Except that the Roadrunner is in the oven cooking. We just need to put the stuffing in later on.The TDS of anti-Trumpers is like Wily Coyote trying to catch the Roadrunner.
You people are cartoons!!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Except that the Roadrunner is in the oven cooking. We just need to put the stuffing in later on.The TDS of anti-Trumpers is like Wily Coyote trying to catch the Roadrunner.
You people are cartoons!!
they lied about things pertinent to an official investigation.... thus the charge. Can't have a perjury charge unless the lie involves the investigation...Thanks! You don't have any proof to the contrary. Calling them "ginned up process crimes" is worth shit. You lose.Law enforcement already proved you wrong. With Flynn going to jail lying to the FBI about lifting the sanctions, proves Trump was owned by the Russians. Trump was part of the quid pro quo with Russia concerning Trump Tower Moscow which triggered the stolen email scandal to get him elected. Jim Corsi's emails prove that he was working with Wikileaks and Gucifer 2.0 to get Trump elected to get dirt on Clinton.There is no proof that Trump colluded with the Russians to steal the election.
You lose.
And then there was the Trump Tower meeting where a series of four different lying stories came out of that, confirming the conspiracy with Russia.
Got any proof to the contrary? Of course you don't. You lose.
These are ginned up process crimes (i.e., "Lying" to the FBI by giving wrong dates about things that the subject readily disclosed).
Andrew McCarthy is one of the better analysts following this farce. Mueller is not investigating a crime, he is preparing a political hit job.
With respect to the president and “collusion,” Mueller does not have a crime he is investigating. He is investigating in hopes of finding a crime, which is a day-and-night different thing.
Papadopoulos and Cohen. They consult with Russian operatives, plan meetings for themselves and Trump with Russian officials, and — in Papadopoulos’s case — discuss the possibility of obtaining campaign dirt against Hillary Clinton from Russians. Yet, though these activities are the laser focus of his investigation, Mueller did not charge them as crimes because they are not crimes. Papadopoulos, Cohen, and the rest got jammed up, not for what they did, but for lying about what they did....
Mueller’s Trump Investigation Plan: Report Not a Criminal Case | National Review
Also, Trump has been caught with Don Jr. making up four different stories for the Trump Tower meeting, which is an attack with a foreign adversary in a presidential election against the country. Proof, at the very least that Trump is a co-conspirator for the cover up for this conspiracy. That has already been proven, and will be in Mueller's report.
And we have other proof of the conspiracy. Corsi's email dump proves the conspiracy between Trump and Russia as well.
If Andrew McCarthy were right, we wouldn't have guilty pleas with Trump people going to jail. Anyone who thinks differently is a total retard.
Your reading comprehension and logic functions are seriously deficient.
They were charged with lying about things that aren't illegal. That's what process crimes are. If Mueller weren't engaged in a Beria-style inquisition, none of these people would have been set up to "lie".
It does exist, and we don't need tapes. There is a mountain of evidence against Trump in so many other areas that it doesn't change anything. A lot of folks are going to jail. Lock them all up for mounting an illegal election.It's illegal in all 50 states to record a conversation between two people who don't know about it.
Inadmissible evidence even if it does exist = nothing burger.
Why did he LIE about it, during the campaign.... and for the next two years....? While the Russians and Putin KNEW Trump and his team were lying about it to the American people.... KOMPROMAT The Russians even tried to cover up Trump's lies....I kinda missed the minute details over the last few days of Ivanka, JR and Cohen all working on the Moscow deal and the finite dates. Numerous sources say next week could get interesting, this time focusing on the kids. Was TRUMP told to stay out of it, let the kids do it? Was Trump driving their every move?
If the deal was LEGAL, above board and ALLOWED, why the fuck is everyone lying about it? Why did TRUMP repeatedly while STILL RUNNING, then after the election and for the 21 months since the inauguration, REPEAT ad naseum I had nothing going on in Russia?
Ex-prosecutor hints Michael Cohen may have secretly recorded Don Jr. and Ivanka: ‘Lordy, I hope there are tapes’
![]()
BOB BRIGHAM
01 DEC 2018 AT 15:42 ET
Donald Trump, Jr. and senior White House advisor Ivanka Trump are facing “real danger areas” of criminal liability, career prosecutor Glenn Kirshner explained on MSNBC on Saturday.
Kirschner worked with special prosecutor Robert Mueller and was the chief of homicide prosecution at the U.S. attorney’s office in Washington, DC.
“Is there legal jeopardy in your mind?” anchor Alex Witt asked. “Could there be for Don Jr. and potentially Ivanka?”
“There could be, Alex,” Kirschner replied.
“When it comes to the kids, Ivanka and Don Jr., I think there are a couple of real danger areas, because we heard that Michael Cohen lied to Congress about, among other things, keeping the kids — keeping Donald Trump’s kids informed about what was going on on this potential deal with Russia,” he explained...
Ex-prosecutor hints Michael Cohen may have secretly recorded Don Jr. and Ivanka: 'Lordy, I hope there are tapes’
Trump has broken some of you, turned you into complete retards. Trump has been harder on Russia since being elected than Obama ever thought about being. FACT.
Who gives a shit if his company was trying to build a hotel in Moscow in 2015, or even is trying to now?
It does exist, and we don't need tapes. There is a mountain of evidence against Trump in so many other areas that it doesn't change anything. A lot of folks are going to jail. Lock them all up for mounting an illegal election.It's illegal in all 50 states to record a conversation between two people who don't know about it.
Inadmissible evidence even if it does exist = nothing burger.
they lied about things pertinent to an official investigation.... thus the charge. Can't have a perjury charge unless the lie involves the investigation...Thanks! You don't have any proof to the contrary. Calling them "ginned up process crimes" is worth shit. You lose.Law enforcement already proved you wrong. With Flynn going to jail lying to the FBI about lifting the sanctions, proves Trump was owned by the Russians. Trump was part of the quid pro quo with Russia concerning Trump Tower Moscow which triggered the stolen email scandal to get him elected. Jim Corsi's emails prove that he was working with Wikileaks and Gucifer 2.0 to get Trump elected to get dirt on Clinton.
And then there was the Trump Tower meeting where a series of four different lying stories came out of that, confirming the conspiracy with Russia.
Got any proof to the contrary? Of course you don't. You lose.
These are ginned up process crimes (i.e., "Lying" to the FBI by giving wrong dates about things that the subject readily disclosed).
Andrew McCarthy is one of the better analysts following this farce. Mueller is not investigating a crime, he is preparing a political hit job.
With respect to the president and “collusion,” Mueller does not have a crime he is investigating. He is investigating in hopes of finding a crime, which is a day-and-night different thing.
Papadopoulos and Cohen. They consult with Russian operatives, plan meetings for themselves and Trump with Russian officials, and — in Papadopoulos’s case — discuss the possibility of obtaining campaign dirt against Hillary Clinton from Russians. Yet, though these activities are the laser focus of his investigation, Mueller did not charge them as crimes because they are not crimes. Papadopoulos, Cohen, and the rest got jammed up, not for what they did, but for lying about what they did....
Mueller’s Trump Investigation Plan: Report Not a Criminal Case | National Review
Also, Trump has been caught with Don Jr. making up four different stories for the Trump Tower meeting, which is an attack with a foreign adversary in a presidential election against the country. Proof, at the very least that Trump is a co-conspirator for the cover up for this conspiracy. That has already been proven, and will be in Mueller's report.
And we have other proof of the conspiracy. Corsi's email dump proves the conspiracy between Trump and Russia as well.
If Andrew McCarthy were right, we wouldn't have guilty pleas with Trump people going to jail. Anyone who thinks differently is a total retard.
Your reading comprehension and logic functions are seriously deficient.
They were charged with lying about things that aren't illegal. That's what process crimes are. If Mueller weren't engaged in a Beria-style inquisition, none of these people would have been set up to "lie".
This is a joke. Just because you hate Trump doesn't mean you shouldn't be able to recognize what is being done here. They are just interviewing people over everything to catch them in a lie. That one guy was charged with perjury simply because he forgot about one email he sent a year ago when asked about it. Do you think THAT is fair? Forget about an email, get charged with a felony?
Why did he LIE about it, during the campaign.... and for the next two years....? While the Russians and Putin KNEW Trump and his team were lying about it to the American people.... KOMPROMAT The Russians even tried to cover up Trump's lies....I kinda missed the minute details over the last few days of Ivanka, JR and Cohen all working on the Moscow deal and the finite dates. Numerous sources say next week could get interesting, this time focusing on the kids. Was TRUMP told to stay out of it, let the kids do it? Was Trump driving their every move?
If the deal was LEGAL, above board and ALLOWED, why the fuck is everyone lying about it? Why did TRUMP repeatedly while STILL RUNNING, then after the election and for the 21 months since the inauguration, REPEAT ad naseum I had nothing going on in Russia?
Ex-prosecutor hints Michael Cohen may have secretly recorded Don Jr. and Ivanka: ‘Lordy, I hope there are tapes’
![]()
BOB BRIGHAM
01 DEC 2018 AT 15:42 ET
Donald Trump, Jr. and senior White House advisor Ivanka Trump are facing “real danger areas” of criminal liability, career prosecutor Glenn Kirshner explained on MSNBC on Saturday.
Kirschner worked with special prosecutor Robert Mueller and was the chief of homicide prosecution at the U.S. attorney’s office in Washington, DC.
“Is there legal jeopardy in your mind?” anchor Alex Witt asked. “Could there be for Don Jr. and potentially Ivanka?”
“There could be, Alex,” Kirschner replied.
“When it comes to the kids, Ivanka and Don Jr., I think there are a couple of real danger areas, because we heard that Michael Cohen lied to Congress about, among other things, keeping the kids — keeping Donald Trump’s kids informed about what was going on on this potential deal with Russia,” he explained...
Ex-prosecutor hints Michael Cohen may have secretly recorded Don Jr. and Ivanka: 'Lordy, I hope there are tapes’
Trump has broken some of you, turned you into complete retards. Trump has been harder on Russia since being elected than Obama ever thought about being. FACT.
Who gives a shit if his company was trying to build a hotel in Moscow in 2015, or even is trying to now?
come on man, that ain't no nothing burger.... LIE TO US, while the Russians knew he was LYING to us....
You, of course, could not possibly know the truth of this and are soothing yourself out loud.There is no proof that Trump colluded with the Russians to steal the election.
they lied about things pertinent to an official investigation.... thus the charge. Can't have a perjury charge unless the lie involves the investigation...Thanks! You don't have any proof to the contrary. Calling them "ginned up process crimes" is worth shit. You lose.These are ginned up process crimes (i.e., "Lying" to the FBI by giving wrong dates about things that the subject readily disclosed).
Andrew McCarthy is one of the better analysts following this farce. Mueller is not investigating a crime, he is preparing a political hit job.
With respect to the president and “collusion,” Mueller does not have a crime he is investigating. He is investigating in hopes of finding a crime, which is a day-and-night different thing.
Papadopoulos and Cohen. They consult with Russian operatives, plan meetings for themselves and Trump with Russian officials, and — in Papadopoulos’s case — discuss the possibility of obtaining campaign dirt against Hillary Clinton from Russians. Yet, though these activities are the laser focus of his investigation, Mueller did not charge them as crimes because they are not crimes. Papadopoulos, Cohen, and the rest got jammed up, not for what they did, but for lying about what they did....
Mueller’s Trump Investigation Plan: Report Not a Criminal Case | National Review
Also, Trump has been caught with Don Jr. making up four different stories for the Trump Tower meeting, which is an attack with a foreign adversary in a presidential election against the country. Proof, at the very least that Trump is a co-conspirator for the cover up for this conspiracy. That has already been proven, and will be in Mueller's report.
And we have other proof of the conspiracy. Corsi's email dump proves the conspiracy between Trump and Russia as well.
If Andrew McCarthy were right, we wouldn't have guilty pleas with Trump people going to jail. Anyone who thinks differently is a total retard.
Your reading comprehension and logic functions are seriously deficient.
They were charged with lying about things that aren't illegal. That's what process crimes are. If Mueller weren't engaged in a Beria-style inquisition, none of these people would have been set up to "lie".
This is a joke. Just because you hate Trump doesn't mean you shouldn't be able to recognize what is being done here. They are just interviewing people over everything to catch them in a lie. That one guy was charged with perjury simply because he forgot about one email he sent a year ago when asked about it. Do you think THAT is fair? Forget about an email, get charged with a felony?If you catch someone in a lie when it comes to the law, do you not understand that that has nothing to do with hate, and everything to do with the law? You folks are total idiots. Stop making stupid excuses.
Email dumps to help Trump, using Cambridge Analytica as a conduit to spread false information about your opponent, using Gucifer 2.0 and Wikileaks to spread false information about your opponent through a foreign adversary, and having a Trump Tower meeting with foreigners who we have sanctions against to get dirt on your U.S. presidential opponent. That is a criminal conspiracy. Paying off porn stars to keep quiet during the election and using charitable contributions through your own charity to pay off law suits during the campaign. Those are campaign finance violations.It does exist, and we don't need tapes. There is a mountain of evidence against Trump in so many other areas that it doesn't change anything. A lot of folks are going to jail. Lock them all up for mounting an illegal election.It's illegal in all 50 states to record a conversation between two people who don't know about it.
Inadmissible evidence even if it does exist = nothing burger.
What is "mounting an illegal election?"
The process crimes are all linked to the Trump Tower meeting, Corsi's email dump, Wikileaks, Gucifer 2.0, and Cambridge Analytica. All these process crimes involve co-conspirator activity by Trump associates and his family to cover up activity legal or illegal as a front to actual illegal activity later on.Thanks! You don't have any proof to the contrary. Calling them "ginned up process crimes" is worth shit. You lose.Law enforcement already proved you wrong. With Flynn going to jail lying to the FBI about lifting the sanctions, proves Trump was owned by the Russians. Trump was part of the quid pro quo with Russia concerning Trump Tower Moscow which triggered the stolen email scandal to get him elected. Jim Corsi's emails prove that he was working with Wikileaks and Gucifer 2.0 to get Trump elected to get dirt on Clinton.There is no proof that Trump colluded with the Russians to steal the election.
You lose.
And then there was the Trump Tower meeting where a series of four different lying stories came out of that, confirming the conspiracy with Russia.
Got any proof to the contrary? Of course you don't. You lose.
These are ginned up process crimes (i.e., "Lying" to the FBI by giving wrong dates about things that the subject readily disclosed).
Andrew McCarthy is one of the better analysts following this farce. Mueller is not investigating a crime, he is preparing a political hit job.
With respect to the president and “collusion,” Mueller does not have a crime he is investigating. He is investigating in hopes of finding a crime, which is a day-and-night different thing.
Papadopoulos and Cohen. They consult with Russian operatives, plan meetings for themselves and Trump with Russian officials, and — in Papadopoulos’s case — discuss the possibility of obtaining campaign dirt against Hillary Clinton from Russians. Yet, though these activities are the laser focus of his investigation, Mueller did not charge them as crimes because they are not crimes. Papadopoulos, Cohen, and the rest got jammed up, not for what they did, but for lying about what they did....
Mueller’s Trump Investigation Plan: Report Not a Criminal Case | National Review
Also, Trump has been caught with Don Jr. making up four different stories for the Trump Tower meeting, which is an attack with a foreign adversary in a presidential election against the country. Proof, at the very least that Trump is a co-conspirator for the cover up for this conspiracy. That has already been proven, and will be in Mueller's report.
And we have other proof of the conspiracy. Corsi's email dump proves the conspiracy between Trump and Russia as well.
If Andrew McCarthy were right, we wouldn't have guilty pleas with Trump people going to jail. Anyone who thinks differently is a total retard.
Your reading comprehension and logic functions are seriously deficient.
They were charged with lying about things that aren't illegal. That's what process crimes are. If Mueller weren't engaged in a Beria-style inquisition, none of these people would have been set up to "lie".
Even though there is nothing illegal about Trump Tower Moscow, the actual project ended up being the prelude to a boat load of illegal activity by team Trump later on, which compromised Trump and all of his associates. Including his family. This is where the illegal activity came in, and explains all the other schemes associated with getting Trump elected through Russia. This proves Trump conspired with Russia. By way of how the law is written, there just is no other way for Trump to walk around that fact. And by the way, there doesn't exist any lawful defense for Trump. He is a proven criminal for which his Sheep support.
they lied about things pertinent to an official investigation.... thus the charge. Can't have a perjury charge unless the lie involves the investigation... it must be materialistic in the investigation.Thanks! You don't have any proof to the contrary. Calling them "ginned up process crimes" is worth shit. You lose.Law enforcement already proved you wrong. With Flynn going to jail lying to the FBI about lifting the sanctions, proves Trump was owned by the Russians. Trump was part of the quid pro quo with Russia concerning Trump Tower Moscow which triggered the stolen email scandal to get him elected. Jim Corsi's emails prove that he was working with Wikileaks and Gucifer 2.0 to get Trump elected to get dirt on Clinton.There is no proof that Trump colluded with the Russians to steal the election.
You lose.
And then there was the Trump Tower meeting where a series of four different lying stories came out of that, confirming the conspiracy with Russia.
Got any proof to the contrary? Of course you don't. You lose.
These are ginned up process crimes (i.e., "Lying" to the FBI by giving wrong dates about things that the subject readily disclosed).
Andrew McCarthy is one of the better analysts following this farce. Mueller is not investigating a crime, he is preparing a political hit job.
With respect to the president and “collusion,” Mueller does not have a crime he is investigating. He is investigating in hopes of finding a crime, which is a day-and-night different thing.
Papadopoulos and Cohen. They consult with Russian operatives, plan meetings for themselves and Trump with Russian officials, and — in Papadopoulos’s case — discuss the possibility of obtaining campaign dirt against Hillary Clinton from Russians. Yet, though these activities are the laser focus of his investigation, Mueller did not charge them as crimes because they are not crimes. Papadopoulos, Cohen, and the rest got jammed up, not for what they did, but for lying about what they did....
Mueller’s Trump Investigation Plan: Report Not a Criminal Case | National Review
Also, Trump has been caught with Don Jr. making up four different stories for the Trump Tower meeting, which is an attack with a foreign adversary in a presidential election against the country. Proof, at the very least that Trump is a co-conspirator for the cover up for this conspiracy. That has already been proven, and will be in Mueller's report.
And we have other proof of the conspiracy. Corsi's email dump proves the conspiracy between Trump and Russia as well.
If Andrew McCarthy were right, we wouldn't have guilty pleas with Trump people going to jail. Anyone who thinks differently is a total retard.
Your reading comprehension and logic functions are seriously deficient.
They were charged with lying about things that aren't illegal. That's what process crimes are. If Mueller weren't engaged in a Beria-style inquisition, none of these people would have been set up to "lie".
You are a weakling and a coward because of your off topic deflection. You have no counter argument to mine, so you take the low road. Move along loser.they lied about things pertinent to an official investigation.... thus the charge. Can't have a perjury charge unless the lie involves the investigation...Thanks! You don't have any proof to the contrary. Calling them "ginned up process crimes" is worth shit. You lose.
Also, Trump has been caught with Don Jr. making up four different stories for the Trump Tower meeting, which is an attack with a foreign adversary in a presidential election against the country. Proof, at the very least that Trump is a co-conspirator for the cover up for this conspiracy. That has already been proven, and will be in Mueller's report.
And we have other proof of the conspiracy. Corsi's email dump proves the conspiracy between Trump and Russia as well.
If Andrew McCarthy were right, we wouldn't have guilty pleas with Trump people going to jail. Anyone who thinks differently is a total retard.
Your reading comprehension and logic functions are seriously deficient.
They were charged with lying about things that aren't illegal. That's what process crimes are. If Mueller weren't engaged in a Beria-style inquisition, none of these people would have been set up to "lie".
This is a joke. Just because you hate Trump doesn't mean you shouldn't be able to recognize what is being done here. They are just interviewing people over everything to catch them in a lie. That one guy was charged with perjury simply because he forgot about one email he sent a year ago when asked about it. Do you think THAT is fair? Forget about an email, get charged with a felony?If you catch someone in a lie when it comes to the law, do you not understand that that has nothing to do with hate, and everything to do with the law? You folks are total idiots. Stop making stupid excuses.
Well then, for sure you should be able to direct me to a single post from you stating that Hillary Clinton obviously is a criminal who belongs in jail because look at all the lies she told during her life.................
they lied about things pertinent to an official investigation.... thus the charge. Can't have a perjury charge unless the lie involves the investigation...Thanks! You don't have any proof to the contrary. Calling them "ginned up process crimes" is worth shit. You lose.Law enforcement already proved you wrong. With Flynn going to jail lying to the FBI about lifting the sanctions, proves Trump was owned by the Russians. Trump was part of the quid pro quo with Russia concerning Trump Tower Moscow which triggered the stolen email scandal to get him elected. Jim Corsi's emails prove that he was working with Wikileaks and Gucifer 2.0 to get Trump elected to get dirt on Clinton.
And then there was the Trump Tower meeting where a series of four different lying stories came out of that, confirming the conspiracy with Russia.
Got any proof to the contrary? Of course you don't. You lose.
These are ginned up process crimes (i.e., "Lying" to the FBI by giving wrong dates about things that the subject readily disclosed).
Andrew McCarthy is one of the better analysts following this farce. Mueller is not investigating a crime, he is preparing a political hit job.
With respect to the president and “collusion,” Mueller does not have a crime he is investigating. He is investigating in hopes of finding a crime, which is a day-and-night different thing.
Papadopoulos and Cohen. They consult with Russian operatives, plan meetings for themselves and Trump with Russian officials, and — in Papadopoulos’s case — discuss the possibility of obtaining campaign dirt against Hillary Clinton from Russians. Yet, though these activities are the laser focus of his investigation, Mueller did not charge them as crimes because they are not crimes. Papadopoulos, Cohen, and the rest got jammed up, not for what they did, but for lying about what they did....
Mueller’s Trump Investigation Plan: Report Not a Criminal Case | National Review
Also, Trump has been caught with Don Jr. making up four different stories for the Trump Tower meeting, which is an attack with a foreign adversary in a presidential election against the country. Proof, at the very least that Trump is a co-conspirator for the cover up for this conspiracy. That has already been proven, and will be in Mueller's report.
And we have other proof of the conspiracy. Corsi's email dump proves the conspiracy between Trump and Russia as well.
If Andrew McCarthy were right, we wouldn't have guilty pleas with Trump people going to jail. Anyone who thinks differently is a total retard.
Your reading comprehension and logic functions are seriously deficient.
They were charged with lying about things that aren't illegal. That's what process crimes are. If Mueller weren't engaged in a Beria-style inquisition, none of these people would have been set up to "lie".
This is a joke. Just because you hate Trump doesn't mean you shouldn't be able to recognize what is being done here. They are just interviewing people over everything to catch them in a lie. That one guy was charged with perjury simply because he forgot about one email he sent a year ago when asked about it. Do you think THAT is fair? Forget about an email, get charged with a felony?
they lied about things pertinent to an official investigation.... thus the charge. Can't have a perjury charge unless the lie involves the investigation... it must be materialistic in the investigation.Thanks! You don't have any proof to the contrary. Calling them "ginned up process crimes" is worth shit. You lose.Law enforcement already proved you wrong. With Flynn going to jail lying to the FBI about lifting the sanctions, proves Trump was owned by the Russians. Trump was part of the quid pro quo with Russia concerning Trump Tower Moscow which triggered the stolen email scandal to get him elected. Jim Corsi's emails prove that he was working with Wikileaks and Gucifer 2.0 to get Trump elected to get dirt on Clinton.
And then there was the Trump Tower meeting where a series of four different lying stories came out of that, confirming the conspiracy with Russia.
Got any proof to the contrary? Of course you don't. You lose.
These are ginned up process crimes (i.e., "Lying" to the FBI by giving wrong dates about things that the subject readily disclosed).
Andrew McCarthy is one of the better analysts following this farce. Mueller is not investigating a crime, he is preparing a political hit job.
With respect to the president and “collusion,” Mueller does not have a crime he is investigating. He is investigating in hopes of finding a crime, which is a day-and-night different thing.
Papadopoulos and Cohen. They consult with Russian operatives, plan meetings for themselves and Trump with Russian officials, and — in Papadopoulos’s case — discuss the possibility of obtaining campaign dirt against Hillary Clinton from Russians. Yet, though these activities are the laser focus of his investigation, Mueller did not charge them as crimes because they are not crimes. Papadopoulos, Cohen, and the rest got jammed up, not for what they did, but for lying about what they did....
Mueller’s Trump Investigation Plan: Report Not a Criminal Case | National Review
Also, Trump has been caught with Don Jr. making up four different stories for the Trump Tower meeting, which is an attack with a foreign adversary in a presidential election against the country. Proof, at the very least that Trump is a co-conspirator for the cover up for this conspiracy. That has already been proven, and will be in Mueller's report.
And we have other proof of the conspiracy. Corsi's email dump proves the conspiracy between Trump and Russia as well.
If Andrew McCarthy were right, we wouldn't have guilty pleas with Trump people going to jail. Anyone who thinks differently is a total retard.
Your reading comprehension and logic functions are seriously deficient.
They were charged with lying about things that aren't illegal. That's what process crimes are. If Mueller weren't engaged in a Beria-style inquisition, none of these people would have been set up to "lie".
Do you remember every email you sent over the past 10 years? Do you remember where you were on August 18, 2015? No fair checking your calendar or email records - just tell us.
Do you remember how many red lights you ran? No! But I'll bet you remember those where law enforcement stopped you right? Ignorance of the law is no excuse. If it were, laws would have no meaning. Stop making idiotic counter arguments. It's embarrassing.they lied about things pertinent to an official investigation.... thus the charge. Can't have a perjury charge unless the lie involves the investigation... it must be materialistic in the investigation.Thanks! You don't have any proof to the contrary. Calling them "ginned up process crimes" is worth shit. You lose.Law enforcement already proved you wrong. With Flynn going to jail lying to the FBI about lifting the sanctions, proves Trump was owned by the Russians. Trump was part of the quid pro quo with Russia concerning Trump Tower Moscow which triggered the stolen email scandal to get him elected. Jim Corsi's emails prove that he was working with Wikileaks and Gucifer 2.0 to get Trump elected to get dirt on Clinton.
And then there was the Trump Tower meeting where a series of four different lying stories came out of that, confirming the conspiracy with Russia.
Got any proof to the contrary? Of course you don't. You lose.
These are ginned up process crimes (i.e., "Lying" to the FBI by giving wrong dates about things that the subject readily disclosed).
Andrew McCarthy is one of the better analysts following this farce. Mueller is not investigating a crime, he is preparing a political hit job.
With respect to the president and “collusion,” Mueller does not have a crime he is investigating. He is investigating in hopes of finding a crime, which is a day-and-night different thing.
Papadopoulos and Cohen. They consult with Russian operatives, plan meetings for themselves and Trump with Russian officials, and — in Papadopoulos’s case — discuss the possibility of obtaining campaign dirt against Hillary Clinton from Russians. Yet, though these activities are the laser focus of his investigation, Mueller did not charge them as crimes because they are not crimes. Papadopoulos, Cohen, and the rest got jammed up, not for what they did, but for lying about what they did....
Mueller’s Trump Investigation Plan: Report Not a Criminal Case | National Review
Also, Trump has been caught with Don Jr. making up four different stories for the Trump Tower meeting, which is an attack with a foreign adversary in a presidential election against the country. Proof, at the very least that Trump is a co-conspirator for the cover up for this conspiracy. That has already been proven, and will be in Mueller's report.
And we have other proof of the conspiracy. Corsi's email dump proves the conspiracy between Trump and Russia as well.
If Andrew McCarthy were right, we wouldn't have guilty pleas with Trump people going to jail. Anyone who thinks differently is a total retard.
Your reading comprehension and logic functions are seriously deficient.
They were charged with lying about things that aren't illegal. That's what process crimes are. If Mueller weren't engaged in a Beria-style inquisition, none of these people would have been set up to "lie".
Do you remember every email you sent over the past 10 years? Do you remember where you were on August 18, 2015? No fair checking your calendar or email records - just tell us.
they lied about things pertinent to an official investigation.... thus the charge. Can't have a perjury charge unless the lie involves the investigation...Thanks! You don't have any proof to the contrary. Calling them "ginned up process crimes" is worth shit. You lose.
Also, Trump has been caught with Don Jr. making up four different stories for the Trump Tower meeting, which is an attack with a foreign adversary in a presidential election against the country. Proof, at the very least that Trump is a co-conspirator for the cover up for this conspiracy. That has already been proven, and will be in Mueller's report.
And we have other proof of the conspiracy. Corsi's email dump proves the conspiracy between Trump and Russia as well.
If Andrew McCarthy were right, we wouldn't have guilty pleas with Trump people going to jail. Anyone who thinks differently is a total retard.
Your reading comprehension and logic functions are seriously deficient.
They were charged with lying about things that aren't illegal. That's what process crimes are. If Mueller weren't engaged in a Beria-style inquisition, none of these people would have been set up to "lie".
This is a joke. Just because you hate Trump doesn't mean you shouldn't be able to recognize what is being done here. They are just interviewing people over everything to catch them in a lie. That one guy was charged with perjury simply because he forgot about one email he sent a year ago when asked about it. Do you think THAT is fair? Forget about an email, get charged with a felony?If you catch someone in a lie when it comes to the law, do you not understand that that has nothing to do with hate, and everything to do with the law? You folks are total idiots. Stop making stupid excuses.
Well then, for sure you should be able to direct me to a single post from you stating that Hillary Clinton obviously is a criminal who belongs in jail because look at all the lies she told during her life.................
Irrelevant argument! Lying proves they are co-conspirators to all the other crimes. It's why they lied dumb ass.The process crimes are all linked to the Trump Tower meeting, Corsi's email dump, Wikileaks, Gucifer 2.0, and Cambridge Analytica. All these process crimes involve co-conspirator activity by Trump associates and his family to cover up activity legal or illegal as a front to actual illegal activity later on.Thanks! You don't have any proof to the contrary. Calling them "ginned up process crimes" is worth shit. You lose.Law enforcement already proved you wrong. With Flynn going to jail lying to the FBI about lifting the sanctions, proves Trump was owned by the Russians. Trump was part of the quid pro quo with Russia concerning Trump Tower Moscow which triggered the stolen email scandal to get him elected. Jim Corsi's emails prove that he was working with Wikileaks and Gucifer 2.0 to get Trump elected to get dirt on Clinton.
And then there was the Trump Tower meeting where a series of four different lying stories came out of that, confirming the conspiracy with Russia.
Got any proof to the contrary? Of course you don't. You lose.
These are ginned up process crimes (i.e., "Lying" to the FBI by giving wrong dates about things that the subject readily disclosed).
Andrew McCarthy is one of the better analysts following this farce. Mueller is not investigating a crime, he is preparing a political hit job.
With respect to the president and “collusion,” Mueller does not have a crime he is investigating. He is investigating in hopes of finding a crime, which is a day-and-night different thing.
Papadopoulos and Cohen. They consult with Russian operatives, plan meetings for themselves and Trump with Russian officials, and — in Papadopoulos’s case — discuss the possibility of obtaining campaign dirt against Hillary Clinton from Russians. Yet, though these activities are the laser focus of his investigation, Mueller did not charge them as crimes because they are not crimes. Papadopoulos, Cohen, and the rest got jammed up, not for what they did, but for lying about what they did....
Mueller’s Trump Investigation Plan: Report Not a Criminal Case | National Review
Also, Trump has been caught with Don Jr. making up four different stories for the Trump Tower meeting, which is an attack with a foreign adversary in a presidential election against the country. Proof, at the very least that Trump is a co-conspirator for the cover up for this conspiracy. That has already been proven, and will be in Mueller's report.
And we have other proof of the conspiracy. Corsi's email dump proves the conspiracy between Trump and Russia as well.
If Andrew McCarthy were right, we wouldn't have guilty pleas with Trump people going to jail. Anyone who thinks differently is a total retard.
Your reading comprehension and logic functions are seriously deficient.
They were charged with lying about things that aren't illegal. That's what process crimes are. If Mueller weren't engaged in a Beria-style inquisition, none of these people would have been set up to "lie".
Even though there is nothing illegal about Trump Tower Moscow, the actual project ended up being the prelude to a boat load of illegal activity by team Trump later on, which compromised Trump and all of his associates. Including his family. This is where the illegal activity came in, and explains all the other schemes associated with getting Trump elected through Russia. This proves Trump conspired with Russia. By way of how the law is written, there just is no other way for Trump to walk around that fact. And by the way, there doesn't exist any lawful defense for Trump. He is a proven criminal for which his Sheep support.
Nonsense. They didn't commit any crimes. They "lied" about dates.
If what they did were actual crimes, then they would have been charged with those crimes instead of "lying" to the FBI during entrapment sessions.
they lied about things pertinent to an official investigation.... thus the charge. Can't have a perjury charge unless the lie involves the investigation... it must be materialistic in the investigation.Thanks! You don't have any proof to the contrary. Calling them "ginned up process crimes" is worth shit. You lose.These are ginned up process crimes (i.e., "Lying" to the FBI by giving wrong dates about things that the subject readily disclosed).
Andrew McCarthy is one of the better analysts following this farce. Mueller is not investigating a crime, he is preparing a political hit job.
With respect to the president and “collusion,” Mueller does not have a crime he is investigating. He is investigating in hopes of finding a crime, which is a day-and-night different thing.
Papadopoulos and Cohen. They consult with Russian operatives, plan meetings for themselves and Trump with Russian officials, and — in Papadopoulos’s case — discuss the possibility of obtaining campaign dirt against Hillary Clinton from Russians. Yet, though these activities are the laser focus of his investigation, Mueller did not charge them as crimes because they are not crimes. Papadopoulos, Cohen, and the rest got jammed up, not for what they did, but for lying about what they did....
Mueller’s Trump Investigation Plan: Report Not a Criminal Case | National Review
Also, Trump has been caught with Don Jr. making up four different stories for the Trump Tower meeting, which is an attack with a foreign adversary in a presidential election against the country. Proof, at the very least that Trump is a co-conspirator for the cover up for this conspiracy. That has already been proven, and will be in Mueller's report.
And we have other proof of the conspiracy. Corsi's email dump proves the conspiracy between Trump and Russia as well.
If Andrew McCarthy were right, we wouldn't have guilty pleas with Trump people going to jail. Anyone who thinks differently is a total retard.
Your reading comprehension and logic functions are seriously deficient.
They were charged with lying about things that aren't illegal. That's what process crimes are. If Mueller weren't engaged in a Beria-style inquisition, none of these people would have been set up to "lie".
Do you remember every email you sent over the past 10 years? Do you remember where you were on August 18, 2015? No fair checking your calendar or email records - just tell us.you actually think it was simply one email....
![]()