 941.20 has an exception for defense of privilege of self-defense, or defense of others, which Grosskreutz might claim, and which Rittenhouse is already claiming in his lawyers' statement.

The Kenosha County Prosecutor has decided to press charges against Kyle Rittenhouse, and not against his attackers. This shows a reluctance, almost certainly due to political pressure, not to charge the rioters. All three attackers appear to be from Wisconsin, so there is no interstate nexus for federal charges, unless it can be shown that they received funding or direction from out of state, which would be difficult to prove.

The case shows the incredible power of prosecutors to decide who will be charged, and who will not. The voters have the ultimate authority to place or remove prosecutors. Prosecutors are almost never removed unless their crimes are blatant.

Kenosha County District Attorney Michael D. Graveley may be contacted at (262) 653-2400. Email can be sent through a email wizard at the Kenosha County website.

The Assistant DA who signed the criminal complaint against Kyle Rittenhouse is Angelina Gabriele. Her email is:
[email protected]"
They chased a criminal who had just killed someone and fled the scene.
They should have beat the crap out of him

Bullshit. He was attacked by the rioters, shot two of them dead, and blew the arm off another who had pointed a pistol at him.

Clear case of self-defense...

Kyle-Rittenhouse-Was-Being-Hunted-By-Rioters-After-Clashes-With-Militias-Guarding-Gas-Stations-672x420.jpg


Kyle-Rittenhouse-attacked-with-skateboard.jpg


Watch the video...

Lawyer of alleged Kenosha shooter Kyle Rittenhouse claims self-defense as video emerges
Rittenhouse shot a man before these people attacked him he ran from the scene of the first shooting after calling a buddy to tell him he killed someone. ( bragging?).

So it could be said these people were trying to stop him from killing anyone else

First of all, that would be vigilantism. Something the leftards are against.

Second - They all knew who he was. They were engaged with him and his friends at the gas station - all of them.

Third - that makes them acting in the capacity of judge, jury and executioner.

Ritttenhouse was breaking the law so whatever happened to him was ultimately his own fault
False.

That's like saying if someone attacks you while you're jaywalking you can't defend yourself.

Quit embarrassing yourself.
Great, post the Wisconsin law that indicates jaywalking is a misdemeanor...
Why bother?

I could post irrefutable proof that what you're saying is wrong and you will never accept it. I could bring every member of the Supreme Court to your house and every single one of them could explain to you why you're wrong and ignorant and that the law doesn't work the way you really really want it to, and you'd still never stop.

You're fucked in the head, lady.
"Why bother?"

LOL

Translation: Ya got me, I can't. There's no such law. :eusa_doh:
Are you saying there's no law against jaywalking anywhere in that state?

I've never been there, but that seems awfully unlikely.


And btw, we all know you're trying to deflect from the topic and argue about inanities so you don't have to defend your ridiculous bullshit but you go ahead.
You're the one who equated it with illegally carrying a firearm by a minor, which is a misdemeanor. That's your claim -- that makes it your claim to prove... so post the Wisconsin law which states jaywalking is a misdemeanor....

G'head, while I enjoy my popcorn.

:popcorn:
And you're the one who claimed that people forfeit their rights if they violate even the most minor ordinance..... which still hasn't even been established.
You made that claim and have consistently failed to back it up.
Although that sure hasn't stopped you from continuing to assert it.


Now I know all you're gonna do is keep making bullshit assertions based on what you feel should happen, no matter what anyone tells you, and then, when everyone gets tired of your constant, neverending nonsense, and walks away from your stupidity, you will claim victory and dance around like the damn fool you are.


Carry on.
 

Sign it, and then share it, far and wide.




There are 2 things that have shown to be successful in deterring rioters and neither have been tried except in isolated cases (when they have been, they have been hugely successful though), and that is aggressively prosecuting people for rioting, rather than just playing catch and release, and just shooting them dead.
I think we need to put some pressure on these prosecutors and municipalities, and convince them they need to start aggressively putting rioters in prison, and leaving people who are just defending themselves and their property alone. Because I don't want things to get to where all we can do is shoot them all.

I been there, done that...... and I don't think ya'll are going to like it much.
"552 SIGNED"

LOLOL

You go get 'em, girl.

:lmao:
So?


Would more signatures make the prosecutors less wrong, or something?
Lots more signatures might get some attention. Might even show people agree. But I refreshed and now it's up to 553.

0.6% there! :lmao:

At this rate, they'll hit their goal in March. The teen murderer might already be convicted by then.
I just found it about 5 this morning. I could share it faster if I had social media like FB or Twatter, but I don't.
Because they're biased too.


Anyone know why the board won't let me copy and paste an image?
My first hunch... 'cause you're an idiot?
So you're admitting that you're just here to troll and be an asshole?



Thanks, but I'm pretty sure everyone already knows that.
No, not at all. I just can't think of another reason you struggle with such a basic function.
It normally lets me, suddenly it won't. I'm wondering why.


And you of course, are acting like a juvenile asshole.
Yeah, it's you.

2ujj2e.jpg
 
From the link;
Read more: Why haven't Kyle Rittenhouse' Attackers been Arrested and Charged?
Under Creative Commons License: Attribution
Follow us: @Ammoland on Twitter | Ammoland on Facebook

"Numerous felonies appear to have been committed against Rittenhouse by the three attackers. One attacker, Anthony Huber, is dead.

What charges might be brought against the other two attackers?
As there were multiple, coordinated attacks, they could be charged with conspiracy to commit a felony, under Wisconsin statutes 939.31.

The first, unknown attacker, clearly committed battery against Kyle Rittenhouse with the flying kick attack; because it was countered, the damage may not have been great, making it a Class A misdemeanor under Wisconsin statutes 940.19.

Huber committed a battery, but Huber is dead, so he will not be charged. Because he died, however, in the commission of a crime, the other two combatants may be charged with felony murder, Wisconsin statute 940.30. All three attackers were acting in concert, so the felony murder statute is likely to apply.

Grosskreutz could be charged under the endangering safety by use of a deadly weapon, statute, 941.20, for his actions with the semi-automatic pistol. 941.20 has an exception for defense of privilege of self-defense, or defense of others, which Grosskreutz might claim, and which Rittenhouse is already claiming in his lawyers' statement.

The Kenosha County Prosecutor has decided to press charges against Kyle Rittenhouse, and not against his attackers. This shows a reluctance, almost certainly due to political pressure, not to charge the rioters. All three attackers appear to be from Wisconsin, so there is no interstate nexus for federal charges, unless it can be shown that they received funding or direction from out of state, which would be difficult to prove.

The case shows the incredible power of prosecutors to decide who will be charged, and who will not. The voters have the ultimate authority to place or remove prosecutors. Prosecutors are almost never removed unless their crimes are blatant.

Kenosha County District Attorney Michael D. Graveley may be contacted at (262) 653-2400. Email can be sent through a email wizard at the Kenosha County website.

The Assistant DA who signed the criminal complaint against Kyle Rittenhouse is Angelina Gabriele. Her email is:
[email protected]"
They chased a criminal who had just killed someone and fled the scene.
They should have beat the crap out of him

Bullshit. He was attacked by the rioters, shot two of them dead, and blew the arm off another who had pointed a pistol at him.

Clear case of self-defense...

Kyle-Rittenhouse-Was-Being-Hunted-By-Rioters-After-Clashes-With-Militias-Guarding-Gas-Stations-672x420.jpg


Kyle-Rittenhouse-attacked-with-skateboard.jpg


Watch the video...

Lawyer of alleged Kenosha shooter Kyle Rittenhouse claims self-defense as video emerges
Rittenhouse shot a man before these people attacked him he ran from the scene of the first shooting after calling a buddy to tell him he killed someone. ( bragging?).

So it could be said these people were trying to stop him from killing anyone else

First of all, that would be vigilantism. Something the leftards are against.

Second - They all knew who he was. They were engaged with him and his friends at the gas station - all of them.

Third - that makes them acting in the capacity of judge, jury and executioner.

Ritttenhouse was breaking the law so whatever happened to him was ultimately his own fault
False.

That's like saying if someone attacks you while you're jaywalking you can't defend yourself.

Quit embarrassing yourself.
Great, post the Wisconsin law that indicates jaywalking is a misdemeanor...
Why bother?

I could post irrefutable proof that what you're saying is wrong and you will never accept it. I could bring every member of the Supreme Court to your house and every single one of them could explain to you why you're wrong and ignorant and that the law doesn't work the way you really really want it to, and you'd still never stop.

You're fucked in the head, lady.
"Why bother?"

LOL

Translation: Ya got me, I can't. There's no such law. :eusa_doh:
Are you saying there's no law against jaywalking anywhere in that state?

I've never been there, but that seems awfully unlikely.


And btw, we all know you're trying to deflect from the topic and argue about inanities so you don't have to defend your ridiculous bullshit but you go ahead.
You're the one who equated it with illegally carrying a firearm by a minor, which is a misdemeanor. That's your claim -- that makes it your claim to prove... so post the Wisconsin law which states jaywalking is a misdemeanor....

G'head, while I enjoy my popcorn.

:popcorn:
"And you're the one who claimed that people forfeit their rights if they violate even the most minor ordinance "

Well, no, I'm the one who showed the law does not offer self defense in cases where the "actor" is committing a crime -- and like it or not, a misdemeanor is actually a crime.

You're the one who tried to argue the ridiculous by comparing the teen murderer's crime with jaywalking, which you failed miserably when challenged to post the Wisconsin law to that effect. Still waiting...

:popcorn:
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top