Majority Approves of Garland Confirmation

Will Dems actually run on a "we'll appoint judges who will repeal the Second Amendment" platform?

But they won't because they're lying pussies
 
Yep, the senate should do their job, vote.
Then, continue their duties and REFUSE him.

The Senate really needs to vote on Garland. Just go ahead and vote him down if they're not satisfied with the appointment. It would be much more respectable, and much better for the party.
 
I don't understand why the RW'ers, in a country where left/right is 50-50, think that they deserve another 80 - 20 rightwing judge.
Your math is fuzzy. The court lost a conservative judge, meaning a real judge, not an activist. Replacing him with anything but tilts the scale right now.

Plus the country is about 1/3rd left, 1/3rd right and 1/3 middle don't knowers.
 
Americans were hoping the president they elected, along with the senators they elected would simply do their job!

it's this type of nonsense that makes people fed up with politics...

most Americans are too busy living their lives and doing their jobs...

our senators should do their fucking jobs, you know, like the dignified statesmen they were elected to be.
They are. They are standing in the way of the US slipping further into the leftist's shit stew.
 
Americans were hoping the president they elected, along with the senators they elected would simply do their job!

it's this type of nonsense that makes people fed up with politics...

most Americans are too busy living their lives and doing their jobs...

our senators should do their fucking jobs, you know, like the dignified statesmen they were elected to be.
They are. They are standing in the way of the US slipping further into the leftist's shit stew.

The people voted for Obama knowing he picks justices. They are standing in the way of the people. That won't be good come election time.
 
Americans were hoping the president they elected, along with the senators they elected would simply do their job!

it's this type of nonsense that makes people fed up with politics...

most Americans are too busy living their lives and doing their jobs...

our senators should do their fucking jobs, you know, like the dignified statesmen they were elected to be.
They are. They are standing in the way of the US slipping further into the leftist's shit stew.

The people voted for Obama knowing he picks justices. They are standing in the way of the people. That won't be good come election time.


standing in the way of the people?

Hardly.

Obama, and Democrats?

yes
 
Americans were hoping the president they elected, along with the senators they elected would simply do their job!

it's this type of nonsense that makes people fed up with politics...

most Americans are too busy living their lives and doing their jobs...

our senators should do their fucking jobs, you know, like the dignified statesmen they were elected to be.
They are. They are standing in the way of the US slipping further into the leftist's shit stew.

The people voted for Obama knowing he picks justices. They are standing in the way of the people. That won't be good come election time.


standing in the way of the people?

Hardly.

Obama, and Democrats?

yes

Obama won. So yes in the way of the people. People know what is right and fair. The repubs are deeply in the wrong on this one. Not good come election time.
 
Yep, the senate should do their job, vote.
Then, continue their duties and REFUSE him.

The Senate really needs to vote on Garland. Just go ahead and vote him down if they're not satisfied with the appointment. It would be much more respectable, and much better for the party.
True.

Snag is there's no legitimate reason to not confirm the appointment, hence Senate Republicans' refusal to hold hearings and schedule a vote.
 
Yep, the senate should do their job, vote.
Then, continue their duties and REFUSE him.

The Senate really needs to vote on Garland. Just go ahead and vote him down if they're not satisfied with the appointment. It would be much more respectable, and much better for the party.
True.

Snag is there's no legitimate reason to not confirm the appointment, hence Senate Republicans' refusal to hold hearings and schedule a vote.
The Constitution does not lay out what a legitimate reason or illegitimate reason to confirm is. So it looks like a fail on your part.
 
Americans were hoping the president they elected, along with the senators they elected would simply do their job!

it's this type of nonsense that makes people fed up with politics...

most Americans are too busy living their lives and doing their jobs...

our senators should do their fucking jobs, you know, like the dignified statesmen they were elected to be.
They are. They are standing in the way of the US slipping further into the leftist's shit stew.

The people voted for Obama knowing he picks justices. They are standing in the way of the people. That won't be good come election time.


standing in the way of the people?

Hardly.

Obama, and Democrats?

yes

Obama won. So yes in the way of the people. People know what is right and fair. The repubs are deeply in the wrong on this one. Not good come election time.


Obama won.

The presidency, not emperor, king, etc.

People know what is right and fair

Looking at the candidates this year, I'm not so sure
 
Yep, the senate should do their job, vote.
Then, continue their duties and REFUSE him.


yeah, if so, let us see precisely WHY, so we can hold politicians accountable accordingly.
Don't they usually give reasons for that? I know they did they turned him down for a state job..


yes, we are privy to the public hearings, which is what i'd like to see.

this grandstand obstructionism is sackless political brinkmanship...
 
plus the majority elected obama in 2012, knowing that he might possibly have another SCOTUS vacancy to fill.

GOP has no idea how foolish they look painting themselves into this corner...
It would be more foolish to provide the most liberal SCOTUS on a silver spoon plate!
 
Yep, the senate should do their job, vote.
Then, continue their duties and REFUSE him.


yeah, if so, let us see precisely WHY, so we can hold politicians accountable accordingly.
Don't they usually give reasons for that? I know they did they turned him down for a state job..


yes, we are privy to the public hearings, which is what i'd like to see.

this grandstand obstructionism is sackless political brinkmanship...
That's what you get from Washington.
 

Forum List

Back
Top